| RedFace | hey people | 02:33 |
|---|---|---|
| === chris|| is now known as chris| | ||
| mok0_ | Now why does bzr builddeb and debuild not do the same thing? | 09:57 |
| hyperair | what's the conventional way of numbering SRU bugfixes? | 12:41 |
| hyperair | for previously synced packages i mean | 12:41 |
| hyperair | this is regarding nautilus-image-manipulator. it's 0.3-1 in oneiric, 0.4-1 in debian, and i'd like to more or less backport 0.4-1 (with some changes) into oneiric-proposed | 12:43 |
| hyperair | 0.4-1 will be synced to precise first though. | 12:43 |
| hyperair | would it be 0.4-0ubuntu0.1? | 12:43 |
| hyperair | or just 0.4-0ubuntu1? | 12:43 |
| hyperair | hmm okay, -0ubuntu0.1 looks right | 12:50 |
| Rhonda | hyperair: the wikipage about SRU has the numbering schema in it | 12:51 |
| hyperair | hmm | 12:52 |
| Rhonda | Wouldn't 0.4-1~oneiric1 be the one to go with? | 12:52 |
| hyperair | Rhonda: i don't see it. | 12:53 |
| Rhonda | And, somehow I doubt that a new upstream version would get approved for SRU | 12:53 |
| hyperair | Rhonda: not quite, it's not a direct backport. | 12:53 |
| hyperair | Rhonda: there will be a delta. | 12:53 |
| Rhonda | so? | 12:53 |
| hyperair | hm okay | 12:53 |
| broder | new upstream versions can be accepted for SRUs if it makes sense | 12:53 |
| Rhonda | It's still a backport of 0.4-1, no matter whether there are changes or not | 12:53 |
| broder | (i.e. upstream pushed a new release with just your fix) | 12:53 |
| hyperair | nautilus-image-manipulator is completely defunct in oneiric. | 12:53 |
| Laney | just use something that is in between, don't think the exact schema matters | 12:53 |
| Laney | -1~ubuntu0.1 | 12:54 |
| hyperair | that works too. | 12:54 |
| broder | ah yeah, totally defunct in the previous release is also a good justification for doing otherwise unacceptable things | 12:54 |
| broder | btw, the sru wiki page links to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging for version numbering advice | 12:54 |
| hyperair | ah | 12:54 |
| hyperair | thanks | 12:56 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| broder | hyperair: at the end of the day, a lot of version number discussion is just bikeshedding. the thing that matters most is that a package's version numbers are well-ordered between releases | 12:58 |
| * hyperair nods | 12:59 | |
| hyperair | okay | 12:59 |
| hyperair | i haven't made an SRU update in a while, so i just wanted to make sure i didn't screw anythign up. | 12:59 |
| === hrww is now known as hrw | ||
| Rhonda | hmmm, who was my sysadmin contact again for sulfur … | 13:32 |
| === RoAkSoAx is now known as roaksoax | ||
| === tgall_foo is now known as Dr_Who | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Riddelll is now known as Riddell | ||
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
| === kees__ is now known as kees | ||
| === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 | ||
| stlsaint | hey folks had a question here | 18:35 |
| stlsaint | i just created a 11.10 vm, grabbed a bzr branch from lp and ran bzr builddeb on it | 18:35 |
| stlsaint | build went fine minus the debsign | 18:35 |
| stlsaint | i then tried that exact same process on my host which ive been doing all packaging on and bzr builddeb command is search for a source upstream tar? | 18:35 |
| stlsaint | why now and not on the vm? | 18:35 |
| ersi | stlsaint: What are you running on the host? I bet that'd be a good question to ask :) | 18:51 |
| stlsaint | ersi: host is lucid | 18:52 |
| ersi | changed anything recently on the host? like packages, configurations? | 18:53 |
| ersi | I mean, if it worked previously | 18:53 |
| stlsaint | ersi: no, thru troubleshooting i believe that the error is due to issues with my host versions of packages | 18:54 |
| stlsaint | builddeb/pristine-tar possibly | 18:54 |
| === micahg_ is now known as micahg | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!