| wgrant | tumbleweed: Not quite. Things were different in those days. | 01:32 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | tumbleweed: Security updates ere done by handing a source to the security team, who uploaded it to a dak instance, built everything there, then uploaded source+binaries to LP. So most secuirity uploads from back then probably have oddly named changes files :/ | 01:33 |
| broder | tumbleweed: requestbackport is looking awesome. i just ran through all the list of pending-but-approved backports and it came up with the right information for all of them | 03:17 |
| broder | remaining issues: (a) it looks like it's including reverse-suggests. i don't expect people to test recommends or suggests, so those should be ignorable | 03:18 |
| broder | (b) now that we have the checklist, the only other testing that needs to be documented is b/i/r for the package itself...which we could probably do by adding entries to the checklist itself | 03:19 |
| broder | and then we can probably drop the "Testing performed" section entirely | 03:19 |
| broder | tumbleweed: hmm, possibly (c) if the user specifies a non-existent source package, check to see if it's a binary package name before bailing (and adjust appropriately) | 03:25 |
| tumbleweed | wgrant: suprised I haven't run into more of them, then. I'm scraping all upload history, for udd.debian.org | 08:03 |
| wgrant | tumbleweed: Interesting. Perhaps they sometimes were _source.changes despite containing binaries. | 08:12 |
| tumbleweed | oh, I just checked my logs. Yes, there were many | 08:14 |
| tumbleweed | the practice seems to have started around dapper | 08:14 |
| tumbleweed | Laney: um, that's a problem, I guess we need to survive without them | 08:15 |
| tumbleweed | oh, right, we are. nm | 08:15 |
| tumbleweed | broder: I didn't filter suggests, enhances, etc, because I thought they were worth mentioning. Should I mention them, but not as checklist items, or add a sentance to the instructions saying they can be ignored? | 08:29 |
| tumbleweed | I can't see enough information in the LP API, to locate the source package that built a binary, but we can ask apt | 08:38 |
| === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 | ||
| tumbleweed | broder: how's that? (r1223) | 09:23 |
| Laney | morning | 10:18 |
| l3on | Hi all... I'm trying to use requestsync but I've some problem :/ | 11:12 |
| tumbleweed | Laney: what is it? | 11:12 |
| tumbleweed | err l3on | 11:12 |
| l3on | Please edit the report and give an explanation. | 11:12 |
| l3on | Not saving the report file will abort the request. | 11:12 |
| tumbleweed | Laney, broder: happy with requestbackport ? | 11:12 |
| l3on | what is a report exactly? | 11:12 |
| l3on | I mean.. which kind of info I've to report there ? And, is there an example somewhere? | 11:13 |
| tumbleweed | l3on: requestsync is going to file a bug report. The report is the bug report that it'll file | 11:13 |
| tumbleweed | l3on: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess | 11:13 |
| l3on | I'm reading it.. | 11:14 |
| l3on | What I understand is: | 11:14 |
| l3on | 1. You can use LP web iterface or reqeustsync | 11:14 |
| l3on | if you want use requestsync use command in this way: | 11:14 |
| l3on | blabla blalba blala | 11:14 |
| l3on | So.. what's wrong? :) | 11:14 |
| tumbleweed | are you saying you can't read the wiki page because it's too long? | 11:15 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, maybe | 11:15 |
| Laney | manage-credentials?! | 11:15 |
| tumbleweed | Laney: that may still be necessary on lucid... | 11:15 |
| Laney | tumbleweed: haven't tried it, sorry | 11:16 |
| tumbleweed | Laney: why do you think I'm prodding you :) | 11:16 |
| tumbleweed | l3on: "Content of a sync request" answers the first question you asked | 11:17 |
| tumbleweed | how about you tell us what you are trying to file a sync request for? | 11:17 |
| l3on | apt-cacher | 11:17 |
| l3on | and thanks for input :) | 11:18 |
| tumbleweed | so, we currently have an ubuntu-delta for apt-cacher | 11:18 |
| l3on | what do you mean with ubuntu-delta ? | 11:18 |
| tumbleweed | we've changed it in Ubuntu | 11:19 |
| tumbleweed | the current version is 1.6.12ubuntu1. The "ubuntu" means it's been modified | 11:19 |
| l3on | I know the basic tumbleweed :) | 11:19 |
| tumbleweed | The last upload was a merge, so the current state of the delta should be summarised in the changelog https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-cacher/1.6.12ubuntu1 | 11:19 |
| l3on | Changes are now in debian | 11:20 |
| tumbleweed | fantastic, thesn please file a sync request and say so :) | 11:20 |
| tumbleweed | requestsync --lp apt-cacher | 11:20 |
| l3on | but I'm not sure about a file "apt-cacher2" that's in 1.6.12-1ubuntu1 but not in new version 1.7.1 | 11:20 |
| tumbleweed | looks like apt-cacher2 moved to apt-cacher, and doesn't include the changes we have to apt-cacher2 | 11:27 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, mmm | 11:33 |
| l3on | sure? | 11:33 |
| l3on | I see a NEWS somewhere... | 11:33 |
| l3on | line 89 | 11:34 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, in debian changelog I can read: | 11:40 |
| l3on | * Add changelog and NEWS.Debian to installer_files_regexp | 11:41 |
| tumbleweed | ah, right, yes, I think that covers it | 11:44 |
| l3on | Ok I proceed :) | 11:44 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, maype there's a lack on debug symbol package | 11:50 |
| tumbleweed | ah, yes. You'll need to do a merge. And please pass that patch to the debian maintainer | 11:52 |
| tumbleweed | no | 11:52 |
| tumbleweed | package_files_regexp includes ddeb | 11:52 |
| l3on | yes you're right | 11:52 |
| l3on | d|deb | 11:52 |
| tumbleweed | (u|d)?deb | 11:53 |
| l3on | yep :) | 11:53 |
| broder | tumbleweed: sorry, we hit my too-tired-to-be-useful point about 2 hours ago. i'll take another look after catching some shuteye | 12:00 |
| tumbleweed | broder: err yes, why are you awake? | 12:01 |
| broder | not really sure :) | 12:01 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, thanks for help... sync reported :) | 12:01 |
| tumbleweed | l3on: seeing as I've already reviewed it, I'll sponsor it | 12:02 |
| l3on | thanks again :D | 12:02 |
| l3on | bug 889448 | 12:02 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 889448 in apt-cacher (Ubuntu) "Sync apt-cacher 1.7.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889448 | 12:02 |
| tumbleweed | there are a fair number of open bugs for it in LP. Do you think any of them are fixed by the new version? | 12:03 |
| l3on | let me see | 12:04 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, this 83987 is fixed in debian | 12:07 |
| l3on | bug 83987 | 12:07 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 83987 in apt-cacher (Ubuntu) "apt-cacher doesn't know about Translation-[lang].bz2 files" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/83987 | 12:07 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, this bug 219095 is fixed | 12:09 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 219095 in apt-cacher (Ubuntu) "apt-cacher: keep getting 400 No Request Recieved" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/219095 | 12:09 |
| tumbleweed | neither of those were explicitly closed in the debian changelog (only the debian versions of the bugs) | 12:10 |
| tumbleweed | Can you make a comment in the sync request bug, with the list of bugs to close, when it's synced? | 12:10 |
| l3on | of course! | 12:10 |
| tumbleweed | great, then we can close them, then | 12:11 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, It's right: | 12:12 |
| l3on | According to debian bug system, these bug could be closed because fixed in debian: | 12:12 |
| l3on | * https://launchpad.net/bugs/83987 | 12:12 |
| l3on | * https://launchpad.net/bugs/219095 | 12:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 83987 in apt-cacher (Ubuntu) "apt-cacher doesn't know about Translation-[lang].bz2 files" [Medium,Confirmed] | 12:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 219095 in apt-cacher (Ubuntu) "apt-cacher: keep getting 400 No Request Recieved" [Low,Confirmed] | 12:12 |
| l3on | or more info is needed ? | 12:13 |
| tumbleweed | sounds fine | 12:14 |
| l3on | comment filed :) | 12:16 |
| tumbleweed | thanks. Hopefully I'll remember to close them when the sync is processed. | 12:18 |
| l3on | wait | 12:18 |
| l3on | :) | 12:18 |
| l3on | there's another bug :P | 12:18 |
| l3on | bug 366293 | 12:19 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 366293 in apt-cacher (Ubuntu) "Non-existent i18n files lead to needless server failover" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/366293 | 12:19 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| l3on | Someone knows why "LDFLAGS += -Wl,--no-as-needed" should be important in debian/rules? :) | 16:29 |
| jtaylor | it shouldn't | 16:30 |
| jtaylor | you only need that in very rare cases | 16:30 |
| l3on | I'm trying merge gnome-phone-manager | 16:30 |
| l3on | and it does it | 16:30 |
| jtaylor | its better to fix the build to work with as-needed | 16:31 |
| l3on | It's the only change, others are now in Debian, and I don't know if I've to request a sync or not | 16:31 |
| jtaylor | does it build in ubuntu? | 16:31 |
| l3on | this is the build without any changes: | 16:31 |
| l3on | http://debomatic.debian.net/precise/pool/gnome-phone-manager_0.68-1ubuntu1/gnome-phone-manager_0.68-1ubuntu1.buildlog | 16:31 |
| l3on | of course! | 16:31 |
| jtaylor | and are all plugins fully linked? | 16:31 |
| jtaylor | aka does it run | 16:32 |
| l3on | Let me try :) | 16:32 |
| jtaylor | do a build without that flag and check dpkg-shlibdeps | 16:33 |
| l3on | The build I showed you is without that flag | 16:33 |
| jtaylor | seems fine then | 16:34 |
| jtaylor | to be sure check ldd -r of all shared libraries | 16:34 |
| jtaylor | if thats ok it can be synced | 16:34 |
| l3on | I can't install it damn it | 16:35 |
| l3on | because I'm on oneric right now | 16:36 |
| l3on | jtaylor, some suggestions ? :) | 16:37 |
| jtaylor | why can't you install it in oneiric? | 16:39 |
| l3on | depends on | 16:39 |
| l3on | gnome-phone-manager depends on libebook1.2-12 (>= 3.2.1); however: | 16:39 |
| l3on | Version of libebook1.2-12 on system is 3.2.0-0ubuntu1. | 16:39 |
| l3on | gnome-phone-manager depends on libedataserver1.2-15 (>= 3.2.1); however: | 16:39 |
| l3on | Version of libedataserver1.2-15 on system is 3.2.0-0ubuntu1. | 16:39 |
| jtaylor | did youbuild it for oneiric? | 16:39 |
| l3on | no precise | 16:40 |
| jtaylor | if it isn't installable in precise - no sync | 16:40 |
| jtaylor | to test you can build in oneiric | 16:40 |
| jtaylor | so far I know there are no toolchain differences that are relevant | 16:40 |
| tumbleweed | but ifyou are going to be doing any reasonable amounts of work on Ubuntu, you probably want to set up local chroots / pbuilder, so that you can test things like that | 16:41 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, I know ... I'll do it :) | 16:41 |
| l3on | jtaylor, bug 889563 | 17:21 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 889563 in gnome-phone-manager (Ubuntu) "Sync gnome-phone-manager 0.68-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889563 | 17:21 |
| === Guest7778 is now known as JackyAlcine | ||
| l3on | Hi all, I'm receving this error during merge cdebootstrap | 21:43 |
| l3on | error: ignoring return value of 'fgets', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result] | 21:44 |
| l3on | And in debian/rules I have: | 21:44 |
| l3on | CFLAGS_DEB = -Wall -W -Werror -ggdb | 21:44 |
| l3on | What's the best way to fix it? | 21:44 |
| l3on | remove -Werror or control fgets return value ? | 21:44 |
| tumbleweed | well, it's a bug. It should be fixed upstream by checking the return value, and appropriately handling error situations | 21:46 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, and for now what you suggest to do ? | 21:47 |
| tumbleweed | if it doesn't look particularly dangerous, then -Wno-error=unused-result may be the easiest solution for Ubuntu | 21:47 |
| l3on | ok, i'll try :) | 21:47 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, take a look at this: | 21:48 |
| l3on | CFLAGS_DEB = -Wall -W -Werror -ggdb | 21:48 |
| l3on | CFLAGS_STATIC = -Wall -W -Werror | 21:48 |
| l3on | CFLAGS_UDEB = -Wall -W -Werror | 21:48 |
| l3on | I've just to edit CFLAGS_DEB ? | 21:48 |
| tumbleweed | I assume those apply to the three binary packages it builds | 21:48 |
| tumbleweed | so probably all of them | 21:48 |
| l3on | ok, thanks.. I'll try :) | 21:49 |
| tumbleweed | you probably want to add support for precise while you're there | 21:50 |
| tumbleweed | did you notice bug 884185? | 21:51 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 884185 in cdebootstrap (Ubuntu) "Please merge cdebootstrap 0.5.8 (universe) from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/884185 | 21:51 |
| l3on | I knwo and I did :) | 21:51 |
| l3on | oh wow! But it's not reported in m.u.com/universe ! | 21:51 |
| l3on | well :) | 21:51 |
| tumbleweed | that was two weeks ago | 21:52 |
| tumbleweed | dupondje: still working on it? | 21:52 |
| tumbleweed | the previous uploader is considered responsible for merging into the next release, and it's a good idea to ask before starting a merge. But if you don't, the worst you can do is waste your time | 21:53 |
| tumbleweed | *before starting someone else's merge | 21:53 |
| tumbleweed | btw, if you are looking for packages that are most in need of merging: http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/oldmerges/ and http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/bugs/rcbugs/precise/ | 21:55 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, thanks! :) | 21:55 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, well... learn me to use that websites :) | 21:57 |
| l3on | ops.. s/learn/teach/ :) | 21:58 |
| tumbleweed | which one? | 21:58 |
| l3on | The oldmerges are merges older than 90 days, it's clear :) | 21:59 |
| l3on | so I can take one of these without carry about last uploader | 21:59 |
| l3on | but.. second one? | 21:59 |
| tumbleweed | right, of course some of the onse at the top of oldmerges are rather hard / not actually mergeable | 21:59 |
| tumbleweed | but many others are just neglected | 22:00 |
| tumbleweed | The rcbugs page lists packages that have had RC (release critical) bugs fixed in Debian, but we haven't got those fixed versions yet | 22:00 |
| l3on | and I can take it without contact old uploader ? | 22:01 |
| tumbleweed | the bug fixed may not affect Ubuntu, but they're a good way to find easy improvements for ubuntu | 22:01 |
| l3on | well cdeboostrab now builds :) | 22:02 |
| tumbleweed | contacting the old uploader is never a bad idea, but nothing requires you to | 22:02 |
| tumbleweed | you can also look a tthe upload history, to get afeeling for how much someone cares about a package | 22:02 |
| dupondje | hi ! | 22:03 |
| dupondje | started with cdebootstap, but did some bugreporting in debian first | 22:04 |
| dupondje | to get it fixed there | 22:04 |
| dupondje | l3on: its indeed build with -Wno-error atm | 22:06 |
| dupondje | thats quite fine, but they should fix it upstream also, anyway :) | 22:06 |
| dupondje | also add Precise to dists | 22:07 |
| dupondje | and your fine | 22:07 |
| dupondje | feel free to upload the merge | 22:07 |
| l3on | Ok :) | 22:07 |
| l3on | I edited how tumbleweed suggested | 22:07 |
| l3on | and it builds | 22:07 |
| dupondje | well its currently also build with additional options for those build errors | 22:08 |
| l3on | I've to contact upstream ? | 22:08 |
| dupondje | you could, I already asked them to add oneiric & precise | 22:10 |
| dupondje | not the build errors yes | 22:10 |
| dupondje | Also you need to check if NO_PKG_MANGLE is still needed | 22:10 |
| tumbleweed | l3on: we like to push everything upstream whenever possible. Maintaining deltas (differences) in Ubuntu is painful (it requires merging, and we can't keep up with all the merges) | 22:10 |
| l3on | dupondje, how can I do it ? | 22:11 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, thanks :) | 22:11 |
| dupondje | l3on: well there is where I got stuck ... :D | 22:12 |
| l3on | lol | 22:12 |
| l3on | here the buildlog: http://debomatic.debian.net/oneiric/pool/cdebootstrap_0.5.8ubuntu1/cdebootstrap_0.5.8ubuntu1.buildlog | 22:12 |
| tumbleweed | l3on: you should be building for precise, not oneiric | 22:12 |
| tumbleweed | also, that's the failed build | 22:12 |
| l3on | gosh.. sorry, wrong url | 22:12 |
| l3on | http://debomatic.debian.net/precise/pool/cdebootstrap_0.5.8ubuntu1/cdebootstrap_0.5.8ubuntu1.buildlog | 22:13 |
| l3on | :) | 22:13 |
| tumbleweed | so, you want to know if NO_PKG_MANGLE is still needed | 22:15 |
| tumbleweed | if you read the ubuntu changelog, you can see why it was added | 22:15 |
| l3on | I would know what is NO_PKG_MANGLE and I'm googling it :) | 22:15 |
| tumbleweed | hrm, don't know if that's well documented anywhere | 22:16 |
| tumbleweed | we have a package called pkgbinarymangler, that we install in our build chroots (although debomatic doesn't appear to have it. DktrKranz?) | 22:16 |
| tumbleweed | it allows us to mangle the packages a little during the build, for the things that we do differently to debian | 22:17 |
| dupondje | its for translations I think | 22:17 |
| dupondje | but not totally sure | 22:17 |
| tumbleweed | e.g. it sets the maintainer to "Ubuntu Developers", removes translations, yes, optimises PNGs, removes changelogs https://launchpad.net/pkgbinarymangler | 22:18 |
| l3on | and how you know if we need it ? | 22:19 |
| tumbleweed | oh, sorry debomatic does have it. I missed that | 22:19 |
| tumbleweed | well, cdebootstrap is a bit odd. You'll notice the debs it builds contain debs | 22:19 |
| tumbleweed | DktrKranz: unping, nm | 22:19 |
| l3on | yep, it's right I've debs inside deb | 22:21 |
| l3on | http://debomatic.debian.net/precise/pool/cdebootstrap_0.5.8ubuntu1/cdebootstrap_0.5.8ubuntu1.contents | 22:21 |
| tumbleweed | the changelog entry that added NO_PKG_MANGLE says: | 22:21 |
| tumbleweed | helper/Makefile.am, helper/Makefile.in: Set NO_PKG_MANGLE while building nested packages so that pkgstriptranslations doesn't kick in. | 22:22 |
| tumbleweed | I don't think anything would have changed there, that's still a potential problem | 22:22 |
| tumbleweed | you can, of course, forward that patch to Debian too, it will do nothing in Debian, and make Ubuntu's life easier | 22:23 |
| dupondje | that has been forwared to debian | 22:23 |
| dupondje | and rejected btw | 22:23 |
| dupondje | so :) | 22:23 |
| l3on | lol | 22:24 |
| tumbleweed | right, debian bug 486899 | 22:25 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 486899 in cdebootstrap "cdebootstrap: Please set NO_PKG_MANGLE while building nested package" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/486899 | 22:25 |
| l3on | well tumbleweed, if I understood.. NO_PKG_MANGLE should allow us to not have nested packeges | 22:34 |
| l3on | but... using it I've still debs inside debs | 22:35 |
| l3on | That's new contents: | 22:35 |
| l3on | http://debomatic.debian.net/precise/pool/cdebootstrap_0.5.8ubuntu1/cdebootstrap_0.5.8ubuntu1.contents | 22:35 |
| tumbleweed | l3on: the problem is that debian package building is modified by the presense of pkgbinarymangler. But this can be disabled by exporting NO_PKG_MANGLE | 22:36 |
| tumbleweed | we don't want those modifications on the nested packages | 22:36 |
| l3on | this is the patch : | 22:36 |
| l3on | http://paste.ubuntu.com/736721/ | 22:36 |
| tumbleweed | that looks right | 22:36 |
| l3on | ok :) | 22:36 |
| l3on | i'll debdiff and upload the bug :) | 22:36 |
| l3on | thanks (again!) :) | 22:37 |
| l3on | ok, done bug 884185 | 22:42 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 884185 in cdebootstrap (Ubuntu) "Please merge cdebootstrap 0.5.8 (universe) from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/884185 | 22:42 |
| l3on | thanks tumbleweed dupondje :) | 22:42 |
| dupondje | + - Patch 002-Fix-netsted-packages.patch setting NO_PKG_MANGLE while building | 22:48 |
| dupondje | typo | 22:48 |
| l3on | dupondje, mmm... is it important ? :/ | 22:54 |
| l3on | I need to redebuild ?! | 22:54 |
| dupondje | and I see the series seems adjusted in the code | 22:56 |
| dupondje | and there is also a patch included ... | 22:56 |
| l3on | double type, patch name heading with 0002_... | 22:56 |
| l3on | s/type/typo/ | 22:58 |
| l3on | ok.. maybe it's time to go bed :) | 22:58 |
| l3on | dupondje, suggestions ? :) | 22:59 |
| l3on | well I've to go.. bye bye and thanks for all :) | 23:15 |
| l3on | see you :) | 23:15 |
| broder | tumbleweed: ok, actually taking a look at the requestbackport changes. i would like the installability checkbox to be per-binary package, to make it explicit that people test all of them | 23:50 |
| broder | (i screwed that up once in the past) | 23:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!