[00:34] how do I do to sync tomboy with Ubuntu One in Oneiric? [00:40] hi mfilipe. Have you read this? https://one.ubuntu.com/help/tutorial/install-and-setup-notes-sync/ [00:41] elopio, yes but I found out what is the problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomboy/+bug/871139 [00:41] Launchpad bug 871139 in tomboy (Ubuntu) "UbuntuOne sync option wording is suboptimal (affects: 5) (heat: 24)" [Low,Confirmed] [00:42] it is only a usability problem :) [00:43] mfilipe, right. You can subscribe to that bug to follow its progress. [10:04] Good morning all! [10:09] morning all! [10:09] JamesTait, morning ;) [10:09] * mandel a little off having some hardware issues [10:57] hi! [11:00] good morning! [11:01] ralsina, hi! how are you? [11:01] hi gatox! Fine, back at work, looking at 1250 canonical emails ;-) [11:01] ralsina, jejej yes, that is always difficult.. [11:02] ralsina, one of those e-mails says that now that i don't have more classes until next year, we talk with nessita and we decided that would be best if i work from 8am to 5pm [11:02] gatox: sounds ok [11:07] gatox, ralsina morning! [11:08] mandel, hi [11:09] hi mandel! [11:31] gatox, did we get the fixes of the control panel with the new ubuntuone-dev-tools? [11:32] mandel, sorry.... not follow... [11:33] gatox, do you remember the fixes we had to made for the setUp calls etc.. [11:33] ?? [11:33] mandel, yep yep [11:33] mandel, everything it's fixed [11:33] regarding that [11:34] gatox, sweet, then I have to merge my branch with trunk :) [11:34] :P [11:35] hello everyone! [11:35] nessita, morning [11:35] nessita, hi [11:35] mandel, if you have a sec...... can you review this branch? https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/uistr-fix/+merge/82001 IS REALLY SMALL [11:36] nessita, ralsina I have a very big doc on how to setup your machines and network to tst proxy, is there a wiki where I can put that, or should I just use a google doc [11:36] gatox, sure [11:36] hello nessita! [11:36] hello ralsina, mandel, gatox! [11:36] mandel: I think a google doc is ok, remember to share it with everyone [11:36] mandel: google doc is fine [11:37] ralsina: so, we should be making a release of windows today or tomorrow... I need to confirm that a last minute bug is fixed, but other than that we're almost good to go. Did you read the email about qt4reactor? === eu is now known as Guest40520 [11:38] nessita: I am catching up on email, should be done in a couple f hours [11:38] but sure, we can do a release, no problem [11:39] nessita, ralsina ok,do you guys know how to format text in a google doc for code, there is a fair amount of config file to play with [11:39] * mandel hates config files.. [11:39] mandel: no idea... set font to courier? ;-) [11:40] ralsina, hehe that should work, at the end of the day is a c++ base config style.. [11:40] I cannot believe people do that, but there you go :( [11:40] c++? for what? [11:42] ralsina, bind9 in case you want to setup your machine as a dns server to resolve the local machines with static ips and the active directory domain [11:42] hello #ubuntuone! [11:42] hi there, ralsina, mandel! [11:42] mandel: oh, dhcpd. Yes, it looks like c++ [11:42] hi alecu! [11:42] ralsina, it was a major PITA to find out how to add the stupid AD subdomain, but with that network setup we should have most of the stuff covered :) [11:42] alecu, hola! [11:43] gatox, your branch looks ok, I've tan the tests in N so it shoul dbe ok for O too :) [11:43] mandel, yes, i tested in O [11:44] gatox, cool, I'll add the +1 and soons as my browser ges back to live.. for some reason starting a vm make chrom go banannas :) [11:46] gatox, https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/uistr-fix/+merge/82001 should be ready for you to make it merge [11:47] morning all [11:49] mandel, thanks! [11:50] gatox, np [12:03] alecu, ping [12:04] mandel, pong [12:05] alecu, I've updated https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/ubuntuone-control-panel/auto-update-looping-call/+merge/81015 (although lp has not yet noticed the changes) can you take a look when possible [12:09] * alecu loves that vi has syntax highlighting for straces [12:25] alecu, ups, I just realized that the changes did not appear in lp because I push with them not being commited, just fixed that, sorry :) [12:25] mandel, lol! [12:25] alecu, is monday.. ( is that a valid excuse) [12:29] ralsina, nessita, so, the fix for vista is easy, but we have to change the way we distribute the .exes.. the problem is 'simple' since we just have to change the location of the autoupdater.exe to be out of dist [12:30] ralsina, nessita that means changing the code that finds the .exe and the package, and tell Vista users to download the new installer, those that sound ok? [12:31] we also need to think the correct location for it, and change the location of update.ini [12:32] mandel: what does it mean "to change the location of the autoupdater.exe to be out of dist"? [12:33] nessita, in the package we release on windows, we have a data folder, a dist folder etc.. [12:34] nessita, the dist folder contains among other things the .exes created by py2exe AND the autoupdater.exe [12:34] nessita, the problem is py2exe adds a library that makes the autoupdater.exe brake [12:35] nessita, sorry break, is not running hehe [12:35] mandel: so we need to drop the autoupdater.exe somewhere else? [12:35] anyways, so we have to make sure that the autoupdater.exe is not placed in the same location as the py2exe libs and .exe [12:36] nessita, yes, I was thinking on creating a new folder called updater where the .exe and the update.ini are placed [12:36] nessita, then we will have the Vista clients updating \o/ [12:37] nessita, ralsina_ so, I'm guessing I need to work based on the branch that we used to build the installer, right? [12:38] mandel: yes [12:38] and propose and MP agains it, although I prefer to get that merge to trunk first and the MP agains trunk [12:38] let's merge that branch already [12:38] it needs cleaning, but it's going to rot if we don't merge :-( [12:38] since only I can commit to it [12:39] and some of the cleanups are things you (mandel) did that I only understand vaguely (the module finder for py2exe, for example) [12:41] ralsina_: one thing about that [12:41] ralsina_, nessita if you want I can take a look at those things and clean them before we merge it [12:41] ralsina_: we need to install the qt4reactor differently now... did you read the email? [12:42] nessita: still not there :-) [12:42] nessita: I had about 1500 emails this morning [12:42] mandel: I think is best that your try to focus on proxy support [12:42] 350 left to go [12:42] mandel: leave that script to ralsina_ :-) [12:42] ok [12:42] I will spend the evening hacking at the script to clean up a bit, then propose for merging [12:42] ralsina_: ok, just heads up that before you build the installer, you need to change how the script uses/install qt4reactor [12:43] nessita: cool, thanks [12:43] mandel: I can fix the autoupdater, too, since it's easy to move it [12:43] ralsina_: so, qt4reactor now should be downloaded from git, and inside it just run: python ./setup.py install (for installation, I guess for releasing we do something differently? [12:43] ) [12:43] ralsina_, ok, sounds good [12:44] whoa, it has a setup.py now? :-D [12:45] ralsina_: yeap :-) I submitted a couple of merge requests to upstream and they got merged [12:45] awesome === Guest40520 is now known as adorilson [12:59] mandel: hi there, I'm re-reviewing lp:~mandel/ubuntuone-windows-installer/put-migration-together and it has 7 conflicts... [13:00] nessita, really.. maybe something landed after I did the update, on it right now I'm between bugs [13:00] mandel: no rush, just FYI [13:02] alecu, can you re-review this one? https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/network-detect/+merge/77048 [13:06] gatox: sine you are working n expanduser, check bug #889785 for a nice corner case [13:06] Launchpad bug 889785 in ubuntuone-client "Can not add folders in WinXP (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889785 [13:08] ralsina_: we're no longer using the HOME env var (bah, when gatox's branches land, that is) [13:08] ralsina_: but that's s good bug report :-) [13:09] nessita: indeed, I was like, "whoa" :-) [13:09] ralsina_: gatox: we should also check how we handle folder path case sensitiveness :-/ [13:10] nessita: for UDF names? [13:10] nessita, what happened with the windows main module in ubuntuone_installer, where did it all go? [13:11] nessita, it seems that a lot changed in a recent merge [13:11] mandel: yeap, I made a cleanup for the main() [13:11] mandel: everything 'useful' should be in utils/ now [13:11] nessita, hm.. ok, I'l look around there [13:12] mandel: check_credentials is now at multiplatform level (utils/__init__.py) [13:12] nessita, where did the success_cb go? [13:13] away :-) [13:13] is dead [13:14] ralsina_, ack [13:15] nessita, ok.. so I had an extra step in that cb, can you point me where to look at so I can add that extra thing? [13:15] mandel: utils/__init__.py check_credentials [13:15] nessita, ok [13:17] ralsina_, can i assign that bug to me? [13:17] gatox: of course [13:17] ralsina_, ok! :D [13:17] in fact, it could go as a duplicate of the one you have to make expanduser cross platform [13:20] ralsina_, ok [13:20] gatox, mandel, alecu, dobey, nessita: standup in 10' [13:21] ralsina_, ack [13:21] ack [13:24] ok [13:31] me [13:31] me [13:31] me [13:32] alecu, ralsina? [13:32] me [13:32] and me [13:33] shall I then? [13:33] dobey: stand up? (and welcome back!) [13:33] mandel: go ahead [13:33] DONE: Fixed following MP comments lp:~mandel/ubuntuone-control-panel/auto-update-functions lp:~mandel/ubuntuone-control-panel/auto-update-loopingcall. Confirmed bug 586582 as invalid with the current release. [13:33] TODO: Fix conflicts in lp:~mandel/ubuntone-windows-installer/put-migration-together it will take me a little long since there are a big number of changes. Look at the bugs I have to tackle related to proxy [13:33] BLOCKED: No [13:33] COMMENT: I might need to leave a few mins early to go to the doctor and get pain killers, I broke my ribs during the weekend (they were broken and decided to play rugby, yes I'm stupid) [13:33] Launchpad bug 586582 in ubuntuone-windows-installer "Ubuntu One don't works - Active Directory User (affects: 1) (heat: 3)" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/586582 [13:33] nessita go! [13:33] DONE: coded and landed every qt4reactor branch (ussoc, controlpanel, installer), reviews, a tiny bit of magicicada [13:33] TODO: schedule the rest of the holidays, coordinate windows release, coordinate SRU release [13:33] BLOCKED: nopes [13:33] NEXT: gatox [13:33] DONE: [13:33] Propose and landed small successful branch fix, Fixed some conflicts in network-detect, improves in unicode issues branch. Some improves in freaky friday project ui. [13:33] TODO: [13:33] Finish fixes for shared links in unicode branch [13:33] BLOCKED: [13:33] No [13:33] ralsina, go [13:33] DONE: http://picplz.com/user/ralsina/pic/fmctx/ TODO: finish answering mail, cleanup build branch for windows, propose for merging, tech leads call, work on hiring BLOCKED: no [13:34] alecu? [13:34] ralsina, jejejej [13:35] DONE: freaky friday: started learning packaging for txsecrets [13:35] TODO: back to proxy branches [13:35] BLOCKED: no [13:35] comments? [13:35] me! [13:35] I will be on holiday all the next week and some days of the following after that [13:36] nessita: cool, have fun! [13:36] nessita: "coordinate windows release" do you want to do the RTs? [13:36] ralsina: no, chasing people to do it :-) [13:36] nessita, If I where youd, I'd say no ;) [13:36] ralsina: could you please file them? ;-) [13:36] nessita: ok ;-) [13:37] thanks! [13:37] nessita: on it! [13:37] I say we schedule it for wednesday, pushing RTs back is a pain [13:37] ralsina: if you have to request a date, I would advice this Wed [13:37] coincidences :-) [13:37] ralsina: yey! great mind think alike [13:37] and also, we do! [13:37] ;-) [13:38] nessita, i finish with the migration of windows-installer network detect to a new branch to avoid the weird conflicts.... let me know when you have a moment to review it [13:38] ralsina: also, I have 4 days left of holidays that I need to schedule, I was wondering if I can have one this Friday (I need to close some teaching activities that will take the whole afternoon) [13:38] ok, scheduling for wednesday, that would mean a thursday release, probably [13:38] gatox: I would like to pause that (both on ussoc and installer) until we release [13:38] nessita: sure, canonicaladmin is one of my things for today, so file it [13:38] gatox: can we do that? [13:38] nessita, ok, no problem... [13:38] nessita, i'll keep working on create shares link now [13:39] gatox: great! let me know how that goes (though that will go into another windows release -- not this one) [13:40] nessita, yes..... that branches will need some irl testing i think [13:40] gatox: you say some, I say A LOT :-D [13:40] nessita, :P [13:40] "create shares link" ? [13:40] ralsina, it's related to the unicode issues [13:40] ralsina: link creation is failing big time when there are weird characteres in the user home [13:40] ack [13:41] ralsina: gatox needs to use a function that supports unicode, otherwiser we can't create synlinks [13:41] ralsina, now syncdaemon and sso are working, but the creation of shares link are failing [13:41] symlinks* [13:41] For the link to the share. got it, thanks. [13:41] ralsina, i mean..... working in the user with weird chars in the username [13:41] gatox: I'm guessing you'd have to use ctypes, since is very likely that pywin32 will not export the unicode version of the function (let me know when you find the answer) [13:41] gatox: he, that bug is like an octopus or something. Maybe a hydra. [13:42] ralsina, i could explain it better jejeje [13:42] couldnt* [13:42] nessita: if pywin32 doesn't export it explicitly, it's because the one without the W in it is supposed to be the unicode version. At least according to pywin32 "folklore" [13:43] ralsina: well, I can ensure you that the current code for making symlink explotes big time with unicode paths [13:43] so, I leave gatox to do the diagnosis and report back :-) [13:43] nessita: sounds like a bug in pywin32 and should be reported [13:43] ralsina: perhaps, yes [13:43] ralsina, yes, that's true... but not always it seems, in some other part of the code we needed to use another function because the one supportedd by pywin wasn't the W [13:43] gatox: argh [13:44] ralsina, for LookupAccountName [13:45] gatox: you mean unicode arguments? LookupAccountName returns a book [13:45] a bool [13:46] ralsina, for c, in python it returns a tuple with the SID and a bool..... yes..... in this case was a problem in the arg it seems [13:46] we obtain the proper username..... but lookupaccoutname always fails [13:46] right, it's used because of arg-by-reference are returned [13:47] right [13:48] nessita, gatox, ralsina creating symlinks is a proble, it does not support somethngs such as \\?\ if I where you, before you do any code I'd test if a manually created lnk works [13:49] mandel: if ~ needs to be a literal path, it's a corner case from hell [13:49] mandel: yeap, I remember [13:49] mandel: anyways, I want gatox to do some research about that, to see what's the bets solution we cna provide [13:49] even if we have to go with ctypes [13:49] ralsina, nessita, gatox I just mentioned because it might give funny issues with unicode too [13:50] mandel: it certainly has [13:50] :( [13:50] we need to start firming up consistency on ctypes/pywin32 [13:51] ralsina, nessita I can confirm that we do not support XP x64 (not that many people have that) [13:51] uh [13:51] ralsina: I agree. The thing is that we're *way* broken ATM for users with non ascii chars in the home, or any xdg path [13:51] but I think we have proven both tools insufficient for the task at hand [13:51] yeah, 08:30 is way too early :) [13:51] λ DONE: UDS, holidays [13:51] λ TODO: banshee race re-fix, stable branches, tarmac config update [13:51] λ BLCK: No. [13:51] dobey: standup!!! (and welcome back) [13:51] nessita: thanks [13:51] dobey, mandel: figure out between you a standup time that works ;-) [13:52] dobey: did you enjoy your holidays? [13:52] somewhat [13:52] dobey, I have lunch in 10 mins + wak the dog, so for me in an hour would be ok, what about you? [13:52] having my brakes go out on my truck in the middle of an emergency stop wasn't exactly enjoyable :) [13:52] mandel: that would be fine, yes [13:53] nessita, ralsina we have a deal ^ [13:53] nessita, gatox: moving standup to 12AM ART so it's after mandel's lunch and after dobey wakes up makes sense for you? [13:53] alecu: ^ [13:53] in an hour should be ok for both (I hate diff time zones and DST and al that) [13:54] ralsina, ack [13:54] gatox: I want your opinion :-) [13:55] ralsina, fine by me... now that i start later it gives me more time to close the things from the previous day better before standup [13:56] dobey: so, we have in stable-2-0 the fix for the IO ValueError bug. Could we please make a release of that so I can start the SRU process? [13:56] * mandel lunch + dog walking [13:56] ok, so it's +4 so far. Unless nessita and alecu really hate it? [13:56] ralsina: so, what would be the new time? 4pm UTC? [13:57] nessita: 3PM UTC I think [13:57] nessita: are the other 2 major bugs fixed? (mem usage, and unicode?) [13:57] 1500Z yes [13:57] since .ar is -0300 [13:57] dobey: nopes, and we have no ETA for those. And since we have a lot of users affected by this, Cheepaca asked to SRU ASAP [13:59] dobey: or, you can teach me how to release and package from u1client, and I can do it, I need to learn this eventually [13:59] nessita: bzr diff -p 1 -c $revno_of_fix lp:ubuntuone-client/stable-2-0 > debian/patches/15_value_io_error_fix.patch [13:59] nessita: just stick the diff in debian/patches and SRU with that for now. :) [14:00] dobey: is there any reason to do that and not a new tarball release and a new package from that? [14:01] nessita: it's faster; and i'd rather wait to make a tarball release until the other 2 issues are fixed up as well [14:01] dobey: ok, and after that we "collapse" the patches or something like that? [14:01] and making a tarball release for every SRU isn't necessarily a good plan [14:01] dobey: tell me more, I'm interested :-) [14:01] nessita: yeah, when we do an SRU with the new tarball, we'll pull the patches out [14:02] why is not a good plan to have a release per each SRU (or group of SRUs)? [14:02] well, if we have no ETA, and we make a tarball release today, and tomorrow someone finds a magical fix that solves the other 2 problems, when we'll have to get them in as well [14:03] nessita: for a big group is fine, but for each little change it's a waste of time to deal with all the release/packaging details [14:04] dobey: ack, I get it. So, I also wanted to talk with you about 2 things: the dev-tools issue you disagree with (I'm happy to change), and the stable-3-0 branches. Do you have some time now? [14:05] nessita: sure [14:06] dobey: so, I changed the dev-tools so we can have the pylintrc being reachable on windows, otherwise we're not using the "global" pylintrc, and we have tons of errors on windows. Options to have devtools not depending on ussoc are: [14:06] * stop using xdg on windows and have a local copy of pylintrc on each project [14:06] sorry, "option is", I have only one :-) [14:06] we need to fix xdg (iow, take over ownership of it) [14:07] dobey: yeah, that is another option, but is kinda out of the roadmap for now... [14:07] then we need to stop using pyxdg everywhere. [14:08] dobey: and replace with our custom code or do you have another idea? [14:08] nessita: well, fork and take it over; write a new replacement, or use something else (glib or qt impl maybe) [14:10] +1 on using qt/glib impl. Maybe with a tiny wrapper on top. Have not looked if Qt provides everything we need though [14:10] dobey: I agree that's the best solution, but then again we're in the situation that we have no room in the roadmap for that :-/ [14:11] nessita: well, taking over pyxdg isn't really a huge burden. [14:12] dobey: are you volunteering to do that :-)? [14:12] but continuing to use abandoned libraries is a ticking time bomb === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [14:13] dobey: so, are you volunteering to do that :-)? [14:14] i will help make it happen, but i am not volunteering to be the new owner myself, no. but i am happy to help move it to LP properly, and get it set up in tarmac/nightlies/etc… [14:15] dobey: well, that makes sense, we should consider the whole ubuntuone-hackers+ team to be the owner, but we certainly need someone to actually do the initial dance [14:16] right, and i can probably do most of that. will probably need lo-sa help and such [14:16] dobey: sounds like a plan then. As soon as that is in place, I will revert the devtools change [14:17] nessita: also, i think qtreactor is packaged wrong [14:17] dobey: tell me more [14:18] nessita: well it seems like perhaps the files should be installed in a qtreactor/ subdir, to avoid breaking all the imports that anyone ever had, for it [14:18] dobey: but the README says otherwise, the project doc says we need to import qt4reactor [14:18] dobey: so I decided to be consistent with the doc [14:19] hmm [14:19] dobey: we were using it wrong, let's say... and I already fixed all our branches [14:20] dobey: question re: the u1client patch. Why 15? [14:21] nessita: i just figured it was a number that was greater than the numbers used by current patches (i didn't actually look) [14:22] dobey: shall I use the next consecutive number from the current patch (which is 01)? [14:22] nessita: i think there's supposed to be some naming scheme for that, but not entirely sure what it is. and since we own it all, it doesn't really matter [14:22] nessita: sure, that's fine too [14:22] nessita: you did branch from lp:ubuntu/oneiric-proposed/ubuntuone-client right? [14:23] hum, oneiric [14:23] I will push to -proposed [14:23] you need to pull from -proposed [14:23] you're right [14:23] (unless it doesn't exist, but i'm pretty sure that one does) [14:24] pulling... [14:24] bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/%2Bbranch/ubuntu/oneiric-proposed/ubuntune-client/". [14:24] sorry! [14:24] my bad, typo :-D [14:24] ubuntune, that's a funny name [14:25] heh [14:25] dobey: ok, so, last issue I wanted to talk with you. Shall I do all the stable-3-0 branches as the former "after release" stable branches? or shall I take something extra into consideration? [14:28] nessita: there are a couple of 'stable' branches i need to make still, that weren't bumped to 2.0 versions, or that we didn't bother with for oneiric; but shouldn't take long to do [14:28] i also need to finish the move of the banshee extension, which i started to do, which shouldn't take very long either [14:28] then after that, I think we can probably make all the stable-3-0 branches [14:29] dobey: ok, so, we can do the 3-0 branches for those projects that already have the 3-0 right? [14:30] nessita: i think it's safe to go ahead and make stable-3-0 series/branches for most of the things though (u1cp, protocol, client, etc) [14:30] right [14:31] nessita: and if you are going to bump the versions in the branches and trunk, please make the branch versions be 3.0 and the trunk ones be 3.1 [14:31] (not 3.0.0 or 3.1.0, but without a microversion) [14:31] dobey: right, I remember from last time, no 3.1.0 [14:31] yeao [14:31] :) [14:33] dobey: any idea why I can't push to lp:~nataliabidart/ubuntu/oneiric-proposed/ubuntuone-client/fix-872924 ? error is No such distribution series oneiric-proposed [14:36] nessita: you need to push to /oneiric/ i think, and propose for merge into lp:ubuntu/oneiric-proposed/ubuntuone-client [14:36] ack [14:45] dobey: you can sponsor this or shall I ask the platform guys? [14:45] https://code.launchpad.net/~nataliabidart/ubuntu/oneiric/ubuntuone-client/fix-872924/+merge/82154 [14:45] nessita: i can upload it to -proposed, yes [14:45] awesome [14:47] ok, stable branches, here I come! [14:52] dobey: since the stable version will be 3.0, shall the tag be release-3_0 as well, without microversion? [14:53] nessita: you don't need to create tags or make a tarball release of the stable-3-0 branches yet, no [14:53] dobey: I understand no tarball, but why no tags? [14:54] nessita: because we aren't making a release of it, so a tag isn't necessary [14:54] dobey: hum, I thought that tags were tied to version changes, not tarballs [14:54] dobey: you sure about this? [14:55] nessita: tags should be tied to releases (or anything else we decide needs a tag), but i'm suree we don't need a tag that is basically the initial revision on a new branch [14:56] ack === yofel_ is now known as yofel [15:15] meh, i need to get in the habit of eating breakfast again [15:24] nessita, dobey: i assume we'll be doing an sru for (at least) bug #872924 this week, correct? [15:24] Launchpad bug 872924 in ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu Precise) (and 5 other projects) "Resuming a failed upload crashes with ValueError: I/O operation on closed file (affects: 24) (dups: 3) (heat: 146)" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/872924 [15:24] joshuahoover: yes, the upload to oneiric-proposed is happening any minute now [15:24] nessita: cool, thanks :) [15:25] dobey: would you please let joshuahoover and me know when the upload is in place? so we can IRL test [15:25] nessita, joshuahoover: after i upload it, an archive admin will have to approve it, and then it will get built. but should hopefully not be too long after i upload [15:26] dobey: thank you [15:31] bah [15:31] my pbuilder-dist is broken on oneiric [15:33] nm, fixed that [15:34] nice [15:40] ralsina, ping [15:40] mandel: pong [15:41] ralsina, can you ping me when you are done with the installer branch, I wanted to try something during the night with it :) [15:41] ralsina, is not sexual [15:41] mandel: by my current progress, very late tonight :-/ [15:41] ralsina, well then on Wed night :) [15:50] nessita, joshuahoover: is uploaded to -proposed, and waiting for an admin to approve [15:50] dobey: great! [15:50] dobey: awesome, thanks! [16:08] gatox, ping [16:09] mandel, pong [16:09] gatox, do you have your windows vm running? [16:09] mandel, yes..... i'm testing the shortcut thing [16:09] what do you need? [16:10] gatox, give me a min [16:10] mandel, ok [16:12] gatox, cool, can you run ubuntuone-windows-installer tests from trunk [16:12] gatox, I think they are broken.. at least when I run them in my machine [16:12] * gatox testing.... [16:13] gatox, seems to be an attribute error in one of the compiled classes from qt [16:14] mandel, working here [16:14] mandel, let me give you the revnos [16:15] gatox, please [16:16] mandel: have you run setup.py build in ussoc and controlpanel (possible issue)? [16:16] gatox, I'm at 88 [16:16] mandel, sso revno: 811, u1-client revno: 1158, installer revno: 88 [16:16] nessita, run-test.bat should do it.. [16:16] gatox, hm, maybe I have old dependencies.. [16:16] * mandel makes sure [16:16] mandel: run-tests builds the project, of course, not the dependecies [16:17] mandel: each one of us have the dependencies in custom locations [16:17] mandel, true..... i need to build cp by my own [16:17] in ordeer to see the changes inn the installer [16:17] gatox: and that's correct! :-) [16:21] lunch time, bbiab [16:21] * mandel is amazed on how slow the windows tests are.. [16:28] nessita, gatox you were right, old dependencies.. [16:29] mandel: :-) [16:43] mandel: you around? [16:44] nessita, yes, tell me [16:45] mandel: would you be up to do some boring reviews? storage protocol branches needed to have their test suites updated (see all the merge proposals in bug #890277) [16:45] Launchpad bug 890277 in ubuntuone-storage-protocol/trunk (and 5 other projects) "Test are failing due to ubuntuone.devtools.testing.txcheck.SuperNotCalled (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/890277 [16:45]