StevenK | wgrant: I was going to do my own QA first. | 00:00 |
---|---|---|
lifeless | wgrant: one per person in the team | 00:00 |
wgrant | lifeless: No. | 00:01 |
wgrant | lifeless: TeamParticipation.person is constrained to me. And Person is contrained to TeamParticipation.team | 00:01 |
wgrant | So it's finding all of my teams that have subscriptions | 00:01 |
lifeless | to bug 1234 | 00:02 |
_mup_ | Bug #1234: Gina is an unmaintainable mess of command line options, environment variables and shell scripts <lp-foundations> <Launchpad itself:Fix Released by debonzi> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1234 > | 00:02 |
wgrant | Right. | 00:02 |
lifeless | nested loop on TP though, which is a nuisance | 00:02 |
lifeless | if we're right | 00:02 |
lifeless | can teams have multiple subscriptions ? | 00:06 |
lifeless | ah it sthe order by | 00:07 |
lifeless | wgrant: will 8ms do ? | 00:10 |
wgrant | lifeless: Nah. | 00:11 |
wgrant | What'd you change? | 00:11 |
lifeless | couple of things | 00:11 |
lifeless | CTE | 00:11 |
wgrant | srsly? | 00:11 |
lifeless | plus narrower distinct by nested tables | 00:11 |
wgrant | For TP again? | 00:11 |
lifeless | https://pastebin.canonical.com/55155/ | 00:11 |
lifeless | just checking on wildcherry | 00:11 |
lifeless | 28 and 11 | 00:12 |
lifeless | checking old query | 00:12 |
lifeless | old query is 130ms on wildcherry consistently | 00:12 |
lifeless | 11ms new | 00:13 |
lifeless | consistently | 00:13 |
lifeless | wgrant: anyhow, context switching if you're finished with me ? | 00:16 |
wgrant | That indeed looks better. Odd. | 00:16 |
wgrant | Thanks. | 00:16 |
lifeless | https://pastebin.canonical.com/55156/ | 00:17 |
lifeless | is the new plan | 00:17 |
lifeless | wgrant: I'm not sure the distinct is needed | 00:18 |
lifeless | wgrant: unless teams can have multiple subscriptions to a bug | 00:19 |
wgrant | I'm not sure. | 00:20 |
lifeless | wgrant: the reason for the CTE is the 105 teams all did table walks on TP | 00:20 |
wgrant | Hah | 00:20 |
lifeless | if you look at the original plan | 00:20 |
wgrant | But we have to guess at what's expensive. And I can't test fixes :( | 00:26 |
wgrant | Because | 00:26 |
wgrant | Total runtime: 0.693 ms | 00:26 |
lifeless | who is reviewin today ? | 02:12 |
lifeless | StevenK: could you spare time to do a review? | 02:15 |
lifeless | https://code.launchpad.net/~lifeless/python-oops-datedir-repo/less-rsync/+merge/80861 | 02:16 |
StevenK | lifeless: Can do -- I was noming, sorry | 03:01 |
lifeless | StevenK: food? zomg NOOOOOOO | 03:01 |
lifeless | [thanks] | 03:01 |
StevenK | lifeless: r=me | 03:03 |
lifeless | thanks | 03:04 |
lifeless | I have another in a sec :) | 03:04 |
StevenK | lifeless: And wgrant is OCR today, but there is some silly horse race on. | 03:04 |
lifeless | yeah, wiki was down when I asked | 03:04 |
lifeless | StevenK: https://code.launchpad.net/~lifeless/python-oops-tools/amqp-polish/+merge/80864 in a minute or two | 03:08 |
lifeless | StevenK: and thanks! | 03:08 |
lifeless | StevenK: diff is up | 03:12 |
StevenK | I've already read it, just thinking | 03:13 |
lifeless | I can do a test for the upper if you want | 03:17 |
lifeless | though its one of those things that isn't going to break once its done | 03:17 |
StevenK | That's not my concern | 03:17 |
lifeless | :) | 03:17 |
StevenK | My concern is if there is a neater way to do it | 03:18 |
lifeless | we could reindex the 27M oops ids in the db with a functional index on upper() | 03:18 |
StevenK | Ew | 03:19 |
StevenK | Approvinated | 03:19 |
lifeless | thanks! | 03:19 |
lifeless | have you had an instant-oops yet ? | 03:20 |
StevenK | I've seen the new ids | 03:20 |
lifeless | heh, close :) | 03:20 |
StevenK | Personally, I think lp-oops.c.c needs to be better before I stop ssh'ing into carob to see OOPSes | 03:21 |
lifeless | its pleasant to hack on now | 03:21 |
lifeless | 6s test suite | 03:21 |
lifeless | etc | 03:21 |
StevenK | lifeless: Can I take output from subunit-ls and say to bin/test please run those | 03:22 |
lifeless | StevenK: yes | 03:22 |
lifeless | thats what testr run --failing does | 03:22 |
lifeless | the machinery is: | 03:22 |
lifeless | subunit-ls > list-file | 03:22 |
lifeless | bin/test --load-list list-file | 03:22 |
StevenK | I wonder if bin/test will like /dev/stdin as a list file | 03:22 |
lifeless | StevenK: it might, but ewww ;) | 03:23 |
lifeless | StevenK: you know you're reinventing testr by hand, right (AFAICT) | 03:23 |
* StevenK tries it, just to make lifeless a little greener | 03:23 | |
StevenK | Yeah, maybe I should just testr init, testr load, etc | 03:23 |
lifeless | ok, so thats deployed out; next thing, the workarounds for oops-amqp | 03:33 |
lifeless | almost need a fixed-amqplib | 03:33 |
lifeless | but I'm not quite there yet | 03:33 |
StevenK | Argh, model code updated by triggers | 03:40 |
* StevenK claws his eyes out | 03:40 | |
lifeless | StevenK: bug heat ? | 03:40 |
StevenK | lifeless: Branch.unique_name | 03:40 |
* StevenK waits for his branch to stop WADLing | 03:41 | |
lifeless | quack quack | 03:42 |
* StevenK grumbles. | 03:56 | |
StevenK | I suspect this branch is impossible with FDT. | 03:56 |
StevenK | jtv: O hai, can you QA r14202? | 03:57 |
jtv | Hi StevenK | 03:57 |
jtv | I'll get to it in a moment | 03:58 |
wgrant | StevenK: Are you still trying to rename +junk without talking to mrevell and others? | 04:00 |
poolie | StevenK: i would like to be involved in planning what happens there | 04:09 |
wgrant | Renaming it is technically trivial. | 04:09 |
wgrant | Every other aspect of it is not trivial. | 04:09 |
lifeless | mostly trivial | 04:09 |
lifeless | depending on the new name + backward compat desires | 04:09 |
poolie | i think we ought to at least think about the larger story of how projects get started and grow | 04:10 |
poolie | some things in junk are purely personal | 04:10 |
lifeless | poolie: I think that hinders the local improvement | 04:10 |
lifeless | poolie: of just having a better na,e | 04:10 |
poolie | others are nascent larger projects | 04:10 |
wgrant | A local improvement should be hindered. | 04:10 |
nigelb | Hey, can SSO grab from lp if a person is remote or not? | 04:10 |
wgrant | Because it is a large backwards-compatibility burden. | 04:11 |
nigelb | (for a sprint) | 04:11 |
lifeless | wgrant: only if it breaks +junk | 04:11 |
poolie | lifeless: thinking about it does not hinder it | 04:11 |
lifeless | wgrant: which isn't presumed | 04:11 |
wgrant | lifeless: We now have to support +junk forever. | 04:11 |
poolie | it's been like this for ~5 years | 04:11 |
wgrant | lifeless: Adding a new name means we have to support the new name forever too. | 04:11 |
lifeless | I shouldn't have said anything. I have work to do :) | 04:11 |
poolie | congratulations on getting realtime oopses done | 04:12 |
poolie | btw | 04:12 |
lifeless | thanks | 04:13 |
lifeless | StevenK: care to do https://code.launchpad.net/~lifeless/python-oops-amqp/0.0.4/+merge/80865 as well ? | 04:13 |
lifeless | StevenK: diff is there | 04:16 |
StevenK | wgrant: So its apparently pointless to do, then? | 04:20 |
StevenK | poolie: Involved how? | 04:20 |
poolie | StevenK: when lp changes things like this that affect bzr, i'd appreciate being told beforehand | 04:22 |
nigelb | +junk is going away? | 04:24 |
StevenK | It is not. | 04:24 |
lifeless | no | 04:24 |
nigelb | Or going to be called something "better" | 04:24 |
lifeless | but there is broad consensus that its a horrible name | 04:24 |
poolie | i'm heartily in favour of improving it and of looking for a small change that will improve it | 04:24 |
poolie | what are you planning to do? | 04:24 |
nigelb | heh, agreed. | 04:24 |
StevenK | poolie: I'm planning on changing the code to return +personal by default, but accepting both +junk and +personal. | 04:24 |
poolie | StevenK, we write documentation about launchpad and we answer a lot of questions about how to use it | 04:24 |
poolie | and we make design decisions that work with launchpad | 04:25 |
StevenK | However, I'm not even sure if it's landable | 04:25 |
poolie | so i think it's reasonable not to be surprised by changes there | 04:25 |
StevenK | Since there is a trigger involved. | 04:25 |
poolie | ok | 04:25 |
poolie | is this in an mp? i don't see any mail about it | 04:26 |
lifeless | StevenK: some care needed to check interactions with e.g. the apache rewrite map | 04:26 |
lifeless | StevenK: I think that uses that column | 04:26 |
StevenK | It's local only at this point. | 04:26 |
poolie | that sounds like a good step though | 04:26 |
poolie | a great step in fact | 04:26 |
lifeless | I think we should have a brief discussion with mrevell about the new url component | 04:27 |
lifeless | I'm in favour of something like 'p' | 04:27 |
lifeless | may as well make it not fugly | 04:27 |
StevenK | +p ? | 04:27 |
lifeless | no | 04:27 |
lifeless | p | 04:27 |
StevenK | We don't allow single character projects, do we? | 04:28 |
lifeless | exactly. | 04:28 |
StevenK | I'm not sure about p, TBH | 04:28 |
lifeless | p might be better reserved for project branches or something, but you get the idea | 04:28 |
lifeless | real-short-and-simple | 04:28 |
lifeless | I don't think + makes for a nice UI, never have. | 04:29 |
poolie | i think according to https://dev.launchpad.net/LaunchpadEnhancementProposalProcess you need to write a lep for it | 04:30 |
lifeless | StevenK: https://code.launchpad.net/~lifeless/python-oops-amqp/0.0.4/+merge/80865 | 04:30 |
StevenK | So sinzui said on the call that +personal seems to be the prefered name, and that I can have a free rs=sinzui so he copes the flak and I don't. :-P | 04:30 |
StevenK | lifeless: Shall I just wait on IRC for your next MP? | 04:30 |
lifeless | StevenK: please | 04:30 |
lifeless | StevenK: that would be awesome | 04:30 |
StevenK | lifeless: Your timing the last two times has been impeccable | 04:31 |
lifeless | StevenK: blame your squadmate :) | 04:31 |
StevenK | I just swap my own work back in and I get pinged again. | 04:31 |
StevenK | I think I'll blame Melbourne. | 04:31 |
lifeless | StevenK: hey, I pinged this one 17 m back, but you were distracted :) | 04:31 |
StevenK | Oh, that one. | 04:32 |
StevenK | I already had it open, I was thinking. | 04:32 |
StevenK | lifeless: Approved, with a comment. | 04:34 |
poolie | :/ | 04:34 |
StevenK | poolie? | 04:34 |
lifeless | poolie: I think you're asking for more from LP devs than they ask from bzr here, and I don't understand why. | 04:34 |
lifeless | poolie: both project cooperate, have a reasonable understanding of the other (at least at team mgmt levels) so they ask when they see impact, and don't when they don't. | 04:35 |
poolie | yeah my unhappiness is basically that they don't ask when they see an impact | 04:36 |
poolie | or perhaps they don't see an impact | 04:36 |
StevenK | poolie: How does the personal namespace impact on bzr? | 04:36 |
poolie | for instance, we have documentation that refers to +junk | 04:37 |
lifeless | So, imagine that we accept +personal and +junk, and advertise +personal. That obviously needs to be socialised amongst everyone doing support, and all our useres. | 04:37 |
lifeless | but its compatible; any docs won't be invalidated, they will keep working. | 04:37 |
poolie | yeah | 04:37 |
StevenK | Exactly | 04:37 |
poolie | i guess that seems a bit pedantic to me | 04:37 |
poolie | and it would be easy and more courteous to just say 'we're going to change this' in advance | 04:37 |
StevenK | poolie: Er, so I didn't even know if it was *possible* to change it until 4pm yesterday. | 04:38 |
StevenK | To be brutually honest, what I have is a play branch | 04:38 |
lifeless | would you tell LP if you added a new verb with no particularly surprising semantics in it, that was backwards compatible with old clients etc? | 04:38 |
* StevenK throws his Dell laptop out the window | 04:39 | |
lifeless | StevenK: how will you play WoW ? Oh right ... | 04:39 |
* StevenK has removed that from his machines | 04:39 | |
StevenK | Besides, I hated playing WoW with a trackpad | 04:40 |
poolie | lifeless: i guess that example means "that had no changes that are likely to impact lp" | 04:40 |
poolie | the difference is that changes to lp's ui/user model do impact us, because we document and support it | 04:40 |
poolie | StevenK: np, i don't really mind this case (and again, i'm happy to see it improved) it just seemed like a bit of a pattern | 04:41 |
lifeless | poolie: what data points are on this pattern? Last time we spoke about this feeling you were hard put to pin it down. | 04:42 |
lifeless | poolie: it *seemed*, as I remember it, to be mainly feeling that LP did stuff without talking about it : but when we compared notes team bzr wasn't communicating (in advance) any more fully | 04:42 |
poolie | i don't think it's about who's doing better or worse | 04:43 |
lifeless | poolie: I don't mean to frame this as what you do vs what lp does, though it seems I'm taking it that way | 04:43 |
poolie | but rather, which things are useful to communicate about | 04:43 |
poolie | if lp changes the namespace for branches that is the kind of thing i'd like to hear about | 04:43 |
StevenK | lifeless: Can we have a quick skype? | 04:44 |
lifeless | StevenK: sure | 04:44 |
poolie | if there's any thing we're changing that you wish you'd heard about earlier, let me know | 04:45 |
lifeless | poolie: I trust that (I track what you are doing enough, and that you make good decisions) to the extent that whatever falls through the cracks, falls through the cracks. | 04:46 |
poolie | yeah i normally do too | 04:48 |
poolie | i was surprised by this because i didn't see anything about it on a bug or mp | 04:48 |
nigelb | Hi, so +temp-meeting-export will not give a subscription information if someone is not registered for a sprint. Is there a chance I can remove that check? | 04:51 |
jtv | StevenK: I need to make dogfood or staging go through the motions of notifying about a package sync or upload… I can't sync Ubuntu packages on dogfood any more; what would I need to do to elicit an email notification from an upload? | 04:51 |
StevenK | jtv: OTP | 04:52 |
jtv | ok | 04:52 |
lifeless | nigelb: I believe summit is the only user, so sure, though the data size can be pretty big on popular blueprints | 04:52 |
nigelb | lifeless: It has always been big. we hit issues with the 2 sprints thing this time. | 04:53 |
nigelb | Some BPs were only registered to LDS. | 04:54 |
nigelb | I'll change it after UDS, lest people murder me. | 04:54 |
lifeless | StevenK: result = store.find( | 04:56 |
lifeless | (Branch.id, Branch.unique_name), | 04:56 |
lifeless | Branch.unique_name.is_in(prefixes), | 04:56 |
lifeless | Branch.transitively_private == False).one() | 04:56 |
nigelb | Oh. | 04:59 |
nigelb | I just noticed rf-* is symblinked to the binary in devel. | 05:01 |
jtv | StevenK, wgrant: mind if I upgrade dogfood? | 05:04 |
poolie | when are builds deleted? like https://code.launchpad.net/~neon/+recipe/project-neon-kdesdk/+build/12437 | 05:09 |
poolie | are they gc'd a while after they complete? | 05:09 |
wgrant | jtv: No. | 05:11 |
jtv | Thanks. | 05:11 |
wgrant | poolie: they're meant to never be deleted. | 05:11 |
wgrant | And I think I convinced code that deleting them was not going to work. | 05:12 |
poolie | so the user must have deleted them? | 05:12 |
wgrant | So IIRC they shouldn't ever be deleted. | 05:12 |
poolie | or the urls are just wrong | 05:12 |
wgrant | What linked to that? | 05:12 |
poolie | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/693524 | 05:12 |
_mup_ | Bug #693524: Daily builds fail because of insufficient memory <escalated> <linaro> <recipe> <Launchpad Auto Build System:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/693524 > | 05:12 |
wgrant | Perhaps they renamed the recipe? | 05:13 |
wgrant | D: | 05:13 |
wgrant | SPRB.destroySelf exists. | 05:13 |
* wgrant goes stabbity stab. | 05:13 | |
wgrant | for release in releases: | 05:13 |
wgrant | release.source_package_recipe_build = None | 05:13 |
wgrant | tergjkeriogjeroigteriogjioergioernjegkl | 05:13 |
wgrant | 23FTRWE89HGN A9PRGHERIUHGER | 05:13 |
wgrant | Yes that's right let's just erase the auditing information | 05:14 |
wgrant | WHY NOT | 05:14 |
poolie | :) | 05:16 |
poolie | wgrant: what would be the most practical way for me to get the versions of bzr and bzr-builder in to the build log file | 05:19 |
poolie | to make bzr-builder print them? | 05:19 |
wgrant | I'm not sure. | 05:20 |
wgrant | I would hesitate to suggest that a bzr-builder upgrade would be the easiest thing. | 05:20 |
poolie | meaning "it probably is, but only slightly" or "it's probably not?" | 05:24 |
wgrant | I would have said it was, until we ran into this recent trouble. | 05:24 |
wgrant | Now it's possibly easier and safer to fix lp-buildd. | 05:24 |
lifeless | ftr this is the bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/147407 | 05:41 |
_mup_ | Bug #147407: Junk sounds too harsh <lp-code> <ui> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/147407 > | 05:41 |
poolie | ftr my bit is https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/884092 | 05:51 |
_mup_ | Bug #884092: source recipe build logs should mention versions used <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/884092 > | 05:51 |
jtv | StevenK: not having much luck testing that revision. Can't even upload a deb to dogfood. :( Since my branch doesn't change any functionality, I think I'll go with "qa-untestable." | 07:08 |
jtv | (The upload failure is something I've seen before — worth chasing down, but probably not worth holding up landings for) | 07:09 |
=== jtv is now known as jtv-eat | ||
poolie | so does buildd/buildrecipe somehow get copied to buildrecipe.py, which seemsto be the name that isactually run? | 07:13 |
poolie | ok https://code.launchpad.net/~mbp/launchpad/884092-buildd-versions/+merge/80870 | 07:21 |
poolie | stevenk, wrgant, how could i usefully locally test a change to buildrecipe? | 07:22 |
lifeless | poolie: there is a makefile in buildd, or a debian.rules - something | 07:24 |
poolie | yeah, even some documentation | 07:24 |
nigelb | wgrant: OCR-ing today? | 07:36 |
wgrant | nigelb: Public holiday. | 07:36 |
wgrant | So I'm mostly not here. | 07:36 |
nigelb | wgrant: HA, what's the holiday for? (its holiday for us too) | 07:36 |
wgrant | Melbourne Cup | 07:37 |
wgrant | Because horse races are awesome, apparently. | 07:37 |
nigelb | Horse race? | 07:37 |
nigelb | lol | 07:37 |
nigelb | Ours is slightly more reasonable. State formation anniversary thingie. | 07:37 |
nigelb | wgrant: Do you get holidays for cricket matches as well? ;) | 07:41 |
wgrant | Nope. | 07:41 |
nigelb | Sad. | 07:41 |
nigelb | That obviously meant more hlidays. | 07:41 |
nigelb | No more make lint? | 07:42 |
* nigelb moves to right folder. | 07:43 | |
nigelb | Ugh, http://paste.ubuntu.com/725049/ | 07:51 |
nigelb | Tried out +temp-meeting-export locally. | 07:51 |
nigelb | Ah, that was my fail :) | 07:52 |
* wallyworld_ off to see Cold Chisel :-) | 07:57 | |
=== jtv-eat is now known as jtv | ||
nigelb | Ew. This was done very badly. | 08:05 |
nigelb | For the meeting export, it gets all the sprint attendees and then gets people from it. | 08:05 |
=== jtv is now known as jtv-afk | ||
nigelb | Could someone give some guidance on potential perfomance? | 08:21 |
nigelb | Currently, the meeting export fetches all the attendees for a summit and filters the people attending from that. | 08:21 |
lifeless | yup | 08:21 |
nigelb | so, the meeting export page is sort of fast. | 08:22 |
lifeless | this is an important characteristic | 08:22 |
nigelb | But the chnage I want kinda screws it up. | 08:22 |
nigelb | And I'm hesitant to do that :) | 08:22 |
lifeless | fair enough too :) | 08:23 |
nigelb | I wondering if we could add people to list as I find them | 08:23 |
nigelb | with the details I want | 08:23 |
lifeless | whats the big picture here | 08:23 |
nigelb | and build the list of people based on the people subscribed to the BPs in the sprint. | 08:23 |
nigelb | The big picture is we want all the people subscribed to a blueprint. | 08:23 |
lifeless | so the export should be 3 queries | 08:24 |
lifeless | -> sprint | 08:24 |
lifeless | -> blueprints | 08:24 |
lifeless | -> people | 08:24 |
lifeless | and then some glue | 08:24 |
nigelb | heh | 08:24 |
nigelb | Yeah | 08:24 |
nigelb | My idea is this | 08:24 |
nigelb | We do this currently | 08:24 |
nigelb | people_by_id = dict((person.id, person) for person in | 08:24 |
nigelb | getUtility(IPersonSet).getPrecachedPersonsFromIDs(attendee_set)) | 08:24 |
nigelb | and then we look into that dict to find a person's ID and whether they are required. | 08:25 |
lifeless | and \o/ instant oopses on staging as well | 08:25 |
nigelb | heh | 08:25 |
nigelb | I'm running it locally :) | 08:25 |
rvba | lifeless: congrats! | 08:25 |
=== jtv-afk is now known as jtv | ||
lifeless | rvba: thanks :) | 08:25 |
nigelb | lifeless: \o/ Nice :) | 08:26 |
lifeless | rvba: allenap: btw - you might like the last commit on oops-amqp - more errors amqplib throws up when rabbits are restsarted | 08:26 |
* rvba looks. | 08:26 | |
nigelb | lifeless: Ideally, I'd like to look if a person exists in a dict I create as I go, if not lookup each person I find on a BP, and find their ID, name, required status and put into that dict. I'll be quering more on launchpad, but only once person. Is that too much of a perf drop? | 08:27 |
lifeless | nigelb: thats about as bad as it gets | 08:28 |
nigelb | I was afraid of that :) | 08:28 |
nigelb | Alternatively, can I look up subscribers to a BP instead? | 08:28 |
lifeless | nigelb: step back | 08:28 |
lifeless | nigelb: you need three queries: | 08:29 |
lifeless | sprint | 08:29 |
lifeless | blueprints | 08:29 |
lifeless | peple | 08:29 |
lifeless | and then glue | 08:29 |
lifeless | the glue is mostly done - jus tneeds shuffling | 08:29 |
nigelb | I get all the people in launchpad? | 08:29 |
lifeless | you can't work with the object model for doing queries though: the object model is intrinsically hostile to performance | 08:29 |
lifeless | nigelb: no, you get all the people relevant to the blueprints | 08:29 |
lifeless | one query. | 08:30 |
nigelb | I can do that? | 08:30 |
* nigelb didn't know. | 08:30 | |
lifeless | well, you'll need to put the bits in the right order, but yes. | 08:30 |
lifeless | thats what the current code does (but it selects all attendees, not all subscribers-or-attendees) | 08:30 |
lifeless | [caveat, I haven' tlooked at that code in ~ 9 months, bzr annotate will tell you precisely when) | 08:31 |
nigelb | Is there code to do that or do you suggest I write it? :) | 08:31 |
lifeless | I don't know how much will need assembling and how much is pre canned | 08:31 |
lifeless | this is bread-and-butter to changing something in LP though, its not at all unordinary | 08:32 |
nigelb | Excellent. I'll look at the model and see if I can figure something out :) | 08:32 |
nigelb | I may need lots of help. | 08:32 |
lifeless | is this desirable? Won't the summit UI explode ? | 08:34 |
nigelb | No. | 08:34 |
nigelb | Summit was always doing this. | 08:34 |
nigelb | Showing all the subscribers to a BP. | 08:34 |
nigelb | It helps people hide the ones they aer not subscribed to. | 08:34 |
nigelb | And setup personal icals. | 08:35 |
lifeless | ok | 08:35 |
lifeless | so how is that data not present ? | 08:35 |
nigelb | all those break since some subscriptions don't get sycned thanks to two summits. | 08:35 |
lifeless | I don't understand the failure mode | 08:35 |
nigelb | We're using 2 launchpad sprints. | 08:35 |
nigelb | some Bps proposed to uds-p, some to lds | 08:35 |
nigelb | (Eventually, all blame goes to linaro :P) | 08:35 |
lifeless | but if you're using temp-meeting-export, that means you're not getting all subscriptions | 08:35 |
nigelb | we query both | 08:36 |
nigelb | so we get all subscriptions | 08:36 |
nigelb | But we don't get all the people | 08:36 |
nigelb | some people are registered for uds, some for lds. | 08:36 |
lifeless | I don't understand | 08:36 |
lifeless | neither export includes non-attendees | 08:36 |
lifeless | how are you getting 'all subscriberes to a BP' | 08:36 |
nigelb | Its from the export | 08:37 |
nigelb | I need to find out how james set this up. | 08:37 |
lifeless | so the export includes all subscribers irrespective of attendees ? | 08:37 |
nigelb | (at the summit end) | 08:37 |
nigelb | export does not. | 08:37 |
lifeless | then how is summit showing all subscribers ? | 08:37 |
nigelb | export includes only subscribers who are attendees. | 08:37 |
nigelb | Summit isn't showing all subscribers, which is what I'm digging for. | 08:38 |
lifeless | but you said 'summit was always doing this' | 08:38 |
nigelb | We always had one sprint. | 08:38 |
lifeless | 21:34 < lifeless> is this desirable? Won't the summit UI explode ? | 08:38 |
lifeless | 21:34 < nigelb> No. | 08:38 |
lifeless | 21:34 < nigelb> Summit was always doing this. | 08:38 |
lifeless | 21:34 < nigelb> Showing all the subscribers to a BP. | 08:38 |
nigelb | so, this was never a problem. | 08:38 |
lifeless | nigelb: one sprint doesn't mean showing all subscriberes | 08:38 |
lifeless | nigelb: the statements are not at all equivalent | 08:38 |
nigelb | lifeless: I'll rephrase. | 08:38 |
nigelb | Until now, we never noticed the impact. | 08:39 |
nigelb | Most Ubuntu folks were attendees. | 08:39 |
lifeless | right, and thats why I'm asking. | 08:39 |
lifeless | Won't the summit UI explode ? | 08:39 |
nigelb | explode in what sense? | 08:39 |
lifeless | 600 attendees | 08:41 |
nigelb | we don't show all attendees in one place. | 08:41 |
nigelb | But we show all subscribers to a BP. | 08:41 |
lifeless | bear with me | 08:41 |
nigelb | Yeah, I'm misunderstanding soething :) | 08:41 |
nigelb | Would skyping help? | 08:42 |
lifeless | ok, 597 subscribers across all bp;s | 08:47 |
lifeless | peaks is 46 | 08:48 |
lifeless | thats probably tolerable | 08:48 |
lifeless | (on a single spec) | 08:48 |
nigelb | hah, that. | 08:48 |
nigelb | Yeah. | 08:48 |
nigelb | We do occasionally have UI explosion for big and famous sessions | 08:48 |
nigelb | But its only if you mouse over. | 08:49 |
nigelb | lifeless: You just made me realize I need to dig deeper into summit for this. | 08:52 |
nigelb | Because with both the meetings, we should get all the subscriberes, but we're not. | 08:52 |
lifeless | nigelb: consider the more permanent solution :) | 08:52 |
nigelb | lifeless: I like what's currently there for its performance :) | 08:53 |
nigelb | I probably only wold add a warning when subscribing that "You aren't markd as attending for this sprint" or osmething. | 08:53 |
allenap | lifeless: Yes, tip top, thanks. | 09:20 |
lifeless | allenap: also the current catch IOError in LP is too broad | 09:21 |
lifeless | allenap: (again, see oops-amqp for better handling of that) | 09:21 |
allenap | lifeless: rvba has been working on that, but is suffering badly from a Heisenbug around OOPSes. I suspect the big OOPS landing yesterday might help. | 09:22 |
rvba | allenap: I tried to use the new oops thing yesterday and land it again, but I've been suffering from the perf problem lifeless mentioned in his email and I killed it after 6 hours in ec2. | 09:23 |
lifeless | rvba: its fixed now :) | 09:24 |
rvba | lifeless: \o/. I shall try to land it again then. Thanks for the heads up. | 09:24 |
lifeless | if it takes that long its your change :P | 09:24 |
* rvba tries to land it again. | 09:25 | |
=== jtv is now known as jtv-afk | ||
=== jtv-afk is now known as jtv | ||
=== gmb changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: gmb | Critical bugtasks: 266 | ||
bigjools | gmb: can I bother thee for a review please | 11:32 |
gmb | bigjools: Sure. I'll take a look as soon as I've done with rvba's. | 11:32 |
bigjools | thanks | 11:32 |
bigjools | gmb: heh, good point with the comments | 12:28 |
gmb | :) | 12:28 |
bigjools | I only even added those ones as an afterthought - never a good idea | 12:28 |
deryck | Morning, all. | 12:58 |
danhg | Hi Everyone, if you're a Launchpad user, please get in touch if you'd like to do some usability testing today. | 13:16 |
lifeless | danhg: I suggest trying in #ubuntu-uds | 13:19 |
danhg | thanks lifeless | 13:19 |
lifeless | danhg: folk here probably don't qualify for such tests :P | 13:19 |
danhg | I've posted there too | 13:20 |
lifeless | danhg: I don't see you in that channel ? | 13:20 |
danhg | I'm in it now | 13:20 |
danhg | I'm on Colloquy. It likes to mess around. | 13:21 |
lifeless | indeed, you are too | 13:21 |
rvba | lifeless: Your new oopses code fixed my Heisenbug. Thank you for that! | 14:24 |
lifeless | \o/ | 14:25 |
lifeless | how? | 14:25 |
rvba | I don't know (hence the Heisenbug), but I was able to land my code without a problem once I've refactored it to use the new oops code. | 14:26 |
rvba | I had this weird 'test hung' failure. | 14:26 |
rvba | That I could not reproduce locally. | 14:26 |
rvba | lifeless: If you're really interested, you have all the details about the Heisenbug in my email "Help with a hung test" to the mailing list. | 14:32 |
Beret | lifeless, thought you were going to bed? :) | 14:33 |
lifeless | I was | 14:34 |
lifeless | I am too :P | 14:34 |
lifeless | rvba: were you using getLastOops ? | 14:34 |
rvba | lifeless: yes. | 14:34 |
lifeless | then you were seeing an oops from the test before, in all probability | 14:34 |
lifeless | because it was a terrrrrible API (though probably not obviously so at the time it was written) | 14:35 |
lifeless | rvba: I'm glad its working for you | 14:35 |
lifeless | and with that, I really am halt()ing state | 14:35 |
rvba | Good night lifeless! | 14:35 |
=== jtv is now known as jtv-afk | ||
rvba | gmb: I've got a tiny review for you if you're up for it ;). https://code.launchpad.net/~rvb/launchpad/combinator-bug-881144/+merge/80911 | 14:42 |
gmb | rvba: I'm OTP and then am going to be grabbing a late lunch, but I'll come to it soon thereafter. | 14:42 |
rvba | gmb: sure. Thank you! | 14:43 |
deryck | abentley, should we do a late standup now, while I wait on staging update? | 15:04 |
abentley | deryck: sure. | 15:04 |
deryck | abentley, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/725330/ | 15:08 |
deryck | abentley, we will need to get a loading spinner of some sort working when changing the ordering. | 15:25 |
deryck | abentley, but I think we'll need to rethink our current spinner approach since a whole section of the page changes. | 15:25 |
abentley | deryck: We haven't implemented precaching yet :-) Well, I guess we should add a spinner anyhow. | 15:25 |
deryck | abentley, yeah, just to be safe. | 15:26 |
deryck | mrevell, staging is working now. https://bugs.staging.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bugs | 15:26 |
mrevell | Woooo! Thanks deryck | 15:26 |
deryck | mrevell, np. | 15:26 |
deryck | mrevell, some minor issues still, like needing a loading symbol to indicate we're getting results, but overall, the resorting is pretty darn cool. | 15:27 |
deryck | but after the initial load, it's super fast. | 15:27 |
mrevell | deryck, Cool :) What team do I need to be in the thing? | 15:27 |
mrevell | Sorry, that made little sense. | 15:28 |
deryck | mrevell, I think matsubara added the product team to the feature flag rule. | 15:28 |
mrevell | I'm not seeing the new listings so I'll hunt him down and ask him to pop me in the relevant team. Cheers. | 15:28 |
deryck | mrevell, cool. cheers. | 15:29 |
abentley | deryck: very nice. | 15:29 |
deryck | thanks, abentley! | 15:30 |
jml | mrevell: in this ask ubuntu session, you'd be amazed at how much people are talking about 'reputation' (their karma equiv.) as a desirable commodity and a motivator for actions. | 15:57 |
=== beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
gmb | rvba: I haven't had chance to review your branch yet, but I will do before I EoD. | 16:45 |
=== gmb changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: - | Critical bugtasks: 266 | ||
rvba | gmb: Great, it's not urgent so if you don't have the time today that's fine, I'll get it reviewed tomorrow. | 16:46 |
gmb | rvba: Okay, thanks. I'll do my best though. Interviews are sucking up a lot of time for team Yellow this week. | 16:47 |
=== beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
=== Pendulum_ is now known as Pendulum | ||
mrevell | hey huwshimi | 21:18 |
thumper | hi mrevell | 21:18 |
huwshimi | mrevell: Morning! | 21:18 |
thumper | mrevell: you in orlando? | 21:18 |
thumper | mrevell: is sinzui there with you? | 21:20 |
thumper | I'd like to talk privacy with him | 21:21 |
mrevell | thumper, sinzui is here, he arrived today | 21:21 |
mrevell | thumper, and "hello" :) | 21:21 |
mrevell | huwshimi, Hey, do you want to have a catch-up call? | 21:21 |
mrevell | thumper, I'm not sure where he is right now but I can let him know you want to talk. | 21:22 |
thumper | mrevell: that'd be cool | 21:22 |
huwshimi | mrevell: Sure | 21:22 |
thumper | mrevell: I'm back home now though, so it would have to be afternoon for him | 21:22 |
huwshimi | mrevell: 5 mins? | 21:22 |
mrevell | thumper, Okeydoke. I'll let him know to contact you when I see him. | 21:23 |
mrevell | huwshimi, Sure. | 21:23 |
lifeless | mrevell: allo | 21:23 |
mrevell | hello lifeless | 21:23 |
jelmer | hi launchpadders | 21:25 |
lifeless | mrevell: have you seen the new LessJunk LEP? I haven't read it yet but given that the implementation is pretty shallow it would be worth us working through the questions I expect it raises. | 21:27 |
huwshimi | mrevell: Ready when you are | 21:29 |
mrevell | lifeless, I've seen that it exists but not yet read it; it's been pretty full on today and yesterday. I'll take a look tonight or tomorrow morning and perhaps we can have a call tomorrow. | 21:29 |
mrevell | huwshimi, Cool. Is Skype okay? | 21:30 |
huwshimi | mrevell: yup | 21:30 |
lifeless | mrevell: sweet | 21:30 |
huwshimi | mrevell: I'm getting nothing | 21:33 |
mrevell | huwshimi, Oh, weird. It was ringing for me. I'll try again | 21:34 |
huwshimi | mrevell: It rang and I answered, but no sound | 21:34 |
huwshimi | mrevell: Oh, looks like skype crashed | 21:34 |
huwshimi | mrevell: Try again? | 21:36 |
lifeless | flacoste: dunno if you saw, but wgrant shaved a second off of ubuntu bug searches | 21:41 |
lifeless | flacoste: maybe more in fact - poor behaviour on the TeamParticipation table | 21:42 |
lifeless | flacoste: I going to ask stub to look into some pg innards relating to this | 21:42 |
flacoste | lifeless: i saw mention of a performance related feature flag earlier | 21:42 |
flacoste | didn't know the details | 21:42 |
flacoste | but that's excellent | 21:42 |
lifeless | its a bit worrying, but good we have a workaround - I suspect table and index bloat on the table | 21:42 |
lifeless | flacoste: also \o/ \o/ \o/ I'm so happy the major part of the oops arc is complete. | 21:44 |
flacoste | yes, this is also awesome news! | 21:48 |
lifeless | I know I mentioned it yesterday, but I'm still bouncy from it ;) | 21:48 |
poolie | flacoste, all | 21:54 |
flacoste | hi poolie | 21:54 |
poolie | hi huwshimi? | 22:59 |
poolie | lifeless, huw, i wonder if there should be some kind of systematic answer to whether to provide counts of objects from the thing that links to them | 23:37 |
poolie | like rvb's recent bug 827935 | 23:37 |
_mup_ | Bug #827935: Person:+branches timeouts <regression> <timeout> <Launchpad itself:In Progress by rvb> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/827935 > | 23:37 |
poolie | perhaps it's just simply: do it if it's useful but not if it's too expensive | 23:37 |
lifeless | I think it depends a lot on context | 23:43 |
lifeless | for instance, a dashboard telling you what things need doing it much more useful if you don't need to click through | 23:43 |
lifeless | the portlet showing high/critical/untriaged/my bugs for instance - the first three tell you things you need to action, the last one is more 'canned search' - if you see what I mean | 23:44 |
wgrant | lifeless: Is lp-oops missing its 500.html again? | 23:48 |
lifeless | wgrant: it hasn't been added ever | 23:48 |
lifeless | wgrant: its barfing on the index page? | 23:48 |
wgrant | Yes. | 23:48 |
wgrant | And all other pages. | 23:48 |
wgrant | Ah, no, some OOPSes work. | 23:48 |
lifeless | should wire it up with oops reporting | 23:49 |
wgrant | Heh | 23:49 |
lifeless | ./src/oopstools/settings.py:INDEX_TEMPLATE = "index-launchpad.html" | 23:50 |
poolie | lifeless: yeah i like the new/high/critical things | 23:50 |
StevenK | And then if the OOPS reporting causes an OOPS while reporting an OOPS, we reboot Launchpad. | 23:50 |
lifeless | wgrant: should be fixed | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!