[19:02] <lifeless> wgrant: can you check in one of your lucid lxc's, is /var/run a tmpfs, or a naked dir ?
[19:04] <nigelb> Morning lifeless
[19:44] <lifeless> morning nigelb
[19:45] <nigelb> :)
[19:45] <lifeless> question for the floor - I need a sanity check - set_session_pkg_data() takes parameters that need obfuscating?
=== micahg_ is now known as micahg
[21:28] <poolie> lifeless, thanks for the partial review
[21:29] <lifeless> no probs
[21:47] <wgrant> lifeless: Obfuscating how?
[21:48] <lifeless> wgrant: have a look at OOPS-3cbd11de34ca8a70afaf668853adc17e in bad-oops on carob
[21:48] <lifeless> wondering if we should be preventing query param substition
[21:48] <wgrant> Oh, in query logs, I see.
[21:49] <wgrant> lifeless: Where is bad-oops?
[21:49] <lifeless> lpoops/
[21:49] <wgrant> That's not a directory.
[21:50] <wgrant> Ah, there, I see.
[21:50] <lifeless> wgrant: its a sidestraction from https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-oops-datedir-repo/+bug/896959
[21:51] <wgrant> That probably is somewhat sensitive, yeah.
[21:53] <lifeless> I happened to notice it ;)
[21:55] <lifeless> wgrant: I propose to monkey patch update-db to handle unicodedecode error until the fix is deployed.
[21:56] <wgrant> lifeless: That would be my suggestion.
[21:56] <lifeless> done
[21:59] <poolie> anyhow thanks again for the prompt review, i replied
[21:59] <poolie> incidentally the button is already hidden on private bmps
[22:09] <wgrant> Heh
[22:10] <lifeless> poolie: how is it hidden?
[22:10] <wgrant> Bug 896968, bug 896691
[22:10] <lifeless> poolie: I didn't see a clause fo rit
[22:10] <poolie> line 132 of the diff
[22:10] <poolie> +    tal:condition="not:view/is_private"
[22:10] <poolie> on the macros that insert the buttons
[22:11] <poolie> i was quite pleased with that
[22:11] <poolie> but maybe there's a better way
[22:11] <poolie> much better than counting on every template getting it right
[22:28] <poolie> lifeless, i was hoping you'd say "oh that's nice" :)
[22:29] <lifeless> poolie: heh, sorry.
[22:29] <lifeless> uhm
[22:30] <lifeless> thats probably reasonable
[22:30] <poolie> lifeless, i was hoping you'd say "oh that's nice" :)
[22:30] <poolie> oops
[22:31] <lifeless> deja vue
[22:31] <poolie> typo, not trying to be whiny
[22:51] <wgrant> I'm saying that your second-latest comment is spreading common misunderstandings.
[22:51] <lifeless> feel free to note that
[22:51] <lifeless> both aaron and I were spreading it
[22:51] <lifeless> however we don't have -any- bug.datecreated search in bugtask.py
[22:51] <lifeless> so while its true that the bug datecreated field can be different
[22:51] <lifeless> its not relevant to the bug
[22:52] <wgrant> bugtask.datecreated will be similarly different.
[22:52] <wgrant> Or at least should be.
[22:53] <lifeless> yes