/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/11/13/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

CarlFKbug 723932 - I added package to the mentioned bug, so this bug is kinda 'done' or something?01:54
ubot4Launchpad bug 723932 in isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) "dhcpd wont start due to rndc.key permissions (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/72393201:55
CarlFKgiven there isn't anything there, how should I mark it?01:55
benonsoftwareHello02:17
Abhijithi06:22
Abhijitchangeing gtk themes for gtk application in kde needs restart of that apps. what packaging agianst to submit this bug? kde? or gtk?06:22
Abhijithelp06:22
iceroothttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/869502  i want to add the package "linux-firmware" as "affected" but i only see the option to edit existing packages (linux), maybe someone can give me a hint about adding "linux-firmware"09:57
ubot4Launchpad bug 869502 in linux (Ubuntu) "Kernel-Panic with 3.0.0.12-generic on asus eee pcs and msi wind (both using rt2800 wifi chipset) (affects: 39) (dups: 4) (heat: 220)" [High,Confirmed]09:57
icerootogasawara:09:59
icerootogasawara: the bug seems to be a wrong firmware-file (rt2860bin) inside the package "linux-firmware" so the kernel itself is not affected10:00
Snicksieiceroot, i guess i found out ;)10:02
Snicksiei added the package linux-firmware for you :)10:02
icerootSnicksie: great, thank you :)10:03
Snicksiei chose 'also affects distribution' and put linux-firmware there... i guess its correct the way it is now, can you check? :)10:03
icerootSnicksie: yes, thats what i wanted :)10:04
Snicksieokay, great i could help ;)10:04
icerootogasawara: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/869502/comments/9410:08
ubot4Launchpad bug 869502 in linux-firmware (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Kernel-Panic with 3.0.0.12-generic on asus eee pcs and msi wind (both using rt2800 wifi chipset) (affects: 39) (dups: 4) (heat: 220)" [Undecided,New]10:08
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
FusioniteHey11:48
SwitchDKHi Fusionite11:50
FusioniteI just applied to the BugSquad team on LP, so I am waiting ancs11:51
FusioniteI just applied to the BugSquad team on LP, so I am waiting*11:52
SwitchDKFusionite, great you have applied. It might take some time before your request will be processed11:52
SwitchDKFusionite, but it shouldn't stop you from doing triaging :D11:53
Fusionite:311:53
SwitchDKFusionite, if you need any help at all with the triaging process just ask the questions in this channel. You may not get a response immidiately but somebody will reply11:57
FusioniteThanks bro12:02
SwitchDKFusionite, no problem12:02
iktdoesn't one have to make an application to the mailing list?12:03
iktas well as on lp12:04
FusioniteI have12:05
Fusioniteand signed the Code of Conduct12:05
SwitchDKthen all pre-reqs are in place :D12:05
FusioniteIm gonna go for a bit, see you later guys12:06
SwitchDKFusionite, later12:07
=== maxb is now known as Guest38799
=== JanC is now known as Guest33428
elgatonHi, could someone please set the importance of bugs #889406 and #889405 to "Low" and their status to "Triaged"? Thanks!14:43
ubot4Launchpad bug 889406 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "apt-add-repository --remove does not remove deb-src line (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88940614:43
ubot4Launchpad bug 889405 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Readding repo using apt-add-repository can cause invalid repo line (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88940514:43
elgatonHi, I'm currently triaging bug #889411. At present, the bug report is complete. The original reporter says he has tested the bug on three different computers and installations. There are no upstrem bug reports nor duplicates in Launchpad about that issue. Should I leave the status as New or exceptionally mark it as Confirmed?15:23
ubot4Launchpad bug 889411 in network-manager (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "[Samsung CMC-370] MEZON modem not detected (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88941115:23
CarlFKelgaton: "if another Ubuntu user manages to reproduce the bug, " so I think you should leave it new15:31
elgatonCarlFK: OK, thanks15:31
=== Guest38799 is now known as maxb
elgatonHi, could someone please set the importance of bugs #889406 and #889405 to "Low" and their status to "Triaged"? Thanks!17:14
ubot4Launchpad bug 889406 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "apt-add-repository --remove does not remove deb-src line (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88940617:14
ubot4Launchpad bug 889405 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Readding repo using apt-add-repository can cause invalid repo line (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88940517:14
penguin42elgaton: I'm tempted to set 889405 higher since it leaves apt in a mess17:19
elgatonpenguin42: Medium or high? (Perhaps high since it has a severe impact on apt?)17:21
penguin42elgaton: So if you do it as described does apt just sit there and complain - so you wouldn't get any updates etc ?17:22
penguin42elgaton: And this could be triggered by doing it through the GUI as well?17:22
elgatonpenguin42: Let me check17:22
CarlFKlooking at the code, I think the GUI does it ok17:28
CarlFKthis is based on 2 thigns: there is code to remove the src line, that code is not use by apt-add-repository.17:29
penguin42CarlFK: I'm not too worried about not removing the src line; that can be a low; I was more worried by it leaving the corrupt version there17:29
CarlFKmy assumption is the code is used by the gui.  or just not used at all.  which isn't out of the question :)17:29
CarlFKwell, the corruption is caused by not removing17:30
penguin42CarlFK: Well I just meant that leaving an old deb-src line isn't that much of a pain; leaving something that is invalid syntax is much nastier symptoms17:31
CarlFKpenguin42: actually you have me wondering: what is the invalid syntax?17:33
penguin42CarlFK: The bug shows a line starting with     src17:33
CarlFKfrom reading it seems like putting the -src line first is causing a problem, which seems odd17:33
CarlFKumm.. re-reading...17:34
CarlFKbtw, which bug?17:34
CarlFKBug #88940517:35
ubot4Launchpad bug 889405 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Readding repo using apt-add-repository can cause invalid repo line (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88940517:35
CarlFKah, missed that it broke the src line17:36
penguin42yeh so 405 seems High to me since it leaves you with an invalid config; 406 is low-medium17:37
CarlFKhas someone here confirmed?17:37
penguin42no, elgaton was just doing it I think17:37
elgatonpenguin42: I'm testing right now. As CarlFK noticed, the GUI does it OK since it requires you to type the full sources.list line. The bug does not occur with python-software-properties 0.81.10 but does occur with 0.81.13 on my box, I'll try to test on 0.81.13 on a clean box now.17:38
elgatonCarlFK: Yes, confirmed on my box, trying on a clean one now17:38
CarlFKelgaton: it creates a line starting with "src" ?17:38
elgatonCarlFK: Yes, after you run apt-add-repository --remove. Notice also that the deb-src and what was the original "deb" line are inverted.17:40
CarlFKwtf.. anyone notice this:17:44
CarlFKjuser@trist:~$ sudo apt-add-repository --remove ppa:mythbuntu/0.2517:44
CarlFKYou are about to add the following PPA to your system:17:44
CarlFKalso what it prints next isn't what I would expect:  0.2517:47
elgatonStrange: does not happen on a fresh Oneiric installation with only python-software-properties upgraded.17:49
elgaton(The deb-src line is not removed but the deb one is).17:49
CarlFKdoesn't happen on stock 11.1017:49
CarlFKer, right17:49
CarlFKdeb-src is left, deb gets added,17:50
elgatonCarlFK: is there a way to debug that python script? Since it happens on my box (or at least I tried it when I read the bug report first), maybe I can have a look...17:52
CarlFKelgaton: add lots of "print" commands..17:52
CarlFKhows your python skillz?17:52
elgatonCarlFK: zero -.-17:52
elgatonCarlFK: OK, found a Python debugger. Let's see.17:53
CarlFKelgaton: pfft.  just use a text editor17:53
CarlFKtrying to learn how to use a debugger is going to be more work and just muddle things17:54
jtaylordepends, do you know gdb?17:54
CarlFKyou can worry about learning a debugger later, or never.  it is so easy to just add print commands...17:54
jtaylorpdb is not that different17:55
CarlFKelgaton: wait.. what bug are you trying to debug?18:00
CarlFK" does not happen on a fresh Oneiric installation with only python-software-properties upgraded."18:00
elgatonCarlFK: Bug #88940518:00
ubot4Launchpad bug 889405 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Readding repo using apt-add-repository can cause invalid repo line (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88940518:00
CarlFKhave you actually seen that happen ?18:01
CarlFKI don't see it on my 11.10 box.18:01
elgatonYes, it happens on my box. I'm debugging to see where the problem is.18:02
CarlFKhttp://dpaste.de/TDEHf/18:04
elgatonThat's what happens on a stock install, on my box I experience the same symptoms described by the reporter18:05
elgatonBRB, I was called18:05
CarlFKBug #88940618:06
ubot4Launchpad bug 889406 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "apt-add-repository --remove does not remove deb-src line (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88940618:06
CarlFKthat's what I see18:06
CarlFKBug #83850718:10
ubot4Launchpad bug 838507 in software-properties (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "apt-add-repository --remove doesn't remove deb-src entry (affects: 8) (dups: 2) (heat: 36)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/83850718:10
CarlFK"This bug was fixed in the package software-properties - 0.81.13.1"18:10
CarlFKbut not.. maybe? wtf.18:11
CarlFKI would say it's being worked on "now" and best left alone18:12
elgatonBack18:18
elgatonCarlFK: Yes, definitely not.18:18
CarlFK838507 is active, 889406 is a dupe of it.  how do I mark that?18:19
CarlFKI hate just leaving a note in the comments.18:19
CarlFKfound it.. again.18:19
elgatonCarlFK: Mark as duplicate and add a comment in BOTH bugs.18:19
penguin42ouch, so I think you're saying that the corruption is a result of the first fix for 83850718:28
=== teprrrr is now known as teprrr
jtaylorare bug importance relative to the package or to the whole archive?21:33
FusioniteJust got accepted into the LP :D22:33
=== Fusionite is now known as Ultimate
=== Ultimate is now known as Ultimation
=== Ultimation is now known as Fusionite
=== Fusionite is now known as Backdoor
=== Backdoor is now known as Fusionite
=== Fusionite is now known as Jarubyh_The_Seco
=== Jarubyh_The_Seco is now known as Jarubyh_The_2nd
=== Jarubyh_The_2nd is now known as Virus
=== Virus is now known as BiosDestroyer
BiosDestroyerTake care all23:42
=== BiosDestroyer is now known as Fusionite|AFK

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!