[01:54] <CarlFK> bug 723932 - I added package to the mentioned bug, so this bug is kinda 'done' or something?
[01:55] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 723932 in isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) "dhcpd wont start due to rndc.key permissions (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/723932
[01:55] <CarlFK> given there isn't anything there, how should I mark it?
[02:17] <benonsoftware> Hello
[06:22] <Abhijit> hi
[06:22] <Abhijit> changeing gtk themes for gtk application in kde needs restart of that apps. what packaging agianst to submit this bug? kde? or gtk?
[06:22] <Abhijit> help
[09:57] <iceroot> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/869502  i want to add the package "linux-firmware" as "affected" but i only see the option to edit existing packages (linux), maybe someone can give me a hint about adding "linux-firmware"
[09:57] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 869502 in linux (Ubuntu) "Kernel-Panic with 3.0.0.12-generic on asus eee pcs and msi wind (both using rt2800 wifi chipset) (affects: 39) (dups: 4) (heat: 220)" [High,Confirmed]
[09:59] <iceroot> ogasawara:
[10:00] <iceroot> ogasawara: the bug seems to be a wrong firmware-file (rt2860bin) inside the package "linux-firmware" so the kernel itself is not affected
[10:02] <Snicksie> iceroot, i guess i found out ;)
[10:02] <Snicksie> i added the package linux-firmware for you :)
[10:03] <iceroot> Snicksie: great, thank you :)
[10:03] <Snicksie> i chose 'also affects distribution' and put linux-firmware there... i guess its correct the way it is now, can you check? :)
[10:04] <iceroot> Snicksie: yes, thats what i wanted :)
[10:04] <Snicksie> okay, great i could help ;)
[10:08] <iceroot> ogasawara: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/869502/comments/94
[10:08] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 869502 in linux-firmware (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Kernel-Panic with 3.0.0.12-generic on asus eee pcs and msi wind (both using rt2800 wifi chipset) (affects: 39) (dups: 4) (heat: 220)" [Undecided,New]
[11:48] <Fusionite> Hey
[11:50] <SwitchDK> Hi Fusionite
[11:51] <Fusionite> I just applied to the BugSquad team on LP, so I am waiting ancs
[11:52] <Fusionite> I just applied to the BugSquad team on LP, so I am waiting*
[11:52] <SwitchDK> Fusionite, great you have applied. It might take some time before your request will be processed
[11:53] <SwitchDK> Fusionite, but it shouldn't stop you from doing triaging :D
[11:53] <Fusionite> :3
[11:57] <SwitchDK> Fusionite, if you need any help at all with the triaging process just ask the questions in this channel. You may not get a response immidiately but somebody will reply
[12:02] <Fusionite> Thanks bro
[12:02] <SwitchDK> Fusionite, no problem
[12:03] <ikt> doesn't one have to make an application to the mailing list?
[12:04] <ikt> as well as on lp
[12:05] <Fusionite> I have
[12:05] <Fusionite> and signed the Code of Conduct
[12:05] <SwitchDK> then all pre-reqs are in place :D
[12:06] <Fusionite> Im gonna go for a bit, see you later guys
[12:07] <SwitchDK> Fusionite, later
[14:43] <elgaton> Hi, could someone please set the importance of bugs #889406 and #889405 to "Low" and their status to "Triaged"? Thanks!
[14:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 889406 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "apt-add-repository --remove does not remove deb-src line (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889406
[14:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 889405 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Readding repo using apt-add-repository can cause invalid repo line (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889405
[15:23] <elgaton> Hi, I'm currently triaging bug #889411. At present, the bug report is complete. The original reporter says he has tested the bug on three different computers and installations. There are no upstrem bug reports nor duplicates in Launchpad about that issue. Should I leave the status as New or exceptionally mark it as Confirmed?
[15:23] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 889411 in network-manager (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "[Samsung CMC-370] MEZON modem not detected (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889411
[15:31] <CarlFK> elgaton: "if another Ubuntu user manages to reproduce the bug, " so I think you should leave it new
[15:31] <elgaton> CarlFK: OK, thanks
[17:14] <elgaton> Hi, could someone please set the importance of bugs #889406 and #889405 to "Low" and their status to "Triaged"? Thanks!
[17:14] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 889406 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "apt-add-repository --remove does not remove deb-src line (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889406
[17:14] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 889405 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Readding repo using apt-add-repository can cause invalid repo line (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889405
[17:19] <penguin42> elgaton: I'm tempted to set 889405 higher since it leaves apt in a mess
[17:21] <elgaton> penguin42: Medium or high? (Perhaps high since it has a severe impact on apt?)
[17:22] <penguin42> elgaton: So if you do it as described does apt just sit there and complain - so you wouldn't get any updates etc ?
[17:22] <penguin42> elgaton: And this could be triggered by doing it through the GUI as well?
[17:22] <elgaton> penguin42: Let me check
[17:28] <CarlFK> looking at the code, I think the GUI does it ok
[17:29] <CarlFK> this is based on 2 thigns: there is code to remove the src line, that code is not use by apt-add-repository.
[17:29] <penguin42> CarlFK: I'm not too worried about not removing the src line; that can be a low; I was more worried by it leaving the corrupt version there
[17:29] <CarlFK> my assumption is the code is used by the gui.  or just not used at all.  which isn't out of the question :)
[17:30] <CarlFK> well, the corruption is caused by not removing
[17:31] <penguin42> CarlFK: Well I just meant that leaving an old deb-src line isn't that much of a pain; leaving something that is invalid syntax is much nastier symptoms
[17:33] <CarlFK> penguin42: actually you have me wondering: what is the invalid syntax?
[17:33] <penguin42> CarlFK: The bug shows a line starting with     src
[17:33] <CarlFK> from reading it seems like putting the -src line first is causing a problem, which seems odd
[17:34] <CarlFK> umm.. re-reading...
[17:34] <CarlFK> btw, which bug?
[17:35] <CarlFK> Bug #889405
[17:35] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 889405 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Readding repo using apt-add-repository can cause invalid repo line (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889405
[17:36] <CarlFK> ah, missed that it broke the src line
[17:37] <penguin42> yeh so 405 seems High to me since it leaves you with an invalid config; 406 is low-medium
[17:37] <CarlFK> has someone here confirmed?
[17:37] <penguin42> no, elgaton was just doing it I think
[17:38] <elgaton> penguin42: I'm testing right now. As CarlFK noticed, the GUI does it OK since it requires you to type the full sources.list line. The bug does not occur with python-software-properties 0.81.10 but does occur with 0.81.13 on my box, I'll try to test on 0.81.13 on a clean box now.
[17:38] <elgaton> CarlFK: Yes, confirmed on my box, trying on a clean one now
[17:38] <CarlFK> elgaton: it creates a line starting with "src" ?
[17:40] <elgaton> CarlFK: Yes, after you run apt-add-repository --remove. Notice also that the deb-src and what was the original "deb" line are inverted.
[17:44] <CarlFK> wtf.. anyone notice this:
[17:44] <CarlFK> juser@trist:~$ sudo apt-add-repository --remove ppa:mythbuntu/0.25
[17:44] <CarlFK> You are about to add the following PPA to your system:
[17:47] <CarlFK> also what it prints next isn't what I would expect:  0.25
[17:49] <elgaton> Strange: does not happen on a fresh Oneiric installation with only python-software-properties upgraded.
[17:49] <elgaton> (The deb-src line is not removed but the deb one is).
[17:49] <CarlFK> doesn't happen on stock 11.10
[17:49] <CarlFK> er, right
[17:50] <CarlFK> deb-src is left, deb gets added,
[17:52] <elgaton> CarlFK: is there a way to debug that python script? Since it happens on my box (or at least I tried it when I read the bug report first), maybe I can have a look...
[17:52] <CarlFK> elgaton: add lots of "print" commands..
[17:52] <CarlFK> hows your python skillz?
[17:52] <elgaton> CarlFK: zero -.-
[17:53] <elgaton> CarlFK: OK, found a Python debugger. Let's see.
[17:53] <CarlFK> elgaton: pfft.  just use a text editor
[17:54] <CarlFK> trying to learn how to use a debugger is going to be more work and just muddle things
[17:54] <jtaylor> depends, do you know gdb?
[17:54] <CarlFK> you can worry about learning a debugger later, or never.  it is so easy to just add print commands...
[17:55] <jtaylor> pdb is not that different
[18:00] <CarlFK> elgaton: wait.. what bug are you trying to debug?
[18:00] <CarlFK> " does not happen on a fresh Oneiric installation with only python-software-properties upgraded."
[18:00] <elgaton> CarlFK: Bug #889405
[18:00] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 889405 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Readding repo using apt-add-repository can cause invalid repo line (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889405
[18:01] <CarlFK> have you actually seen that happen ?
[18:01] <CarlFK> I don't see it on my 11.10 box.
[18:02] <elgaton> Yes, it happens on my box. I'm debugging to see where the problem is.
[18:04] <CarlFK> http://dpaste.de/TDEHf/
[18:05] <elgaton> That's what happens on a stock install, on my box I experience the same symptoms described by the reporter
[18:05] <elgaton> BRB, I was called
[18:06] <CarlFK> Bug #889406
[18:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 889406 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "apt-add-repository --remove does not remove deb-src line (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889406
[18:06] <CarlFK> that's what I see
[18:10] <CarlFK> Bug #838507
[18:10] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 838507 in software-properties (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "apt-add-repository --remove doesn't remove deb-src entry (affects: 8) (dups: 2) (heat: 36)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/838507
[18:10] <CarlFK> "This bug was fixed in the package software-properties - 0.81.13.1"
[18:11] <CarlFK> but not.. maybe? wtf.
[18:12] <CarlFK> I would say it's being worked on "now" and best left alone
[18:18] <elgaton> Back
[18:18] <elgaton> CarlFK: Yes, definitely not.
[18:19] <CarlFK> 838507 is active, 889406 is a dupe of it.  how do I mark that?
[18:19] <CarlFK> I hate just leaving a note in the comments.
[18:19] <CarlFK> found it.. again.
[18:19] <elgaton> CarlFK: Mark as duplicate and add a comment in BOTH bugs.
[18:28] <penguin42> ouch, so I think you're saying that the corruption is a result of the first fix for 838507
[21:33] <jtaylor> are bug importance relative to the package or to the whole archive?
[22:33] <Fusionite> Just got accepted into the LP :D
[23:42] <BiosDestroyer> Take care all