[06:00] micahg: not sure what you mean about an oneiric release. I tested the current build of seamonkey on lucid through oneiric. It builds and other have tested as well. [06:02] micahg: I've been using the current 2.5 seamonkey from my ppa on maverick and oneiric as my daily browser. [07:01] joelesko: just a merge with your changes from your merge into the .head branch proposed as a merge into the .oneiric branch (or did I not create that yet)? [07:01] joelesko: also, would you want to wait 2 more weeks to update seamonkey in oneiric to get 2.6 or would you be willing to test 2.5? [07:02] joelesko: so, the thing is, with security updates, you want to test the binaries on the release they're built for in case there are any platform specific bugs [07:02] joelesko: I need to prepare a short list of functionality for you or someone else to test before it would be able to go to -updates/-security in the stable release [07:03] once we fix the various remaining packaging issues in precise, we can do an update for lucid-natty as well (I don't like to do too many updates w/major packaging changes) [10:20] Hey peeps, maybe someone knows about this issue, even google does not get it. My Thunderbird keeps polling http://solvians-push1.www.gs.de/public/index.html [14:00] good afternoon === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [15:21] any plans on updating the daily chromium PPA for Precise? [15:22] aren't they already? [15:22] oh they aren't [15:22] gnomefreak, yeah, i guess i'll get around to that at some point soon [15:22] chrisccoulson: thanks [15:22] FernandoMiguel: no its not [15:23] i haven't used chromium for quite a while now, so i just forgot to do it ;) [15:24] i dont use it as default but i do use it maybe 1/2 the time [15:24] default is ff-trunk [15:25] here is a good read: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/243541/seven_changes_to_watch_for_in_ubuntu_1204_precise_pangolin.html [15:25] ok im out i keep dozing off [15:30] I went to chrome instead [15:31] maybe we should drop it [15:54] FernandoMiguel, perhaps we should, although I probably wouldn't take that decision ;) [15:54] most people in canonical seem to use chrome as well [15:54] which is pretty depressing tbh [15:54] right now, we have very little to gain [15:55] vs the binary google provides [15:55] chrisccoulson: most of out attach come from two places [15:57] if we dropped chromium, we'd never have the oh-so-fun chromium versus firefox sessions at UDS ;) [15:58] one the awesome work done by fta [15:58] two we using chromium way before there was a chrome for linux [15:58] chrisccoulson: none of those two verifies now [15:59] I have no idea what does are [16:16] well, building chromium with the ubuntu toolchain has security advantages [16:17] hmm [16:18] I don't know that it is true that 'most people in canonical use chromium' [16:19] FernandoMiguel: fta's work lives on actually-- at least in some sort of automated builds aiui [16:19] that might just be for stable [16:19] true [16:19] micahg would know best [16:19] well, and chrisccoulson [16:34] yeah, the automated builds continue, but the chromium ones are on life support really [16:34] * micahg will fix that soon [16:35] chrisccoulson: I was going to fix the CHromium FTBFS this week and ask you to enable precise :) [20:32] hey all, I wanna help out === FernandoMiguel is now known as FernandoMiguel_f === FernandoMiguel_f is now known as FernandoM_fewd === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away