/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/11/22/#ubuntu-tv.txt

dmj726hi will :)09:09
Wellarkhi! :)12:29
MrChrisDruifAloha willcooke and the rest14:10
Wellarkhi14:11
MrChrisDruifHow's it going here?14:12
Wellarkpretty quiet it seems right now14:17
MrChrisDruifYeah, but I didn't hear about this channel untill today14:18
willcookeHello guys, MrChrisDruif14:28
willcookeWellark, hi14:28
willcookesorry I was OTP14:28
MrChrisDruifOn The Potty?14:28
willcookeXD14:28
willcookephone!14:28
MrChrisDruifCan't be, Ubuntu still got to release one of those ;-)14:28
MrChrisDruifWhen I typed it, I thought I should be phone, but still...for the lulz I typed potty14:29
MrChrisDruifAnyhow, what did you guys think of Thomas his mail?14:31
MrChrisDruifAnd the others ofx14:31
MrChrisDruifofc*14:31
willcookeHi again all, back from meetings....16:10
tgm4883o/ hello room16:10
willcookeHi tgm488316:10
tgm4883Hi willcooke16:10
tgm4883meetings, bleh :(16:10
willcookehehe16:11
willcookeSo, you know what... I'm slightly surprised at how most people are of the opinion that 3d is not very important.  I thought I was in the minority with my opinion of 3d being "Meh"16:11
tgm4883I think it has to do with needing new hardware, needing to buy glasses for everyone, and then even after spending all that money all you get is "hey, those mountains look a little bit farther than they used to"16:12
willcooketgm4883, thank you for your email by the way.  Very interesting.  I'd like to take a bit of time to properly digest it and write a decent reply...16:12
dmj726It's probably important to support playback at some point16:13
tgm4883willcooke, yea sorry about the long wall of text, we never did get a chance to meet up again at UDS16:13
dmj726even if I don't personally care about it most times16:13
willcookedmj726, Where are we with capable graphics cards?  Do they exist?16:13
tgm48833d graphics cards exist16:13
willcooketgm4883, UDS was HARD work.  So many people!16:13
tgm4883nvidia has some, I would assume AMD does as well16:13
dmj726we should use the right terminology here: We're talking about *stereoscopy*16:14
* willcooke isn't down with the lingo16:14
willcookethe one where you have to wear stupid glasses.16:14
dmj726which is when you get a 3D effect by having each eye see a slightly different image16:15
willcookeyeah, that one16:15
willcookeWhat's the alternative?16:15
willcookeIs it that thing that R2D2 can do with the projection?16:15
dmj726There are a number of diferent ways to indicate depth, but that's the one we call 3D16:15
willcookeI guess that's the accepted standard now16:16
dmj726simply moving the camera side to side, having objects grow smaller in the distance are all cues the brain uses even in "2D" films16:16
willcookeright, I'm with you16:16
willcookeYes, when I say 3D I'm talking stereoscopic16:17
dmj726just saying there's more to 3D (think how game engines manage it) than stereoscopy, but stereoscopy is our subject here16:17
willcookeit is16:18
tgm4883what would be required to support 3d? Just the ability to turn off the second picture? (by extension, support for a second stream of video)16:18
tgm4883Honestly I think 3D is further down the list16:19
willcookeI /think/ some devices just display the two pictures side by side on the same frame and then the TV itself does the magic16:19
imnicholtgm4883: are you Thomas Mashos?16:22
imnicholOh, belay that, just saw the bottom of your latest email16:23
tgm4883imnichol, yes16:23
tgm4883:)16:23
tgm4883rhpot1991, !16:23
tgm4883rhpot1991 is on the Mythbuntu team as well16:23
rhpot1991hi16:23
tgm4883imnichol, yea that was a bit of a longwinded email16:24
tgm4883I expect it to take a little while to get a reply or two16:25
imnicholI was just wondering about your first email on the list: do you have a reason for not wanting Unity?16:25
imnicholIt seems like you think it's not ontrollable by remote?16:25
imnicholAm I correct or did I miss something?16:25
imnicholNote: I don't care one way or the other, I'm just curious.16:25
tgm4883I don't think it would fit well on a TV. By that I mean the desktop in general16:25
tgm4883You want a 10 foot UI for the TV, and I don't think Unity in it's currently form fits that16:26
tgm4883now you could take a 10 foot UI and theme it to look similar to Unity16:26
tgm4883Note: I actually like Unity and use it on my desktop and netbook16:26
imnicholHahah16:26
MrChrisDruifAloha tgm488316:26
tgm4883Hi MrChrisDruif16:26
MrChrisDruifI've read your message in the list16:27
imnicholOk, I think I can get what you're saying.16:27
MrChrisDruifAnd I agree on a lot of the points16:27
tgm4883when you go TV, you need to scale everything up a bit16:27
MrChrisDruifIndeed 10' interface16:27
imnicholBut I'm still a little unclear what you mean when you say that its current form doesn't fit16:27
tgm4883TV's are like texas, everything is larger16:27
imnicholLike the icon bar in the upper right?16:27
MrChrisDruifBut it doesn't necessarily mean we'd have to use XBMC16:27
imnicholBut unlike texas, we aren't trying to execute people with our TVs16:28
imnichol;)16:28
willcookeXD16:28
tgm4883Right, XBMC was an example. I suggest we use something that has already been developed and can be fitted for our needs. I really don't want to see yet another media centre startup16:28
MrChrisDruifWe could, but it has to have some serious theming love16:28
tgm4883there are way too many as there is16:28
MrChrisDruifDoes anybody remember Linux MCE?16:29
imnicholWhat's wrong with a media center setup?16:29
tgm4883imnichol, Unity is a great desktop, but for a tv interface it is needing to be controlled by a remote control (IR probably), and then you have a bunch of wasted space16:29
tgm4883imnichol, media center startup, not setup. Being with Mythbuntu, I keep my eye on this and every so often a new group of developers will try to recreate a media center from scratch. I guess that is the open source way though16:30
imnicholOH ok I gotcha16:30
imnicholAnd yeah I agree about the remote thing16:30
tgm4883Sometimes it's a good idea, and things get better16:30
tgm4883other times it is just because someone didn't like the design of other media centers, and it's irrelevant16:31
imnicholThose are some good arguments16:31
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, personally I think the XBMC theming engine has some good features16:31
imnicholI assume we're all also on the ubuntu-phone mailing list?16:31
tgm4883I'm not16:31
MrChrisDruifimnichol; I am at least16:31
tgm4883although I think there are probably a lot of similarities between the two (tv and phone)16:32
tgm4883Linux MCE is a heavily modified MythTV frontend16:32
imnicholThere's been some discussion on the ubuntu-phone list about using phones to control the tvs16:32
imnicholAnd I presume that tablets could do the same thing16:32
tgm4883imnichol, I do that already :)16:32
MrChrisDruifYeah, and more16:33
MrChrisDruifI like some features that LinuxMCE apparently has, like controlling the lighting in your house16:33
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, there is a lot of hardware that is necessary for that16:33
MrChrisDruifYeah, but still the option to do so16:34
tgm4883home automation is something that we should consider though, I think it should be low priority though16:34
MrChrisDruifJust some checkmark somewhere that you have that kind of hardware16:34
MrChrisDruifFirst of indeed, but when the "basics" are done we should consider it16:34
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, the issue is there isn't really a standard used to control that16:35
MrChrisDruifEither here or the entire platform ;-)16:35
MrChrisDruiftgm4883; the problem there are MULTIPLE standards used ;-)16:35
MrChrisDruif+is16:35
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, well yes. Multiple standards == no standards :)16:35
MrChrisDruif-s16:36
tgm4883And that is just for lighting16:36
tgm4883you could do heating, CCTV, VOIP, all which seem to have multiple standards16:36
tgm4883Minimally, I think lighting would be nice to have though since we are talking TV's and media centers16:37
MrChrisDruifThat's why I mentioned it in the first place ;-)16:37
MrChrisDruifAnd after that I think VoIP?16:37
tgm4883VoIP or CCTV16:38
MrChrisDruifEasier will be CCTV ;-)16:38
tgm4883along with VoIP, Video calling as well16:38
tgm4883yes16:38
MrChrisDruifBut concerning this project I'd say Video Conferencing16:39
tgm4883yes, Video conferencing would be nice and is a growing market16:39
MrChrisDruif(I was thinking about that instead of the "official" ViOP ;-) )16:39
MrChrisDruifEuhm VoIP*16:40
MrChrisDruifEuhm, I was missing playback features16:41
MrChrisDruifLike Blu-ray doesn't work at all for me16:41
MrChrisDruifI've heard that can be solved with the paid fluenza codec pack, but that just one small mention somewhere16:41
tgm4883So that is another angle, physical media16:42
MrChrisDruifYeah16:42
callumsaunders1Can i ask, what is UTV targeted towards? being preinstalled in a TV set or a set top box?16:42
MrChrisDruifI was starting to wonder that myself, if we would consider playback of physical media16:43
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, looks like it might, their site doesn't point out bluray16:43
tgm4883it does list the codecs, but I think the issue might be the encryption keys16:43
tgm4883callumsaunders1, not sure, I would say ideally on the TV, pre-built set-top box, and also an image you could install yourself16:44
tgm4883I think in order to say it is on a TV, it needs to be built into the TV, although if it was one of the small linaro units that could be attached to the TV I'd be ok with that16:45
tgm4883sorry, that is a freescale board, the mx5316:46
MrChrisDruifSmall quote from the Fluendo website about bluray playback: "We are currently not moving much in that field as BluRay has a lot of legal constraints making it very difficult for a Linux product to include it(we cannot certify it as DRM compliant). We will add support on GStreamer when libbluray and libaacs are ready for show time, so that the OpenSource players can benefit from it. Don't expect a "commercial" Linux BluRay player from F16:48
MrChrisDruifluendo anytime soon, though."16:48
imnicholGiven the abilities of the raspberry pi, I imagine that there could be TVs with the computer portion built in16:50
tgm4883Here is an interview from UDS regarding the i.mx53 from freescale16:51
tgm4883http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KtYAbAzJRw16:51
MrChrisDruifCurrent flatscreen tv's already have software on them16:51
tgm4883the size of the board is pretty tiny16:51
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, yea, but every time i've used the built in stuff, it's pretty slow/crappy16:51
callumsaunders1I can't see how UbuntuTV could work without here being an 'Ubuntu TV', if you get what i mean, time has proven that nobody wants another set top box16:52
tgm4883More on that board with a better image of it  http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2011/03/01/new-low-cost-cortex-a8-board-from-freescale/16:52
MrChrisDruiftgm4883; I know, but that can all change when they might start using ARM processors i.e.16:52
tgm4883Note: i'm not affialiated with Linaro nor Freescale16:52
MrChrisDruifLike I said, ARM ;-)16:53
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, could be ARM, could be Atom16:53
MrChrisDruifHaha, Atom...a dieing race. It's got some catching-up to do16:54
MrChrisDruifAtom is normal x86 btw16:54
imnicholIt seems to me that we should be eating our own dog food here16:54
tgm4883yes, x86 and x86-6416:54
MrChrisDruifAlso?16:54
imnicholI mean with the ARM stuff Ubuntu is starting to do16:54
tgm4883imnichol, unfortunatly I didn't win any of the ARM boards they gave away at UDS :(16:55
tgm4883That said, again I don't think it's something we should recreate from scratch. There are some perfectly capable media centers out there16:55
tgm4883I'd have to look more into XBMC, I've heard conflicting reports whether it would work on ARM or not16:56
callumsaunders1 I don't thin Ubuntu TV should just be another media center16:56
MrChrisDruifIf we want something soon, then yes. But if we want something good, well maybe we should?16:57
imnicholSo if it's not just another media center, what is it?16:57
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, and that is how you start writing another media center from scratch16:57
callumsaunders1Even Apple have failed to do the TV thing16:57
tgm4883callumsaunders1, what would you like to see from it?16:57
MrChrisDruifcallumsaunders1; it depends on what we want to achieve for TV?16:57
tgm4883I don't think any of us think it's going to be strictly a media center, but I don't think we would say it is a desktop either16:58
callumsaunders1I think that with Ubuntu getting into Tablets and phones and toilets what ever16:58
callumsaunders1then that will be be its biggest advantage16:58
callumsaunders1and all these devices should be able to play together16:58
MrChrisDruifTrue16:58
tgm4883callumsaunders1, sounds like you haven't read my super long email :)16:58
MrChrisDruifHaha, seems so16:58
callumsaunders1there is interesting convo going on in the ubuntu-phone mailing list about using the tv as a hub for collaboritive and social applications16:59
tgm4883I think we are all on the same page here :)16:59
callumsaunders1where is this email?16:59
imnicholIt was yesterday on the ubuntu-tv list16:59
tgm4883callumsaunders1, on the Ubuntu TV mailing list16:59
MrChrisDruifcallumsaunders1; https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-tv/msg00003.html16:59
callumsaunders1give me a min then :P16:59
MrChrisDruifThere you go O=)16:59
imnichollol17:00
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, So I guess the question is, what are we trying to achieve that isn't currently an option with the already existing media centers?17:01
tgm4883talking software here, not getting it on TV's17:01
callumsaunders1thanks for the link, tgm4883, i agree with you on practically all points17:02
MrChrisDruiftgm4883; it might not be creating what isn't on existing media centers, but finding a good way to put it all together in a fuss-free manner17:02
tgm4883callumsaunders1, thanks, I'm on the Mythbuntu team so i've been watching what people have been requesting for the last 3 years :)17:03
callumsaunders1Haha people are funny though, they rarely know what they want17:04
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, I'm not tied to any particular media center, I just don't want to recreate the wheel if we don't have to17:04
callumsaunders1well17:04
callumsaunders1what they need17:04
tgm4883callumsaunders1, what people need and what people want are two very different things17:04
callumsaunders1true17:04
tgm4883Mostly I listen to what people want and if it's awesome, start thinking about what it would take to make it happen17:05
tgm4883sometimes it pans out, sometimes it requires too much other stuff17:05
MrChrisDruiftgm4883; I think we should make a list of all the feature we might want implemented for a first version and see what software is most compatible?17:07
MrChrisDruif(I think it would be XBMC, but still)17:07
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, I think that is a great idea17:08
MrChrisDruifWhen do we even WANT a first release?17:08
imnicholTomorrow17:08
callumsaunders1Not until its ready.17:08
MrChrisDruifI heard something in the lines of AFTER 12.0417:08
tgm4883well regarding that, whatever we do, I don't think we should switch core items like that17:08
tgm4883especially if we make it pluggable17:08
tgm4883scratch that, I think pluggable is a requirement17:08
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, yea, it's definitly after 12.0417:09
tgm4883I'm guessing 13.0417:09
MrChrisDruifAlright, about a year of development17:09
MrChrisDruifRight?17:09
tgm4883willcooke or popey would probably know more ^^17:09
* tgm4883 is unsure if there are other canonical employees in the room17:10
MrChrisDruifPlease speak ;-) (Btw, popey you've still got voice in here ;-) )17:10
tgm4883for the record, I am not employed by canonical17:10
tgm4883I'm just passionate about TV's :)17:11
* MrChrisDruif wants to become a canonical employee =P but that doesn't count17:11
callumsaunders1just a dude17:11
imnicholsame17:12
willcookeWell, how long is a piece of string?  I think first we need to know *what*.  Then we can work out *who* and divide up the jobs.  Then we'll work out *how long* by "simply" dividing one by the other.17:12
willcookeIn my mind, it makes sense to build on an LTS though17:13
MrChrisDruifHaha, simply ;-)17:13
tgm4883willcooke, I agree with the LTS (Mythbuntu is moving to LTS only releases for similar reasons)17:13
willcookeMrChrisDruif, we're hiring.  Check out the careers page!  Loads of jobs17:14
tgm4883Is there somewhere we should be making a list of features?17:14
willcooketgm4883, Good idea - we need a wiki page17:15
tgm4883we can make it here, but it should be documented somewhere for discussion before it goes in a blueprint17:15
willcookeWe have a log bot, but I think a wiki page would be easier to maintain and follow17:15
tgm4883willcooke, Wiki it is, although I really liked the etherpad we used at UDS17:16
willcooketgm4883, oh yeah, I hadn't even thought of that17:16
imnicholProblem with etherpad's is that you need rights to view them17:16
imnicholOr at least, I did17:16
willcookewell, whatever is easiest - but not IRC :)17:17
imnicholAgreed17:17
willcookeHmmmm - I don't have an account on the Ubuntu wiki.  Ooops.17:18
imnicholI really hate that I need to create so many different accounts.17:18
tgm4883Ubuntu one SSO FTW!17:19
tgm4883alright someone create a page, i'm going to grab a drink then we can discuss17:20
popeyUbuntu UK team has a public wiki.17:21
popeyyou're probably better off using that for now17:22
popeybecause the ubuntu.com one is getting some maintenance soon17:22
=== popey changed the topic of #ubuntu-tv to: Welcome to #ubuntu-tv | http://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tv | http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/UbuntuTV
popeythere you go17:22
tgm4883^^ Shameless plug17:23
MrChrisDruifAhh, I thought you meant wiki...17:23
imnicholSweet17:23
MrChrisDruifNow, where was that mail...*goes to inbox*17:26
tgm4883So we have a pretty nifty list over at http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/UbuntuTV17:39
tgm4883If anyone wants to pop in and take a look, we're going to start ranking them17:39
* popey thinks it should be clearly labelled as a wishlist ☺17:42
popeya community developed wishlist no-less17:42
tgm4883done17:42
popeyta17:42
popeydon't want people wandering in and thinking this is a feature list which we've already settled on ☺17:42
tgm4883popey, how is that?17:43
popeyhaha17:44
popeythats outrageous!17:45
popeyit's 'popey' not 'Popey'17:45
tgm4883fixed :)17:45
imnicholHey everyone!18:00
MrChrisDruifAloha18:00
tgm4883ok, so prioritizing the items, we will discuss that here so it's logged and other people can weigh in18:00
imnicholSounds good18:00
imnicholWhat's first?18:00
tgm4883Item 1:  10' interface18:01
imnicholThat's like the definition of what we should be doing18:01
callumsaunders1I don't suppose we have any designers here?18:01
MrChrisDruifpopey; I think you had a meeting bot lying around?18:01
MrChrisDruifNot professional I think callumsaunders118:01
tgm4883well I was thinking this needs to be more of a higher level discussion for prioritizing the items, not an indepth discussion about each one18:02
tgm4883unless that is what people want18:02
* MrChrisDruif has to go I'm afraid18:02
MrChrisDruifI hope someone can post the log somewhere so I can have a read back?18:02
imnicholI'm down for a high level discussion18:03
popeyhttp://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/11/22/%23ubuntu-tv.html18:03
popeyalready logging18:03
MrChrisDruifThanks popey =)18:03
=== popey changed the topic of #ubuntu-tv to: Welcome to #ubuntu-tv | http://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tv | http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/UbuntuTV | This channel is logged to http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/
* MrChrisDruif is off18:03
tgm4883I mean, we can discuss how to implement a 10' interface (whether it is built from scratch or something already created) at a later time18:04
callumsaunders1bye18:04
callumsaunders1ok no problem18:04
tgm4883So i think the consensus of the 10' UI was ESSENTIAL, correct?18:07
callumsaunders1agreed18:07
imnicholYes18:07
tgm4883ok, second item: Watching Media (DVR, Live, Network)18:07
callumsaunders1whats tv without it18:07
tgm4883also ESSENTIAL18:07
tgm4883exactly18:07
tgm4883the first two are pretty easy :)18:08
tgm4883both ESSENTIAL, the rest of the items we'll probably actually have to discuss18:08
tgm4883ok, third item - Plugin support18:08
tgm4883currently listed as HIGH18:09
imnicholWhen we say "plugin" what are we talking about?18:09
imnicholLike abiltity to extend the software capabilities?18:09
tgm4883yes18:09
tgm4883similar to the way banshee has plugins18:09
callumsaunders1i would rather see apps for that18:09
tgm4883The issue with having apps for that, is then you need a way to control that particular app18:09
callumsaunders1the way phones work18:10
callumsaunders1true.18:10
tgm4883callumsaunders1, I think that works for phones since you have a common expected input device18:10
tgm4883also, phone apps are built for that input device18:10
callumsaunders1i dont think plugin should be priority, i think the experience needs to be created first and then devs can add on to that18:10
callumsaunders1i get you18:11
tgm4883where as other apps aren't going to be built to be controlled by a remote control, smart phone, tablet etc18:11
tgm4883well thats the point, devs can't (easily) add on unless there is plugin support18:11
imnicholSo we're agreed that plugin support is a high priority then?18:12
callumsaunders1go for it18:12
imnicholOh wait, sorry, misread what callumsaunders1 was saying18:12
imnicholSorry dude, didn't mean to stomp on you or anything18:12
callumsaunders1no problem18:12
tgm4883so high or medium?18:13
callumsaunders1if it'll promote development then high18:14
tgm4883I think it will, at the least, it could allow for third party companies to build plugins for it (eg. netflix, amazon VOD, etc)18:14
tgm4883I don't think that is happening without it18:15
callumsaunders1good stuff18:15
tgm4883ok,  so next is - Cloud and/or server storage (for home grown media)18:15
tgm4883currently at HIGH18:15
callumsaunders1high18:16
imnicholYeah18:16
callumsaunders1we provide this for windows18:16
tgm4883ok then18:16
tgm4883next - Playback of physical media (USB cd/dvd/bluray drive)18:17
callumsaunders1high18:17
imnicholhigh18:17
imnicholIt's kind of going into set-top box territory18:17
imnicholBut I think that it's a good added value18:17
imnicholBlue-ray would have to work though18:17
imnicholAnd IIRC from earlier in the conversation, that's maybe not happening so fast?18:17
callumsaunders1could a manufacturer add blu ray support on their own though?18:18
callumsaunders1i want to see a tv where you can just plug in a blur ray drive via usb and the tv handles it18:19
callumsaunders1oops, blu ray18:19
callumsaunders1blur ray would be a terrible format18:19
imnichollol18:20
imnicholBut that's a good question:  if the tv runs Ubuntu, is there going to be a way for the manufacturer to add blueray support?18:22
imnicholAnd as a corellary: will it not be a sucky tacked-on pile of crap?18:23
callumsaunders1cant we provide it, and just allow the manufacturer to enable it18:23
tgm4883callumsaunders1, from a technical standpoint, the TV could provide a bluray player and then we could just control it. We would probably do LiveTV the same way18:30
tgm4883which is allow the TV to do the heavy lifting, and just control it and have the Ubuntu interface be an overlay18:30
tgm4883sorry about the delay, was called  away for a quick issue18:32
callumsaunders1sounds good18:33
tgm4883Next item - Installable image18:33
tgm4883currently HIGH18:33
callumsaunders1high18:33
tgm4883This goes along the lines of a STB18:33
callumsaunders1i was thinking for testing18:34
tgm4883I was thinking for installing it on your own hardware, rather than purchasing pre-built systems18:34
callumsaunders1both are good18:35
Wellarkwillcooke: can I get one rasperry pi? It has HDMI. :)18:35
willcookeAnd h264 video acceleration18:35
willcookeI think the raspberry pi will be a great little video player, but I doubt it's usefulness as a "STB" - just not enough power18:36
WellarkI listened the UDS session recording18:36
Wellarksomeone mentioned pandaboard18:37
Wellarkunfortunately that's pretty much a no-go18:37
tgm4883Wellark, have you seen the freescale i.mx5318:37
Wellarkbecause they have no predictable lead-time. I tried to get one for myself and gave up after 4 months of waiting and no news on next patch18:37
Wellarktgm4883: I know the board, haven't had the opportunity to play with one, yet18:38
tgm4883Linaro showed one off at UDS playing 1080p video beautifully18:38
Wellarksure, those can do that18:39
tgm4883callumsaunders1, imnichol next item - Easy configuration of new devices (eg. installing same plugins, mounting same network shares)18:39
tgm4883currently HIGH18:39
imnicholYes18:39
tgm4883I'm thinking that could be moved to medium18:39
Wellarkoh, sorry. you have a meeting. didn't realize. I'll shutup now18:39
callumsaunders1high yes18:40
callumsaunders1join in18:40
callumsaunders1Ubuntu One accounts are a prerequisite..18:41
tgm4883Wellark, we're just trying to prioritize what we think features should be18:41
tgm4883next -Ubuntu One Accounts18:41
tgm4883define prerequisite?18:41
tgm4883Can I use the TV without Ubuntu One?18:41
callumsaunders1it is needed, to be able to use the cloud store18:42
willcookeI gotta go, I'm really excited to see things moving so quickly.  Thanks guys, I'll catch you all tomorrow18:42
Wellarkyou should be able. not all TV's are connected to the internet18:42
tgm4883bye willcooke18:42
Wellarkstrong ubuntu one integration is very important from day-0 IMHO18:43
tgm4883Ok, so for Ubuntu one accounts, it's a high priority then?18:43
callumsaunders1I agree you shouldnt NEED an account, but to use cloud storage it is necessary18:43
callumsaunders1yes18:43
tgm4883everything that would depend on it is currently medium priority18:43
callumsaunders1which is why U1 needs to be there first18:44
WellarkUbuntu1 is a cruzial factor of the "Unity Experience"18:44
tgm4883ok HIGH then18:44
tgm4883moving on18:44
tgm4883- Control from portable devices (phones/tablets/remotes)18:45
tgm4883currently medium18:45
WellarkI would leave it as is18:45
imnicholWellark - any reason?18:45
tgm4883we should ammend this to phones/tablets, and make a separate entry for remotes that is ESSENTIAL18:45
Wellarkyou have to provide a standalone remote anyway18:45
callumsaunders1yes18:45
Wellarkwhich should be very low-tech18:46
Wellark(cheap)18:46
tgm4883I mean, it is required to have some sort of control, but phone/tablet would be gravy18:46
callumsaunders1also i wouldnt rule out controlling the tv from a laptop/pc either18:46
Wellarksure18:46
imnicholOk yeah18:46
Wellarkbut no point marking everything HIGH :)18:46
imnicholGood point18:46
tgm4883added "web interface"18:46
callumsaunders1hmm18:46
tgm4883agree, which is why I say we make "remotes" essential and leave the rest of this one as medium18:46
tgm4883or possibly low18:47
callumsaunders1i dont see the uses of it being on the web18:47
callumsaunders1baked into regular ubuntu18:47
callumsaunders1actually18:47
callumsaunders1being able to set it to record something rom the web would be good18:48
Wellarksure18:48
tgm4883yea18:48
Wellarkbut sounds like low18:48
callumsaunders1but it would have to provide a tv guide18:48
Wellarkbasically providing access to the tv guide through browser18:48
callumsaunders1anyone from the uk? Sky+ does this18:48
callumsaunders1or an app18:48
callumsaunders1mobile app18:48
tgm4883callumsaunders1, mythtv does this as well18:49
callumsaunders1great18:49
callumsaunders1so easy then18:49
Wellarkhere in finland one of the internet service providers is offering their iptv with applications to iphone and android to setup recordings remotely18:49
tgm4883which reminds me, I have a few things to add, but I'll wait until the end18:49
tgm4883actually, I have to leave in about 10 minutes18:49
tgm4883where did the day go?18:49
Wellarkwest..18:49
callumsaunders1you are the glue that holds this meeting together!18:49
tgm4883heh18:50
callumsaunders1so ...18:50
callumsaunders1push media?18:50
tgm4883- Push media to/from other Ubuntu devices / Media syncing capabilities (Pause on one device, resume from same spot on another device)18:50
tgm4883Currently MEDIUM18:50
WellarkI would love to see that HIGH18:51
Wellarkthat's like the whole point of "smart tv"18:51
callumsaunders1medium is good, this is and collab devices are the gravy for me18:51
Wellarkor smart devices18:51
Wellarkor leave it medium18:51
tgm4883I think this goes hand in hand with remote controls18:51
tgm4883and probably requires U1 integration18:51
tgm4883remote controls being phone/tablet/PC18:52
callumsaunders1U1 would make managing allowed devices easier18:52
tgm4883HIGH then?18:52
imnicholYeah18:52
imnicholThat's my belif18:52
callumsaunders1ok18:52
tgm4883ok18:52
imnicholMeeting time, peace out everyone18:52
tgm4883- Collaborate with other Ubuntu devices (context: https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-phone/msg00006.html )18:52
tgm4883bye imnichol18:52
callumsaunders1byee18:52
WellarkI have to go to put my son to bed.18:53
WellarkIt's a warzone here :/18:53
callumsaunders1shall we mark a point on etherpad and get back to it tomorrow?18:53
tgm4883callumsaunders1, sounds good to me18:53
callumsaunders1because i cant do this on my own! lol18:54
tgm4883ok, marked on the etherpad18:54
callumsaunders1great18:54
tgm4883I'm assuming this thing lives on for awhile18:54
callumsaunders1is there a person who owns the pad?18:55
tgm4883popey^^18:56
callumsaunders1great18:56
popeynobody owns the pad19:15
popeydaviey runs the server it's on19:15
popeybut it's like the wiki, it's a community resource.19:16
MrChrisDruif(UGT) Morning21:38
MrChrisDruifWe're going to continue prioritizing tomorrow?21:38
MrChrisDruiftgm4883; ?21:39
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, yes, we ran out of time21:39
MrChrisDruifWhat time?21:40
tgm4883heh, that wasn't decided. I'd assume about 9:00 AM PST, although it seems I have a meeting at that time21:41
MrChrisDruifHaha21:42
MrChrisDruif17:00 UTC?21:42
MrChrisDruifRight after the Weekly Ubuntu Foundations Meeting?21:43
MrChrisDruiftgm4883; ^21:46
tgm4883heh, I guess so21:46
MrChrisDruifShall I put it on real quick and announce it on the mailing-list?21:46
MrChrisDruifWhy do I forget to mention you every time tgm4883 ? =)21:47
MrChrisDruifFor a weekly meeting we could best move it to Monday on the same time, right after the Ubuntu Friendly meeting (if we want to use #ubuntu-meeting, which is preferred I think) tgm4883 =)21:48
MrChrisDruiftgm4883; can we get this sorted? I need to go to bed =P21:51
MrChrisDruifAlarm goes in about 5,5 hours21:51
MrChrisDruif=P21:51
MrChrisDruiftgm4883; PING!21:54
MrChrisDruif<_<"21:58
MrChrisDruifAnyone? Wellark ? popey ?22:06
MrChrisDruifWell, it has to be an unannounced meeting then...22:22

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!