[11:40] <gioele> Hello
[11:40] <gioele> may any bug supervisor nominate this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx/+bug/836018 as SRU for Lucid?
[11:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 836018 in lyx (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Update LyX to final micro-release 1.6.10 (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[13:38] <alourie> I have the following issue:
[13:39] <alourie> using XChat, I minimize to tray
[13:39] <alourie> now, I have no access to it
[13:39] <alourie> nothing appears in messaging menu
[13:39] <alourie> nor in indicators
[13:39] <alourie> nor in launcher
[13:39] <alourie> is it a bug or just a usability issue?
[13:41] <penguin42> alourie: Maybe try the xhat-gnome-indicator or xchat-indicator plugin?
[13:41] <penguin42> c
[15:59] <iceroot> if someone is facing kernel-panics with rt2800pci (e.g. eeepcs, msi wind) please try this fix. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/869502/comments/118
[15:59] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 869502 in linux-firmware (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Kernel-Panic with 3.0.0.12-generic on asus eee pcs and msi wind (both using rt2800 wifi chipset) (affects: 45) (dups: 4) (heat: 252)" [Undecided,Invalid]
[15:59] <iceroot> invalid.... in your face ubot4 :)
[16:00] <pedro_> hahah!
[16:01] <pedro_> not me
[16:02] <om26er> bug 869502
[16:02] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 869502 in linux (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Kernel-Panic with 3.0.0.12-generic on asus eee pcs and msi wind (both using rt2800 wifi chipset) (affects: 45) (dups: 4) (heat: 252)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/869502
[16:03] <om26er> magic
[16:03] <om26er> :-D
[16:03] <om26er> iceroot, ^^
[16:03]  * pedro_ pass the wizard hat to om26er
[16:03] <iceroot> cheater :)
[16:03] <om26er> haha :p
[16:21] <penguin42> iceroot: You might want to comment on bug 875571 as well - I think that's the same stuff?
[16:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 875571 in linux (Ubuntu) ""Panic occurred, switch back to text console" and freezes - On 11.10 (affects: 17) (heat: 90)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/875571
[16:22] <iceroot> penguin42: i will have a look
[16:24] <iceroot> penguin42: thank you, its also rt2800pci, so i marked it as "duplicate" and put a comment on that bug
[16:26] <penguin42> iceroot: No problem, I'd been triaging it a while ago
[16:27] <iceroot> hopefully its finally fixed with that patch
[16:28] <iceroot> else someone will buy a eeepc 901 with a sign of my fist on it? :)
[16:28] <penguin42> haha
[16:28] <penguin42> 'slight damage'
[17:52] <alex_mayorga> Hi! Can someone here help on bug 893328?
[17:52] <ubot4> alex_mayorga: Error: Bug #893328 not found.
[17:52] <alex_mayorga> it is security related
[17:55] <hggdh> alex_mayorga: if it is set as security, only the folks at #ubuntu-hardened can help you
[17:58] <bil21al> helo  can any body tell me what is haze's log ?
[18:04] <alex_mayorga> hggdh: thanks!
[18:04] <bil21al> pedro_
[18:05] <bil21al> what is haze's log?
[18:05] <pedro_> bil21al, not sure what you're referring to, maybe telepathy-haze ?
[18:07] <bil21al> pedro_ see this developer ask me this log so what is he talking about just the debugg or some thing else and how to get it?
[18:07] <bil21al> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664375
[18:07] <ubot4> Gnome bug 664375 in Accounts "Yahoo account fails to login" [Normal,Needinfo]
[18:07] <pedro_> bil21al, ok so telepathy-haze
[18:08] <bil21al> and please tell me how to get it?
[18:08] <pedro_> bil21al, you can get it from the help menu (help-> debug- > choose telepathy-haze there)
[18:08] <bil21al> ok
[18:08] <bil21al> tku
[18:08] <pedro_> help menu from empathy btw
[18:26] <bil21al> pedro_ there is no any option of hazes there is control-mission, gabble , salut ,emathy file transfer ,empathy chat room, indicator approver ,logger these option are there which one is to be selected ?
[18:38] <pedro_> bil21al, i do have haze here, if you can't login then it is not going to appear as an option
[18:38] <pedro_> bil21al, perhaps look at Empathy.Auth to see the reason?
[18:39] <pedro_> it should say there why you cannot login
[21:17] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, are you available for a question?
[21:18] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: yes
[21:18] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, it is just regarding the Foundation Bot system
[21:18] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: cool, go ahead
[21:19] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, would you prefer I don't convert a bug to a question which the Bot has worked on?
[21:19] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, bug 890258
[21:19] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 890258 in ubuntu "VGA Drivers Not Install (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/890258
[21:20] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: No, its fine.  I think I've gathered enough data to make a decision as to whether or not to keep commenting on no package bug reports.
[21:20] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, i'm just aware that you are collecting data so you specifically mentioned in the ML that we refrain from changing bugs
[21:20] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, ok, does it work?
[21:21] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, the Bot (that is)
[21:21] <bdmurray> Yes, I've seen reporters set the source package for their bug reports
[21:21] <bdmurray> and there hasn't been any harm so its a win as far as I'm concerned
[21:21] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, that is great news
[21:22] <SwitchDK> I have noticed other bugs which might need some special attention, is it acceptable I work on those (although the Bot has already been there)?
[21:23] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, just don't want to mess with your system ;)
[21:24] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: Do you have an example?
[21:24] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, yeah, if I could find it, sorry, just a moment
[21:26] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: No problem, its probably fine - I'm just curious
[21:26] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, bug 890616
[21:26] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 890616 in ubuntu "Booting ubuntu 11.10 64 bit edition on my HP mini 110-3606tu gets stuck up on starting fax server (affects: 1) (heat: 9)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/890616
[21:27] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: sure any no package bug reports are fine - that comment is more an informational message for the bug reporter than anything else
[21:27] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, according to the Finding Package page it could be registered against xorg but xorg doesn't exist. Well I can't find it at leat
[21:28] <SwitchDK> least*
[21:28] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, OK, i tend to only work on nopackages to better understand how it all works so i will just continue doing that
[21:29] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, even when the Bot has said "Hello" first ;)
[21:29] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: this has some useful information about how to get more boot messages
[21:29] <bdmurray> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelBoot
[21:30] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, I just noticed when I search for xorg, "Select a Package" search field reports too many matches, should we update the Wiki to include a more specific xorg package
[21:30] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, thanks for the link. I will use that for that particular bug
[21:32] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: what do you mean xorg doesn't exist?
[21:32] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, it was an inaccurate statement. I meant "there are too many options" if a newbie like me follows the FindingPackage page
[21:33] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, the page states report against xorg but searching for xorg package yields too many search results to be displayed
[21:34] <bdmurray> where are you searching for xorg?
[21:34] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, under Target-> Distribution->Package
[21:35] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: Ah, why are you searching?
[21:36] <bdmurray> I mean you click (Choose...) right?
[21:36] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, yes, correct, I click Choose and then enter "xorg"
[21:36] <bdmurray> and why are you searching?
[21:36] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, and get the following message "Too many matches. Please try to narrow your search."
[21:38] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, sorry, I am uncertain about the question: I'm searching because I don't know the package name and because the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage#During_boot states use xorg
[21:39] <bdmurray> But if FindRightPackage says its xorg then its xorg and you don't need to search. ;-)
[21:39] <bdmurray> Anyway its messed up that Launchpad says too many matches for an exact match
[21:39] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, oh ok, i didn't know you could do that. I thought it had to match
[21:40] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: well it does match, its just the choose feature isn't helpful
[21:40] <bdmurray> in this particular case
[21:40] <bdmurray> so if you don't use choose you can just put in the package name
[21:40] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, haha it all makes sense now
[21:40] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, thank you for clarifying
[21:41] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: the "too many matches" response is certainly a bug in Launchpad if you want to report it
[21:41] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, maybe I should do that. I have never reported a bug before so that could be fun
[21:41] <bdmurray> If you let me know what number it is I'll be happy to comment on it.
[21:42] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, ok, i will sort out these bugs I am working on and then open a report for that specific problem with LP
[21:42] <bdmurray> Perhaps FindRightPackage should use some better way to indicate the package name than it currently does too.
[21:42] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, but that would be a feature request, wouldn't it? ;)#
[21:42] <bdmurray> whatever markup it is using now is not very distinctive
[22:21] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, I raised a bug against Launchpad itself with bug 893796
[22:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 893796 in launchpad ""too many matches" although searching for specific package (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/893796
[22:24] <bdmurray> SwitchDK: awesome thanks
[22:24] <SwitchDK> bdmurray, let me know if it is not clear enough or information is missing