[02:57] <Resistance> does anything special have to be in debian/changelog for the distributions a recipe builds for?
[02:58] <wgrant> Resistance: No, recipes override that.
[02:58] <Resistance> wgrant:  so if i specify "natty" in debian/changelog...
[02:58] <Resistance> and i have the recipe set for natty, oneiric, precise
[02:58] <Resistance> it'll build for all three, and override?
[02:59] <wgrant> Yes
[02:59] <wgrant> It creates a new changelog entry
[02:59] <wgrant> Overriding the version and series.
[02:59] <Resistance> so for what its worth, i could have had foobarbaz in the changelog, and it'd have overridden?
[02:59] <Resistance> :P
[02:59] <wgrant> Yup
[02:59] <Resistance> oh cool...
[03:00] <Resistance> *updates his debian/ templates destined for recipe builds*
[03:17] <Resistance> do recipe builds and what not get a lower build / ppa-build priority?
[03:18] <Resistance> the same source package uploaded by hand myself gets a sooner build time than the recipe build on lp
[03:57] <dobey> Resistance: recipe builds occur on a different set of servers from PPA builds, afaik; so it may take longer for some of those servers to catch up with build requests (they generate source packages, that then get uploaded to the PPAs, which then get prioritized on the PPA build farm)
[03:59] <Resistance> dobey:  out of pure curiosity, is there a way to up the priority of a recipe build?
[04:01] <wgrant> dobey, Resistance: It's the same build farm, but recipes build only on the i386 builders.
[04:02] <Resistance> wgrant:  the same last question still stands.
[04:02] <Resistance> is there a way to increase the priority of a build?
[04:02]  * Resistance knows with PPA builds, increasing the priority helps a bit.
[04:02] <wgrant> We only do that in exceptional cases.
[04:03] <Resistance> by increase, i meant negligibly increase, so that instead of 6 hours to build/upload it decreases to 3 or smth
[04:03] <wgrant> Everyone thinks that their builds are important and need to be at the top of the queue :)
[04:03]  * Resistance does not want to stay awake for about 20 hours to see whether the recipe will succeed or not
[04:03] <Resistance> oh crap, low battery...
[04:03]  * Resistance shall return after changing location to find power
[04:03] <wgrant> It would normally be immediate, but we're low on builders at the moment.
[04:05] <YokoZar> wgrant: you should learn from realtime strategy games
[04:06] <YokoZar> wgrant: you can never have enough builders
[04:06] <wgrant> Heh
[04:06] <wgrant> Indeed
[04:21] <micahg> YokoZar: we have quite a few times when there are idle builders, if all the builders are present :)
[04:22] <wgrant> Indeed, we need to take another base.
[04:37] <dpb_> mup: hi
[06:15] <evander> err the launchpad search is not working at the moment.
[06:17] <wgrant> What a useful problem report.
[06:17] <StevenK> Sure, we'll get right on that.
[06:17] <StevenK> Or something.
[06:17] <wgrant> (it works fine, fwiw)
[06:31] <nigelb> heh
[06:32] <nigelb> wgrant: Should have http://imgur.com/jacoj handy :)
[06:41] <wgrant> Heh
[07:40] <stewart> hi! i've renamed a milestone (B to A) and now I cannot create a new milestone with name B (nor rename A back to B)
[07:40] <stewart> known issue?
[07:41] <wgrant> stewart: What were names A and B?
[07:41] <stewart> "5.5.17-23.0" and "5.5.17-22.1"
[07:41] <stewart> (B and A respectively)
[07:43] <wgrant> Are you using the AJAX popup, or the plain HTML form?
[07:43] <wgrant> What's the error when you try to create or rename?
[07:43] <stewart> the AJAX popup
[07:44] <stewart> "The following errors were encountered:
[07:44] <stewart> Bad Requestname: The name 5.5.17-23.0 is already used by a milestone in Percona Server."
[07:44] <stewart> and i reloaded the page and it seems to exist now....
[07:44] <stewart> strange
[07:45] <wgrant> Ah. Perhaps it created the first time, but you were looking at a cached version of the timeline graph?
[07:45] <wgrant> (there may be issues with its invalidation)
[07:45] <stewart> possibly
[10:35] <pan1nx> did I just hit the launchpad offline  time...
[10:36] <wgrant> pan1nx: Yes, we're in the middle of a scheduled DB upgrade.
[10:36] <wgrant> Should be back in 5-10 minutes.
[12:10] <soren> Is there anything (other than this IRC broadcast ping) I can do to get some movement on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/177443 ?
[12:11] <mrevell> gnuoy, Can you help soren?
[12:13] <wgrant> mrevell: gnuoy's not here today, I believe. mthaddon: ^^?
[12:14] <mrevell> Ah, cheers wgrant
[12:14] <mthaddon> wgrant: if you can provide the SQL :)
[12:14] <wgrant> Curses.
[12:14]  * wgrant writes it.
[12:21] <wgrant> mthaddon: It's on RequestLogging/LP/SQL, but I don't think there's anybody around to approve it yet.
[12:34] <wgrant> soren: I'll seek approval of the SQL when I can track down a team lead tomorrow.
[12:35] <soren> wgrant: Lovely,thanks. Would you mind following up on the question to that effect?
[12:38] <wgrant> soren: I set the whiteboard and assigned it to myself a few minutes back.
[12:39] <soren> wgrant: Oh. I didn't notice the whiteboard thing. I didn't even realise answers had whiteboard. Go figure. Thanks!
[12:41] <geser> should it be time to make this change possible through LP API? it's at least the 3rd time such change was needed and it always included SQL (with all its process)
[12:51] <mvo> hello! could someone help me with figuring out why https://translations.launchpad.net/ddtp-ubuntu/precise/+translations has not exported anything to lp:~mvo/ddtp-ubuntu/ddtp-precise yet?
[13:53] <pindonga> hi there, I have a question about using launchpad for translations, is this the right place for that?
[15:04] <jelmer> pindonga: hi
[15:04] <jelmer> pidyes
[15:05] <jelmer> pindonga: yes
[15:05] <pindonga> hey jelmer , I was wondering if it's possible to split translations into different files, so that they can follow different review cycles
[15:06] <pindonga> for example, one file for community approved translations and one for private team approved translations
[15:06] <pindonga> some strings are sensitive and want to be under more thorough control
[15:07] <jelmer> pindonga: I don't think that is possible at the moment, but I'm not all that familiar with Launchpad translations
[15:07] <jelmer> perhaps there some other Launchpad dev around?
[16:31] <SpamapS> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/85322365/buildlog.txt.gz  ... it seems like ca-certificates-java randomly causes package builds to fail quite often...
[16:31] <SpamapS> Is it just a function of which buildd I ended up on?
[16:36] <jelmer> SpamapS: possibly. recipe builds also have a memory limit of 1Gb
[16:37] <SpamapS> So possibly the java bits in the postinst need to have some memory limiting?
[16:39] <jelmer> that would fix it
[16:40] <jelmer> there is also a bug open in Launchpad about the memory restrictions
[16:47] <jelmer> SpamapS: bug 693524 ?
[16:49] <SpamapS> jelmer: probably
[16:50] <SpamapS> If only Critical meant "somebody is staying up all night weekends and evenings to fix it" ;)
[17:05] <jelmer> SpamapS: there is a trivial fix. I just seem to have trouble convincing one of the other developers that recipe builds don't need stricter memory restrictions than regular builds.
[19:21] <CarlFK> https://launchpad.net/~carlfk/+archive/ppa/+build/2933792  why is this only building for i386?
[19:26] <micahg> CarlFK: if it's Architecture: all, it's only build on i386 and used everywhere
[19:27] <CarlFK> micahg: cool.  i think it is just config files, so makes sense
[19:27] <CarlFK> how is multi release coming?