=== TheEvilPhoenix is now known as Resistance | ||
CarlFK | http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=pxelinux.0 | 04:02 |
---|---|---|
CarlFK | <a href="/karmic/syslinux">syslinux</a> | 04:03 |
CarlFK | "error: two or more packages specified (syslinux karmic) " | 04:03 |
CarlFK | hmm, maybe #u-bugs will know what to do with this | 04:03 |
=== stub1 is now known as stub | ||
=== stub1 is now known as stub | ||
=== stub1 is now known as stub | ||
=== stub1 is now known as stub | ||
[Dmitry] | Hello | 11:00 |
[Dmitry] | it's seems to a bug: https://code.launchpad.net/~itmages/+archive/software/+recipebuild/107546 | 11:01 |
[Dmitry] | Started on 2011-10-26 | 11:01 |
[Dmitry] | Estimated finish 2011-10-26 | 11:01 |
jelmer | I had one of those as well | 11:02 |
bigjools | [Dmitry]: I cancelled it - re-request one | 11:31 |
bigjools | we had a little snafu in the build farm the other day | 11:32 |
[Dmitry] | bigjools: thx. | 12:01 |
=== head_v is now known as head_victim | ||
GatoLoko | hi, i'm having trouble setting a team contact address. In june i reported #801423 (oops on trying to change it), but now it doesn't oops any more, it shows a message telling me a confirmation message was sent but that confirmation email never arrives | 13:55 |
GatoLoko | is there any other way to set the contact address? | 13:56 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
=== joey is now known as zz_joey | ||
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
=== TRB143_ is now known as TRB143 | ||
=== bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 | ||
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
czajkowski | sidnei: nice to meet you | 19:09 |
sidnei | czajkowski, erm me too *wink* | 19:10 |
* sidnei ponders if it was another message misdirected to sinzui | 19:10 | |
czajkowski | ahh | 19:10 |
czajkowski | stupid tab completing and similar names | 19:10 |
czajkowski | Curtis | 19:11 |
sidnei | :P | 19:11 |
czajkowski | sidnei: I'm sure it'd be nice to meet you | 19:11 |
sidnei | eh | 19:11 |
=== zz_joey is now known as zz_zz_joey | ||
=== micahg_ is now known as micahg | ||
ilmari | How can I flag a comment on a bug as spam? | 22:14 |
ilmari | specifically https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/181406/comments/15 | 22:14 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 181406 in aptitude (Ubuntu) "aptitude crashed with SIGSEGV in pkgRecords::Lookup()" [Critical,Fix released] | 22:14 |
lifeless | ilmari: tell us here | 22:15 |
ilmari | I believe I just did :) | 22:16 |
lifeless | and you'll note the comment is gone ;) | 22:16 |
ilmari | indeed, thanks :) | 22:17 |
Lekensteyn | Hi, I made a mistake in uploading a broken .orig.tar.gz file to a PPA. When I tried to upload the fixed one, it was rejected. How can I make LP accept my new tarball? | 22:40 |
wgrant | Lekensteyn: You can't. You need to give it a new name. | 22:45 |
StevenK | Or a new version. | 22:47 |
Lekensteyn | I've just read that it could help to get the old tarball and run debuild -S with it | 22:48 |
wgrant | That will make the new package use the old tarball. | 22:49 |
wgrant | But it won't help you upload two different files with the same version. | 22:49 |
Lekensteyn | I also tried adding a prefix, but it was rejected by debuild, something like pkg_1.2.3dev.tar.gz. Is n.n.n the only allowed name? | 22:50 |
Lekensteyn | Also, what would you suggest to use? If I bump the version number, future releases will conflict with it | 22:50 |
wgrant | Lekensteyn: foo_1.2.3+repack1.orig.tar.gz is a commonly used style. | 23:03 |
wgrant | Lekensteyn: You'll also need to make a corresponding change to the version in debian/changelog, so it knows to use the new tarball. | 23:03 |
tumbleweed | if I pass a timezone aware date to a launchpadlib method, I see it includes the TZ in the request, and if I don't, it doesn't. | 23:04 |
tumbleweed | does it assume UTC for TZ-naive datetimes? | 23:04 |
wgrant | I believe it does, but I forget exactly. | 23:07 |
wgrant | raise ValueError("Time not in UTC.") | 23:08 |
wgrant | Bah | 23:08 |
wgrant | if timezone not in ['Z', '+0000', '-0000']: | 23:08 |
wgrant | raise ValueError("Time not in UTC.") | 23:08 |
wgrant | That's at the end of the marshaller. | 23:08 |
tumbleweed | thanks :) | 23:08 |
wgrant | So it'll either fail or be UTC. | 23:08 |
* tumbleweed should have actually tested with non-UTC :P | 23:08 | |
wgrant | The ISO8601 parser we use (zope.datetime.DateTimeParser) defaults to an offset of 0. So yes, timezone-naive datetimes on the wire will be treated as UTC. | 23:10 |
Lekensteyn | wgrant: What do I need to change in the changelog then? My versions are now like 2.4.1-1+git20111102.932b245~lucidppa2. I'm now trying it with debian/patches | 23:11 |
wgrant | Lekensteyn: Hm, that's an interesting version. Why is the git version after the -? | 23:12 |
wgrant | Is it not a git snapshot tarball? | 23:12 |
wgrant | Normally it'd be 2.4.1+git20111102.932b245-1~lucidppa2. | 23:12 |
wgrant | As it is now, it looks like the git snapshot is part of the Debian changes. | 23:12 |
Lekensteyn | Hmm, mistake in our version policies then. The package is a development snapshot for a testing PPA | 23:14 |
Lekensteyn | Would I need to change the directory in the tarball if I name it pkg_1.2.3+repack1.orig.tar.gz? | 23:15 |
wgrant | Lekensteyn: No, the name in the tarball doesn't matter. | 23:20 |
wgrant | Lekensteyn: If you are packaging regular snapshots, you probably want to name the tarball pkg_1.2.3+git12341212.blahblah.orig.tar.gz | 23:21 |
wgrant | Otherwise you'll have to keep the diff in diff.gz/debian.tar.gz | 23:21 |
Lekensteyn | wgrant: Many thanks for your help, I've now used a debian/patches approach (since I also manage upstream, and this is a non-official development snapshot, it should not be the end of the world). The next time, I'll try the pkg_x.y.z+repackN.orig.tar.gz method | 23:22 |
=== spm` is now known as spm |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!