[08:39] hi there [08:39] i'd need some help with preseed : i can't get it to honor some directive (e.g. do not ask for keyboard configuration) === jetole is now known as joebob === joebob is now known as jetole [15:03] ev, did you ever see this? https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-installer/2011-October/000859.html [15:05] weird, no [15:15] bdmurray: I don't believe there is. If apt-clone crashes, you'll surely see it in the logs (though it'll end up against the apt-clone package anyway. [15:15] b [15:15] but unless you run ubiquity in debug mode, you wont see what autopartitioning option you've selected [15:42] ev: what about "Oct 28 17:10:37 ubuntu AptDaemon: INFO: UpgradeSystem() was called with safe mode: 1"? [15:43] oh, nice [15:44] So that seems reliable? [15:44] looks it [15:47] cool, thanks [19:06] Do you know if mint modifies their install process significantly? Should ubiquity bugs regarding mint just be moved to the linuxmint project? [19:12] i think thats what i see colin do regulary with them [19:22] I want to post a statement in a bug report, which may be disputed and overruled, but it will be a starting point. [19:22] should packages installed into the target effect the install process? [19:22] in this case: I use a proxy: d-i mirror/http/proxy string http://chris:8000/ [19:23] and then ask for a proxy manager? to be installed: d-i pkgsel/include string squid-deb-proxy-client [19:23] which errors when it tries to run in chroot /target [19:23] and ends up clobbering http://chris:8000/ [19:25] I think it comes down to: should the installer rely on /target being functional? [19:38] bdmurray: they should definitely be moved off ubuntu/ubiquity. historically I've just closed them as invalid with an explanation, but now that we have distrosourcepackage->product reassignment, I agree we should do that [19:38] CarlFK: the installer should rely on /target being functional. I think your previous bug is good enough, though; this is a one-off issue with squid-deb-proxy-client, and I don't think it's worth trying to solve generically - we'll just figure out how to deal with that issue [19:39] cjwatson: okay, I'll set up the bug bot to do that then but perhaps we should actually modify apport somehow [19:40] cjwatson: thanks. [19:40] possibly - although I think it is linuxmint's responsibility to sort this out, but maybe we should figure out how to get in touch with them [19:40] just as it was and remains our responsibility and not Debian's to stop our bug reports going to Debian [19:41] I see your point but I just ran across a ubiquity bug report from Commodore Vision OS and I don't think we can rely on every derived distribution to do the right thing here [19:42] * ogra_ saw that one too and was pondering [19:43] i guess thats one to just close [19:43] bdmurray: yeah, there's a principle/practicality line to draw [19:44] I suspect we should attempt to do both - contact the big ones, work around the small ones (and the big ones who ignore us) [19:44] after all it's presumably in their interests to hear about bugs installing their system [19:46] okay that make sense, I'll poke around our bugs and see which other distros they come from [20:35] bdmurray: it might be worthwhile to ask whoever works on linux mint's deviations in the installer to idle in here and to subscribe to ubiquity bugs [20:36] might be able to get them to push the things they change up, or at least understand what they're doing differently and why