[00:31] Howdy, folks. It seems as though one of my feeds is broken (perhaps a bigger issue then just me) - http://feeds.launchpad.net/~paultag/revisions.atom [00:31] It's hanging up a script that I have, just wondering if I should disable it or let it gel [00:31] this issue appears recent, within the last few days [00:41] paultag: It looks fine to me. [00:41] LP doesn't seem to know about any revs from you in the last month. [00:41] Which is the limit of revisions feeds by default. [00:41] wgrant: Oh, it's only the last month. [00:41] Interesting === geser_ is now known as geser [08:54] Morning [09:08] What's up? === Guest37602 is now known as jpds [09:34] Hello, is there actually some issue with PPA source package upload? I get a "Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ['General error', 'General error', 'General error'] : Permission denied. [09:34] Note: This error might indicate a problem with your passive_ftp setting.". My settings have not changed and worked for months [09:35] jfi: ignore, it's a server side bug [09:35] upload is ok [09:35] bigjools, ok, thanks === bigjools changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: bigjools | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad === jtv1 is now known as jtv === matsubara_ is now known as matsubara [13:21] I'm confused about bug 894442. [13:21] Launchpad bug 894442 in Launchpad itself "Dynamic bug listings are too sparse" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/894442 [13:21] There's a comment from lpqabot saying it's fixed in stable r14429. [13:22] The footer on bugs.launchpad.net says it's at r14435. [13:22] ...but the bug listings I see don't match the screenshot huw attached to demonstrate the change. [13:23] Oh, If I remove "bug age" it does. [13:23] Sorry. [13:51] exactly how do you specify to bzr to merge changes only to particular files? [13:59] i got it now [14:09] brendand: care to share? [14:10] bzr merge /path/to/file [14:10] the trick is the file has to be local [14:11] bzr branch lp:myproject [14:11] bzr branch lp:~me/myproject/thebranch [14:12] cd myproject [14:12] bzr merge ../thebranch/thedir/thefile [14:13] hi [14:13] https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/staging-overlay/+build/2976062 - can someone tell me how can I check why it failed? [14:19] Hi, does anyone have some good links to share to some "howto backport packages using launchpad ppa"? (I am new to this consept and I was playing around with the toolset, but failed to build stuff with backportpackage to depency problems.. how to continue from there) [14:21] hrw: I think you are the victim of a bug. Clicking on the recipe build link shows it worked. [14:21] el2ro: you might want to visit #ubuntu-motu [14:22] bigjools: what is that? [14:22] another irc channel [14:23] bigjools: https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-pkg/+recipe/gcc-linaro-native-daily shows builds from 2011-12-01 as failed wthout any explanation. but if this is a known bug then I will add note to my notes and check some week(s) later does it happen again [14:24] hrw: I think it's a manifestation of bug 717969 [14:24] Launchpad bug 717969 in Launchpad itself "storeBuildInfo is sometimes ineffective" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/717969 [14:24] can someone please kill a daily build that has been stuck for a couple weeks? [14:24] kenvandine: I can [14:24] https://code.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine/+archive/gwibber/+recipebuild/107067 [14:24] bigjools, thx! [14:24] kenvandine: done [14:24] awesome, thx! [14:24] bigjools: thx [14:26] stgraber: can you point me at the branch that holds edit_acl.py? [14:27] bigjools: lp:~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools/trunk/ [14:27] thanks === allenap changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: bigjools, allenap | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [14:28] what happened to bug 900000? [14:28] Error: Launchpad bug 900000 could not be found [14:29] mrevell: Fwiw, you can (and probably should) triage bugs like https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/899761 when you come across them. [14:29] Ubuntu bug 899761 in Launchpad itself "Adding comma in Translations text" [Undecided,New] [14:29] fair enough allenap [14:29] mrevell: Also, do you reckon that's a High or a Low? [14:30] mrevell: Ta :) [14:31] allenap, Low :) [14:35] 2/wk === yofel_ is now known as yofel [15:11] bigjools: just wondering, any change you can fix all the packagesets? utouch is now fixed which is great but I just got told at least edubuntu and kernel have the same issue, and I'm starting to suspect they all do :) [15:11] Laney: ^ [15:11] stgraber: urgh [15:11] you can see at e.g. http://people.canonical.com/~stgraber/package_sets/precise/cli-mono [15:12] bigjools: based on what cjwatson told me, it could have been an issue when they first got initialized for precise, some kind of copy from oneiric that may have gone wrong :) [15:12] yeah that's what I was thinking [15:17] ok, I'll put it on my queue [15:29] Laney: regarding bug 827555, how essential is it that we store the person sponsoring? I've done the sponsored person as spph.creator. [15:29] Launchpad bug 827555 in Launchpad itself "native syncs have no way to indicate sponsorship" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827555 [15:30] bigjools: rather important. Can you make a new field called signer? [15:30] Laney: is it stored for syncs right now? [15:30] :) [15:30] no [15:30] this would be a win [15:30] as this process is being improved … [15:31] it was, at least, recorded in -changes mail for archive-admin syncs [15:32] approver was? [15:32] oh, right, wasn't [15:32] * tumbleweed hasn't slept enough again [15:49] Laney, tumbleweed: I won't be able to make the change that records the sponsor for a while, do you want me to go ahead and release the changes done so far or do you want to wait? The changes so far allow you to specify a sponsor on the API. I've not made changes on the web UI yet. [15:51] bigjools: yes, please release it — having this is already a vast improvement :-) [15:51] I figured you were heavy API users :) [15:51] tumbleweed wrote a sponsorship checker tool [15:51] it'll mean that this cannot know about sponsored syncs [15:56] bigjools: yeah, we hit the API a bit. I'd be amused to see where I sit on the loader-board right now (been crawling Ubuntu's upload history) :P [15:56] * tumbleweed would also rather see this released as is. If it's recording the data, that's a good start [15:58] it is also sometimes useful to know who sponsored something for other reasons (i.e. naming and shaming :P) [15:58] it overrides SPPH.creator and From: on announcements [15:58] yes it does form part of Ubuntu's audit trail [15:58] both to the sponsoree? [15:59] (that sounds right) [15:59] the sponsored person, yeah [16:01] great [16:07] as long as people use the option to syncpackage to close the bug when they sponsor a sync then we shouldn't regress in terms of audit trail [16:07] well, assuming that out of band syncs don't become more common (which they probably will) === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] [17:10] Any series/milestone experts in here? Please can you help answer https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/180693? === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [19:19] WHY THIS NO BUILD? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/86706162/buildlog.txt.gz [20:07] Hi [20:08] could someone tell me why my receipe (https://code.launchpad.net/~tux-style/+recipe/eflxx-daily) doesn't build my binaries in the deb as expected? I only get the copyright in the deb file. I don't understand it. [20:09] Are there instructions for getting apt to work with private PPAs? [20:13] YokoZar: I don't think you need to do much weirdness [20:13] YokoZar: deb https://:@private-ppa.launchpad.net/... should work [20:13] stgraber: ahh, ok, fair nuff [20:14] YokoZar: at least it does here for the few I have [20:14] * YokoZar considers filing a LP bug about the instructions that appear in a private PPA page saying that rather than the default text... [20:14] there is one I believe [20:14] you can me-too it [20:15] audifahrer: I'd suspect that you need to add something like 'run bootstrap' in the recipe. [20:17] audifahrer: (bootstrap being the file used by elfxx to produce configure et al) [20:17] stgraber: oh I see, I need to go to my profile page and copy-paste that rather than the PPA page [20:20] lifeless: I suppose it's this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/458360 which is 2 years old (!) [20:20] Ubuntu bug 458360 in Launchpad itself "Show source entries with tokens in private PPAs instead of ppa:team/ppa-name" [Low,Triaged] [20:21] YokoZar: I'm not sure what the ! is for - we get many more bugs in than we can keep up with [20:21] YokoZar: we -love- patches === keffie_jayx is now known as effie_jayx === effie_jayx is now known as keffie_jayx [21:02] Ampelbein: yes, but there's also an autogen.sh script that calls bootstrap. I don't know what magic is behind bzr-builder. What does it call automagic and what not? Does it call make dist and build from there? [21:08] audifahrer: bzr-builder only calls the "clean" target from debian/rules after it's built the tree === EvilResistance is now known as Resistance [21:08] audifahrer: the run command is disabled on Launchpad [21:13] ah, I looked in other debian structure I see always this: [21:13] include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk [21:13] include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk [21:14] does this enable ./autogen.sh stuff automatic? [21:16] audifahrer: IIRC it just enables the running of ./configure, not autogen.sh [21:16] audifahrer: that bit is also only run during the build of the binary package, not when the source package is built (from the recipe) [21:21] jelmer: could you show me a correct rules file for building from SVN (./autogen.sh; make,...)? [21:21] audifahrer: what you just posted and /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/autoreconf.mk [21:22] audifahrer: you'll need a build-dependency on dh-autoreconf as well [21:37] Can I request that a PPA be moved from my LP account to a team account? [21:44] I need disk space increased for a private PPA...should I post a _public_ question about it? [22:00] debian/rules:4: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk: No such file or directory [22:00] debian/rules:5: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk: No such file or directory [22:00] make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk'. Stop. [22:01] :-( [22:01] this is what launchpad said === jcsackett|afk is now known as jcsackett [22:03] audifahrer: you will need to have cdbs as a build dependency too, but that's implied for those lines [22:04] audifahrer: it's usually a good idea to build the package locally first [22:05] jelmer: doesn't work with ubuntu 10.04 as described in launchpad help :-( [22:05] audifahrer: how do you mean? [22:05] bzr-builder and python is to old. :-( [22:05] I mean local testing [22:05] audifahrer: there are two steps involved here [22:06] audifahrer: building a source package from a recipe and some branches - that's what's documented on the launchpad help page [22:06] audifahrer: but you can test the source package and what contents it should have, even in 10.04 [22:06] audifahrer: any ubuntu packaging guide should help you create a proper source package. once you have that, it should be a lot easier to create a recipe that generates source packages. [22:08] jelmer: I'm sure it build localy and I had no problems with that missing cdbs. [22:08] for sure I tried this [22:08] audifahrer: did you build in a chroot? You might just have cdbs installed on your system already, without the package having an explicit dependency on it. [22:09] jelmer: ah, ok. I didn't build in chroot. Thats maybe the reason! [22:39] hello , I am trying to create a ppa for daily build of a project i am not the owner of it hosted on google code but it fails when i enter the repository address in launchpad https://code.google.com/p/plowshare [22:40] is this address ok ? when i try git clone https://code.google.com/p/plowshare on my pc it works but when i enter this url on launchpad hosting it fails while import [22:45] dr3mro: got a link to the import? [22:45] https://code.google.com/p/plowshare [22:46] mwhudson, https://code.google.com/p/plowshare [22:47] dr3mro: on launchpad [22:47] you pasted _that_ link twice already :) [22:47] lp:plowshare [22:48] mwhudson, https://code.launchpad.net/~dr3mro/plowshare/plowshare-trunk [22:48] mwhudson, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/86721936/dr3mro-plowshare-plowshare-trunk.log [22:49] huh, that's strange [22:49] jelmer: around? [22:49] mwhudson, that was import log [22:49] dr3mro: thanks [22:51] mwhudson, i can import with (git clone url ) on my pc so ithink the url is valid and it's not a problem of google code? [22:51] yeah, i don't know what that problem indicates, it's not something i've seen before [22:52] mwhudson, can any one in the channel help ??? [22:53] dr3mro: jelmer is your best bet, if he is around [22:53] i have other things to do i'm afraid :/ [22:57] thanks [22:58] mwhudson, thank [22:58] jelmer, hello .. can you help me ? [23:05] hi dr3mro, mwhudson [23:06] hello jelmer thanks for response [23:06] dr3mro: https://code.launchpad.net/~dr3mro/plowshare/plowshare-trunk doesn't work here [23:06] hello , I am trying to create a ppa for daily build of a project i am not the owner of it hosted on google code but it fails when i enter the repository address in launchpad https://code.google.com/p/plowshare [23:06] jelmer, yes [23:07] jelmer, how to make it work [23:07] if something doesn't work and you delete it, that's not very helpful :) [23:07] jelmer, the developer don't want to host it on launchpad and he uses google code and i want to make ubuntu ppa [23:07] jelmer: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/86723548/dr3mro-plowshare-plowshare.log [23:08] mwhudson, i deleted it and i retry again [23:08] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/86723548/dr3mro-plowshare-plowshare.log [23:08] same error again [23:08] jelmer, how to fix it what i do wrong [23:11] jelmer, mwhudson hello [23:12] dr3mro: it's late for jelmer and i have to work [23:12] dr3mro: maybe you should file a bug at http://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad [23:12] mwhudson, ok thnx any way and google is no help [23:18] dr3mro: I think this is a known bug that already has a report filed on launchpad.net [23:18] jelmer, is there a work around [23:20] dr3mro: you should be able to do a local import and push that to launchpad [23:20] jelmer, but i had to do that every day .. i want to create a daily ppa [23:24] dr3mro: bug 878085 [23:24] Launchpad bug 878085 in Launchpad itself "NoSuchRevision error during git import" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878085 [23:46] are the amd64 builders busy? [23:46] like bogged down? [23:46] i'm trying to build within a PPA a backported php5, and the amd build has a 36 minute time-to-build, up from a 16 minutes-to-build === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson