[06:00] <joelesko> micahg: not sure what you mean about an oneiric release. I tested the current build of seamonkey on lucid through oneiric. It builds and other have tested as well.
[06:02] <joelesko> micahg: I've been using the current 2.5 seamonkey from my ppa on maverick and oneiric as my daily browser.
[07:01] <micahg> joelesko: just a merge with your changes from your merge into the .head branch proposed as a merge into the .oneiric branch (or did I not create that yet)?
[07:01] <micahg> joelesko: also, would you want to wait 2 more weeks to update seamonkey in oneiric to get 2.6 or would you be willing to test 2.5?
[07:02] <micahg> joelesko: so, the thing is, with security updates, you want to test the binaries on the release they're built for in case there are any platform specific bugs
[07:02] <micahg> joelesko: I need to prepare a short list of functionality for you or someone else to test before it would be able to go to -updates/-security in the stable release
[07:03] <micahg> once we fix the various remaining packaging issues in precise, we can do an update for lucid-natty as well (I don't like to do too many updates w/major packaging changes)
[10:20] <kevke> Hey peeps, maybe someone knows about this issue, even google does not get it. My Thunderbird keeps polling http://solvians-push1.www.gs.de/public/index.html
[14:00] <FernandoMiguel> good afternoon
[15:21] <gnomefreak> any plans on updating the daily chromium PPA for Precise?
[15:22] <FernandoMiguel> aren't they already?
[15:22] <FernandoMiguel> oh they aren't
[15:22] <chrisccoulson> gnomefreak, yeah, i guess i'll get around to that at some point soon
[15:22] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: thanks
[15:22] <gnomefreak> FernandoMiguel: no its not
[15:23] <chrisccoulson> i haven't used chromium for quite a while now, so i just forgot to do it ;)
[15:24] <gnomefreak> i dont use it as default but i do use it maybe 1/2 the time
[15:24] <gnomefreak> default is ff-trunk
[15:25] <gnomefreak> here is a good read: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/243541/seven_changes_to_watch_for_in_ubuntu_1204_precise_pangolin.html
[15:25] <gnomefreak> ok im out i keep dozing off
[15:30] <FernandoMiguel> I went to chrome instead
[15:31] <FernandoMiguel> maybe we should drop it
[15:54] <chrisccoulson> FernandoMiguel, perhaps we should, although I probably wouldn't take that decision ;)
[15:54] <chrisccoulson> most people in canonical seem to use chrome as well
[15:54] <chrisccoulson> which is pretty depressing tbh
[15:54] <FernandoMiguel> right now, we have very little to gain
[15:55] <FernandoMiguel> vs the binary google provides
[15:55] <FernandoMiguel> chrisccoulson: most of out attach come from two places
[15:57] <chrisccoulson> if we dropped chromium, we'd never have the oh-so-fun chromium versus firefox sessions at UDS ;)
[15:58] <FernandoMiguel> one the awesome work done by fta
[15:58] <FernandoMiguel> two  we using chromium way before there was a chrome for linux
[15:58] <FernandoMiguel> chrisccoulson: none of those two verifies now
[15:59] <FernandoMiguel> I have no idea what does are
[16:16] <mdeslaur> well, building chromium with the ubuntu toolchain has security advantages
[16:17] <jdstrand> hmm
[16:18] <jdstrand> I don't know that it is true that 'most people in canonical use chromium'
[16:19] <jdstrand> FernandoMiguel: fta's work lives on actually-- at least in some sort of automated builds aiui
[16:19] <jdstrand> that might just be for stable
[16:19] <FernandoMiguel> true
[16:19] <jdstrand> micahg would know best
[16:19] <jdstrand> well, and chrisccoulson
[16:34] <chrisccoulson> yeah, the automated builds continue, but the chromium ones are on life support really
[16:34]  * micahg will fix that soon
[16:35] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I was going to fix the CHromium FTBFS this week and ask you to enable precise :)
[20:32] <keffie_jayx> hey all, I wanna help out