=== highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage [10:18] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1573 ubuntu/ (5 files in 2 dirs): Move to 3.2.0-3 kernels. [10:19] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1574 ubuntu/ (10 files in 6 dirs): Add armhf support, with only the omap flavour for now. [10:20] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1575 ubuntu/debian/changelog: releasing version 20101020ubuntu82 [10:22] partman-uboot: cjwatson * r14 ubuntu/ (5 files in 4 dirs): Add armhf support. [10:25] partman-uboot: cjwatson * r15 ubuntu/debian/changelog: releasing version 5 [12:39] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1576 ubuntu/ (build/util/get-packages debian/changelog): [12:39] debian-installer: Don't fail when one of the entries in sources.list.udeb has an empty [12:39] debian-installer: Packages file. [12:45] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1577 ubuntu/debian/ (changelog control): Update build-dependencies for armhf. [12:48] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1578 ubuntu/ (4 files in 3 dirs): Fix some broken symlinks for armhf. [12:49] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1579 ubuntu/debian/changelog: releasing version 20101020ubuntu83 [14:57] hi, i'm stuck with 11.10 alternate install with usbkey see this for details : http://pastealacon.com/29243 [14:58] what's the right way to pass the isofile as an argument ? [15:06] DoberMann: I have no clue about booting iso like that, but I noticed the oneiric doesn't have boot=casper [16:10] CarlFK: boot=casper is ignored for alternate CDs anyway. [16:10] 16:05 I don't think you can; you have to use the hd-media installer image. [16:10] 16:06 It probably only worked before by luck [16:10] 16:08 It would work if written directly to a USB key (or ought to), but the business of loop-mounting the image off a file on the USB key is something the alternate installer doesn't contain code for [16:11] by default. [16:11] as said to DoberMann when asked the same question in /query [16:17] k, thx === Guest76640 is now known as NCommander === NCommander is now known as Guest67564 === Guest67564 is now known as NCommander [21:43] ev, cjwatson: I have a question on how to debug a package installation issue on maverick. Currently, there is an update to procps in maverick-proposed that fails to install via netinstaller. I need to debug why. See bug 771372 (comment 16) for details. [22:10] #771372 [22:10] wheres the bot? grumble... [22:13] Launchpad bug 771372 in procps (Ubuntu Precise) (and 5 other projects) "procps runs too early in the boot process (affects: 7) (heat: 52)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/771372 [22:13] Launchpad bug 771372 in procps "procps runs too early in the boot process" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/771372 [22:55] GrueMaster: I've posted an analysis. [22:56] (and tagged it v-f-maverick) [22:57] Excellent, thanks.