[01:13] wtf oracle branding solaris 11 as the first cloud os.. [01:13] crack marketing.. cloud this, cloud that [01:30] cloud linux.. http://bellard.org/jslinux/ ;-) [01:32] hahaha [12:47] g'morning [13:04] hazmat: yo [13:08] greetings rog [14:04] hazmat, should we now be marking bugs "fix committed" rather than "fix released"? [14:04] fwereade, good question [14:04] hazmat, heh :) [14:05] fwereade, i'm unsure.. it probably does make sense, but such usage would mean realigning milestones to releases [14:05] hazmat, and plausibly tweaking the kanban board [14:06] fwereade, i was thinking we could have a team meeting today to try and catch up post sprint and that could be a topic of discussion [14:06] fwereade, i'm already on that one ;-) [14:06] hazmat, ah, cool :) [14:06] fwereade, although its more just a new dyanmic readonly lp frontend for juju.. its turning out to be significantly more work than the charm browser [14:06] hazmat, sounds good, I can be around this evening [14:07] hazmat, heh :) [14:07] fwereade, great [14:07] silly pure rest api [14:15] * niemeyer waves [14:15] I've pointed out I'd be late today earlier, now I noticed I was disconnected.. duh [14:19] niemeyer, greetings [14:19] * hazmat ponders puppet === chuck__ is now known as zul [14:38] fwereade, is 6pm local okay for you re meeting? [14:55] hazmat, sure [15:11] hazmat, you marked https://code.launchpad.net/~fwereade/juju/visible-instance-state/+merge/79215 as "needs fixing" a while ago [15:11] hazmat, did I address your concerns? [15:21] fwereade, i'll take a look again in a few, i think so.. i backed away from shared state vocabulary [15:22] * hazmat feels like its been all email and reviews the last few days, the code itch builds [15:34] hazmat, fwereade, team meeting sounds like a good idea today [15:52] * SpamapS imagines a little code-hungry bug inside hazmat chewing on the base of his spine [16:00] fwereade: Is visible-instance-state touching the format of the status output? [16:10] hey juju-istas :) [16:10] if I wanted to poke/signal a service (e.g. force a manual reload), whats the best way to to it? config-changed and a dummy config value? [16:15] bloodearnest: right now yes, though I'm thinking there needs to be a "refresh everything" command [16:16] SpamapS: kthx. I think a generic "signal" and "handle-signal" or hook (or similar) would be nice [16:17] bloodearnest: custom hooks have been discussed as well [16:17] SpamapS: cool. I'll go with config-changed for now. Is there any way to get what the old config value was for a particular field? [16:19] bloodearnest: no, I think there's an open bug for that [16:19] SpamapS: kthx [16:32] bloodearnest, if you want the old value the hook should store it [16:32] and diff to the new [16:33] hazmat: of course - I will do that :) [16:38] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/84857743/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.juju_0.5%2Bbzr413-1juju1%7Eprecise1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [16:40] looks like juju is broken on precise.. fine on oneiric and natty [16:49] SpamapS, it looks like a conflict between builtin argparse vs a packaged argparse [16:50] odd that it only shows up only those on tests, but i guess those tests stuff the python path and launch a process [16:57] hazmat: they had updated some strings in the last update of argparse breaking tests as well [16:58] bcsaller, doesn't look like the issue here however [17:00] (simply some sort of conflict on the python-argparse package for one of our dependent packages, vs the argparse we use anyway) [17:08] hazmat, meeting time? [17:08] fwereade, indeed [17:09] niemeyer, jimbaker, bcsaller, SpamapS ... meeting time.. anyone else? [17:09] t+10 [17:09] hazmat, niemeyer, sounds good [17:10] rog is also waiting, and i'm sure fwereade is interested [17:11] invites out [17:12] its giving me a little trouble connecting, trying again [17:13] bcsaller, sending a new invite.. [17:14] might be faster to just relog, the camera and so on doesn't seem to be working [17:14] bcsaller, it was sort of like you joined and immediately dropped [17:14] SpamapS, robbiew invites out to you guys as well if your interested [17:16] http://www.reviewboard.org/ [17:21] hazmat: "I'm not supposed to be here today" ;) [17:21] maybe plan the next meeting more than 24 hours in advance? ;) [17:22] things are in a surprisingly horrible state of decay here [17:22] trying to fix [17:31] bcsaller, perhaps try a different browser [17:32] hazmat: its far worse than that that at this point, anything with GL won't run now, so unity borked. I tried 2d, etc, its not working at all, I have an empty desktop here, but am still trying to connect again [17:33] I think its crashing the googletalk plugin too though [17:34] everything was fine yesterday, I so don't need this [17:35] bcsaller, did a reboot help? sounds like a driver problem [17:36] no, it didn't [17:36] going to see if I can load an older kernel [17:37] SpamapS, sounds good [18:35] 1) The requirement is to put things in the same container [18:35] 2) We use relations so the admin doesn't need a different mental model to create slaves [18:35] 3) We introduced the idea of juju-info relation so that we don't need the strange idea of promiscuous relations [18:35] (copied here so I have in logs.. this is the shortest explanation I could come up with, so want to save.. ;) [18:38] cheers all, later [18:44] failure [18:45] hazmat: re-invited [19:04] bcsaller, thanks [19:54] hazmat: wtf seems to be fine, btw [20:07] * niemeyer steps out for a while [20:21] greetings everyone, I'm trying to setup juju using the local/lxc environment, and I'm getting errors when I try to deploy a charm [20:23] nuclearbob: what error are you getting? [20:23] evan_: if I try to deploy the wordpress charm, I get: [20:23] max@WOPR:~$ juju deploy --repository=charms wordpress [20:23] User timeout caused connection failure. [20:23] 2011-11-10 15:20:22,539 ERROR User timeout caused connection failure. [20:25] Do you have the charms on your local machine? [20:26] i.e. I have my charms in a directory called "lucid" so when I deploy - juju deploy --repository . local:lucid/charmname [20:27] I've got them in /home/max/charms [20:28] do I need them in oneiric/charms since I'm on oneiric? [20:30] nuclearbob: juju deploy --repository . local:path/to/charm should work if i'm not mistaken [20:31] evan_: now I'm getting a connection refused, I may have goofed something up, I'll see if I can fix it [20:35] nuclearbob: If the bootstrapping node has not yet completed bootstrapping it could cause this error, ok. [20:35] evan_: I wasn't getting that error before, but I just started after I had been messing with things [20:35] evan_: I can try running the bootstrap again [20:36] evan_: it says I'm already bootstrapped [20:37] nuclearbob: what does it say when you run "juju status" [20:37] evan_: max@WOPR:~$ juju status [20:37] could not connect before timeout [20:37] 2011-11-10 15:37:42,353 ERROR could not connect before timeout [20:39] nuclearbob: Indication the environment needs more time to complete initialization [20:39] nuclearbob: more here https://juju.ubuntu.com/docs/user-tutorial.html [20:40] evan_: thanks, I'll take a look at that [20:40] nuclearbob: you bet [21:32] niemeyer: hi. sorry I couldn't show up so far, it was a crazy week. I'll probably collapse to bed soon, but starting from tomorrow I'll be a lot more available to talk. [21:37] evan_: are you still around? [21:40] nuclearbob: yea, did you get it figured out? [21:41] eavn_: I got the latest version from the ppa, rebooted, ran juju bootstrap (it said it was already bootstrapped) and gave it about a half an hour, but it's still getting timeouts [21:44] I sysadmin the servers at my company, around a dozen servers, with heterogenous hardware configs, all running various versions of ubuntu server. What I wanted to build, before I found juju, was a tool that would orchestrate application-level services and their dependencies. Juju seems to fit the bill nicely, except, rather than targeting EC2, or even a private cloud, I'd rather target my own bare-metal servers, with the applicat [21:45] I saw where recently the ability to deploy to containers was added, I'm just wondering if there's any explicit push toward supporting that for production deployment? The mailing list message I saw on it seemed slanted towards development/debugging usage. [21:55] nuclearbob: hmmm I am unsure of why it would be doing that. Maybe someone else here would know [21:56] evan_: thanks for pointing me at the tutorial as well, I've got another machine to set it up on, and maybe I can avoid mistakes I might have made on this one [21:57] nuclearbob: no problem. I am fairly new so I'm learning as well. Best of luck to you. Let me know if you figure out the problem