[01:26]  * xjjk eagerly awaits the next Aurora
[06:24] <atulagrwl> I am on ubuntu 11.10 (64 bit) and even after adding ppa:ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa, I am getting firefox10.0~a1~hg20111108r79928-0ubuntu1~umd1 while trying to install firefox-trunk. Is there any known issue or problem with my system only?
[06:25] <micahg> atulagrwl: the daily is currently failing to build
[06:26] <atulagrwl> micahg, okay.
[06:27] <atulagrwl> micahg, I guess it will take some time to resolve !!
[06:28] <micahg> well, there were some changes made and new builds in the queue, idk if they'll actually build or not (merges welcome with fixes :), check with chrisccoulson first so as not to duplicate work)
[06:31] <atulagrwl> micahg, build problem is not in the upstream right
[06:31] <micahg> usually not
[06:32] <atulagrwl> micahg, let me check if I can do something about it.. getting the source right now
[06:33] <micahg> atulagrwl: you might want to wait for today's builds
[06:34] <atulagrwl> Okay.. I will wait for today's builds but in the mean time I will get the source and fire the build :)
[06:34] <micahg> atulagrwl: I think this is something chrisccoulson will need to fix in the global menu extension
[06:35] <micahg> atulagrwl: if you're interested in helping to maintain the PPAs though, you can chat with chrisccoulson, he should be online in 2-4 hours
[06:36] <atulagrwl> I will do that but I don't have any experience in maintaining packages
[06:36] <micahg> oh, that was yesterday's build that just was built a few hours ago...
[06:37] <micahg> yeah, today's builds should have progress
[06:45] <atulagrwl> hmm.. so today's change will take be built tomorrow?
[06:46] <micahg> it's starting in 1hr supposedly
[11:25] <atulagrwl> chrisccoulson, May I know what is the problem with firefox-trunk?
[11:25] <chrisccoulson> i've no idea, couldn't you be a little bit more specific please?
[11:35] <xjjk> woo new aurora
[11:36] <atulagrwl> chrisccoulson, Sorry for not being specific, When I try to download firefox-trunk, I am getting firefox10.0 but I see firefox11.0 in the upstream as well on the launchpad page. micahg told me that there has been some build failures.
[11:38] <chrisccoulson> that's right
[11:39] <chrisccoulson> those are fixed now, there will probably be new builds in the next publisher run
[11:46] <atulagrwl> chrisccoulson, Thanks a lot.. waiting for the new builds now :)
[13:21] <atulagrwl> Got the new package via upgrade.. Thanks a lot chrisccoulson
[13:44] <chrisccoulson> atulagrwl, cool :)
[13:47] <atulagrwl> chrisccoulson, Is there any help needed in maintaining PPAs? I can help but I don't have any experience in packaging
[14:05] <DannyButterman> One of my ubuntu user has recurring errors with firefox, though it can't be reproduced : it occasionally doesn't display bookmarks anymore and browsing is no more possible. I don't know how to fix it, yet alone how to find what's happening
[14:05] <DannyButterman> Can someone help me ?
[14:07] <DannyButterman> Please ?
[14:20] <DannyButterman> Hello (lo... lo... lo.....)
[14:20] <nikolam> omg those FF versions are starting to be annoying. Mozilla tries to do something with versioning that eludes my reasoning..
[14:21] <nikolam> At least Seamonkey is not following that line of thinking. For time being.
[14:21] <bhearsum> nikolam: Firefox is releasing the same number of versions as before
[14:22] <bhearsum> you should focus on what's in them, not on the number
[14:22] <bhearsum> the fact is, you're getting features and performance improvements every 6 weeks instead of just security fixes
[14:23] <nikolam> but version numbers are booming. Soon we will have FF 2830 and then what.
[14:24] <nikolam> Isnt it actually nightmare2 mozilla street for website devs?
[14:27] <chrisccoulson> why? it's just a number, like it always has been
[14:28] <chrisccoulson> and jumping in here with "omg those FF versions are starting to be annoying" is unlikely to win you any sympathy in here btw :-)
[14:29] <nikolam> Well I have an opinion :)
[14:29] <nikolam> I alwas associated nice, round version numbers with long time supportable releases. And that is what people mostly want.
[14:30] <nikolam> Security patched medium long supported releases. Stability.
[14:31] <nikolam> I just figured newer lightning does not work for me on TB 8 and TB 3 eather. So frustration on versioning.
[14:31] <nikolam> lightning 1
[14:32] <chrisccoulson> that's nothing to do with versioning, but rather the fact that lightning ships binary components
[14:32] <chrisccoulson> you could call tb 8 something like tb 3.8 and it still wouldn't make any difference
[14:32] <chrisccoulson> like i said, it's just a number
[14:34] <nikolam> So how do I know it is long supported if its versions are going to so high numbers. At least how customers would know it is just a number.
[16:47] <chrisccoulson> well, here we go
[16:47] <chrisccoulson> updating to precise now