[00:51] matrix3000: raphink is correct, orchestra is for building your own cloud basically. If you have access to an openstack deployment, or you want to pay amazon, you can just use the ec2 provider. [00:51] matrix3000: in theory it will work with Eucalyptus too [01:56] So, building a charm and since co-location is in the works I'm adding a configuration option to switch between using mysql interface and local sqlite [01:56] Is this feasible [05:37] <_mup_> juju/robust-zk-connect r417 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com [05:37] <_mup_> Test normal (fast path) connection to ZK [05:37] <_mup_> juju/robust-zk-connect r418 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com [05:37] <_mup_> Merged trunk [05:43] <_mup_> juju/robust-zk-connect r419 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com [05:43] <_mup_> Removed redundant tests for EC2 connect (in common anyway) [05:47] <_mup_> juju/robust-zk-connect r420 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com [05:47] <_mup_> Removed redundant orchestra connection tests [05:49] <_mup_> juju/robust-zk-connect r421 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com [05:49] <_mup_> PEP8, PyFlakes [06:08] I'm in the middle of writing a charm and I can't get juju to start. [06:08] Running 'juju bootstrap' yields: "Environment already bootstrapped" [06:08] But 'juju status' yields: "ERROR could not connect before timeout". [06:08] What does that mean? [06:33] george_e Local or EC2? [06:34] I got it running now. [06:34] I don't know what happened though. [06:34] Nice, what was it? [06:34] Yeah, it was local. [06:34] I just ran 'juju destroy-environment' and started it again. [06:34] ...and it worked. [06:35] I know local messes up on boot strap occasionally, I can't remember the reason. Someone explained it to me earlier [06:36] Well, at least it's working. [06:36] I'm starting to get a feel for how powerful Juju really is. [06:37] it is AWESOME [06:37] I believe you. [06:37] ...and I am sooo gonna write more of these when this one is done. === ejat- is now known as ejat [15:53] Oh, apparently charms can contribute to charm-tools - I opened a merge proposal for a small bug, can I just...merge it? Or would it be better to keep doing merge requests for you guys [16:18] marcoceppi: If its trivial, just go ahead and merge/push. If its something that makes a large change, reviews are a nice way to ensure the tools have a high quality. [16:43] Okay, yeah, these are just language changes for the bugs about charm create [16:55] marcoceppi: is Ondina, LLC your corporate alter-ego ? [17:13] SpamapS: It's the company I started, I still can't figure out WHY it shows Ondina as the one committing when it's actually me and my personal key [17:28] SpamapS: Thanks for the update on the bug, I misunderstood the context of the bug. Would adding a config key of "autogenerated" to meta.yaml or a file that simply says "removebeforeflight"? [17:44] <_mup_> Bug #892548 was filed: missing "us-west-2" in schema definition < https://launchpad.net/bugs/892548 > [17:58] <_mup_> Bug #892552 was filed: juju does not extract system ssh fingerprints < https://launchpad.net/bugs/892552 > [23:27] I'm trying to pass config values on the bootstrap with juju deploy --config "foo=bar" [...] local:charm but it's expecting a file. Does this kind of functionality work? [23:31] Furthermore, if it doesn't - should it work as such?