| buzz_ | argh! - builders - i386 26 1167 jobs (12 hours) | 01:20 |
|---|---|---|
| buzz_ | how did the queue get that big! :) | 01:21 |
| wgrant | buzz_: An issue with a kernel security update took out most of the builders for a day or so. They're back now and catching up. | 01:23 |
| buzz_ | i see. good it is fixed anyway | 01:24 |
| buzz_ | thanks for the info. | 01:25 |
| psusi | did I recently see the ability to remove a task from a bug was finally added? how is this done? I don't see a new command documented on https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface | 01:27 |
| wgrant | psusi: It's not exposed through the email interface. | 01:27 |
| wgrant | Only the API and web UI. | 01:27 |
| psusi | wgrant, wait, it's exposed through the web ui? where? | 01:36 |
| wgrant | psusi: Are you in launchpad-beta-testers? | 01:39 |
| psusi | I forget ;) | 01:39 |
| psusi | doesn't look like it atm | 01:40 |
| wgrant | http://blog.launchpad.net/bug-tracking/removing-a-project-from-a-shared-bug-report | 01:42 |
| wgrant | You need to be a beta tester. | 01:42 |
| wgrant | And also have either created the task, or be the bug supervisor for the project/distro. | 01:42 |
| psusi | wgrant, does that mean ubuntu-bugcontrol for ubuntu package tasks? | 02:27 |
| wgrant | psusi: Right. | 02:27 |
| psusi | k... can clean up those at least... | 02:27 |
| psusi | say wait a second... can't I just reassign tasks to other projects back to Ubuntu, and then delete them anyhow? | 02:28 |
| wgrant | Shhhhh | 02:28 |
| psusi | ;) | 02:28 |
| psusi | well, it's better than the NULL Project | 02:28 |
| wgrant | Yup. | 02:28 |
| psusi | any plans to add it to the email interface? ;) | 02:30 |
| wgrant | psusi: No, but patches welcome :) | 02:33 |
| === thumper is now known as thumper-afk | ||
| === jtv changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: jtv | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| === aj00200 is now known as Aj00300 | ||
| rousskov | Hello. Does anybody know how to mark a private branch as "private"? Yes, we paid Canonical to allow private branch hosting, but the freshly uploaded branch defaulted to public and I do not see a knob to change that. The "Change branch details" page does not have a "make private" option. | 04:43 |
| wgrant | rousskov: Did you request private branches to be set up for your project? | 04:44 |
| rousskov | How do I request that? | 04:44 |
| lifeless | rousskov: hi, we need to do two things; toggle that branch to private, and setup a rule so new branches are private. | 04:44 |
| wgrant | Best to ask at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion | 04:44 |
| lifeless | the former is probably time sensitive - can you msg me the branch name ? | 04:45 |
| rousskov | https://code.launchpad.net/~measurement-factory/squid-future/bump-server-first | 04:45 |
| lifeless | [more time sensitive] | 04:45 |
| rousskov | It is not so secret, fortunately. | 04:45 |
| lifeless | rousskov: we are right now overhauling this to make it much better | 04:46 |
| rousskov | I hope so :-) | 04:46 |
| lifeless | wgrant is one of the folk doing that ;) | 04:46 |
| rousskov | I can delete that branch and start from scratch if it makes things easier. | 04:47 |
| rousskov | wgrant, FWIW, I kind of expected "private" to be the default for paid-for projects because there is probably no reason to pay for a project if you do not need "privacy". | 04:49 |
| spm | rousskov: that branch; and defaults against that project should be set to private now; have at it | 04:50 |
| wgrant | Yeah, it's all a little bit odd at the moment. | 04:50 |
| rousskov | spm, thank you. | 04:51 |
| rousskov | What do I do when we are ready to make the branch public? Ask on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion? | 04:51 |
| lifeless | spm: did you set the policy to private-by-default (vs private-only) ? | 04:52 |
| spm | just private, yes. | 04:52 |
| lifeless | spm: can you make it private-by-default? That should permit rousskov to open them himself | 04:53 |
| spm | sure | 04:53 |
| lifeless | thanks | 04:53 |
| spm | hang on. that's what I did set it to. :-) private, not provate-only. /confusion | 04:54 |
| lifeless | rousskov: you should see a pen icon in the top right of the branch page. Click that to toggle/change privacy | 05:02 |
| rousskov | Cool, thank you. | 05:03 |
| rousskov | lifeless, I got "Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad." error while trying to specify a trunk branch for this project. Is it useful to discuss it here? | 05:09 |
| rousskov | (it does not bother me much, but if it helps others, I can discuss details) | 05:10 |
| det | When you upload a package that provides packages for "all" architecture, are those built separately from the i386/amd64/etc ? | 07:24 |
| det | I uploaded a package that has been built/published for amd64 (and is currently building for i386), but the -common package (which is for architecture "all") has not been published | 07:28 |
| wgrant | det: all packages are built in the i386 build. | 07:33 |
| det | Thanks. | 07:33 |
| === thumper-afk is now known as thumper | ||
| jtv | det: the "all" builds are currently built as if they were i386, and then published in multiple architectures. | 08:16 |
| jtv | det: I believe an "arch-all" package has to be published in all its architectures at once; maybe that's holding it up somehow. | 08:18 |
| danhg | Morning | 09:11 |
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| oojah | Hello | 11:16 |
| oojah | I'm getting an error when trying to dput to my ppa: 550 Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ['General error', 'General error', 'General error']: Permission denied. | 11:17 |
| oojah | It is signed. | 11:17 |
| === matsubara_ is now known as matsubara | ||
| oojah | Hmm, but I have just received an "upload accepted" email. | 11:18 |
| geser | oojah: bug #798957 | 11:21 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 798957 in Launchpad itself "PPA Uploads are seemingly (but not actually) rejected" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/798957 | 11:21 |
| oojah | geser: Ok, thanks. | 11:27 |
| === jtv changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| falstaff | Hi, I renamed the wrong .orig.tar.gz and uploaded it. Now I wanted to upload the correct one, but launchpad keeps rejecting my package. Yes I deleted the whole package from the Web UI | 13:10 |
| falstaff | Is there a way to complete vanish an orig.tar.gz? | 13:11 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| lag | How do I view more than one changelog item when viewing packages in a PPA? | 14:22 |
| christoph_debian | anything wrong with ppa upload atm? failing with a gpg verification message in dput when uploading the *.changes but it is signed and the key (including the used subkey) seems to be known to launchpad | 15:15 |
| geser | did you got an email that it got rejected or accepted? | 15:16 |
| christoph_debian | noticed dput failing and didn't expect mails in that case but indeed there are some | 15:17 |
| christoph_debian | seems `Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ['General error', 'General error', 'General error'] : Permission denied.` does stand for `you use the wrong distribution` | 15:18 |
| geser | there are 2 gpg checks: one at upload time (likes to fail) and a second one when the upload is processed. A failure at the first check is ignored, but the second check must pass. | 15:18 |
| geser | christoph_debian: see bug #798957 | 15:19 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 798957 in Launchpad itself "PPA Uploads are seemingly (but not actually) rejected" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/798957 | 15:19 |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| eLBati | ciao | 16:35 |
| eLBati | how bugs are decided to be displayed by default on bug tracker? | 16:37 |
| eLBati | in other words, why this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-italia/+bug/890108 | 16:37 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 890108 in OpenERP Italia "l10n_it_account - il check delle date delle fatture non dovrebbe usare SQL" [Medium,New] | 16:37 |
| eLBati | doesn't appear here https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-italia | 16:37 |
| eLBati | ? | 16:37 |
| cjohnston | How do I add a project to a project group? does it have to be done by a question? | 18:43 |
| EvilResistance | i take it there's no launchpad admins watching the answers queue? | 18:44 |
| EvilResistance | >=24 hours and no response to my answer/request | 18:44 |
| lifeless | cjohnston: just set it as 'part of' in the project edit page | 18:49 |
| lifeless | EvilResistance: there is a maintenance squad watching the launchpad-project answers queue | 18:49 |
| cjohnston | lifeless: thanks | 18:50 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| nook | Is it possible that the global menu of Unity allways show the menu items? I dont want to hover the menu to see the items... That makes me crazy :( | 20:53 |
| dobey | nook: i think this is the wrong channel for that question; you might want to try #ayatana or #ubuntu (or #unity if there is one) | 20:57 |
| nook | ok thanks | 20:58 |
| thopiekar | hi.. can you help getting this problem solved? We are using these packaging files lp:~maliit-team/+junk/maliit-framework-debian to package lp:~maliit-team/maliit/maliit-framework and we want to make them compatible to oneiric and natty while oneiric has multi-arch support and paths for the install files differ.. how can I make the debian files work on both releases? | 21:15 |
| lifeless | thopiekar: hi; the #ubuntu-packaging channel is more likely to be able to help with that | 21:26 |
| lifeless | thopiekar: they support folk doing packaging on Launchpad PPAs and Ubuntu itself | 21:26 |
| thopiekar | lifeless: thanks! | 21:26 |
| danielinux | sorry I got disconnected so I don't know if my question was answered... | 21:39 |
| danielinux | my project has two branches, a "trunk" with last release 0.4 and a 0.5 branch for maintaining this version. I just released a 0.5, but on the download box the latest suggested file is still 0.4 is there a way to configure the download box on the overview page to show the latest released file (tarball for 0.5)? | 21:39 |
| flacoste | danielinux: i think this portlet is cached... | 22:03 |
| flacoste | let me confirm | 22:04 |
| flacoste | danielinux: i'm wrong, it's not cached | 22:06 |
| flacoste | danielinux: unfortunately, it's not configurable, and it's likely that we think release from trunk should sort higher than anything else | 22:06 |
| danielinux | Ok, thanks flacoste. I would suggest to consider to sort them by date (this seems more logical to me, since the box description clearly states "latest") | 22:09 |
| danielinux | anyway, thanks for looking into that | 22:09 |
| danielinux | I luv launchpad. | 22:10 |
| danielinux | goodnight | 22:10 |
| marcoceppi | So, this is' | 22:19 |
| marcoceppi | n't a support channel? | 22:19 |
| lifeless | marcoceppi: why do you say that ? | 22:19 |
| marcoceppi | The message I got from the room to seek support elsewhere, I've got hopefully a quick question | 22:20 |
| lifeless | what message? | 22:20 |
| lifeless | marcoceppi: if you mean 'Need help with Launchpad? Visit https://help.launchpad.net for the user guide. Still stuck or need to report spam? Go to https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad' | 22:21 |
| lifeless | marcoceppi: that offers additional places for help, for when noone answers | 22:21 |
| marcoceppi | Ah, thanks | 22:21 |
| lifeless | marcoceppi: you are totally welcome to ask anything here | 22:21 |
| marcoceppi | So I have a team setup in LaunchPad, since it's setup Launchpad has shown all of my commits as coming from that team | 22:21 |
| marcoceppi | despite me not using that email in bzr whoami. How can I stop masquerading as the team? | 22:22 |
| lifeless | whats the branch ? | 22:23 |
| marcoceppi | whoami: Marco Ceppi <marco@ceppi.net>, bzr log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/747601/, Offense: https://code.launchpad.net/~charmers/charm-tools/trunk | 22:23 |
| lifeless | are you talking about ~ondina? | 22:24 |
| lifeless | brb, ELOCAL | 22:24 |
| marcoceppi | lifeless: Yeah, It shows as ~ondina though I'd like it to come from ~marcoceppi | 22:24 |
| poolie | hi marcoceppi | 22:27 |
| marcoceppi | Hey poolie | 22:27 |
| lifeless | marcoceppi: can you do | 22:28 |
| lifeless | bzr log -n0 -r 83 | 22:28 |
| marcoceppi | Sure thing lifeless! http://paste.ubuntu.com/747605/ | 22:29 |
| lifeless | interesting | 22:34 |
| lifeless | I have no idea whats up here | 22:34 |
| lifeless | thumper: hey, do you happen to remember ^ | 22:34 |
| thumper | hi | 22:34 |
| lifeless | thumper: wrong email address being associated w/commits | 22:34 |
| thumper | whats up? | 22:34 |
| poolie | i wonder if the bot has the same address or something | 22:34 |
| marcoceppi | If it helps, my account and the ondina account once shared an email address, I changed the Ondina address to resolve this but it seems to have remembered> | 22:34 |
| poolie | :) | 22:34 |
| marcoceppi | (marco@ceppi.net) | 22:34 |
| poolie | did you change that after 2011-11-20? | 22:35 |
| thumper | is this linking revision authors to people? | 22:35 |
| marcoceppi | I changed it about two weeks ago | 22:35 |
| poolie | yes | 22:35 |
| * marcoceppi looks for lp email | 22:35 | |
| thumper | ok... what happens is as follows | 22:35 |
| marcoceppi | Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:15:24 -0000 (11/19/2011 04:15:24 PM) | 22:36 |
| thumper | when a new revision author is found | 22:36 |
| thumper | the email address is looked up internally | 22:36 |
| thumper | and the person with that email address is linked to that revision author | 22:36 |
| thumper | once a person is linked, it is never looked at again | 22:36 |
| thumper | if a person isn't found at that time | 22:36 |
| thumper | it is looked up periodically | 22:36 |
| thumper | and if found, linked | 22:36 |
| poolie | right | 22:37 |
| poolie | i wonder if it could be matching against a disabled address | 22:37 |
| maxb | The hugely non-obvious bit is that the linkage is between *full revision author string* and LP person | 22:37 |
| poolie | hi maxb | 22:37 |
| maxb | Not between extracted email address and LP person | 22:37 |
| thumper | well, the email part is extracted | 22:38 |
| poolie | really? | 22:38 |
| thumper | each full revision author string has a separate row in the revision author table | 22:38 |
| thumper | there can be multiple rows containing the same extracted email address | 22:38 |
| thumper | and depending on a point in time, these could potentially link to different actual LP people | 22:38 |
| marcoceppi | So, how can I fix this? | 22:39 |
| lifeless | thumper: thanks | 22:39 |
| lifeless | so there are two things here I think | 22:39 |
| lifeless | a) we shouldn't ever link to teams; teams don't do commits. | 22:39 |
| lifeless | thats a bug, if its not filed already. | 22:40 |
| === epsy is now known as \u03b5 | ||
| lifeless | b) we can update the reference in the DB to not point at the team. | 22:40 |
| lifeless | for that, please open a ticket at answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | 22:40 |
| marcoceppi | lifeless: Will this be retoactive? IE: Fix all previous commits? | 22:41 |
| lifeless | marcoceppi: IIRC, yres. | 22:41 |
| marcoceppi | Awesome, I can keep committing then :) | 22:42 |
| lifeless | thumper: do you agree that (a) is a defect? | 22:42 |
| thumper | if (a) happens, yes I'd agree it is a defect | 22:43 |
| poolie | so if on the 20th | 22:45 |
| poolie | that email address was no longer associated with the team | 22:45 |
| poolie | why would revisions pushed on the 20th still get linked to the team? | 22:45 |
| wgrant | poolie: BranchAuthor is forever. | 22:54 |
| wgrant | Er, RevisionAuthor | 22:55 |
| poolie | yes i know | 22:56 |
| poolie | but how can new revisionauthor records be created, for new revisions, chasing a no-longer-existing user-email mapping? | 22:56 |
| wgrant | No no. | 22:56 |
| wgrant | Revision references a RevisionAuthor | 22:57 |
| wgrant | RevisionAuthor is a (id, name, email, person) | 22:57 |
| marcoceppi | Thanks everyone! https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/179802 | 23:00 |
| andy_js | Hi, I'm trying to install an instance of Launchpad but I'm encountering "OpenID Provider Is Unavailable at This Time" when I attempt to login. | 23:19 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!