[02:59] <cjohnston> svwilliams: try this:
[02:59] <cjohnston> create an optional url field
[02:59] <cjohnston> then an if statement for the display
[03:00] <cjohnston> if url field display url field
[03:00] <cjohnston> else display
[03:00] <cjohnston> take a look at the registration URL stuff for events for an example of how thats done
[03:00] <cjohnston> i will be around tomorrow
[03:01] <svwilliams> o, I'll give that a shot
[03:01] <svwilliams> ok*
[03:07] <cjohnston> cprofitt: im not sure why, but your MP didn't contain anything. I don't have time tonight to work on it anymore unfortunatly, but I can help you tomorrow.. but in general, you make the code changes, save the file(s), bzr commit -m "something to describe" then bzr push lp:~name/loco-team-portal/something
[03:07] <cjohnston> svwilliams may also be able to help you
[03:12] <cprofitt> alright...
[03:13] <cprofitt> I will check to ensure the files were saved
[03:14] <cprofitt> ah.... I just did a pust cjohnston
[03:14] <cprofitt> svwilliams: you here?
[03:14] <cjohnston> you didnt commit?
[03:15] <cprofitt> no...
[03:15] <cprofitt> just did that now and re-pushing
[03:15] <cjohnston> ok.. cool
[03:15] <cjohnston> the other thing that I would say is, I probably wouldnt put urls into the commit message, but not a big deal afaik
[03:16] <cprofitt> ok
[03:16] <cprofitt> appreciate all the help
[03:16] <svwilliams> hey cprofitt
[03:16] <cjohnston> we do too
[03:17] <svwilliams> sorry guys, wasn't paying attention
[03:17] <cprofitt> hmm... my revision on LP still says 510 but the bzr command says 510
[03:18] <cprofitt> alright... the about.html says 511
[03:18] <cprofitt> and is updated now
[03:19] <cprofitt> sorry about that earlier
[03:19] <svwilliams> which bug is it cprofitt
[03:19] <cprofitt> 892436
[03:20] <cjohnston> svwilliams: im going to try to do your reviews tomorrow.. got stuck today with doing homework
[03:21] <svwilliams> no worries cjohnston
[03:21] <cprofitt> there are days I wish I could go back to school for RIT
[03:21] <svwilliams> cprofitt, the commit looks good, but I can't review :-) so its all on cjohnston
[03:21] <cjohnston> there are 365 days a year that i wish that i could be done with school
[03:21] <cprofitt> svwilliams: cool.
[03:21] <cjohnston> svwilliams: feel free to review..
[03:22] <cjohnston> Tarmac just wont accept it until someone with commit access reviews it
[03:22] <cprofitt> cjohnston: I just got side tracked by my dad who told me no future in computers
[03:22] <svwilliams> ahh ok, I'll look it over then
[03:22] <cprofitt> I wish I had not listened too him in 1985, but such is life
[03:23] <cjohnston> but you doing reviews (and good reviews) will 1) make you learn quciker/more 2) help you gain our trust
[03:24] <svwilliams> cjohnston, I wondered about this with our previous change of loco-directory to loco-team-porta
[03:24] <cjohnston> svwilliams: yup
[03:24] <svwilliams> do we need to change all of the internal items
[03:24] <svwilliams> like loco_directory.db
[03:24] <svwilliams> etc
[03:24] <cjohnston> the only issue was that the team url hadnt been updated yet
[03:25] <cjohnston> svwilliams: i havent decided yet..
[03:25] <svwilliams> ok
[03:25] <cjohnston> need to think about implications more
[03:25] <svwilliams> yeah long term it can cause confusion
[03:25] <svwilliams> short term, it could be alot of work
[03:25] <cjohnston> cprofitt: inprogress = you are working on it, fix committed = merged into trunk, fix released = live
[03:26] <cjohnston> svwilliams: yes, but also since we dont do the releases, and not totally sure how it would effect the code.
[03:26] <svwilliams> back in a bit, I'll look it over cjohnston so I get used to doing reviews
[03:26] <cjohnston> might be something we look at next uds
[03:26] <svwilliams> ahh good point
[03:26] <cjohnston> we have too much summit stuff to do this cycle
[03:26] <cjohnston> im off to spend time with the boss
[03:26] <cjohnston> g'nite
[03:27] <svwilliams> g'nite
[04:00] <cprofitt> svwilliams: so when I submit a merge proposal that would be in progress
[04:00] <cprofitt> and when it is accepted that is committed?
[04:03] <svwilliams> cprofitt, when you begin to work on it it is in progress
[04:03] <svwilliams> then when you propose it for merge and someone with commit access accepts it
[04:03] <svwilliams> the ticket automatically moves to fix committed
[04:03] <cprofitt> ok
[04:04] <svwilliams> so really you just mark it in progress
[04:04] <svwilliams> and lp does the rest of the work
[04:52] <cprofitt> night all
[11:57] <doctormon> I'm forked the loco portal: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-design-website
[11:57] <doctormon> The idea is to forge a website for designers, a lot of the same functions are needed.
[11:57] <doctormon> So far I've gutted the code and converted two models.
[11:59] <cjohnston> cool
[12:49] <daker> doctormon, are you going to use django 1.3 or 1.1 ?
[12:57] <cjohnston> daker: im working with IS on a timeframe for upgrading
[13:35] <doctormon> daker: At this stage we can only use what you have already a transition is beyond our resources at this early stage.
[14:24] <daker> cjohnston, doctormon ok
[14:37] <cjohnston> johnoxton: did you get my email
[14:38] <johnoxton> cjohnston. I did, and I am sorry I haven't responded yet. hugely busy right now but we will get to this, I promise! :)
[14:38] <cjohnston> no problem. just wanted to make sure you got it
[14:39] <johnoxton> cjohnston. I'll encourage rachelisking to share early and share often. I know she's done so very quick work on UI.
[14:39] <cjohnston> :-)
[14:39] <cjohnston> Awesome
[15:38] <cprofitt> cjohnston: thanks again for the help last night
[15:48] <cjohnston> cprofitt: thank you.. would love to have as much of your help as you will give us
[15:48] <cprofitt> I will keep learning and contributing
[15:48] <cprofitt> and blogging about it
[15:48] <cprofitt> http://ftbeowulf.wordpress.com/2011/11/22/ubuntu-my-first-code-contribution/
[15:48] <cprofitt> hopefully that can inspire some others to help
[15:52] <cjohnston> :-)
[15:52] <cjohnston> thats awesome
[15:56] <cjohnston> nigelb: https://bugs.launchpad.net/loco-team-portal/+bug/892436 any idea why it didnt update the bug status when tarmac merged it
[15:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 892436 in loco-team-portal "Broken link on http://loco.ubuntu.com/about/ (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Medium,In progress]
[16:10]  * cjohnston is spamming everone!! hehehe
[16:41] <daker> cjohnston, 0.3.9 deployed ?
[16:41] <cjohnston> no.. 0.3.9 created
[16:41] <cjohnston> did i release it?
[16:44] <daker> ah no no
[17:41] <nigelb> cjohnston: if someone didn't do the branch -> bug via commandline, tarmac doesn't know about it.
[18:23] <daker> nigelb, why ?
[18:24] <nigelb> daker: Because its not meant to work that way.
[18:24] <nigelb> I talked to dobey about it.
[18:24] <nigelb> 20
[18:25] <daker> nigel, so what you say is correct, bzr commit --fixes lp:#bug doesn't work the same way as you are linking the bug to branche from launchpad UI ?
[18:25] <daker> so if what you say is correct*
[18:25] <nigelb> Nope, right.
[18:26] <nigelb> Because tarmac uses bzr's metadata, not launchpad's meta data.
[18:26] <nigelb> When you do this on lp, nothing gets into bzr.
[18:26] <daker> ah got it
[18:27] <daker> i thought it was working with lp
[18:27] <nigelb> No, this bit is all bzr.
[18:38] <cprofitt> lol
[18:38] <cprofitt> nigelb: should I manually mark that bug a diff. status?
[18:38] <nigelb> cprofitt: Yeah, Fix Commited now that the fix is merged.
[18:39] <cprofitt> done
[18:39] <cprofitt> thanks
[18:42] <mhall119> \/w 36
[18:43] <nigelb> cprofitt: Thanks :)
[18:46] <daker> mhall119, nigelb ?
 20
 \/w 36
[18:46] <daker> ???
[18:46] <mhall119> irssi command gone bad
[18:46] <nigelb> Yeah.
[18:47] <daker> LoL