=== Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha
[03:38] <mfisch> stgraber: you around this evening?
=== bladernr_ is now known as bladernr_afk
[04:17] <mfisch> If I want to link a bug in LP to a yet-to-be-filed gnome bug, what's the procedure to link them?
[04:19] <mfisch> nm, /me found the right wiki page finally
=== TeTeT_ is now known as TeTeT
=== jibel_ is now known as jibel
=== gema_afk is now known as gema
[12:54] <pedro_> om26er, jibel hello ! could you check bug 833397 and give some feedback?
[12:54] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 833397 in unity-2d (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 6 other projects) "indicator power displayed twice on panel (affects: 113) (dups: 8) (heat: 523)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/833397
[12:55] <om26er> pedro_, sure, doing it right now.
[12:55] <jibel> pedro_, for me it's fixed, but I haven't been able to reproduce for a while. So it needs confirmation from someone else
[12:55] <pedro_> jibel, awesome, thanks
[12:55] <jibel> pedro_, and good morning :)
[12:56] <pedro_> om26er, thanks!
[12:56] <pedro_> jibel, good morning ! :-)
[12:56] <pedro_> actually afternoon for you
[14:05] <dholbach> hello
[14:05] <dholbach> where is the current linux upstream bug tracker? is http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ still down because of the security issues?
=== bladernr_afk is now known as bladernr_
[14:16] <brendand> dholbach - i don't know for sure, but i just did a bit of research and it seem the answer is there is no alternative
[14:17] <brendand> dholbach - supposedly you should use the mailing lists if you need to raise issues
[14:17] <dholbach> thanks brendand - that's what it looked like to me
[14:17] <brendand> dholbach - maybe the ubuntu-kernel guys know better
[14:18] <dholbach> yep, I just asked in there as well
[14:42] <pabelanger> how can I add 'Also affects lucid or maverick, etc' for a bug?  I don't see it on bug 615810
[14:42] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 615810 in nagios3 (Ubuntu) "nagios3-common and nagios3-core : grep: /etc/nagios3/cgi.cfg: No such file or directory (affects: 2) (heat: 11)" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/615810
[15:02] <hggdh> pabelanger: the bug comments state it is resolved on Maverick; I can see it being SRU-ed to lucid, though
[15:02] <hggdh> pabelanger: can you please add a comment asking for it, and stating your reasons of why it should be done?
[15:02] <hggdh> I will then open the SRU request for Lucid
[15:03] <pabelanger> hggdh: will do, thanks
[15:10] <hggdh> pabelanger: you should follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates?action=show&redirect=MOTU%2FSRU
[15:10] <hggdh> duh
[15:11] <hggdh> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
[15:18] <hggdh> jibel: are you using alkaid, rukbah, tarf, or phact? Can I go ahead and destroy them?
[15:37] <bdmurray> jibel: can you give me some more information regarding the statuses of bug 898787?
[15:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 898787 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "kubuntu 11.10 failed to install with error in install_misc.py assert cache._depcache.broken_count == 0 (affects: 6) (dups: 3) (heat: 38)" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/898787
[15:40] <jibel> bdmurray, it's been reported 4 times in a row yesterday but I've been unable to reproduce. It affects kubuntu non-english installation.
[15:40] <jibel> bdmurray, critical is a bit too much I think and should be lowered
[15:41] <jibel> bdmurray, no new report today
[15:42] <bdmurray> jibel: and why won't fix for precise?
[15:54] <jibel> bdmurray, the reports were all during a fresh install of oneiric
[15:55] <jibel> bdmurray, it looks like something wrong with oneiric archive.
[15:55] <bdmurray> jibel: and it doesn't happen in precise or what?
[15:55] <jibel> bdmurray, and it doesn't happen in precise
[15:55] <bdmurray> well, then invalid seems more appropriate to me than won't fix
[15:56] <jibel> bdmurray, right
[15:57] <bdmurray> okay, thanks
[16:55] <bdmurray> jibel: do you have any way to get screenshots of your installer testing?
[16:59] <jibel> bdmurray, it's not implemented yet, we could take screenshot of the display. Why would you like to do ?
[17:01] <bdmurray> jibel: I'd just like to have pictures of each step of the installer to help with triaging.  That way when somebody is mentioning a menu, which is sometimes down poorly, we'd have a cheat sheet to look at.
[17:01] <bdmurray> jibel: Does that make sense?
[17:07] <jibel> bdmurray, that makes sense. But the current smoketest uses preseeding and skips the UI.
[17:08] <bdmurray> jibel: ah, okay then
=== EvilJackyAlcine is now known as JackyAlcine
=== EvilJackyAlcine is now known as JackyAlcine
=== JackyAlcine is now known as tenahc
=== tenahc is now known as tenach
=== tenach is now known as JackyAlcine
[23:16] <ashams> hggdh, Hi, do you think this is related to unity? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics/+bug/873482
[23:16] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 873482 in xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (Ubuntu) "elantech: Touchpad always reports 3 finger tap as 1 finger tap (affects: 18) (heat: 98)" [Medium,Confirmed]
[23:21] <nethus> Hi
[23:23] <nethus> is bugs.launchpad.net the right place to what i believe is a bug towards the included version of 3rd party software in apt?
[23:23] <nethus> to report*
[23:25] <greg-g> nethus: what do you mean by 3rd party software in apt? can you give an example?
[23:25] <greg-g> (explicit examples/references are better than general questions :) )
[23:26] <nethus> well: there was a bug in mrtg that was fixed some months ago
[23:27] <nethus> but apt still refers to an older version
[23:30] <nethus> ubuntu 11.10
[23:31] <greg-g> nethus: So, right, if a package is included in Ubuntu (eg: available to be installed via apt-get without enabling any non-Ubuntu apt servers) then yes, Launchpad is the right place to report bugs against that software
[23:31] <greg-g> nethus: you can even, from the command line, do "ubuntu-bug mrtg" (without the quotes, obvs)
[23:33] <greg-g> nethus: but, in this case, since you say it has been fixed in mrtg upstream (the original developers of the software) I would check to see what version is available in Debian (where Ubuntu gets most of the software from, unchanged). If Debian Unstable has a fixed version, then the next version of Ubuntu will also have that fixed version.
[23:34] <greg-g> nethus: with that said, if the bug is severe enough, it might be able to be fixed in Ubuntu 11.10 via the SRU process (Stable Release Update)
[23:38] <nethus> greg-g: thanks for the advice, i'll check it
[23:39] <greg-g> nethus: you're welcome
[23:40] <nethus> the fixed version is not even in debian's unstable packages
=== JackyAlcine is now known as Tenach_
=== Tenach_ is now known as tenach_
=== tenach_ is now known as JackyAlcine