[11:50] <nigelb> daker_: Nice job on the open graph :)
[12:24] <cjohnston> mornin
[12:24] <nigelb> ohai cjohnston
[12:24] <cjohnston> o/
[12:24] <nigelb> did you guys figure out the local_settings issue?
[12:24] <cjohnston> no
[12:25] <nigelb> I will try something out when I get back.
[12:26] <nigelb> Next few days I'm going into preparing for my talks.
[12:26] <cjohnston> !fail
[12:26] <ubot4> Factoid 'fail' not found
[12:42] <cjohnston> mornin daker_ :-
[12:42] <cjohnston> :-)
[13:27] <cjohnston> mornin johnoxton
[14:00] <johnoxton> cjohnston hello! How are you?
[14:01] <cjohnston> doin well.. thanks.. you?
[14:01] <johnoxton> pretty good thanks.. over my bout of flu
[14:01] <cjohnston> thats good
[14:03] <johnoxton> so, re: summit schedule. Rach has done a bit of work actually. I need to ask her to join this channel
[14:03] <cjohnston> thats awesome
[14:05] <johnoxton> and I'll send an email sooooon! about a proposed workflow etc.
[14:06] <cjohnston> ok.. cool
[14:53]  * cjohnston notes that nigelb bugged mhall119 and I for days because we werent doing his reviews fast enough.
[14:54]  * cjohnston also notes that he has had a review waiting for 5 days now
[14:54]  * nigelb notes his reviews were dependent on one another.
[14:54] <nigelb> Also, I'm writing a talk for a conf, packing, etc :D
[14:54] <cjohnston> that stuff isnt important
[14:54] <cjohnston> :-P
[14:54] <johnoxton> cjohnston and anyone else for that matter, rachelisking just joined us to help with summit
[14:54] <cjohnston> rachelisking: !!!!
[14:54] <cjohnston> mhall119: nigelb ^ thats you
[14:54] <rachelisking> hello!
[14:55] <nigelb> Hi rachelisking!
[14:55] <cjohnston> bbiab
[14:55] <mhall119> awesome, welcome rachelisking
[14:56]  * nigelb is the guy who was skyped in.
[14:57] <rachelisking> ah, hi all
[15:01] <rachelisking> about summit, do you guys think we've missed the moment to do a survey?
[15:01] <nigelb> We did do a survey post-UDS.
[15:02] <nigelb> Actually, let me ask for those results.
[15:02] <nigelb> What do you think needs to be surveyed further?
[15:02] <rachelisking> ah, that would be good
[15:02] <rachelisking> there was talk at the hacking session of doing a specific schedule one
[15:05] <rachelisking> oh, actually I never shared the quick notes I took during the session - they are here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tz0ZREgH6hFA1eJWi8j9aiifzQRSJw7yx7H_JQ-_FDk/edit
[15:06] <rachelisking> feel free to add / change anything those who were there!
[15:07] <nigelb> Oooh.
[15:07] <nigelb> Some of them are in line with what I've been thinking.
[15:07] <nigelb> Like, room name not being important.
[15:08] <nigelb> We could do better views for desktop that way, while keeping it same for the screens.
[15:09] <nigelb> Michelle says the survey closes this friday. So we should have feedback next week.
[15:09] <rachelisking> ok great, can you remind me what summit questions were in there again?
[15:10] <nigelb> I think one was general feedback and suggestions
[15:10] <nigelb> and one was for remote participants - what device they were using, desktop, phone otheres.
[15:12] <rachelisking> ah yeah, cool
[17:15] <gmargo> Problem with packages.ubuntu.com - who to report it to?
[17:15] <nigelb> gmargo: #canonical-sysadmin
[17:16] <gmargo> nigelb: thank you
[17:16] <nigelb> gmargo: wait, problem of what kind?
[17:19] <gmargo> nigelb: The oneirc pages do not have package descriptions.
[17:19] <gmargo> s/oneirc/oneiric/
[17:20] <gmargo> For instance, compare http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/lxdm to http://packages.ubuntu.com/natty/lxdm
[17:20] <nigelb> gmargo: could you mention that in #ubuntu-devel please?
[17:20] <nigelb> Someone there probably knows what's wwrong.
[17:20] <gmargo> OK
[17:21] <nigelb> Sorry to point at different places
[17:21] <nigelb> I initally thought it was down or something like that :)
[17:21] <gmargo> join #ubuntu-devel
[17:21] <gmargo> (oops_