[01:20] argh! - builders - i386 26 1167 jobs (12 hours) [01:21] how did the queue get that big! :) [01:23] buzz_: An issue with a kernel security update took out most of the builders for a day or so. They're back now and catching up. [01:24] i see. good it is fixed anyway [01:25] thanks for the info. [01:27] did I recently see the ability to remove a task from a bug was finally added? how is this done? I don't see a new command documented on https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface [01:27] psusi: It's not exposed through the email interface. [01:27] Only the API and web UI. [01:36] wgrant, wait, it's exposed through the web ui? where? [01:39] psusi: Are you in launchpad-beta-testers? [01:39] I forget ;) [01:40] doesn't look like it atm [01:42] http://blog.launchpad.net/bug-tracking/removing-a-project-from-a-shared-bug-report [01:42] You need to be a beta tester. [01:42] And also have either created the task, or be the bug supervisor for the project/distro. [02:27] wgrant, does that mean ubuntu-bugcontrol for ubuntu package tasks? [02:27] psusi: Right. [02:27] k... can clean up those at least... [02:28] say wait a second... can't I just reassign tasks to other projects back to Ubuntu, and then delete them anyhow? [02:28] Shhhhh [02:28] ;) [02:28] well, it's better than the NULL Project [02:28] Yup. [02:30] any plans to add it to the email interface? ;) [02:33] psusi: No, but patches welcome :) === thumper is now known as thumper-afk === jtv changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: jtv | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad === aj00200 is now known as Aj00300 [04:43] Hello. Does anybody know how to mark a private branch as "private"? Yes, we paid Canonical to allow private branch hosting, but the freshly uploaded branch defaulted to public and I do not see a knob to change that. The "Change branch details" page does not have a "make private" option. [04:44] rousskov: Did you request private branches to be set up for your project? [04:44] How do I request that? [04:44] rousskov: hi, we need to do two things; toggle that branch to private, and setup a rule so new branches are private. [04:44] Best to ask at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion [04:45] the former is probably time sensitive - can you msg me the branch name ? [04:45] https://code.launchpad.net/~measurement-factory/squid-future/bump-server-first [04:45] [more time sensitive] [04:45] It is not so secret, fortunately. [04:46] rousskov: we are right now overhauling this to make it much better [04:46] I hope so :-) [04:46] wgrant is one of the folk doing that ;) [04:47] I can delete that branch and start from scratch if it makes things easier. [04:49] wgrant, FWIW, I kind of expected "private" to be the default for paid-for projects because there is probably no reason to pay for a project if you do not need "privacy". [04:50] rousskov: that branch; and defaults against that project should be set to private now; have at it [04:50] Yeah, it's all a little bit odd at the moment. [04:51] spm, thank you. [04:51] What do I do when we are ready to make the branch public? Ask on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion? [04:52] spm: did you set the policy to private-by-default (vs private-only) ? [04:52] just private, yes. [04:53] spm: can you make it private-by-default? That should permit rousskov to open them himself [04:53] sure [04:53] thanks [04:54] hang on. that's what I did set it to. :-) private, not provate-only. /confusion [05:02] rousskov: you should see a pen icon in the top right of the branch page. Click that to toggle/change privacy [05:03] Cool, thank you. [05:09] lifeless, I got "Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad." error while trying to specify a trunk branch for this project. Is it useful to discuss it here? [05:10] (it does not bother me much, but if it helps others, I can discuss details) [07:24] When you upload a package that provides packages for "all" architecture, are those built separately from the i386/amd64/etc ? [07:28] I uploaded a package that has been built/published for amd64 (and is currently building for i386), but the -common package (which is for architecture "all") has not been published [07:33] det: all packages are built in the i386 build. [07:33] Thanks. === thumper-afk is now known as thumper [08:16] det: the "all" builds are currently built as if they were i386, and then published in multiple architectures. [08:18] det: I believe an "arch-all" package has to be published in all its architectures at once; maybe that's holding it up somehow. [09:11] Morning === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [11:16] Hello [11:17] I'm getting an error when trying to dput to my ppa: 550 Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ['General error', 'General error', 'General error']: Permission denied. [11:17] It is signed. === matsubara_ is now known as matsubara [11:18] Hmm, but I have just received an "upload accepted" email. [11:21] oojah: bug #798957 [11:21] Launchpad bug 798957 in Launchpad itself "PPA Uploads are seemingly (but not actually) rejected" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/798957 [11:27] geser: Ok, thanks. === jtv changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [13:10] Hi, I renamed the wrong .orig.tar.gz and uploaded it. Now I wanted to upload the correct one, but launchpad keeps rejecting my package. Yes I deleted the whole package from the Web UI [13:11] Is there a way to complete vanish an orig.tar.gz? === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [14:22] How do I view more than one changelog item when viewing packages in a PPA? [15:15] anything wrong with ppa upload atm? failing with a gpg verification message in dput when uploading the *.changes but it is signed and the key (including the used subkey) seems to be known to launchpad [15:16] did you got an email that it got rejected or accepted? [15:17] noticed dput failing and didn't expect mails in that case but indeed there are some [15:18] seems `Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ['General error', 'General error', 'General error'] : Permission denied.` does stand for `you use the wrong distribution` [15:18] there are 2 gpg checks: one at upload time (likes to fail) and a second one when the upload is processed. A failure at the first check is ignored, but the second check must pass. [15:19] christoph_debian: see bug #798957 [15:19] Launchpad bug 798957 in Launchpad itself "PPA Uploads are seemingly (but not actually) rejected" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/798957 === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === yofel_ is now known as yofel [16:35] ciao [16:37] how bugs are decided to be displayed by default on bug tracker? [16:37] in other words, why this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-italia/+bug/890108 [16:37] Ubuntu bug 890108 in OpenERP Italia "l10n_it_account - il check delle date delle fatture non dovrebbe usare SQL" [Medium,New] [16:37] doesn't appear here https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-italia [16:37] ? [18:43] How do I add a project to a project group? does it have to be done by a question? [18:44] i take it there's no launchpad admins watching the answers queue? [18:44] >=24 hours and no response to my answer/request [18:49] cjohnston: just set it as 'part of' in the project edit page [18:49] EvilResistance: there is a maintenance squad watching the launchpad-project answers queue [18:50] lifeless: thanks === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [20:53] Is it possible that the global menu of Unity allways show the menu items? I dont want to hover the menu to see the items... That makes me crazy :( [20:57] nook: i think this is the wrong channel for that question; you might want to try #ayatana or #ubuntu (or #unity if there is one) [20:58] ok thanks [21:15] hi.. can you help getting this problem solved? We are using these packaging files lp:~maliit-team/+junk/maliit-framework-debian to package lp:~maliit-team/maliit/maliit-framework and we want to make them compatible to oneiric and natty while oneiric has multi-arch support and paths for the install files differ.. how can I make the debian files work on both releases? [21:26] thopiekar: hi; the #ubuntu-packaging channel is more likely to be able to help with that [21:26] thopiekar: they support folk doing packaging on Launchpad PPAs and Ubuntu itself [21:26] lifeless: thanks! [21:39] sorry I got disconnected so I don't know if my question was answered... [21:39] my project has two branches, a "trunk" with last release 0.4 and a 0.5 branch for maintaining this version. I just released a 0.5, but on the download box the latest suggested file is still 0.4 is there a way to configure the download box on the overview page to show the latest released file (tarball for 0.5)? [22:03] danielinux: i think this portlet is cached... [22:04] let me confirm [22:06] danielinux: i'm wrong, it's not cached [22:06] danielinux: unfortunately, it's not configurable, and it's likely that we think release from trunk should sort higher than anything else [22:09] Ok, thanks flacoste. I would suggest to consider to sort them by date (this seems more logical to me, since the box description clearly states "latest") [22:09] anyway, thanks for looking into that [22:10] I luv launchpad. [22:10] goodnight [22:19] So, this is' [22:19] n't a support channel? [22:19] marcoceppi: why do you say that ? [22:20] The message I got from the room to seek support elsewhere, I've got hopefully a quick question [22:20] what message? [22:21] marcoceppi: if you mean 'Need help with Launchpad? Visit https://help.launchpad.net for the user guide. Still stuck or need to report spam? Go to https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad' [22:21] marcoceppi: that offers additional places for help, for when noone answers [22:21] Ah, thanks [22:21] marcoceppi: you are totally welcome to ask anything here [22:21] So I have a team setup in LaunchPad, since it's setup Launchpad has shown all of my commits as coming from that team [22:22] despite me not using that email in bzr whoami. How can I stop masquerading as the team? [22:23] whats the branch ? [22:23] whoami: Marco Ceppi , bzr log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/747601/, Offense: https://code.launchpad.net/~charmers/charm-tools/trunk [22:24] are you talking about ~ondina? [22:24] brb, ELOCAL [22:24] lifeless: Yeah, It shows as ~ondina though I'd like it to come from ~marcoceppi [22:27] hi marcoceppi [22:27] Hey poolie [22:28] marcoceppi: can you do [22:28] bzr log -n0 -r 83 [22:29] Sure thing lifeless! http://paste.ubuntu.com/747605/ [22:34] interesting [22:34] I have no idea whats up here [22:34] thumper: hey, do you happen to remember ^ [22:34] hi [22:34] thumper: wrong email address being associated w/commits [22:34] whats up? [22:34] i wonder if the bot has the same address or something [22:34] If it helps, my account and the ondina account once shared an email address, I changed the Ondina address to resolve this but it seems to have remembered> [22:34] :) [22:34] (marco@ceppi.net) [22:35] did you change that after 2011-11-20? [22:35] is this linking revision authors to people? [22:35] I changed it about two weeks ago [22:35] yes [22:35] * marcoceppi looks for lp email [22:35] ok... what happens is as follows [22:36] Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:15:24 -0000 (11/19/2011 04:15:24 PM) [22:36] when a new revision author is found [22:36] the email address is looked up internally [22:36] and the person with that email address is linked to that revision author [22:36] once a person is linked, it is never looked at again [22:36] if a person isn't found at that time [22:36] it is looked up periodically [22:36] and if found, linked [22:37] right [22:37] i wonder if it could be matching against a disabled address [22:37] The hugely non-obvious bit is that the linkage is between *full revision author string* and LP person [22:37] hi maxb [22:37] Not between extracted email address and LP person [22:38] well, the email part is extracted [22:38] really? [22:38] each full revision author string has a separate row in the revision author table [22:38] there can be multiple rows containing the same extracted email address [22:38] and depending on a point in time, these could potentially link to different actual LP people [22:39] So, how can I fix this? [22:39] thumper: thanks [22:39] so there are two things here I think [22:39] a) we shouldn't ever link to teams; teams don't do commits. [22:40] thats a bug, if its not filed already. === epsy is now known as \u03b5 [22:40] b) we can update the reference in the DB to not point at the team. [22:40] for that, please open a ticket at answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [22:41] lifeless: Will this be retoactive? IE: Fix all previous commits? [22:41] marcoceppi: IIRC, yres. [22:42] Awesome, I can keep committing then :) [22:42] thumper: do you agree that (a) is a defect? [22:43] if (a) happens, yes I'd agree it is a defect [22:45] so if on the 20th [22:45] that email address was no longer associated with the team [22:45] why would revisions pushed on the 20th still get linked to the team? [22:54] poolie: BranchAuthor is forever. [22:55] Er, RevisionAuthor [22:56] yes i know [22:56] but how can new revisionauthor records be created, for new revisions, chasing a no-longer-existing user-email mapping? [22:56] No no. [22:57] Revision references a RevisionAuthor [22:57] RevisionAuthor is a (id, name, email, person) [23:00] Thanks everyone! https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/179802 [23:19] Hi, I'm trying to install an instance of Launchpad but I'm encountering "OpenID Provider Is Unavailable at This Time" when I attempt to login.