=== JackyAlcine is now known as SaintJackyAlcine | ||
=== SaintJackyAlcine is now known as JackyAlcine | ||
=== zkriesse_ is now known as zkriesse | ||
=== claydoh_ is now known as claydoh | ||
=== EvilJackyAlcine is now known as JackyAlcine | ||
hedge104 | Hi, I got a problem while compiling nepomukannotation. It was working fine with kubuntu11.04... now i upgraded it to 11.10.... all kdelibs,kde-runtime work fine without any problem. but nepomukannotation gives this error: http://paste.kde.org/148628/ also in the new version of kubuntu, all kde packages give some warning like this: http://paste.kde.org/148652/ | 08:18 |
---|---|---|
bambee | morning | 08:47 |
=== amichair_ is now known as amichair | ||
=== tazz_ is now known as tazz | ||
Riddell | good morning | 12:00 |
Riddell | guess what? I'm back! | 12:01 |
nihui | good morning! | 12:01 |
Riddell | I wonder what needs doing | 12:01 |
Riddell | lots of merges no doubt | 12:01 |
jussi | Riddell: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 12:03 |
* jussi hugs Riddell | 12:03 | |
=== jussi changed the topic of #kubuntu-devel to: Cookies for Everyone! | 11.10 Released! | 4.7.80: https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/Ninjas/Packaging - Merge with debian first | Riddell is back!!! :D | ||
Riddell | :) | 12:11 |
Riddell | nice to be missed :) | 12:11 |
* Tm_T huggles all | 12:15 | |
Saviq | hi all, are there any efforts around packaging Qt 4.8 going on for Precise? | 12:20 |
Saviq | debfx: I got pointed at you by didrocks ^? | 12:21 |
Riddell | Saviq: we don't generally package Qt until it makes releases, what's the motivation? | 12:23 |
Saviq | Riddell: trying some stuff out, but I got you, will manage myself | 12:25 |
=== OffToHades is now known as BarkingFish | ||
=== BarkingFish is now known as Guest26319 | ||
=== Guest26319 is now known as BarkingFish | ||
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
* Riddell merging qt, this packaging stuff is fiddly | 13:36 | |
* Quintasan goes to get some food before fighting with maliit | 13:37 | |
davmor2 | Riddell: it's tying the bow at the end of wrapping isn't it ;) | 13:38 |
Quintasan | lol | 13:38 |
jussi | ooh its davmor2, some throw something at him! :P | 13:38 |
Quintasan | huh | 13:38 |
Quintasan | like what | 13:38 |
Quintasan | bricks? | 13:38 |
* Quintasan throws apachelogger at davmor2 | 13:39 | |
jussi | nah... cream pies! :D | 13:39 |
Quintasan | oh | 13:39 |
* shadeslayer_ throws dlna at davmor2 | 13:39 | |
* Quintasan puts apachelogger back in his place | 13:39 | |
* Quintasan throws cream pies at davmor2 | 13:39 | |
Quintasan | bbl | 13:40 |
Quintasan | gotta eat and run some errands | 13:40 |
Quintasan | Y U NO HW ACCEL YET TRANSFORMER | 13:40 |
* davmor2 stands behind jussi and awaits the onslaught of incoming objects | 13:40 | |
* jussi ducks and laughs as davmor2 gets hit.. | 13:41 | |
shadeslayer_ | Quintasan: you're lucky, I'm still waiting for lilstevie's app :P | 13:41 |
shadeslayer_ | and this dlna shit isn't making life any easier | 13:42 |
Quintasan | \o/ | 13:42 |
* Quintasan be seriously eating | 13:42 | |
CaptainKnots | is this the channel to discuss kubuntu 12.04? | 14:15 |
jussi | CaptainKnots: yes, in a way, its for the development on that. What would you like to raise? | 14:15 |
CaptainKnots | well I just did a dist-upgrade and am wondering what it's going to break | 14:16 |
CaptainKnots | haha | 14:16 |
CaptainKnots | also, should I remove fglrx before I reboot? | 14:16 |
jussi | CaptainKnots: no idea... I dont upgrade at least ill alpha 3 or so | 14:17 |
CaptainKnots | well, I'll report my findings after I find out then | 14:17 |
jussi | CaptainKnots: you are probably better asking in #ubuntu+1 - it covers kubuntu as well and its more from a user support perspective. (although here isnt so bad either) | 14:17 |
jussi | although it might be a little dead atm | 14:18 |
CaptainKnots | I must say kubuntu 11.10 surprised me | 14:18 |
jussi | cant imagine many people are running it atm | 14:18 |
CaptainKnots | I haven't used ubuntu since hoary, and I was installing 11.10 for my aunt and it drew me back to kde | 14:18 |
CaptainKnots | that unity crap is annoying though | 14:18 |
jussi | ahh well, we arent really into slagging unity here. (personally I feel its not bad, just different). | 14:20 |
CaptainKnots | I'm not slagging it | 14:20 |
CaptainKnots | just stating my opinion from a usability standpoint | 14:21 |
CaptainKnots | to each their own | 14:21 |
Riddell | agateau: how did you get on with qt-at-spi? any progress or should I just update to unset QT_ACCESSIBILITY in KDE apps? | 14:53 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
agateau | Riddell: ah right, I was "successfully" able to crash a qt-only app with qt-at-spi enabled :/ | 14:54 |
Riddell | fooey | 14:54 |
agateau | Riddell: I was waiting for feedback before I file an SRU which would disable a11y for all Qt apps except unity-2d | 14:54 |
agateau | Riddell: got the ok from fregl today, will work on it tomorrow probably | 14:54 |
Riddell | I guess that's the best option, thanks | 14:55 |
agateau | unfortunately | 14:56 |
agateau | hopefully qt-at-spi will be in a much better shape for 12.04 | 14:56 |
fregl | it will be. and that version is worth fixing. please go ahead and test :) | 14:57 |
=== bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 | ||
agateau | fregl: yeah \o/ | 15:08 |
pnh7 | Hi Kubuntu developers, I have a problem with kde/nepomukannotation compilation in kubuntu 11.10... I was using kubuntu 11.04 for kde development..then I upgraded to 11.10.. suddenly it started giving some LINKing related error.. http://paste.kde.org/148994/ | 16:08 |
pnh7 | can some one help me with this? | 16:09 |
pnh7 | I'm getting this after upgrading to 11.10 | 16:09 |
pnh7 | this message clearly says something is wrong with linking: http://paste.kde.org/149000/ | 16:09 |
tsdgeos | pnh7: have you tried nuking your build dir and recompiling from scratch? | 16:13 |
pnh7 | tsdgeos:yes... I compiled everything from scratch(kdelibs,kde-runtime etc)... | 16:14 |
pnh7 | everything works fine except nepomukannotation... | 16:15 |
tsdgeos | ok, no idea then | 16:15 |
yofel | pnh7: the details are on http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking - do what gcc says: add the library to the linker command line in cmake | 16:15 |
pnh7 | yofel: okay.. | 16:16 |
Darkwing | claydoh: how do you see users in a channel with quasseldroid? | 17:00 |
Riddell | tab completion :) | 17:01 |
Darkwing | that the only way? I might see about borrowing /name for it | 17:04 |
Darkwing | grrrr @ kmail. | 17:04 |
Darkwing | it stops dling imap messages | 17:04 |
Saviq | fregl: hi again, I just tried to run unity-2d with Qt 4.8-RC1, the QML Accessible seems not to be there? do we still have to backport stuff for that? | 17:14 |
Saviq | or probably just reuse some of the patches from our current packages? | 17:14 |
Riddell | apachelogger: do we care if phonon build-deps on libqzeitgeist-dev yet? | 17:17 |
* Riddell crys as his build of Qt runs out of disk space | 17:19 | |
Darkwing | Ouch. | 17:19 |
Darkwing | I'm about to put back in my other harddrive... | 17:19 |
Darkwing | 32GB of SSD is starting to get low too often. | 17:20 |
hggdh | rbelem: ping | 17:26 |
=== jtr__ is now known as jtr__|away | ||
markey | is it normal that Nepomuk always screams errors on computer restart? | 17:37 |
markey | 3 popups, always the same | 17:37 |
Riddell | it is if it crashes | 17:38 |
Riddell | fregl: attica 0.2.80 < 0.2.9 ? | 17:46 |
apachelogger | Riddell: not particularly, though tdfischer is the guy to talk to | 17:57 |
apachelogger | he'll be able to advertise the numerous advantages | 17:57 |
Riddell | bah, fail, my first merge and I forget to remove a universe build-dependency | 20:19 |
micahg | Riddell: is there a reason that you're using lzma and not xz? | 21:10 |
=== skreech_ is now known as Daskreech | ||
Riddell | micahg: for what? | 21:20 |
Riddell | and what's the difference? | 21:20 |
micahg | Riddell: debs, xz is in minimal, lzma isn't | 21:21 |
Riddell | micahg: so I should do dh --with xz? | 21:22 |
* micahg would have to look that up | 21:22 | |
micahg | dh_builddeb -- -Zxz (would need an override for dh7+ AFAIK) | 21:24 |
micahg | Riddell: either way you need a pre-depends | 21:24 |
micahg | for xz it's on dpkg to support LTS to LTS upgrades, for lzma, it's on lzma | 21:25 |
apachelogger | micahg: we use lzma because at the time that stuff was introduced there was no xz (support) :P | 21:27 |
micahg | apachelogger: right, but you need a pre-depends on lzma to do it since it's not in minimal anymore | 21:27 |
apachelogger | I believe switching to xz is the right solution there | 21:27 |
Riddell | who's a c++ guru who knows how to fix this? "debugger/qdeclarativedebugserver.cpp:212:86: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]" | 21:28 |
Riddell | it's in this file http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/blobs/4.7/src/declarative/debugger/qdeclarativedebugserver.cpp | 21:28 |
apachelogger | Riddell: just stream into qWarning() like in line 205 | 21:31 |
apachelogger | which is actually why this code is funny in 205 it streams into qwarning doing implicit type conversion in 210 it doesn't and breaks its neck | 21:32 |
apachelogger | not only inconsistent but apparenlty also flawed ^^ | 21:33 |
apachelogger | Riddell: btw, l10n of rekonq is outdated now | 21:38 |
apachelogger | we need a langpack update with rekonq 0.8 data | 21:38 |
Riddell | apachelogger: in oneiric? | 21:41 |
apachelogger | yus | 21:41 |
apachelogger | we shipped with 0.7.90 | 21:41 |
apachelogger | updates now holds 0.8 | 21:41 |
apachelogger | and upstream complains about how our translations are not updated to 0.8 | 21:41 |
Riddell | fooey | 21:43 |
* Riddell makes todo item | 21:43 | |
fregl | Riddell: badly communicated + BIC as far as I understand, so there will be a fixed libattica 0.3.0 I hope | 22:15 |
debfx | micahg: currently there is no automatic way to add the Pre-Depends necessary for data.tar.xz and I don't see a pressing reason why we need to switch to xz | 22:16 |
Riddell | which is nice, solves that nasty version numbering :) | 22:16 |
micahg | debfx: if you're using lzma debs you also need a pre-depends onlzma | 22:16 |
Riddell | debfx: I'm looking to see if I can write an xz.pm for debhelper to do it | 22:16 |
debfx | micahg: why would we need to pre-depend on lzma? | 22:17 |
micahg | debfx: not in minimal | 22:17 |
micahg | unless dpkg has built in lzma support w/out an external library | 22:18 |
debfx | dpkg depends on liblzma so how can it not be minimal | 22:18 |
micahg | debfx: in what release? | 22:19 |
debfx | Riddell: I don't believe that's possible unless you add something like Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends} to all packages | 22:19 |
debfx | micahg: precise, dpkg -> xz-utils -> liblzma2 | 22:20 |
Riddell | debfx: right that would be needed but e.g. qt already has that | 22:20 |
debfx | yes, that's necessary for multi-arched packages but if we just wait until next cycle to switch to xz we can avoid the Pre-Depends mess | 22:21 |
micahg | debfx: hmm, weird, ok, yeah, liblzma is minimal | 22:21 |
micahg | but lzma isn't | 22:21 |
micahg | and for some reason I thought lzma was needed | 22:21 |
micahg | ah, ok, I get my issue now...it's needed for my use case of embedded tarball, but not for deb packages | 22:22 |
micahg | Riddell: apachelogger: debfx: sorry for the noise... | 22:22 |
Riddell | lzma it is then | 22:23 |
apachelogger | actually xz it is :P | 22:28 |
apachelogger | just that lzma is a non-issue | 22:29 |
apachelogger | except for pointless lintian warnings btw | 22:29 |
debfx | that warning will be removed in the next lintian version | 22:31 |
micahg | xz does need the pre-depends (archive enforced) | 22:31 |
debfx | the lzma-deb-archive warning | 22:32 |
micahg | ah | 22:32 |
=== skreech_ is now known as Daskreech |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!