| === jason is now known as Guest38057 | ||
| === Guest38057 is now known as jasef | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === jason is now known as jasef | ||
| scott-upstairs | the ubuntu studio team should be starting their meeting in two minutes | 16:58 |
|---|---|---|
| scott-upstairs | the meeting agenda can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2011September4 | 16:58 |
| astraljava | #startmeeting Ubuntu Studio collaborator meeting | 17:00 |
| meetingology | Meeting started Sun Nov 6 17:00:48 2011 UTC. The chair is astraljava. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot. | 17:00 |
| meetingology | Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired | 17:00 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | Ubuntu Studio collaborator meeting Meeting | Current topic: | ||
| astraljava | Hello everybody. | 17:00 |
| astraljava | Who's with us today? | 17:01 |
| scott-upstairs | hello astraljava | 17:01 |
| scott-upstairs | i am here | 17:01 |
| stochastic | Hi | 17:01 |
| stochastic | can't stay too long | 17:01 |
| scott-upstairs | holstein and falktx said they would not be present today | 17:01 |
| astraljava | Right, okay. Do we have an agenda? | 17:01 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, how much time, do you have preferred topics to discuss now | 17:01 |
| scott-upstairs | agend: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2011September4 | 17:01 |
| scott-upstairs | agenda | 17:01 |
| stochastic | just the sooner I get on the road today the happier I will be, preferably no more than 30min | 17:02 |
| astraljava | Same as from the last one? | 17:02 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, ack | 17:02 |
| astraljava | Ok. What are the most important topics, Scott? | 17:02 |
| scott-upstairs | astraljava, no, i unfortunately updated the wrong one (i.e. sept) | 17:02 |
| astraljava | Ahh... okay, that's fine. | 17:03 |
| scott-upstairs | so the agenda in the link is correct in scope, just not on the right wiki, i will resolve that after the meeting | 17:03 |
| scott-upstairs | okay, i won't bother reading the old business in the meeting | 17:03 |
| scott-upstairs | i will quickly explain the new development process for the ubuntu studio team | 17:04 |
| scott-upstairs | we will be actively involved with the release planning team this cycle | 17:04 |
| astraljava | #topic New development process | 17:04 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | Ubuntu Studio collaborator meeting Meeting | Current topic: New development process | ||
| scott-upstairs | we will collate a group of tasks we want into blueprints within launchpad | 17:04 |
| scott-upstairs | kate stewart, the release manager, will approve them as she sees fit | 17:04 |
| scott-upstairs | our progress will then be tracked on the status.ubuntu.com site | 17:05 |
| scott-upstairs | if anyone has questions how this works, please let me know outside the meeting | 17:05 |
| scott-upstairs | 17:05 | |
| astraljava | Sounds good, thanks. | 17:05 |
| scott-upstairs | this is good because it forces us to be organized | 17:05 |
| scott-upstairs | but it also holds us accountable as our progress (or lack of) will be extremely public | 17:06 |
| scott-upstairs | but this also gives us a forum for resolution if someone is blocking us this cycle | 17:06 |
| astraljava | That is true. | 17:06 |
| scott-upstairs | done | 17:06 |
| astraljava | Ok, any comments/questions regarding this topic? | 17:06 |
| stochastic | just want to say that I'd love a step-by-step e-mail to be sent to the dev list regarding the process if that's possible | 17:07 |
| stochastic | i.e. how do I get task x approved etc.. | 17:07 |
| stochastic | keep everyone in the loop | 17:07 |
| astraljava | Sure, we can work something out, right Scott? | 17:08 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, i can do that, but i should point out that this is something done only at the beginning of the cycle (i.e. getting blueprints approved) | 17:08 |
| stochastic | okay | 17:08 |
| scott-upstairs | i should probably also note this in a wiki somewhere, i'll work on that too | 17:08 |
| scott-upstairs | i'm good | 17:09 |
| astraljava | #action Scott document devel process in the wiki | 17:09 |
| meetingology | ACTION: Scott document devel process in the wiki | 17:09 |
| astraljava | #topic Release planning for Precise | 17:09 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | Ubuntu Studio collaborator meeting Meeting | Current topic: Release planning for Precise | ||
| scott-upstairs | has anyone NOT looked at the release planning wiki? | 17:09 |
| scott-upstairs | i don't want to over commit the team | 17:10 |
| scott-upstairs | hi shnatsel | 17:10 |
| shnatsel | hi scott-upstairs | 17:10 |
| scott-upstairs | so i wanted to make sure that people agree with what is preliminarily planned | 17:10 |
| stochastic | I like the scope of the release plan | 17:10 |
| scott-upstairs | thank you starcraftman | 17:11 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, | 17:11 |
| astraljava | Yeah it shouldn't be impossible. | 17:11 |
| scott-upstairs | sorry, starcraftman | 17:11 |
| scott-upstairs | shnatsel, any opinion on the scope of precise release planning https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/ReleasePlanning | 17:11 |
| scott-upstairs | i think most of the tasks already have people (mainly me) associated with them, so we will be asking people to commit as well | 17:12 |
| astraljava | We can't just do it now, as there's not many in here. | 17:12 |
| stochastic | I just wanted to briefly mention that I'd like to revisit the concept of putting a 'documentation' link on the desktop. | 17:12 |
| astraljava | So I suppose we will ask people to assign themselves due some time? | 17:13 |
| stochastic | This can fit under UI redesign and I'd be happy to help with that task in general | 17:13 |
| scott-upstairs | astraljava, i agree, we don't need to assign everything today, just getting the agreement on the scope was enough to move forward with the release team | 17:13 |
| astraljava | Ok. | 17:13 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, there are several items for "new users" i would like to address as well, but unless they are liminted in scope or studid-simple i was planning on deferring them to later | 17:14 |
| scott-upstairs | you can see them in the release planning page as well | 17:14 |
| shnatsel | scott-upstairs: I want more graphics apps. The doc is large, needs thinking. | 17:14 |
| scott-upstairs | starcraftman, look under precise+1 -> new user support | 17:14 |
| stochastic | quit it with the starcraftman | 17:14 |
| stochastic | I see thanks | 17:15 |
| shnatsel | scott-upstairs: popups tend to not work usually | 17:15 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, sorry again | 17:15 |
| shnatsel | scott-upstairs: they're too intrusive | 17:15 |
| scott-upstairs | shnatsel, that is just brainstorming, i expect others have better methods to accomplish the goals ;) | 17:15 |
| astraljava | Yes, agreed. | 17:15 |
| shnatsel | scott-upstairs: also, you'll need the support to be somewhat localized... and adding bookmarks to firefox doesn't work, I've tried that. | 17:15 |
| scott-upstairs | shnatsel, also, we can certainly explore more graphic applications | 17:15 |
| scott-upstairs | hi JonReagan | 17:16 |
| scott-upstairs | as long as everyone is okay with the scope of precise development then we can discuss the particulars later | 17:16 |
| stochastic | yup | 17:16 |
| JonReagan | hello Scott :) Sorry I'm a bit late | 17:16 |
| astraljava | Ok, anything else regarding this topic? | 17:16 |
| shnatsel | astraljava: yes | 17:17 |
| shnatsel | scott-upstairs: when are you going to introduce workflows in the installer instead of broad categories? 12.10? | 17:17 |
| astraljava | Go ahead. | 17:17 |
| scott-upstairs | shnatsel, that is the next topic actually ;) | 17:17 |
| scott-upstairs | but it will be this cycle | 17:17 |
| astraljava | Yes, thank you. :) | 17:17 |
| shnatsel | ah :D | 17:17 |
| shnatsel | great! | 17:17 |
| astraljava | #topic Updating seeds based on workflows | 17:17 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | Ubuntu Studio collaborator meeting Meeting | Current topic: Updating seeds based on workflows | ||
| shnatsel | scott-upstairs: why it's not in the planning doc then? | 17:18 |
| scott-upstairs | shnatsel, part of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/ReleasePlanning#live_dvd | 17:18 |
| scott-upstairs | i'll explain a bit for those not familiar | 17:18 |
| scott-upstairs | our goals is to do something similar to what tasksel did during the alternate installation where users could pick certain package sets to install or not install | 17:19 |
| scott-upstairs | however, going to the live dvd will will use a GUI method that edubuntu is currently using | 17:19 |
| scott-upstairs | and we will base this on work flows, instead of just broad categories | 17:19 |
| scott-upstairs | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntustudio/+spec/livedvd has more resources | 17:20 |
| scott-upstairs | 17:20 | |
| astraljava | Thanks. Comments/questions? | 17:20 |
| shnatsel | do we need the alternate image at all? | 17:20 |
| scott-upstairs | the exact work flows do not have to be decided this meeting but hopefully we can decide _which_ work flows we will support | 17:20 |
| JonReagan | Ah, workflows meaning packages that would pertain to what people want to do with their system? | 17:20 |
| scott-upstairs | if not the exact contents of each work flow | 17:21 |
| shnatsel | JonReagan: yes, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Workflows | 17:21 |
| scott-upstairs | shnatsel, i believe we should not make an alternate dvd | 17:21 |
| scott-upstairs | err, alternate image | 17:21 |
| shnatsel | I think so too | 17:21 |
| scott-upstairs | JonReagan, rather than make a large cache of audio applications we want to support a smaller, less intrusive package set based on a smaller granularity | 17:22 |
| scott-upstairs | we will targe what people actually want to accomplish | 17:22 |
| scott-upstairs | rather than a broad generalized term | 17:22 |
| JonReagan | gotcha, that makes a lot of sense | 17:22 |
| scott-upstairs | everyone can see what is listed for the work flows at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/ReleasePlanning#live_dvd | 17:23 |
| scott-upstairs | i'll send out an email to the list to solicit peoples opinions so we can make a decision next week | 17:23 |
| astraljava | I'll just have a comment on this; let's not get carried away and add too many of those. This is going to be supported for 3 years. | 17:23 |
| scott-upstairs | aye! very, very good point | 17:23 |
| shnatsel | astraljava: 5 years? | 17:23 |
| scott-upstairs | this LTS is supported for 5 years | 17:23 |
| astraljava | shnatsel: No, that's just server edition. | 17:23 |
| astraljava | Really? | 17:24 |
| astraljava | All of it? | 17:24 |
| scott-upstairs | astraljava, they have changed policy during uds | 17:24 |
| astraljava | Holy c**p. | 17:24 |
| scott-upstairs | they are trying to embrace corporations more | 17:24 |
| astraljava | I stand corrected. | 17:24 |
| scott-upstairs | we'll see where it goes and adjust later | 17:24 |
| astraljava | Even more so. | 17:24 |
| scott-upstairs | astraljava's point still remains, we should ease into this (even if it wasn't an LTS) | 17:25 |
| scott-upstairs | and we still have the opportunity to adjust next cycle if we want to add something | 17:25 |
| scott-upstairs | and backport back to precise if we feel something is worth it | 17:25 |
| astraljava | Yep, thanks. | 17:25 |
| scott-upstairs | so i am strongly suggesting we are cautious and prudent | 17:25 |
| scott-upstairs | any further comments or questions at this time? | 17:26 |
| shnatsel | now postponing workflows to 12.10 sounds like a good idea | 17:26 |
| scott-upstairs | astraljava, can you make the bot recognize i should email the list about work flows? | 17:26 |
| shnatsel | can we really develop and polish them in a cycle? | 17:26 |
| astraljava | #action Scott to email lists regarding work flows | 17:26 |
| meetingology | ACTION: Scott to email lists regarding work flows | 17:26 |
| scott-upstairs | shnatsel, do you really want to? i would think getting the process established now would be good | 17:26 |
| scott-upstairs | we can continue refining the work flows each cycle as needed then | 17:27 |
| astraljava | I agree, this one is going to be present for a long time. Better include it now. | 17:27 |
| shnatsel | I'm neutral on this. | 17:27 |
| scott-upstairs | as long as we can give at least the same functionality as we did with the alternate cd i don't see a downside at this point | 17:27 |
| stochastic | essentially the concept between selecting workflows and selecting a bunch of software bundles is the same, we just label and organize them slightly differently? | 17:27 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, from the user perspective, i would say yes | 17:28 |
| stochastic | okay, but we'd be re-arranging packaging from the dev perspective? | 17:28 |
| shnatsel | stochastic: from dev perspective also | 17:28 |
| shnatsel | stochastic: just requires much more fine-grained selection | 17:28 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, i would say yes again | 17:28 |
| astraljava | What does that mean exactly? | 17:29 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, but i would describe it more as we are re-arranging the package sets but not really the packaging | 17:29 |
| scott-upstairs | astraljava, which part are you asking about? | 17:30 |
| stochastic | well I think it is a do-able concept with very few modifications required. The largest problem will be selecting the ideal workflows to include - that's a big list. | 17:30 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, agreed! this is one reason to focus small on this set | 17:30 |
| astraljava | Re-arranging packaging from dev perspective? | 17:30 |
| scott-upstairs | also, not all work flows are a) complete or b) desired | 17:30 |
| scott-upstairs | we should consider if we feel a large group of users actually desire a work flow | 17:30 |
| stochastic | astraljava, we'd be heavily adjusting the content/labelling of the meta packages | 17:31 |
| astraljava | Ok. | 17:31 |
| scott-upstairs | any further comments or questions? | 17:32 |
| stochastic | yes, this is a task best handled by a committee I think | 17:32 |
| scott-upstairs | agreed! oh, i defintely agree! | 17:32 |
| stochastic | but done for 12.04 | 17:32 |
| JonReagan | +1 on that | 17:32 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, please keep in mind we only need to decide _which_ work flows soon, not just _what_ exactly is in each one | 17:33 |
| scott-upstairs | this may seem strange, but hear me out | 17:33 |
| scott-upstairs | i think we should look at what the users want to do | 17:33 |
| stochastic | yes, true | 17:33 |
| JonReagan | would this mean some sort of survey? | 17:33 |
| scott-upstairs | if we think we can support it, then we can consider it for inclusion | 17:33 |
| scott-upstairs | then later we can fine tune the contents of the ones we will support | 17:33 |
| scott-upstairs | obvsiously we WILL need to examine the contents first if we are not sure we can support it properly before deciding about inclusion | 17:34 |
| scott-upstairs | JonReagan, it could, but perhaps we should discuss that in the next meeting | 17:34 |
| scott-upstairs | i would be completely open to a meeting of anyone interested to discuss these things outside of this meeting | 17:35 |
| astraljava | #action Have a separate meeting for work flows discussion | 17:35 |
| meetingology | ACTION: Have a separate meeting for work flows discussion | 17:35 |
| scott-upstairs | who would be interested in such a meeting? | 17:35 |
| scott-upstairs | i would | 17:35 |
| astraljava | o/ | 17:35 |
| stochastic | aie | 17:35 |
| scott-upstairs | i'm sure holstein would be as well | 17:36 |
| JonReagan | I'd be interested for sure | 17:36 |
| scott-upstairs | good :) basically everyone | 17:36 |
| shnatsel | probably me too | 17:36 |
| scott-upstairs | i can send out an email to coordinate times then | 17:36 |
| scott-upstairs | is this a good time for almost everyone? earlier? later? | 17:36 |
| astraljava | We just don't have everyone here, so we'll throw some suggestions for times on the -devel channel and mailing list later? | 17:36 |
| astraljava | Ahh, one step ahead of me, sorry. | 17:37 |
| stochastic | good time, but depends on the week as to if this day is free for me | 17:37 |
| scott-upstairs | would someone else but me email the list for this purpose, i have enough tasks already | 17:37 |
| astraljava | Good time for me. | 17:37 |
| astraljava | I can do that. | 17:37 |
| JonReagan | sure, I could send out an email | 17:37 |
| astraljava | Oh okay, Jon, go ahead. | 17:37 |
| astraljava | Moving on? | 17:38 |
| scott-upstairs | is it okay if we move on? | 17:38 |
| scott-upstairs | hehe | 17:38 |
| * stochastic needs to be leaving soon | 17:38 | |
| astraljava | #topic Meeting schedule | 17:38 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | Ubuntu Studio collaborator meeting Meeting | Current topic: Meeting schedule | ||
| JonReagan | Alrighty then. What should be said? Need a meeting to discuss workflows, ask for which time works best on Sunday? | 17:38 |
| scott-upstairs | i have a few questions about making our meetings more effective | 17:38 |
| scott-upstairs | JonReagan, stochastic needs to leave, can you and i coordinate after this meeting? | 17:39 |
| JonReagan | absolutely | 17:39 |
| scott-upstairs | how often should we have meetings? | 17:39 |
| scott-upstairs | should we alternate times between meetings for our european friends? | 17:39 |
| stochastic | bi-weekly or weekly would be good for informal, monthly for formal team meeting? | 17:39 |
| scott-upstairs | should have stagger meetings with "informal" meetings in between? | 17:39 |
| astraljava | I'm good for weekly. | 17:40 |
| astraljava | Whatever the formality. | 17:40 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, would you suggest using a regular time for the "informal" meetings? | 17:40 |
| scott-upstairs | not asking you to actually suggest a time right now, just qualify if you think we _should_ use a regular time | 17:40 |
| stochastic | yes, a set hour where it's generally anticipated that people would be around | 17:40 |
| scott-upstairs | i have opinions but don't want to bias the group | 17:40 |
| shnatsel | bi-weekly preferred here (I'm ok with not attending half of meetings, though, and you're probably OK with me missing too) | 17:40 |
| scott-upstairs | lol shnatsel , you are important man! | 17:41 |
| scott-upstairs | but i understand as well | 17:41 |
| === emma is now known as Em | ||
| JonReagan | I'd be up for weekly meetings, we have an awful lot to do before the next release | 17:41 |
| astraljava | Agreed. | 17:41 |
| scott-upstairs | the general consensus i'm seeing is weekly meetings, but perhaps alternating "formal" and "informal"? | 17:41 |
| shnatsel | weekly will definitely make the dev process more lively. | 17:42 |
| scott-upstairs | both using an agreed time? | 17:42 |
| JonReagan | for predictability, I'd say yes | 17:42 |
| astraljava | Preferably, but subject to change if necessary. | 17:42 |
| JonReagan | agreed | 17:42 |
| stochastic | to explain 'formal' and 'informal' I think one would be in here, logged, with an agenda, the other, in -dev with minimal agenda | 17:43 |
| scott-upstairs | perhaps we alternate times between week#1 and week#3 for the "formal meeting" and the same for #2 and #4 for "informal"? | 17:43 |
| astraljava | Sounds good to me. | 17:43 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, +1 | 17:43 |
| scott-upstairs | okay, let's go with that and we can make changes as necessary as astraljava and stochastic are saying | 17:43 |
| scott-upstairs | any other comments or questions? | 17:44 |
| stochastic | I really feel formal will only be needed monthly, but that's just a minor technicality that can be adjusted later | 17:44 |
| astraljava | #action Move to bi-weekly formal and informal meetings alternating | 17:44 |
| meetingology | ACTION: Move to bi-weekly formal and informal meetings alternating | 17:44 |
| scott-upstairs | astraljava, what was that sign you suggested to let the chair know we are done with a topic? | 17:44 |
| scott-upstairs | was it '..' | 17:44 |
| scott-upstairs | i.e. | 17:44 |
| scott-upstairs | .. | 17:44 |
| astraljava | Yes, that would be good. | 17:44 |
| astraljava | And asking for voices with o/ while someone is talking? | 17:45 |
| astraljava | As in not interrupting the talk. | 17:45 |
| scott-upstairs | if we can use .. to help the chair know when to move to the next topic, that would help the meeting progress | 17:45 |
| scott-upstairs | okay, i didn't know that one :) | 17:45 |
| scott-upstairs | everyone okay moving to next topic? | 17:45 |
| astraljava | It helps to keep the talk coherent. | 17:45 |
| stochastic | yup | 17:45 |
| astraljava | #topic Other business | 17:46 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | Ubuntu Studio collaborator meeting Meeting | Current topic: Other business | ||
| scott-upstairs | i have no other business | 17:46 |
| astraljava | Me neither. | 17:46 |
| stochastic | I'd just like to say one brief thing | 17:46 |
| stochastic | In the coming days it'd be nice if the devs could ponder how much social interaction they'd feel comfortable with on the new website. | 17:47 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, would you be up to emailing the -dev list about this? | 17:47 |
| stochastic | yes | 17:47 |
| stochastic | will do | 17:48 |
| scott-upstairs | this would be a good forum to aggregate opinions i think | 17:48 |
| scott-upstairs | err, that would be | 17:48 |
| scott-upstairs | .. | 17:48 |
| stochastic | for now, ponder away, I'm on vacation for a couple days | 17:48 |
| scott-upstairs | enjoy your vacation :) | 17:48 |
| scott-upstairs | next topic? | 17:48 |
| astraljava | #topic Next meeting | 17:48 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | Ubuntu Studio collaborator meeting Meeting | Current topic: Next meeting | ||
| scott-upstairs | oi :) | 17:48 |
| scott-upstairs | okay, sounds like we will meet "formally" in two weeks | 17:49 |
| scott-upstairs | same bat channel, same bat time? (american joke) | 17:49 |
| stochastic | sure | 17:49 |
| astraljava | So according to the decision today, we shall meet formally here on 2011.11.20 1700 UTC | 17:49 |
| stochastic | I might not make that meeting | 17:49 |
| scott-upstairs | stochastic, should we reschedule the time? | 17:50 |
| scott-upstairs | move it ahead a day? | 17:50 |
| JonReagan | haha, that would work for me. you mentioned earlier perhaps finding a time that would work for both europe and in the US? | 17:50 |
| astraljava | And informally on #ubuntustudio-devel on 2011.11.13 1700 UTC, unless otherwise signalled. | 17:50 |
| scott-upstairs | JonReagan, yes! good point | 17:50 |
| scott-upstairs | should the next "formal" meeting be euro friendly? | 17:50 |
| stochastic | scott-upstairs, no need to move it, just uncertain schedule at this point | 17:50 |
| scott-upstairs | perhaps move ahead 12 hours? | 17:51 |
| scott-upstairs | shnatsel, JonReagan, any suggestions? | 17:51 |
| * scott-upstairs is presuming that JonReagan is in a european time zone | 17:51 | |
| astraljava | That's gonna be 5 am. for me. Well, I can work it out. | 17:51 |
| JonReagan | lol nope, I'm EST | 17:51 |
| shnatsel | I'm GMT+4 | 17:51 |
| scott-upstairs | shnatsel, do you have a preference what we should do for the next meeting in two weeks? | 17:52 |
| stochastic | either case would be fine for me 9am or 9pm | 17:52 |
| stochastic | I like the idea of alternating, but I'm not sure how successful it will be :) | 17:53 |
| astraljava | Let's have a voting on this later. | 17:53 |
| astraljava | So we can wrap up here. | 17:53 |
| shnatsel | scott-upstairs: last time I checked there was only one time that fits both european and american useras | 17:53 |
| shnatsel | users | 17:53 |
| shnatsel | I've found one, let me look it up... | 17:53 |
| shnatsel | Asia is out ofc | 17:54 |
| * stochastic is out for now. Will read the rest in meeting minutes | 17:54 | |
| stochastic | goodbye | 17:54 |
| astraljava | Bye. | 17:54 |
| scott-upstairs | bye stochastic ,enjoy the vacation :) | 17:54 |
| scott-upstairs | i actually need to go as well, JonReagan can you email me about what we were going to work on together or catch me later this afternoon in IRC? | 17:55 |
| scott-upstairs | poof | 17:55 |
| astraljava | #action Decide alternating meeting times on channel/mailing list later | 17:56 |
| meetingology | ACTION: Decide alternating meeting times on channel/mailing list later | 17:56 |
| astraljava | #endmeeting | 17:56 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | ||
| meetingology | Meeting ended Sun Nov 6 17:56:27 2011 UTC. | 17:56 |
| meetingology | Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2011/ubuntu-meeting.2011-11-06-17.00.moin.txt | 17:56 |
| astraljava | Thanks everybody! | 17:56 |
| JonReagan | Great meeting, talk to you all later! | 17:57 |
| === jason is now known as Guest3984 | ||
| === Guest3984 is now known as jasef | ||
| starcraftman | Too many S names in this channel! hehe :) | 18:01 |
| texaswriter | more a names | 20:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!