[00:00] <MrCurious> might be because you ARE using a swap
[00:00] <MrCurious> but most likely due to not installing ti omap4 add ons that bring graphics optimizations
[00:40] <An-iSociaL> hmm
[00:40] <An-iSociaL> the motorola atrix uses the same qtouch driver as the xoom
[00:40] <An-iSociaL> and its near twice as many lines
[00:41] <An-iSociaL> around 3500 for atrix and right under 2000 for xoom
[00:41] <An-iSociaL> gonna have to try and diff but i dont think there's going to be any way
[00:44] <An-iSociaL> no there's no way to use it directly
[00:44] <An-iSociaL> back to work
[03:01] <An-iSociaL> yay i have click
[03:02] <An-iSociaL> but its annoying
[03:02] <An-iSociaL> i have to hold, then tap with my other finger to register a full click
[03:02] <An-iSociaL> otherwise its just a mouse down
[03:37] <int_ua> :)
[03:37] <An-iSociaL> howdy
[03:37] <int_ua> it's Xoom, yes?
[03:38] <An-iSociaL> yep
[03:42] <twb> "Transformer Prime"? How is it that Takara Tomy don't sue Asus
[03:49] <int_ua> twb: Maybe "didn't sue yet"?)
[03:49] <twb> Ya
[05:10] <An-iSociaL> ... and ... bored
[05:13] <lilstevie> lol
[05:13] <lilstevie> An-iSociaL: ok, so there is something in teh touch driver the way that google have done the btn_touch
[05:14] <An-iSociaL> oh reeally
[05:15] <An-iSociaL> the button staying stuck down is causing xorg to crash
[05:15] <An-iSociaL> not exactly sure why
[05:15] <lilstevie> heh
[05:16] <lilstevie> well I don't have time at the moment to give you a hand
[05:16] <lilstevie> maybe later
[05:18] <An-iSociaL> no worries im in need of a break
[07:31] <An-iSociaL> sdcards are srsly not meant for operating systems
[11:16] <punxos> I'm using and ARM board (actually qemu versatilepb). When I compile the kernel the entry point is c0008000 (vmlinux), but this memory don't exists in this board. Should I change PAGE_OFFSET ?
[11:18] <ogra_> well, versatile isnt a v7 arch ... ubuntu only supports v7
[11:18] <ogra_> use vexpress
[11:19] <punxos> ok
[11:21] <punxos> but debian works I think. Is just to test it.
[11:38] <ppisati> GrueMaster: when you awake, could you test this one: http://people.canonical.com/~ppisati/linux-image-2.6.35-903-omap4_2.6.35-903.27~lp893190_armel.deb?
[11:39] <ppisati> GrueMaster: in particular, tell me if ptrace() still fails (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/85419190/test-kernel-security.log)
[11:43] <ogra_> punxos, debian supports older arches, so versatile isnt a prob there
[11:43] <punxos> ok
[11:44] <punxos> but is just a conceptual question... but ok.
[11:50] <int_ua> Why exactly all kernels that I've seen for OMAP are 2.6.35? :)
[11:52] <infinity> int_ua: Because you're looking at maverick?
[11:53] <infinity> linux-omap4 | 2.6.35.903.5 |      maverick | armel
[11:53] <infinity> linux-omap4 | 2.6.38.1208.7 |         natty | armel
[11:53] <infinity> linux-omap4 | 3.0.0.1205.0 |       oneiric | armel
[11:53] <infinity> linux-omap4 | 3.0.0.1205.0 |       precise | armel
[11:55] <int_ua> infinity: ok, thanks. I only own N900 and look at this https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-n900#packages_list :)
[12:03] <ogra_> int_ua, well, thats a community maintained kernel, find the maintainer and ask for an update :)
[12:05] <int_ua> ogra_: kind of found :) But he is busy... Thanks for info anyway :)
[12:21]  * ogra_ glares at the default config of a TI android 3.0 kernel ...
[12:21] <ogra_> funny, ext2 is aneabled, ext4 as well ... why the heck is ext3 off ?
[12:21] <ogra_> *enabled
[12:35] <lilstevie> heh
[12:35] <lilstevie> I have ext2/3 disabled on the tf kernels
[12:35] <lilstevie> cause I enable ext4 backwards compatibility
[15:15] <Floodman> Hello, gays.
[15:16] <Floodman> Hello, gays.
[17:53] <An-iSociaL> good afternoon
[17:53] <An-iSociaL> how's everyone today?
[18:15] <An-iSociaL> hmm ok
[18:16] <An-iSociaL> finally got a shell on my setup, watched top from shell while it attempted to do an oem-config
[18:16] <An-iSociaL> aptd uses 100% cpu until there's finally a crash
[18:17] <An-iSociaL> hard crash resulting in a device reset
[18:19] <gildean> overheat?
[18:22] <An-iSociaL> its cool as a cucumber
[18:22] <An-iSociaL> booted up again, not going to touch it
[18:23] <An-iSociaL> see if its aptd or just something that would have happened anyway
[18:23] <An-iSociaL> 2% cpu usage at idle, less than 256mb ram used
[18:27] <An-iSociaL> there it went...
[18:27] <An-iSociaL> 5m idle and it reset
[18:28] <An-iSociaL> i cant find anything in logs to hint at the problem, any other suggestions for log locations or maybe something else entirely?
[19:00] <An-iSociaL> wow i finally have a crash log
[19:00] <An-iSociaL> http://pastie.org/2910381
[19:00] <An-iSociaL> not that i understand a bit of it
[19:00] <An-iSociaL> and its been running now for 18m
[19:01] <An-iSociaL> errors=remount-ro seems to have been the issue
[19:01] <An-iSociaL> remount without options is whats keeping it alive
[19:16] <An-iSociaL> ok
[19:16] <An-iSociaL> i was wrong
[19:16] <An-iSociaL> it doesnt keep it online
[21:23] <An-iSociaL> http://pastebin.com/fnmpJcmk
[21:25] <An-iSociaL> disabling binfmt_misc in the kernel