| mdeslaur | Is there an ETA for the lucid mini 9 sound regression caused by kernel 2.6.32-34? (LP: #875300)? | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| mdeslaur | or do I have to apply workaround for all family and friends? | 00:03 |
| redzarf | more details are here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8088901/ | 00:44 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: whats up :) | 00:46 |
| redzarf | jjohansen: I was hoping you might be around :) | 00:46 |
| redzarf | still can't get the image deb file to build | 00:46 |
| jjohansen | yeah I gathered that :) | 00:46 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: what kernel source are you using, and on what version of the OS are you building | 00:47 |
| redzarf | kernel: linux-ec2-2.6.32 | 00:47 |
| redzarf | OS is lucid (latest on EC2) | 00:47 |
| jjohansen | alright and where is it failing | 00:48 |
| redzarf | Been trying from the plain Ubuntu AMI's | 00:48 |
| redzarf | I think it's during the fakeroot debian/rules binary | 00:48 |
| redzarf | the stackoverflow page has the error message that comes up at the end | 00:49 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: okay, can you paste the error some where? paste.ubunt.com ? | 00:49 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: ah, okay looking again | 00:49 |
| redzarf | thx | 00:49 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: in the source directory, what debian directories exist? is it debian and debian.ec2 or debian and debian.master | 00:51 |
| redzarf | all 3 | 00:52 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: hrmm, try binary-ec2 | 00:53 |
| jjohansen | it should be hooked up so that binary, does binary-ec2 /me is wondering if there is a bug there | 00:54 |
| redzarf | still similar errors as before (no image file) | 00:55 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: what is under debian/build/ | 00:56 |
| redzarf | i'll try redownloading source and doing it from scratch, then paste the full output | 00:56 |
| redzarf | i'll try redownloading source and doing it from scratch, then paste the full output to paste.ubuntu.com | 00:56 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: oh wait did you do a fakeroot debian/rules clean first | 00:57 |
| redzarf | i did | 00:57 |
| redzarf | but i'll do it from scratch to be sure | 00:57 |
| redzarf | would you recommend I get linux-image-2.6.32-318-ec2 or just linux-ec2? | 00:58 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: honestly I would recommend the git tree | 00:58 |
| redzarf | what settings would i need to change for ec2? | 00:59 |
| jjohansen | git clone git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git | 00:59 |
| jjohansen | git checkout --track ec2 -b ec2 origin/ec2 | 00:59 |
| jjohansen | second command from within the directory the first creates | 01:00 |
| redzarf | ah, excellent :-) | 01:00 |
| redzarf | nearly finished using the apt-get version... | 01:00 |
| jjohansen | I know the source tarball should be good enough, but I always use the git tree | 01:00 |
| redzarf | http://paste.ubuntu.com/738824/ | 01:02 |
| jjohansen | looking | 01:03 |
| redzarf | btw, i think the file that is touch'ed on line 11 doesn't exist - the place it's copied from doesn't have that file | 01:03 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: ah yeah, okay do | 01:05 |
| jjohansen | make mrproper | 01:05 |
| jjohansen | git checkout -f | 01:05 |
| jjohansen | and try building again | 01:06 |
| redzarf | ok, doing the clone now | 01:06 |
| redzarf | then I do the first checkout above? (--track ec2) | 01:07 |
| redzarf | then those 2 commands? | 01:07 |
| redzarf | do i make menuconfig just before doing the debian/rules clean? | 01:08 |
| jjohansen | oh, sorry no | 01:08 |
| jjohansen | within a git tree, those last to will let you get past the mrproper error and build, but not from the source tarball | 01:08 |
| jjohansen | so the the clone and checkout commands | 01:09 |
| jjohansen | then do | 01:09 |
| jjohansen | fakeroot debian/rules editconfigs | 01:09 |
| jjohansen | if you do menu config before clean, its changes will get blown away | 01:10 |
| jjohansen | actually you will need to do an | 01:10 |
| jjohansen | fakeroot debian/rules clean | 01:10 |
| jjohansen | before editconfigs | 01:10 |
| jjohansen | editconfigs is a wrapper around make menuconfigs | 01:11 |
| redzarf | i'd been doing make menuconfig then the fakeroot debian/rules clean then fakeroot debian/rules binary, so i guess they were out of order | 01:11 |
| redzarf | right | 01:11 |
| jjohansen | well you can do it but, I won't guarentee that it will work | 01:12 |
| redzarf | so do i still do make mrproper and git checkout -f ? | 01:12 |
| jjohansen | actually I think make menuconfig will but then you hit the mrproper problem | 01:12 |
| jjohansen | no | 01:12 |
| redzarf | so this is what i'm about to run: | 01:13 |
| redzarf | git checkout --track ec2 -b ec2 origin/ec2 | 01:13 |
| redzarf | fakeroot debian/rules clean | 01:13 |
| redzarf | fakeroot debian/rules editconfigs | 01:13 |
| redzarf | fakeroot debian/rules binary | 01:13 |
| redzarf | fatal: git checkout: updating paths is incompatible with switching branches. | 01:14 |
| jjohansen | oops | 01:15 |
| jjohansen | git checkout --track -b ec2 origin/ec2 | 01:15 |
| * jjohansen messed up the checkout syntax | 01:15 | |
| redzarf | thats ok, the noob who doesn't know any better will forgive you :) | 01:15 |
| jjohansen | well even for someone who uses git daily sometimes its syntax is uhm less than friendly | 01:17 |
| redzarf | the binary command is running - taking much longer than it ever has before, so I'll take that as a good sign | 01:20 |
| redzarf | jjohansen: it's finished and the image file is there!! :) | 02:01 |
| redzarf | so I just run dpkg -i linux-*.deb then restart - anything else? | 02:01 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: that should be it | 02:02 |
| redzarf | great, thanks for your help! | 02:03 |
| jjohansen | redzarf: np | 02:05 |
| apw | GrueMaster, did it end up in universe perhaps | 08:39 |
| smb | morning .+ | 08:55 |
| n0ti0nis | morning | 08:58 |
| ppisati | morning morning | 10:01 |
| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| seb03 | Hi, I'd like to help with the ASPM bug, how do I know that I've installed the patched kernel correctly? | 10:56 |
| seb03 | does it simply replace the existing one or should it be selectable on boot? | 10:57 |
| smb | seb03, It would replace the existing one if you take the same version | 10:57 |
| smb | Theoretically you should notice a difference in uname -a after boot | 10:57 |
| smb | but in doubt it is the one compiled on Sat-12 | 10:58 |
| seb03 | sure do: uname -a Linux snoopy 3.0.0-13-generic #22+mjgaspmfix SMP Mon Nov 14 18:02:48 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux | 10:58 |
| smb | So that is the patched one | 10:58 |
| seb03 | so how do I get rid of it again after I've done my power readings? | 10:59 |
| seb03 | install the meta package from the repo again? | 10:59 |
| smb | seb03, In doubt you can get the package from there https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/linux/3.0.0-13.22 | 11:02 |
| smb | There is also some way to force a reinstall with specifying a version, but I personally find it rather complicated. :) | 11:02 |
| seb03 | thanks | 11:04 |
| iceroot | hi | 11:10 |
| iceroot | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/869502 can you have a look at this bug to give me infos how i can support you on a better way to get it fixed | 11:11 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 869502 in linux "Kernel-Panic with 3.0.0.12-generic on asus eee pcs and msi wind (both using rt2800 wifi chipset)" [High,Confirmed] | 11:11 |
| iceroot | see also http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1211290 and http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6192 | 11:14 |
| seanius | hi, quick question: I'm maintaining a local kernel package based off the ubuntu-lucid git repo. I'm wondering how I should make commits to incrememnt the changelog frmo the ubuntu version | 12:08 |
| seanius | is there some magic string i need to put in the commit to get it show up in debian/changelog? and is there anything else I need to do to increment the ubuntu version? | 12:09 |
| tgardner | seanius, kernel maintenance is described somewhere in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel | 12:16 |
| ppisati | seanius: everything you commit (except if you use the Ignore: Yes string in the commit log) should show up in the changelog | 12:20 |
| ppisati | seanius: about the version, it's your duty to increment it | 12:20 |
| ppisati | seanius: you mean the last 2 numbers, right? | 12:21 |
| ppisati | seanius: e.g. linux-image-3.0.0-1206-omap4_3.0.0-1206.12_armel.deb | 12:21 |
| ppisati | seanius: the 1206 and 12 numbers in this pkg | 12:21 |
| * ppisati -> lunch | 12:31 | |
| seanius | ppisati: none of my commits show up in the changelog, but like I said I don't know if there's some documented syntatic sugar i'm missing in the commit or some script/template etc | 12:48 |
| seanius | tgardner: i will poke around and see what i can find | 12:49 |
| apw | seanius, you probabally need a fakeroot debian/rules insertchanges to get them into the changelog, of course that implies you have followed standard proceedure in opening the changelog entry (fakeroot debian/rules newrelease) | 12:49 |
| apw | all of this is documented (poorly) in the kernel-team wiki | 12:50 |
| seanius | looking at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/StableHandbook/StablePatchApplication right now | 12:50 |
| seanius | basically, i have a set of about 50 backported patches which i need to maintain on top of one of the ubuntu-lucid kernels | 12:51 |
| seanius | and periodically rebase against the ubuntu updates int the repo | 12:51 |
| seanius | each time i rebase the list of patches get a bit smaller but i don't see the problem ever going away entirely | 12:54 |
| seanius | at least until 3.2 is released and backported :) | 12:55 |
| seanius | it looks like apw's suggestion agrees with the above wiki page, so i'll try working with that | 12:55 |
| seanius | thanks! | 12:56 |
| seanius | one more question: what provides maint-getabis? | 13:12 |
| apw | there is a getabis script in the tree, maint-getabis is more for use by team members, as it talks to our PPAs etc | 13:19 |
| smb | (which would be in the kteam-tools git repo) | 13:20 |
| seanius | right, thx | 13:20 |
| seanius | and for changes to be inserted via debian/rules insertchanges they need to have an "UBUNTU:" line in them? | 13:22 |
| apw | nope | 13:24 |
| apw | for them to have your name against them ye | 13:24 |
| apw | yes, otherwise no | 13:24 |
| seanius | or... i guess the new release commit has to go before them | 13:24 |
| apw | nope, not that either | 13:25 |
| apw | it looks for the previous release commit | 13:25 |
| apw | the format of the release commit title is important | 13:25 |
| seanius | insertchanges turns my new release changelog into a blank entry | 13:25 |
| ppisati | seanius: did you close it properly? | 13:25 |
| apw | its all simple shell in debian/rules.d so you should be able to debug it pretty easy | 13:26 |
| apw | its definatly orientied to our use models | 13:26 |
| seanius | understandable | 13:26 |
| seanius | okay so this is what i'm doing so far | 13:26 |
| apw | normally an empty entry is triggered by it failing to find the previous release commit | 13:26 |
| seanius | git pull --rebase to get some updates | 13:27 |
| apw | and fakeroot debian/rules printenv will tell you what it things current and previous are | 13:27 |
| seanius | git clean -dffx && git reset --hard | 13:27 |
| seanius | fakeroot debian/rules clean | 13:27 |
| seanius | fakeroot debian/rules startnewrelease | 13:27 |
| seanius | git commit -s -F debian/commit-templates/newrelease | 13:27 |
| seanius | oh, oops, there's a git add debian/changelog in there | 13:28 |
| seanius | er, debian.natty/changelog | 13:28 |
| seanius | and then fakeroot debian/rules insertchanges, which sets the changelog to be empty | 13:28 |
| apw | ok, as i say thats probabally because its failing to find its previous entry | 13:29 |
| apw | fdr printenv will show you the version it is looking for | 13:29 |
| seanius | i also see an error from expr when running fdr startnewrelease | 13:31 |
| seanius | apw: will look at printenv after i clean up again | 13:31 |
| apw | then likely your version format is probabally not working for the tooling, and the tools may need a tweak | 13:32 |
| seanius | but i haven't added any version yet | 13:32 |
| seanius | but this is in the natty-lts-backport tree so maybe it's something existing in the repo | 13:32 |
| apw | if your version is triggering the expr then likely the previos version is being broken | 13:33 |
| apw | which means we won't find it to do the entry detection | 13:33 |
| apw | you can just ignore the tooling there and use like | 13:33 |
| apw | if you look at the implementation of insertchanges, you can see how it works | 13:35 |
| apw | you can use git log of your own in the same command line | 13:35 |
| seanius | ah, yeah, you have a bug in rules.d :) | 13:36 |
| seanius | revision = 13.52~lucid1 | 13:37 |
| seanius | @nextminor=$(shell expr `echo $(revision) | awk -F. '{print $$2}'` + 1); | 13:37 |
| apw | yep, probabally never used on lts backports | 13:37 |
| apw | we don't generate those that way | 13:38 |
| seanius | but really, if all i'm interested is sticking a version on top of the existing backport version, and don't care about good changelog documentation, i could just directly edit the debian.natty/changelog file? | 13:38 |
| apw | yes | 13:39 |
| seanius | okay, simplicity ftw then :) | 13:39 |
| === ericm|ubuntu is now known as ericm-Zzz | ||
| * ogasawara back in 20 | 15:29 | |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| apw | smb, whats the latest official relase of your drm33 tree ? | 15:41 |
| * smb believes 2.6.32.48.21 | 15:42 | |
| smb | apw, ^ Should be that. Am I slacking somewhere? | 15:43 |
| apw | smb, no making sure the flip back to kernel.org worked | 15:43 |
| apw | and that we are up to date | 15:43 |
| smb | Ah, ok | 15:43 |
| smb | apw, We should be up to date from before. I think I saw builds happening while I still was bringing k.org back to life | 15:45 |
| apw | url = git://kernel.ubuntu.com/smb/linux-2.6.32.y-drm33.z.git | 15:46 |
| apw | oh we are on the old one, which one do you want to use | 15:46 |
| apw | are you keeping our mirror up to date anyhow? | 15:46 |
| smb | apw, Sort of automatically as I use it to transfer to local builders to test builds. I had been a bit more lax with the tag, but I guess I will use it as a real mirror now | 15:48 |
| smb | Otherwise: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/smb/linux-2.6.32.y-drm33.z.git | 15:48 |
| apw | smb, ok will leave it pointing at your ubuntu one for nwo | 15:54 |
| ogasawara | ## | 16:01 |
| ogasawara | ## Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Today @ 17:00 UTC - #ubuntu-meeting | 16:01 |
| ogasawara | ## agenda: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting | 16:01 |
| ogasawara | ## | 16:01 |
| ogasawara | ## | 16:55 |
| ogasawara | ## Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - in 5 minutes - #ubuntu-meeting | 16:55 |
| ogasawara | ## | 16:55 |
| === ogasawara changed the topic of #ubuntu-kernel to: Home: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/ || Oneiric Kernel Version: 3.0.0 || Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Tues Nov 22 - 17:00 UTC || If you have a question just ask, and do wait around for an answer! | ||
| apw | ogasawara, ok i've redone the configuration review and dumped a slew of new inconsistant items on your plate :) | 20:02 |
| ogasawara | apw: ack | 20:02 |
| apw | ogasawara, did we add doing a re-review at rally to the work items ? | 20:02 |
| tgardner | ogasawara, I was sure ther would be a few. it was kind of mind numbing with all the new options | 20:03 |
| ogasawara | apw: yep, and I thought you added it to the agenda already | 20:03 |
| apw | tgardner, yeah epecially as you see them all 20 times | 20:03 |
| apw | ogasawara, will check and confirm | 20:03 |
| apw | ogasawara, yep its there good | 20:04 |
| ogasawara | tgardner: how's the sprint going? | 20:04 |
| * ogasawara rebases precise to 3.2-rc2 | 20:04 | |
| tgardner | ogasawara, neck deep in server configuration.... | 20:05 |
| apw | ogasawara, I assume there is no patches for the 3.1.0 -> 3.1.1 stuff | 20:10 |
| ogasawara | apw: which stuff? | 20:10 |
| apw | Replace compat-wireless 3.1.0 with 3.1.1 | 20:10 |
| apw | that stuff, i assume your thread is not meant to contains patches for the code itself | 20:11 |
| ogasawara | apw: not exactly, it just dumps the 3.1.1 tarball over the 3.1.0 bits | 20:11 |
| apw | ogasawara, what are we naming the meta packages nwo | 20:13 |
| apw | i was sort of expecting the relase to be 3.1 in the meta package, pointing to 3.1.x whatever it is called in the lbm package | 20:14 |
| ogasawara | apw: for oneiric it's linux-backports-modules-cw-3.1.1-oneiric-<flavor> | 20:14 |
| ogasawara | apw: I suppose we could make it just be 3.1 | 20:14 |
| apw | we use 2.6.38 presumably for the meta package in previous releases yes? | 20:15 |
| apw | ie it points to the base version? then i think the new ones should be 3.0 3.1 etc as they are meant to upgrade | 20:15 |
| ogasawara | apw: yep, in lucid for we used 3.0.0, so I followed suit and used 3.1.1 | 20:16 |
| apw | well 3.0.0, and 3.1.0 (where the 0 is always 0) might also make sense as it matches our kernel naming | 20:17 |
| apw | but the .1 is like patch releases right? if so then we don't want that bit to change in the meta package name | 20:17 |
| apw | so either not there, or zapped to 0, so we get upgrades | 20:17 |
| ogasawara | apw: yah, I think I like the 2 digit convention | 20:19 |
| ogasawara | apw: eg just 3.1 | 20:19 |
| apw | ogasawara, yeah | 20:20 |
| ogasawara | apw: I'll send a revised patch to the list | 20:20 |
| mdeslaur | tgardner: who do I need to ping for SRU regressions? | 20:20 |
| tgardner | mdeslaur, start with the stable team | 20:22 |
| mdeslaur | who is on the stable team? | 20:22 |
| apw | mdeslaur, bjf and herton in the first instance | 20:23 |
| mdeslaur | apw: thanks! | 20:24 |
| apw | mdeslaur, fileing a bug against the version with regresion-proposed or regression-updates would get their attention too | 20:24 |
| apw | what you found, anything fun ? | 20:24 |
| EtienneG | trying to test the latest natty kernel in natty-proposed, but it seems like linux-image-2.6.38-13-generic is not in the archive. Is it still building? | 20:26 |
| mdeslaur | apw: there's already a bug open (#875300)...we broke sound on mini 9's running lucid...and now, a bunch of friends have started pestering me :P | 20:26 |
| mdeslaur | apw: never _ever_ recommend machines to friends :P | 20:26 |
| apw | EtienneG, shouldn't work that way as things are copied in as a chunk | 20:26 |
| apw | EtienneG, which flavour are you having issues with | 20:27 |
| EtienneG | apw, -generic, amd64 | 20:27 |
| EtienneG | apw, it shows on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/amd64/linux-image-2.6.38-13-generic/2.6.38-13.52, but it not apt-getable from us.a.u.c or archive.u.c directly | 20:27 |
| EtienneG | also, linux-image-generic do depend on linux-image-2.6.38-13-generic, but it is not there ... | 20:28 |
| EtienneG | I am perplexed | 20:28 |
| EtienneG | might just be me doing something wrong | 20:29 |
| apw | EtienneG, they appear to be in universe | 20:30 |
| * apw investigates | 20:31 | |
| EtienneG | ah! | 20:31 |
| EtienneG | weird, but he | 20:31 |
| tgardner | EtienneG, an inexperienced archive admin likely forgot the overrides (again) | 20:32 |
| apw | tgardner, looks like it yep | 20:32 |
| * apw starts poking on #ubuntu-devel | 20:32 | |
| EtienneG | tgardner, I am shocked! is there such a thing as an "inexperienced archive admin"? :) | 20:32 |
| * apw wishes it was not so | 20:32 | |
| apw | though the kernel copies is meant to be scripted so in thory that could be part of the scirpting | 20:33 |
| apw | EtienneG, adding universe temp should let you get testing | 20:33 |
| EtienneG | anyway, that was it. my sources.list entry for natty-proposed only had main and restricted | 20:33 |
| EtienneG | so there | 20:33 |
| EtienneG | thanks for the pointer, as long as I can it, I am happy | 20:34 |
| EtienneG | I guess it will be fixed in time | 20:34 |
| apw | yep, will poke that aa's to get it resolved | 20:36 |
| apw | looking likely will be tommorrow now | 20:36 |
| apw | ogasawara, under the new rougime wherein the archive is meant to work all the time, i wonder if we should upload a semi-official kernel to the kernelppa or something so we can get some testing on it before unleashing it on the unsuspecting public | 21:04 |
| ogasawara | apw: sounds reasonable | 21:04 |
| apw | of course that assumes we have PPAs | 21:05 |
| ogasawara | apw: I know there are still some powerpc build failures that I need to fix us (assuming they're not fixed with -rc2) | 21:05 |
| apw | ogasawara, ok :) let me know if i can help, else i'll keep grinding on the configuration check tommorrow | 21:06 |
| * apw drifts away | 21:06 | |
| ogasawara | apw: ack, I'm gonna kick off test builds and see what's still breaking. Likely won't get to fixing them up till tomorrow since I drop off here in a bit. | 21:07 |
| apw | ogasawara, sounds like a plan to me, now where is that beer | 21:07 |
| ogra_ | apw, you might find this thread intresting https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2011-November/254160.html | 22:01 |
| ogra_ | (looks like overlayfs /cow contents dont go into swap) | 22:02 |
| apw | ogra_, could be | 22:08 |
| === ericm-Zzz is now known as ericm|ubuntu | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!