| * xjjk eagerly awaits the next Aurora | 01:26 | |
| atulagrwl | I am on ubuntu 11.10 (64 bit) and even after adding ppa:ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa, I am getting firefox10.0~a1~hg20111108r79928-0ubuntu1~umd1 while trying to install firefox-trunk. Is there any known issue or problem with my system only? | 06:24 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | atulagrwl: the daily is currently failing to build | 06:25 |
| atulagrwl | micahg, okay. | 06:26 |
| atulagrwl | micahg, I guess it will take some time to resolve !! | 06:27 |
| micahg | well, there were some changes made and new builds in the queue, idk if they'll actually build or not (merges welcome with fixes :), check with chrisccoulson first so as not to duplicate work) | 06:28 |
| atulagrwl | micahg, build problem is not in the upstream right | 06:31 |
| micahg | usually not | 06:31 |
| atulagrwl | micahg, let me check if I can do something about it.. getting the source right now | 06:32 |
| micahg | atulagrwl: you might want to wait for today's builds | 06:33 |
| atulagrwl | Okay.. I will wait for today's builds but in the mean time I will get the source and fire the build :) | 06:34 |
| micahg | atulagrwl: I think this is something chrisccoulson will need to fix in the global menu extension | 06:34 |
| micahg | atulagrwl: if you're interested in helping to maintain the PPAs though, you can chat with chrisccoulson, he should be online in 2-4 hours | 06:35 |
| atulagrwl | I will do that but I don't have any experience in maintaining packages | 06:36 |
| micahg | oh, that was yesterday's build that just was built a few hours ago... | 06:36 |
| micahg | yeah, today's builds should have progress | 06:37 |
| atulagrwl | hmm.. so today's change will take be built tomorrow? | 06:45 |
| micahg | it's starting in 1hr supposedly | 06:46 |
| atulagrwl | chrisccoulson, May I know what is the problem with firefox-trunk? | 11:25 |
| chrisccoulson | i've no idea, couldn't you be a little bit more specific please? | 11:25 |
| xjjk | woo new aurora | 11:35 |
| atulagrwl | chrisccoulson, Sorry for not being specific, When I try to download firefox-trunk, I am getting firefox10.0 but I see firefox11.0 in the upstream as well on the launchpad page. micahg told me that there has been some build failures. | 11:36 |
| chrisccoulson | that's right | 11:38 |
| chrisccoulson | those are fixed now, there will probably be new builds in the next publisher run | 11:39 |
| atulagrwl | chrisccoulson, Thanks a lot.. waiting for the new builds now :) | 11:46 |
| atulagrwl | Got the new package via upgrade.. Thanks a lot chrisccoulson | 13:21 |
| chrisccoulson | atulagrwl, cool :) | 13:44 |
| atulagrwl | chrisccoulson, Is there any help needed in maintaining PPAs? I can help but I don't have any experience in packaging | 13:47 |
| DannyButterman | One of my ubuntu user has recurring errors with firefox, though it can't be reproduced : it occasionally doesn't display bookmarks anymore and browsing is no more possible. I don't know how to fix it, yet alone how to find what's happening | 14:05 |
| DannyButterman | Can someone help me ? | 14:05 |
| DannyButterman | Please ? | 14:07 |
| DannyButterman | Hello (lo... lo... lo.....) | 14:20 |
| nikolam | omg those FF versions are starting to be annoying. Mozilla tries to do something with versioning that eludes my reasoning.. | 14:20 |
| nikolam | At least Seamonkey is not following that line of thinking. For time being. | 14:21 |
| bhearsum | nikolam: Firefox is releasing the same number of versions as before | 14:21 |
| bhearsum | you should focus on what's in them, not on the number | 14:22 |
| bhearsum | the fact is, you're getting features and performance improvements every 6 weeks instead of just security fixes | 14:22 |
| nikolam | but version numbers are booming. Soon we will have FF 2830 and then what. | 14:23 |
| nikolam | Isnt it actually nightmare2 mozilla street for website devs? | 14:24 |
| chrisccoulson | why? it's just a number, like it always has been | 14:27 |
| chrisccoulson | and jumping in here with "omg those FF versions are starting to be annoying" is unlikely to win you any sympathy in here btw :-) | 14:28 |
| nikolam | Well I have an opinion :) | 14:29 |
| nikolam | I alwas associated nice, round version numbers with long time supportable releases. And that is what people mostly want. | 14:29 |
| nikolam | Security patched medium long supported releases. Stability. | 14:30 |
| nikolam | I just figured newer lightning does not work for me on TB 8 and TB 3 eather. So frustration on versioning. | 14:31 |
| nikolam | lightning 1 | 14:31 |
| chrisccoulson | that's nothing to do with versioning, but rather the fact that lightning ships binary components | 14:32 |
| chrisccoulson | you could call tb 8 something like tb 3.8 and it still wouldn't make any difference | 14:32 |
| chrisccoulson | like i said, it's just a number | 14:32 |
| nikolam | So how do I know it is long supported if its versions are going to so high numbers. At least how customers would know it is just a number. | 14:34 |
| chrisccoulson | well, here we go | 16:47 |
| chrisccoulson | updating to precise now | 16:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!