=== JackyAlcine is now known as SaintJackyAlcine === SaintJackyAlcine is now known as JackyAlcine === zkriesse_ is now known as zkriesse === claydoh_ is now known as claydoh === EvilJackyAlcine is now known as JackyAlcine [08:18] Hi, I got a problem while compiling nepomukannotation. It was working fine with kubuntu11.04... now i upgraded it to 11.10.... all kdelibs,kde-runtime work fine without any problem. but nepomukannotation gives this error: http://paste.kde.org/148628/ also in the new version of kubuntu, all kde packages give some warning like this: http://paste.kde.org/148652/ [08:47] morning === amichair_ is now known as amichair === tazz_ is now known as tazz [12:00] good morning [12:01] guess what? I'm back! [12:01] good morning! [12:01] I wonder what needs doing [12:01] lots of merges no doubt [12:03] Riddell: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [12:03] * jussi hugs Riddell === jussi changed the topic of #kubuntu-devel to: Cookies for Everyone! | 11.10 Released! | 4.7.80: https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/Ninjas/Packaging - Merge with debian first | Riddell is back!!! :D [12:11] :) [12:11] nice to be missed :) [12:15] * Tm_T huggles all [12:20] hi all, are there any efforts around packaging Qt 4.8 going on for Precise? [12:21] debfx: I got pointed at you by didrocks ^? [12:23] Saviq: we don't generally package Qt until it makes releases, what's the motivation? [12:25] Riddell: trying some stuff out, but I got you, will manage myself === OffToHades is now known as BarkingFish === BarkingFish is now known as Guest26319 === Guest26319 is now known as BarkingFish === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [13:36] * Riddell merging qt, this packaging stuff is fiddly [13:37] * Quintasan goes to get some food before fighting with maliit [13:38] Riddell: it's tying the bow at the end of wrapping isn't it ;) [13:38] lol [13:38] ooh its davmor2, some throw something at him! :P [13:38] huh [13:38] like what [13:38] bricks? [13:39] * Quintasan throws apachelogger at davmor2 [13:39] nah... cream pies! :D [13:39] oh [13:39] * shadeslayer_ throws dlna at davmor2 [13:39] * Quintasan puts apachelogger back in his place [13:39] * Quintasan throws cream pies at davmor2 [13:40] bbl [13:40] gotta eat and run some errands [13:40] Y U NO HW ACCEL YET TRANSFORMER [13:40] * davmor2 stands behind jussi and awaits the onslaught of incoming objects [13:41] * jussi ducks and laughs as davmor2 gets hit.. [13:41] Quintasan: you're lucky, I'm still waiting for lilstevie's app :P [13:42] and this dlna shit isn't making life any easier [13:42] \o/ [13:42] * Quintasan be seriously eating [14:15] is this the channel to discuss kubuntu 12.04? [14:15] CaptainKnots: yes, in a way, its for the development on that. What would you like to raise? [14:16] well I just did a dist-upgrade and am wondering what it's going to break [14:16] haha [14:16] also, should I remove fglrx before I reboot? [14:17] CaptainKnots: no idea... I dont upgrade at least ill alpha 3 or so [14:17] well, I'll report my findings after I find out then [14:17] CaptainKnots: you are probably better asking in #ubuntu+1 - it covers kubuntu as well and its more from a user support perspective. (although here isnt so bad either) [14:18] although it might be a little dead atm [14:18] I must say kubuntu 11.10 surprised me [14:18] cant imagine many people are running it atm [14:18] I haven't used ubuntu since hoary, and I was installing 11.10 for my aunt and it drew me back to kde [14:18] that unity crap is annoying though [14:20] ahh well, we arent really into slagging unity here. (personally I feel its not bad, just different). [14:20] I'm not slagging it [14:21] just stating my opinion from a usability standpoint [14:21] to each their own [14:53] agateau: how did you get on with qt-at-spi? any progress or should I just update to unset QT_ACCESSIBILITY in KDE apps? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [14:54] Riddell: ah right, I was "successfully" able to crash a qt-only app with qt-at-spi enabled :/ [14:54] fooey [14:54] Riddell: I was waiting for feedback before I file an SRU which would disable a11y for all Qt apps except unity-2d [14:54] Riddell: got the ok from fregl today, will work on it tomorrow probably [14:55] I guess that's the best option, thanks [14:56] unfortunately [14:56] hopefully qt-at-spi will be in a much better shape for 12.04 [14:57] it will be. and that version is worth fixing. please go ahead and test :) === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 [15:08] fregl: yeah \o/ [16:08] Hi Kubuntu developers, I have a problem with kde/nepomukannotation compilation in kubuntu 11.10... I was using kubuntu 11.04 for kde development..then I upgraded to 11.10.. suddenly it started giving some LINKing related error.. http://paste.kde.org/148994/ [16:09] can some one help me with this? [16:09] I'm getting this after upgrading to 11.10 [16:09] this message clearly says something is wrong with linking: http://paste.kde.org/149000/ [16:13] pnh7: have you tried nuking your build dir and recompiling from scratch? [16:14] tsdgeos:yes... I compiled everything from scratch(kdelibs,kde-runtime etc)... [16:15] everything works fine except nepomukannotation... [16:15] ok, no idea then [16:15] pnh7: the details are on http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking - do what gcc says: add the library to the linker command line in cmake [16:16] yofel: okay.. [17:00] claydoh: how do you see users in a channel with quasseldroid? [17:01] tab completion :) [17:04] that the only way? I might see about borrowing /name for it [17:04] grrrr @ kmail. [17:04] it stops dling imap messages [17:14] fregl: hi again, I just tried to run unity-2d with Qt 4.8-RC1, the QML Accessible seems not to be there? do we still have to backport stuff for that? [17:14] or probably just reuse some of the patches from our current packages? [17:17] apachelogger: do we care if phonon build-deps on libqzeitgeist-dev yet? [17:19] * Riddell crys as his build of Qt runs out of disk space [17:19] Ouch. [17:19] I'm about to put back in my other harddrive... [17:20] 32GB of SSD is starting to get low too often. [17:26] rbelem: ping === jtr__ is now known as jtr__|away [17:37] is it normal that Nepomuk always screams errors on computer restart? [17:37] 3 popups, always the same [17:38] it is if it crashes [17:46] fregl: attica 0.2.80 < 0.2.9 ? [17:57] Riddell: not particularly, though tdfischer is the guy to talk to [17:57] he'll be able to advertise the numerous advantages [20:19] bah, fail, my first merge and I forget to remove a universe build-dependency [21:10] Riddell: is there a reason that you're using lzma and not xz? === skreech_ is now known as Daskreech [21:20] micahg: for what? [21:20] and what's the difference? [21:21] Riddell: debs, xz is in minimal, lzma isn't [21:22] micahg: so I should do dh --with xz? [21:22] * micahg would have to look that up [21:24] dh_builddeb -- -Zxz (would need an override for dh7+ AFAIK) [21:24] Riddell: either way you need a pre-depends [21:25] for xz it's on dpkg to support LTS to LTS upgrades, for lzma, it's on lzma [21:27] micahg: we use lzma because at the time that stuff was introduced there was no xz (support) :P [21:27] apachelogger: right, but you need a pre-depends on lzma to do it since it's not in minimal anymore [21:27] I believe switching to xz is the right solution there [21:28] who's a c++ guru who knows how to fix this? "debugger/qdeclarativedebugserver.cpp:212:86: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]" [21:28] it's in this file http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/blobs/4.7/src/declarative/debugger/qdeclarativedebugserver.cpp [21:31] Riddell: just stream into qWarning() like in line 205 [21:32] which is actually why this code is funny in 205 it streams into qwarning doing implicit type conversion in 210 it doesn't and breaks its neck [21:33] not only inconsistent but apparenlty also flawed ^^ [21:38] Riddell: btw, l10n of rekonq is outdated now [21:38] we need a langpack update with rekonq 0.8 data [21:41] apachelogger: in oneiric? [21:41] yus [21:41] we shipped with 0.7.90 [21:41] updates now holds 0.8 [21:41] and upstream complains about how our translations are not updated to 0.8 [21:43] fooey [21:43] * Riddell makes todo item [22:15] Riddell: badly communicated + BIC as far as I understand, so there will be a fixed libattica 0.3.0 I hope [22:16] micahg: currently there is no automatic way to add the Pre-Depends necessary for data.tar.xz and I don't see a pressing reason why we need to switch to xz [22:16] which is nice, solves that nasty version numbering :) [22:16] debfx: if you're using lzma debs you also need a pre-depends onlzma [22:16] debfx: I'm looking to see if I can write an xz.pm for debhelper to do it [22:17] micahg: why would we need to pre-depend on lzma? [22:17] debfx: not in minimal [22:18] unless dpkg has built in lzma support w/out an external library [22:18] dpkg depends on liblzma so how can it not be minimal [22:19] debfx: in what release? [22:19] Riddell: I don't believe that's possible unless you add something like Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends} to all packages [22:20] micahg: precise, dpkg -> xz-utils -> liblzma2 [22:20] debfx: right that would be needed but e.g. qt already has that [22:21] yes, that's necessary for multi-arched packages but if we just wait until next cycle to switch to xz we can avoid the Pre-Depends mess [22:21] debfx: hmm, weird, ok, yeah, liblzma is minimal [22:21] but lzma isn't [22:21] and for some reason I thought lzma was needed [22:22] ah, ok, I get my issue now...it's needed for my use case of embedded tarball, but not for deb packages [22:22] Riddell: apachelogger: debfx: sorry for the noise... [22:23] lzma it is then [22:28] actually xz it is :P [22:29] just that lzma is a non-issue [22:29] except for pointless lintian warnings btw [22:31] that warning will be removed in the next lintian version [22:31] xz does need the pre-depends (archive enforced) [22:32] the lzma-deb-archive warning [22:32] ah === skreech_ is now known as Daskreech