/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/11/04/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

=== cipher is now known as Guest38480
=== dshufelt is now known as dsmitty
=== dshufelt is now known as dsmitty
=== zz_jhelwig is now known as jhelwig
=== jhelwig is now known as zz_jhelwig
icerootis there a way to put comments on launchpad with mail? background is, there is an exisitng bug in launchpad and i need to open same thing to LKML and dont want to post it twice also the feedback from LKML would go directly into launchpad13:28
icerootalso but others ways to i have to "link" the launchpad-bug to the LKML discussion without just a comment with a link?13:28
pleia2iceroot: https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface13:34
pleia2you need to use gpg13:34
icerootpleia2: great, pgp already setup and linked with launchpad13:35
icerootpleia2: but the answer from LKML will not get there until they have a gpg on launchpad13:36
=== tgall_foo is now known as Dr_Who
=== ara is now known as Guest77757
puffHi. I'm not sure if this is an inappropriate question, but... I have a thinkpad t520 running 10.4 LTS and I'd like to upgrade to a more recent release.  In the past I've been bitten by significant bugs on each release upgrade, so I'm trying to check into it before upgrading.15:09
puffI searched on launchpad, that shows me only 5 bugs:15:09
puffhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=t520&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.has_no_package=15:09
jibelbdmurray, could something be done at update-manager level to prevent people reporting bugs like bug 885992 ?15:26
Guest29594Launchpad bug 885992 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "update manager crashes when starting (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88599215:26
hggdhpuff: (caveat -- I have not looked at your link, too big and got broken here) first of all, the upgrade path would be 10.04 -> 10.10 -> 11.04 -> 11.1015:27
hggdh(when we release 12.04, you can do 10.04 -> 12.04 straight)15:28
puffhggdh: Yeah, I'm waffling between just upgrading to 10.10 (not sure if that would solve enough of my problems) versus reinstalling my / partition to 11.04 or 11.10.15:32
puffI'm leaning strongly towards installing a dual boot of 11.10 alongside 10.4 LTS, so I can quickly switch back to 10.4 if I have problems.15:54
AngeloHi! :-)15:55
AngeloWhat should I do to help?15:56
puffthanks for the help folks!15:57
=== tgall_foo is now known as Dr_Who
micahgtitle of channel still says we're having a bug day from a week ago15:57
=== bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-bugs to: Ubuntu Bug Squad - next meeting 11/10/11 | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad | Documentation: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | Want to report a bug? Read https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs | User support (not related to triage) is in #ubuntu
njinhello, can someone wishlist bug 700126 for me, thanks18:02
Guest29594Launchpad bug 700126 in system-config-printer (Ubuntu) "non-primary users not added to acl list for scanner/printer (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/70012618:02
elgatonHi, I'm triaging bug #882255 (if an empty password is set, Sudo incorrectly prompts for it, so operations requiring administrative privileges are not possible). Which package should I target (sudo, pam...)? I'm asking this also because empty passwords are a security risk and the user, when changing password, should be warned of that (or empty passwords should be not allowed, although this choice is a bit limitative, for example for system accounts).18:48
Guest29594Launchpad bug 882255 in ubuntu "No root access after setting password to 'None' (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88225518:48
hggdhand?18:52
hggdhsorry, wrong channel18:53
hggdhelgaton: which password was set to none, and how was it done?19:14
hggdh?19:14
elgatonhggdh: The password of the main user account was set to an empty one (I think during installation or using the User Account management utilities, haven't asked yet).19:15
hggdhok, so not the root password (which is set to empty by default)19:16
elgatonhggdh: OK19:16
hggdhelgaton: IIRC, one has to change LightDM's to ask for a password19:24
hggdhelgaton: let me check19:24
elgatonhggdh: Thanks19:24
hggdhdarn19:27
elgatonhggdh: What happened?19:27
hggdhelgaton: I know I saw it the other day, but cannot remember where.19:27
hggdhelgaton: you will problably get people that know more of desktop on the #ubuntu-desktop channel19:28
elgatonhggdh: OK, I'll ask there. Thanks for your work19:28
elgatonhggdh: It just came to my mind that it is also possible to change user password using the "passwd" command, so a fix in the GUI part is not enough.19:30
elgatonhggdh: Maybe PAM (used by Sudo as well) could be a possible choice?19:31
hggdhelgaton: it could, but it all depends on what was actually done (i.e., how the OP changed the password, how the system was setup, etc. There may indeed be a bug -- or more -- lurking in there.19:33
elgatonhggdh: OK, I'll setup a test VM and try changing in every possible way (passwd and GUI) and see if I can reproduce the bug, but I think the problem is at the Sudo/PAM level.19:34
hggdhelgaton: it could indeed. But we must understand what was actually done -- command sequence, etc -- so that it would be easier to reproduce, instead of running thru a potentially large number of permutations19:35
=== tgall_foo is now known as Dr_Who
=== Elbrus_ is now known as Elbrus
elgatonhggdh: OK, I'll test thoroughly19:46
elgatonThanks again19:47
=== zz_jhelwig is now known as jhelwig
=== zz_jhelwig is now known as jhelwig
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!