[00:09] <CIA-16> partman-crypto: cjwatson * r719 ubuntu/ (6 files in 3 dirs): merge from Debian 49
[00:10] <CIA-16> partman-crypto: cjwatson * r720 ubuntu/debian/changelog: releasing version 49ubuntu1
[00:19] <CIA-16> ubiquity: cjwatson * r5095 trunk/tests/test_gtkui.py: typo
[00:31] <CIA-16> ubiquity: cjwatson * r5096 trunk/ (debian/changelog tests/test_gtkui.py):
[00:31] <CIA-16> ubiquity: Whitelist grub_device_label in test_interface_translated on non-x86
[00:31] <CIA-16> ubiquity: architectures; grub-installer will be unavailable to supply the
[00:31] <CIA-16> ubiquity: translations, but that doesn't matter since the template won't be
[00:31] <CIA-16> ubiquity: displayed anyway.
[00:39] <CIA-16> ubiquity: cjwatson * r5097 trunk/debian/changelog: releasing version 2.9.4
[04:32] <CarlFK> d-i preseed/late_command seen false - "but still have the question asked. To do this the seen flag must be reset to “false” after setting the value for a question.  "
[04:32] <CarlFK> it didn't ask.  I am guessing because it doesn't normally ask?
[13:52] <CIA-16> debian-installer: cjwatson * r1565 ubuntu/ (build/config/armel/omap4.cfg debian/changelog): Move armel/omap4 to 3.0.0-1401 kernels.
[13:55] <CIA-16> debian-installer: cjwatson * r1566 ubuntu/debian/changelog: releasing version 20101020ubuntu78
[16:53] <davmor2> hey ev on the install can you swap the connected to the internet and wifi connection pages,  currently you can't select the download updates from the first screen as you can't connect to wifi till the second (if you follow the pages setup)
[16:54] <ev> nope
[16:54] <ev> because the latter depends on the former
[16:54] <ev> (for broadcom cards, as checking the 3rd party extras box enables support for the wl driver)
[16:54] <davmor2> ev: ah right
[16:55] <davmor2> ev: bit of a pain then :(
[16:57] <ev> yeah, that one needs some mpt brilliance applied to it. I'm all out of ideas.
[17:00] <davmor2> ev: I'm assuming that it is just an python call,  can you display the download updates on the second page aswell as the first and have it already checked if it was on the first page?  (I don't know how plausible it is)
[17:01] <ev> I think that would be confusing
[17:02] <ev> those pages just need a bit of a rethink by a usability expert