[00:02] <Laney> tumbleweed: ok, lets get on it tomorrow
[00:02] <Laney> if you want to bung it over to samosa in advance that would help
[00:50] <tumbleweed> Laney: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~stefanor/merged.tar.gz
[06:27] <highvoltage> good morning
[07:43] <broder> tumbleweed: looks like you left the eatmydata arg out of the getopt call (line 89)
[07:45] <tumbleweed> broder: thank you
[07:48] <broder> ...oh, crud. but i'm just about to find out that i can't mk-sbuild a precise chroot, aren't i
[07:48] <RAOF> Yes.
[07:48] <RAOF> Yes you are.
[07:49] <RAOF> Well, actually you kinda can; the bootstrap will fail, but you can manually fandangle the post-bootstrap things that mk-sbuild does.
[07:49] <broder> ugh
[07:49] <RAOF> Indeed.  That's why this system doesn't have a precise chroot :)
[07:50] <broder> wait...actually, where does it blow up? because i've made it to the unpack stage
[07:50] <RAOF> It blows up at the point where mk-sbuild acutally wants to install something.
[07:51] <broder> :-/
[07:51] <RAOF> Why aren't sandybridge dual-core i7s faster? Stupid C++ :/
[07:53] <tumbleweed> err why is it blowing up?
[07:54] <RAOF> Because debootstrap is apparently freaked out that there are two versions of perl-modules in the archive, and one of them doesn't work.
[07:54] <tumbleweed> ah
[07:55] <broder> i wonder if i can find an archive mirror that predates the transition
[07:56] <dholbach> good morning
[07:56] <tumbleweed> broder: given that there's no push syncing atm, that's likely :)
[07:57] <broder> i have a time machine mirror at work that lets me bring up the archive at a given timestamp
[07:57] <broder> it's slow as #$%^ but should get the job done
[07:59] <tumbleweed> that would be a useful feature in lp, although non-trivial. It has the data...
[08:00] <broder> mine works by rsyncing dists/ and then checking it into a git repo
[08:00] <broder> then redirecting requests on pool/ to launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/
[08:00] <tumbleweed> that works
[08:17] <ricotz> debfx, thanks for vbox
[08:28] <broder> geez. hedgewars has the most absurd set of build-deps
[08:28] <broder> i've already pulled in qt and ghc
[08:42] <Zhenech> broder, patches welcome </debian-games-team-hat>
[08:42] <broder> i mean, if those are the build-deps, those are the build-deps
[08:44] <Zhenech> true
[11:20] <Laney> greetings
[11:21]  * tumbleweed waves
[11:22] <Laney> my shoulders ache
[11:22] <Laney> silly kayaks
[12:12] <krish_> Hello Motu, I am running Oneric Ocelot. To be able to fix bugs, do I need to be running development release version of Ubuntu?
[12:12] <krish_> Or Oneric is fine enough to fix bug in some package?
[12:13] <tumbleweed> no, although it can help to have a machine / vm running the dev release
[12:13] <tumbleweed> it depends how much you want to look for and fix problems, and how much you want to get work done
[12:14] <krish_> Ok. Thanks. I have just started to get familiarized with the whole bug system.
[12:17] <krish_> One more question: Say there is a bug in X package. I will retrieve source from apt, fix the bug in the code. Now, should I send my patch that is in my bzr branch or attach the patch to the bug report?
[12:17] <geser> either works
[12:18] <krish_> Ok. Thank you.
[13:05] <krish_> Hi, Any useful tag to find bugs that require coding and easy to fix?
[13:05] <krish_> in launchpad
[13:06] <geser> bitesize
[13:06] <sladen> krish_: bitesize
[13:07] <geser> but I don't know if there are currenly any bugs open tagged with it
[13:07] <krish_> Ok. I will try it and see
[13:08] <Laney> harvest.ubuntu.com might yield something interesting
[13:08] <sladen> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=bitesize
[13:24] <cjwatson> broder,RAOF: I've fixed debootstrap upstream - should get it into Ubuntu soon
[16:38] <krish_> Is there any way to search for packages in launchpad whose source is written in certain language? Like C or Python?
[16:39] <directhex> no. https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/3945
[16:40] <tumbleweed> but one can get quite far by looking at binary package names, build-dependencies, binary dependencies, filenames, etc.
[16:40] <tumbleweed> krish_: what are you looking for?
[16:42] <mewerner_arand> krish_: You could always use debtags via Debian: http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/ssearch.html ...
[23:03] <broder> Laney: i'm looking at SRU'ing hedgewars 0.9.17 into lucid->oneiric, but it build-deps on libghc-utf8-string-dev, libghc-bytestring-show-dev, and libghc-deepseq-show-dev. do you know off the top of your head if those are libraries that were split out from ghc core or something?
[23:04] <broder> (don't bother digging if you don't know off the top of your head)
[23:25] <Laney> broder: utf8-string used to be in ghc. I don't know about bytestring-show (but probably not) and I don't think deepseq ever was
[23:26] <Laney> install ghc(6) and do ghc-pkg list to see what packages you have
[23:26] <broder> Laney: ok, thanks