[00:01] <iamfuzz> StevenK, I get the same thing when running make run_codehosting as well as when it tries to import my key at: https://bazaar.launchpad.dev/pks/lookup?search=0xD69FC46438D3A33619E5577D39BE3335F26A3797&op=get
[00:01] <StevenK> iamfuzz: -> #launchpad-dev
[00:02] <StevenK> So that more than just me can help you out.
[00:02] <iamfuzz> touche
[01:04] <nigelb> iamfuzz: Ha, you're trying out LP as well? :)
[01:04] <iamfuzz> nigelb, indeed :-)
[01:04] <iamfuzz> looking good so far but about to tackle the soyuz beast
[01:04] <nigelb> Oh dear.
[01:04] <StevenK> It will tackle you back.
[01:04] <StevenK> And then eat you.
[01:04] <nigelb> Exactly.
[01:09] <iamfuzz> :-)
[07:46] <dholbach> good morning
[09:26] <l3on> dholbach: hey :)
[09:29] <l3on> I don't know what's going on... It seems that patch gets corrupted during upload if I use mail to reply to bug report :/
[09:29] <dholbach> l3on, I have to step out for a bit - maybe you can ask for help in here and I'll reply once I get back or maybe somebody else can help out
[09:51] <dholbach> l3on, did you get any help?
[09:53] <dholbach> nevermind, I'll deal with it manually
[19:12] <ricotz> debfx, hi, do you think virtualbox 4.1.6 is syncable yet? first linux 3.2.0 upload is going to land soon
[19:14] <debfx> ricotz: yes. is 4.1.4 incompatible with the 3.2 kernel?
[19:14] <ricotz> debfx, yes it is
[19:14] <ricotz> rev 39224 fixed it
[19:14] <ricotz> https://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/39224
[19:15] <debfx> ah right, afaik that's not included in 4.1.6 though
[19:16] <ricotz> oh, i was hoping so
[19:21] <ricotz> debfx, would be nice to have 4.1.6 uploaded including this patch then
[19:58] <broder> ScottK: some new clamav rebackports just popped up on <http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~broder/rebackporter/rebackports.json>. will you be taking care of getting those backports?
[20:10] <ScottK> broder: Sure.
[20:39] <jasper> Can I ask somebody about btrfs-tools packaging here?
[20:42] <tumbleweed> jasper: asking if you can ask a question isn't very productive. Please ago ahead
[20:46] <jasper> Thank you for you're time. I'm very interested in devoting time in packaging the newer btrfs-tools for ubuntu. I think the btrfs-tools package in the repository is a little bit old. Currently I use my own btrfs-tools which i've build myself. I was wondering if there's a maintainer which would be interested in the packages.
[20:47] <tumbleweed> jasper: we inherit our btrfs-tools package from debian, although it picked up a few modifications on the way, which is why it's now a little behind debian
[20:47] <tumbleweed> debian seems to have a more recent snapshot packaged: http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/btrfs-tools.html
[20:47] <tumbleweed> although, not much more recent...
[20:49] <jasper> Okay, thank you for you're information. I will take a look at the debian packages, and otherwise I'll post my packages in a ppa or something for everybody to find if they like it.
[20:49] <tumbleweed> really, the best person to talk to, about packaging a newer snapshot, is the debian maintainer of btrfs-tools
[20:54] <jasper> Okay, I will try to contact him. Again thanks for you're help.
[20:55] <tumbleweed> np
[21:15] <broder> tumbleweed: i'll file a bug, but it looks like requestbackport doesn't currently look at non-release pockets
[21:20] <tumbleweed> broder: ah, yes, it should
[21:21] <broder> (though i need to check - i'm not entirely sure backport-helper handles non-release backports correctly)
[21:34] <ScottK> broder: Bug filed.  Thanks.
[21:34] <broder> thank you :)