=== Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha === twb` is now known as twb [05:13] micahg: yes, remoting still needs vpx [05:16] suihkulokki: right, but there's an internal libvpx that chromium builds, is there a guide for me to set up a cross-compile env to test this with? [05:17] * micahg would love to be able to fix armel on amd64 [05:38] micahg: for whatever reason the internal vpx is not happy to build on armel [05:39] suihkulokki: ok, I'll try to fix that then, I'd prefer to use internal libvpx since chromium's minimum version will change through the stable release [10:15] hi, I’m a bit concerned about the armel build of mksh and would be grateful if one of you running precise could: [10:15] install mksh_40.3-1_armel; cd /tmp; cp /usr/share/doc/mksh/check.* .; gzip -d check.t; gzip -d check.pl; perl check.pl -s check.t -p /bin/mksh-static -v -C smksh,binsh,convfds,no-histfile 2>&1 | tee log === ogra_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-arm to: Ubuntu ARMv7 Discussion & Development | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM | Submit a Bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug | Get oneiric while it's hot ! http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/11.10/release/ | Logs at http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | armhf builds are running [10:55] * ogra_ finds it worth to put armhf in the topic === doko_ is now known as doko [12:36] hi, rootstock is deprecated right? [12:36] SidH_: yes [12:37] you can still use it, but we're not planning on fixing the issues on it anymore [12:37] live-build should be used instead [12:37] Can I add a note to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/RootfsFromScratch about the deprecation [12:37] but I still need to blog about properly enabling live-build to replace rootstock [12:37] Similar to the Rootstock page itself? [12:37] Ah. [12:38] I tried the -core image on my DaVinci board today [12:38] SidH_, once rsalveti's blog post is out i'll kill the upstream project and ask for package removal from the archive [12:38] SidH_: yeah, we'd need to update this wiki with the instructions to use live-build instead [12:38] Thanks! [12:38] yeah, planning to make it available this week [12:38] no hurry :) [12:38] now that we're off the release week madness [12:39] ogra_: and how is alpha 1 going? [12:39] I'm basically trying out ubuntu-arm on my board and wanted to follow the existing instructions [12:39] ogra_: tested the kernel for omap 3 here yesterday and it's working fine with the config change [12:39] not to bad, the omap3 fix made it in ... i havent tested ac100 yet, panda should be fine [12:39] ogra_: cool [12:40] * ogra_ hasnt heard anything bad from GrueMaster either === Amaranth__ is now known as Amaranth === Amaranth__ is now known as Amaranth === mayday_jay is now known as mayday_jay-|work [15:40] NCommander: help on the packaging side for xbmc should be useful, for sure :-) [15:40] NCommander: one thing aviksil is looking at is trying to integrate the gstreamer patches [15:40] rsalveti: well landing them into the Ubuntu packaging isn't that hard,then its just a matter of making a seed materialize [15:40] then we can properly use the hw decode support at panda === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer [16:28] ogra_: Haven't done any recent testing as I have been fully engaged in getting the qrt kernel tests running for SRU testing. [16:29] yeah, i thought so [16:29] well, shouldn be all solved on omap3 now [16:29] I do plan on testing some current images today (barring interrupts). [16:29] * ogra_ stops interupting immediately [16:31] heh === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch [17:04] NCommander, ogra_: could somebody look at the ruby1.9.1 test failure on armel? === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha [21:53] NCommander: you see this -> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2011-November/018995.html [22:02] robbiew: that's drool worthy [22:02] robbiew: even thoughour support for Xenis 'shakey' at best [22:03] yeah [22:12] I'd love to know how they got A15 hardware though ... [22:13] NCommander: it was vexpress, I assume entirely emulated? [22:13] infinity: yep [22:13] NCommander: Though they gave kudos to ARM, so maybe they actually have a real vexpress A15 sitting on their desks. [22:15] "...the port is already capable of booting a Linux 3.0 based virtual machine (dom0) up to a shell prompt on an ARM Architecture Envelope Model, configured to emulate an A15-based Versatile Express.", so looks like it's all emulated [22:15] * infinity nods. [22:16] Oh, d'oh [22:16] Sounds almost like a xilinx gpgpu emulating an a15. [22:42] Hi, what is the difference between arm-linux-gnuabi and arm-unknown-linux-gnuabi targets? [22:46] jjardon: (Both of those are missing an "e") [22:46] jjardon: And nothing. The -unknown- is a vendor string, and Debian/Ubuntu don't set it. [22:47] jjardon: RedHat sets it to -redhat-, for instance. [22:48] infinity: yeah, you are rigth. I asked because my arm board shows arm-linux-gnuabi and my cross-compiler gcc arm-unknown-linux-gnuabi [22:48] gnueabi, surely. [22:50] Anyhow, arm-linux-gnueabi == arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi == arm-*-linux-gnueabi (the latter being how it's often represented in autotools and such) [22:53] infinity: ok, thanks!