=== dpm is now known as dpm-lunch [12:37] kelemengabor: hey [12:38] good morning TLE [12:38] I forgot again, do you remember which packages it was, whose docs were left out in the original docs-translation package, that the latest update was supposed to fix? [12:40] kelemengabor: actually, maybe I'll ask mdke to put a note about on the testing page [12:41] mdke: hey, I was wondering, for this language pack update, where there is still a few days left, would you include a note on the testing page, about which programs it was where the translation of the manuals were left out entirely [12:41] IIRC, ubuntu-docs, deja-dup, aisleriot and maybe one more I can't recall [12:42] and ubuntu-docs was working before, due to a packaging hack, but it should (and does) work now without that packaging hack [12:43] kelemengabor: ah yes, thank you [12:43] yw [12:43] just finished my testing then, have you done it for your language, or delegated it ;) [12:45] well, I have used it since a few days, but had no time to record it on the wiki [12:56] Everyone, we NEED more language packs tested for this release, so please try and mobilize people from your translation tems or LoCo's and get to it [12:56] The procedure is described here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Translations/LanguagePackUpdatesQA [15:21] TLE, good work with spreading the word. I need to test my langpacks as well. I wonder if the should expand the call to the Ubuntu testing list as well (I'd have to find out if there's one first) === dpm-lunch is now known as dpm [15:22] oops, lunch was over hours ago [15:22] nice long lunch, eh? [15:23] :) [15:23] yeah, that would maybe be a good idea, the question is whether we think that all language pack testing should go via the translation teams, so that they should forward to appropriate lists themselves [15:23] or [15:24] if we should simply say that when we send out the call for testing of the -testing list (if exists) that people that want to test should contact their translations teams first [15:24] TLE, I'd be proactive and CC both [15:24] or [15:25] if we simply don't care and think that anyone should be able to test them [15:25] both? [15:25] brb [15:26] it goes out to ubuntu-translators and we are talking about -testing, is there another? [15:26] dpm: om [15:26] ok [15:32] back [15:33] So I'd say everyone should be able to test the langpacks. The instructions are easy to follow by everyone [15:35] In order to spread the word, we could (I'm thinking aloud here): send the e-mail to ubuntu-translators, plus ubuntu-testing (if that's the one), plus loco-contacts plus the translations portal (once it's syndicated to Planet Ubuntu) [15:49] dpm: Yeah, well at least the two first one and the last one I agree with, but maybe we should discuss it in the list, in any case, it is a bit late to forward to everybody now [15:50] but if you are already on the testing list, would you forward the current call for testing, since we really need more languages to step up [15:57] TLE, I'm not on the list, but I'll take care of it. [16:01] dpm: nice, thanks, I have to go now, see you [16:02] TLE, thanks so much for doing the announcements and handling all the rest of langpack updates! [16:03] no problem, I'll send out an email tomorrow to the list where we can discuss how widely we should advertice, and then I can subscribe to the appropriate mailing lists [16:04] the translation-coordinators list that is [18:51] dpm hey… have you spoken to that guy? :P [18:52] hi Jessica_Lily, no sorry :(, I was quite busy at UDS, and didn't have the chance to talk about new language codes [18:53] ah okay, no problem [19:14] I'm trying to get a diff between two large po files that only differ in a few translations, but somehow diff can seem to find any similar lines [19:15] it shows all lines from file1 as deleted, and all from file2 as added. Has anyone had this problem befor, or know where I can find a solution? [19:51] solved, it appears something went wrong with the spaces in the document. Running diff -b works