[07:22] genjix: I'm keeping a library like that (C++, no formal releases or stable ABI committments) in Debian experimental for now. [07:43] * siretart has such a library in stable :-) [07:44] granted, I don't build the shared object at all and ship a static library only. [07:46] I'll get it out of experimental if/when anyone wants to link to it in another package... [07:47] tumbleweed: why not shipping headers and .a file only? [07:54] siretart: I am, but that's not what I want to do long-term, and there are no reverse-build-deps yet [09:14] tumbleweed: same aplies to aspectc++ (the library is libpuma-dev, a C/C++ parser and manipulation engine) [10:53] tumbleweed: aha great [10:54] how does it work? would i need a debian system? [12:44] genjix: conceptually, rather similar to a PPA. one big ppa shared by all debian developers [12:47] ok nicw [12:47] nice [12:55] tumbleweed: got your memo. Problem with popcon.u.c is that it hasn't updated its data for about a month === yofel_ is now known as yofel [13:10] it seems there is a problem with launchpad? [13:10] when i upload a new package i keep getting: [13:10] Uploading libbitcoin_0~git20111105-1_source.changes: 2k/3k550 Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ['General error', 'General error', 'General error'] : Permission denied. [13:10] but then an email arrives saying it's been accepted. [13:11] ohh nvm. it was rejected for being older [13:11] libbitcoin_0~git20111105-1.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 0~git20111105-1 <= 0~gitfaf47bg-1 [13:11] damn [13:12] jcfp: :/ [13:13] genjix: git commit hashes don't increase :) [13:13] well, they aren't guaranteed to [13:13] yeah, but someone told me yesterday i shouldn't be using hashes [13:13] so i switched above to a date [13:14] i deleted the package and now it won't let me upload this new version. [13:14] deleting packages won't allow you to use lower version numbers [13:14] launchpad remembers everything [13:15] what can i do then? [13:16] delete me PPA and recreate it? [13:17] no, launchpad remembers evenrything [13:17] tumbleweed: can you look at my gedit merge proposal? [13:18] or it can taken care only for -desktop team member? [13:18] genjix: how about 0~git+20111105-1 ? [13:21] ok [13:32] weird, I get some blog when I visit http://pool.sks-keyservers.net/ === emma is now known as Em [18:34] lintian site generation has made it to q! :) [19:02] hiiii! [19:03] :) [19:38] Hi all [19:39] Someone could help me with sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname ? [19:41] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname.html [19:42] I know it, I would like know how to fix it :) [19:42] consider that my rules is "$@" [19:42] its something the upstream software must do [19:43] mmm... upstream is not so open at speech [19:43] have you read this: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html [19:43] library packaging needs much care [19:44] ok, I'm going to read it... [19:59] i'm trying to get python-rbtools updated to the latest release for 12.04 since i'd like to move our company over from fedora to ubuntu and we're using a newer rbtools [19:59] i've opened a ticket, made a branch with the fix [19:59] added the sponsor list to the ticket [19:59] is there anything else i need to do? [20:11] blair: just wait, many devs are on their way back home from UDS so it might take a few days till someone can review/sponsor it [20:13] geser, thanks. is there a process to get commit rights after a while? [20:16] blair: yes, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#Per-package_Uploaders [20:16] highvoltage: not all keyservers run on port 80 [20:17] 11371 is the port you want === kloeri_ is now known as kloeri