[08:07] <czajkowski> aloha
[08:14] <bkerensa> czajkowski: Hello
[12:49] <alourie_laptop> hello
[14:17] <JanC> does anybody know who's responsible for reviewing (commercial and/or open source) apps at Canonical now?
[14:17] <JanC> people are complaining about 1 month delays to get even their first review...
[14:17] <nigelb> JanC: jml is on that team.
[14:17] <JanC> > 1 month actually...
[14:18] <nigelb> There are a few more people, but I don't remember their names.
[14:18] <JanC> nigelb: ah, good to know
[14:18] <nigelb> JanC: I'm now sure who handles the reviews though.
[14:18] <czajkowski> JanC: http://developer.ubuntu.com/publish/commercial-software-faqs/
[14:18] <czajkowski> has a lot of info but no name
[14:18] <nigelb> JanC: this is through apps.ubuntu.com right?
[14:19] <nigelb> Because if its REVU, its a different story.
[14:19] <JanC> I suppose so, it's about commercial apps
[14:19] <JanC> was somebody on #ubuntu-app-devel
[14:19] <JanC> and I heard other complaints earlier
[14:20] <nigelb> JanC: Oh. I just realized, dpm is a good person to talk to about that.
[14:20] <JanC> so I think this is something Canonical needs to improve  ;)
[14:21] <JanC> """<Magnesus> ok, I'll probably just remove the game from Software Center then, it's to risky to publish sth (especially sth people have to pay for) that can't be easily updated if I detect an error""" --> not good
[14:22] <JanC> unless Canonical doesn't care about software center anymore...
[14:37] <jussi> Janc: canonical  doesnt care about any of the products anymore, they just exist to annoy their userbase and see how long people stick around... its just a huge social experiment, havent you heard? :P : P :P
[20:09] <JanC> """<PWF> It's sad, so sad  It's a sad, sad situation  And it's getting more and more absurd... My app in pending review status 6 days, 20 hours ago""" --> more of this  ;)
[20:15] <AlanBell> that is really not good
[20:19] <JanC> AlanBell: it's a problem at Canonical that hurts the reputation of all of the Ubuntu community...
[20:21] <AlanBell> they can't have an overwhelming number of apps in the queue
[20:21] <bkerensa> Debian/Ubuntu jam is going well
[20:21] <JanC> AlanBell: they have a > 1 month queue of commercial apps right now
[20:22] <JanC> which either means nobody is working on it, or there are a large number of apps  ;)
[20:22]  * AlanBell suspects the former
[20:22] <popey> I am in the office in London tomorrow and I know who is responsibe for this, I'll have a word with them
[20:23] <popey> in fact..
[20:23]  * popey mails now
[20:23] <JanC> popey: thanks
[20:25] <popey> btw AlanBell http://popey.com/~alan/Workspace%201_011.png
[20:25] <popey> thats what my google chat thing looks like ☹
[20:26] <AlanBell> hmm, my office looks a lot tidier from my end
[20:26] <AlanBell> oh, and you seem to have some screen corruption
[20:58] <pleia2> AlanBell: have a moment to explain this planet spreadsheet?
[21:00] <czajkowski> popey: you should so grow a moustache!
[21:01] <AlanBell> pleia2: yes
[21:01] <pleia2> AlanBell: so how are we identifying which ones are valid ubuntu members?
[21:02] <pleia2> or we're not on this spreadsheet?
[21:02] <AlanBell> column A is a list of all valid members
[21:02] <AlanBell> column B and C are all the nicks in the planet config file
[21:02] <AlanBell> column B are the ones I can tie to member names
[21:02] <AlanBell> Column C I can't
[21:03] <pleia2> oh, so the rows don't match up along the spreadshet
[21:03] <AlanBell> not for column C
[21:03] <AlanBell> but they are in rough alphabetical position
[21:04] <pleia2> ah, that's the logic
[21:04] <pleia2> ok, so we need to go through column c and see if we can figure out who they are
[21:04] <pleia2> (I see dholbach started)
[21:04] <AlanBell> yeah
[21:04] <AlanBell> might be an idea to put it on google docs or something
[21:05] <pleia2> can't we just search bzr history?
[21:05] <AlanBell> ooh, interesting
[21:06] <pleia2> I actually know a fair number of these off the top of my head (not quite sure what that says about me, or if it's a good thing :))
[21:06] <czajkowski> heh
[21:13] <greg-g> czajkowski: can you invite me to the lococouncil channel, I can't get back in
[21:13] <akgraner> popey I was watching something on the Country music channel and the lead singer for Rascal Flatts was on - and I have changed my mind  - you remind me of him not Elvis :-P
[21:14] <popey> "thanks"
[21:15] <czajkowski> greg-g: done
[21:16] <pangolin> popey: I don't think that was a compliment
[21:16] <popey> pangolin: I don't think that was gratitude
[21:16] <pangolin> oh I see the quotes
[21:16] <czajkowski> heh
[21:16] <pangolin> :)
[21:16] <czajkowski> yeah we'll stick to UK elvis suits popey better
[21:47] <akgraner> nah - I like Rascal Flatts - I wasn't making fun of popey...
[21:51] <AlanBell> not sure I see popey here http://lh5.ggpht.com/_LOMwk5a9V-I/SlCip5zRJkI/AAAAAAAACWQ/jDMi1M4IeHY/Rascal%20Flatts%5B2%5D.jpg
[22:00] <pangolin> 20 years ago, I see it
[22:19] <akgraner> he doesn't look like that now - I'll have to get you a recent pic