[09:24] ScottL, remobe the alt-attribute from that line [09:24] *remove [11:20] knome, that is in the page.php or similar file in the bzr branch isn't it? [11:20] i thought of that when i went to bed last night [11:20] don't know in which file is it [11:20] was trying to get the code up on the tablet but i lost internet connection [11:21] what's funny is i woke up thinking about this and was just heading upstairs to look through some of the php code :P [11:22] heh [11:22] just pull the bar branch to your pc and grep it [12:04] i can't find that line in the code or on the website through the admin pages [12:05] it is strange that i find the banner on the home page only, but i see the word "logo" on almost every other page [12:05] close [12:05] lol [17:31] knome: so this morning i grabbed the bzr branch for the website and did a grep search for 'logo' [17:31] yeah? [17:31] i found some stuff but none of it was the line you quoted [17:31] i have gone through the admin part of the website and couldn't find anything [17:32] eventually i just started turning this off and seeing if it fixed anything (then turning them back on) [17:32] quah [17:32] i've asked dan lynch (i kinda know him) who does some website stuff and is familiar with drupal if he could offer any suggestestion or insight [17:33] only thing he offered was that it sounded like it was looking for the background.png image but can't find it so it's dumpging "logo" up there [17:33] if you can pass me the crendentials, or access to the server, i can look at that too [17:33] yeah, i could figure that out too. [17:33] you could also just put the image on the server... :P [17:33] 1x1 transparent PNG or so [17:33] knome: i dont' want to drag you into this if you don't have the time, it's a minor issue really since we are also going to be updating the site [17:34] knome: yeah, that was my next step, to verify that it isn't there because i think i saw the 'background.png' file in the bzr branch [17:34] well, it isn't, because it really wouldn't be showing the alt text otherwise [17:34] it might just be linked incorrectly (wrong path or so) [17:35] yeah, but i can't find where that damn link in coming from :( [17:35] heh [17:35] do you have access to the server itself? [17:35] i think someone screwed something up and then "fixed" it by putting another image there anyway [17:35] i was thinking we could just make a banner real quick [17:35] something that'll fit [17:35] knome: no, i do not have direct access [17:35] right :( [17:35] it was over my head though [17:35] the access [17:35] holstein, but there is an image already there....the multicolored blotchy stuff above the menu bar [17:36] scott-work, dump some credentials to my email and i'll fix it in a minute [17:36] knome: copy that [17:36] oh, sorry, that's from my wwii airplane game days [17:36] yeah, it would be fine to just get rid of it altogether [17:36] or a transparent .png like knome says ;) [17:36] i like that [17:41] i'd really like to know how it gets fixed (if it does) too [18:43] holstein: kn.ome found the problem: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntustudio-resources/website/view/1/page.tpl.php [18:43] it seems that an earlier version of the page.tpl.php file has the offending bit of code :/ [18:43] which means we aren't using the most current versions of the code on the website [18:43] *shrug* it won't matter in a month or so [18:44] and since getting someone to address an rt ticket might take two months... [18:44] we probably shouldn't worry about it [19:57] hmmm... i still have the bad logo [19:57] maybe it takes a while to update [19:57] i cntl+F5'd [20:02] holstein: i can't fix it [20:03] holstein: sorry, WE can't fix it [20:03] mind said one thing, fingers typed something else :P [20:03] :? [20:03] :/ [20:03] ah well [20:03] we would have to file a rt ticket to have someone update the .php file [20:03] onward and upward [20:03] aye [20:03] we know what it is and how to fix it [20:04] nah, if its not stupdi easy, i say forget it [20:04] it is stupid easy....if we had direct access to the site ;) [20:04] it still is stupid easy, but it would take months probably to get done though [20:06] scott-work: IMHO you have to get rid of that bureaucracy NOW if you want to get something done... [20:07] cant though [20:07] i mean, we can [20:07] but we have to pay for our own hosting AFAIK [20:10] shnatsel: we explored that, but considering that canonical provides hosting and security....we punted [20:11] sorry, freenode is doing funny stuff with my connection...did people see what i typed? [20:12] "....we punted" was the last [20:12] yup [20:21] considering what we do for hosting, which isn't much, we could easily transition to our own hosting [20:22] i suppose the main problem is guarenteeing (sp?) the money for hosting [20:22] although it would be nice to host user generated content (UGC) at some point too [20:23] yeah, free'll be fine [20:23] one we get what we need implemented