[00:13] <hyperair> jtaylor: hmm which bug?
[00:13] <jtaylor> 851383
[00:13] <hyperair> bug 851383
[00:14] <hyperair> hmm wasn't that the bug with the most info?
[00:14] <hyperair> it has sufficient info, doesn't it?
[00:14] <hyperair> an upstream link
[00:14] <jtaylor> another had the commit ids fixing it
[00:14] <hyperair> and the upstream link has a patch
[00:14] <hyperair> oh woops
[00:14] <jtaylor> the upstream link is insufficient
[00:14] <jtaylor> the patch there was already applied
[00:14] <jtaylor> but its not enough
[00:14] <hyperair> oh crap
[00:15] <hyperair> which bug should be the master, then?
[00:15] <jtaylor> I pasted the important info
[00:15] <jtaylor> also -desktop knows about it so doesn't matter so much anymore
[00:15] <hyperair> okay
[00:16] <jtaylor> its an ugly situation
[00:16] <hyperair> =\
[00:16] <hyperair> you could have just changed the master bug
[00:16] <hyperair> these days if you change one duplicate, the rest follow.
[00:16] <jtaylor> the debdiff between .5 and .6 are ~1500 lines in a single file, .6 and .7 another ~1000 lines
[00:16] <jtaylor> and in there somewhere are important bug fixes fore breakage in .6 ^^
[00:16] <jtaylor> nice
[00:16] <hyperair> oh yay
[00:18] <jtaylor> 851383 should probably be master
[00:20] <jtaylor> it would be nice when the affect number would include all duplicates
[00:21] <jtaylor> last time I talked to -desktop they didn't want to fix it because it had to few bugs/affects (~beta 2 I think)
[02:30] <paultag> Do I have to requestsync during DIF?
[02:30] <paultag> erm, debian-import, where we are now
[02:33] <ajmitch> not if it's unmodified in ubuntu, and the version that you want is in testing
[02:33] <paultag> ajmitch: Ah, right, because this is a LTS. Forgot about testing.
[02:33] <paultag> Thanks, just wondering why it was on such a lag :)
[02:34] <tumbleweed> we are still before DIF
[02:34] <paultag> tumbleweed: I corrected myself directly after :)
[02:34] <tumbleweed> of course if something should be rushed from unstable, file a request
[02:34] <paultag> tumbleweed: nope, no rush
[02:34] <paultag> just wondering :)
[02:37] <tumbleweed> I went to the wiki so I could throw a link at you, but it looks like someone broke the wiki
[02:37] <paultag> tumbleweed: it's no worries at all, I was just doing my rounds and got to wondering
[02:38] <paultag> alright, I'm off. Thanks, ajmitch / tumbleweed
[12:55] <highvoltage> paultag: why aren't you uds'ing this year?
[13:01] <paultag> highvoltage: nope :)
[13:01] <paultag> Oh, why
[13:02] <paultag> highvoltage: because I'm leaving, and UDS is a waste of my time, as well as spaceman's :)
[13:02] <tumbleweed> you're leaving?
[13:03] <paultag> tumbleweed: long time coming, my friend. Yeah, I've been dropping roles, and I'm dowm to my last one now
[13:03] <paultag> tumbleweed: I'm coming up here to Debian
[13:03] <paultag> but I'm done with my Ubuntu work, sadly, that part of my life is slowly coming to a close
[13:03] <tumbleweed> right, just moving around a bit then :)
[13:03] <paultag> erm, wow, thought this was the other channel
[13:03] <paultag> this is ubuntu-motu, shoot.
[13:04] <paultag> tumbleweed: yeah, I'll still be contributing, but indirectly :)
[17:31] <azeem> hrm, the Ubuntu diff for xmakemol looks weird
[17:31] <azeem> it talks about lesstif not being in main, but the package is in universe anyway
[17:32] <jtaylor> but are the gl libraries built against it?
[17:35] <jtaylor> but yes it does look weird
[17:36] <azeem> now I remember some issues in/with Ubuntu and libglw1-mesa
[17:36] <azeem> actually, I might just drop the GL version
[17:37] <azeem> people who want to look at something pretty won't use xmakemol
[17:57] <azeem> jtaylor: i guess it was because mesa did not build against lesstif2-dev cause the former is main and the latter universe
[17:57] <azeem> but now libglw1-mesa is built from mesa-glw, which is universe
[22:45] <asomething> anyone know if there is a general developer community/MOTU check-in or anything at UDS this time around? I'm not really seeing it on the schedule...
[22:46]  * ajmitch saw a MOTU session on the schedule
[22:47] <ajmitch> I just have to find it again
[22:48] <ajmitch> friday at 11, it's in the 'other' track
[22:48] <asomething> ajmitch, Thanks!