[10:15] <debfx> bulldog98_: what happened to the kubuntu patches in rekonq 0.7.90-0ubuntu1?
[15:00] <ScottK> Uploaded soprano to the oneiric PPA.
[15:10] <debfx> soprano 2.7.4 has been released fwiw
[15:12] <ScottK> Heh.  Of course.
[15:12] <ScottK> I'll look into it.
[16:33] <Riddell> agateau: how was the qt-at-spi issue resolved?
[16:33] <agateau> Riddell: ah, need to check the status of that
[16:34] <agateau> Riddell: basically, we are disabling a11y for qt apps except unity-2d
[16:34] <agateau> Riddell: this is a two-step process: upload a new unity-2d which sets up a11y for itself only,
[16:34] <agateau> Riddell: then upload a new at-spi2-core which does not enable a11y for qt apps
[16:35] <Riddell> ok seems like that is in process
[16:35] <ScottK> New soprano uploaded.
[16:35] <agateau> Riddell: unity-2d package has reached oneiric-update
[16:35] <agateau> *updates
[16:36] <agateau> need to follow up with at-spi2-core
[16:56] <debfx> I could use some help convincing the firefox maintainers to fix a regression in the kde integration.
[16:56] <debfx> Filing a bug, mentioning it multiple times on IRC and creating a merge request doesn't seem to be enough.
[16:57] <debfx> bug #885836
[16:58] <debfx> opening natty-precise tasks would be a first step ;)
[17:19] <bambee> hi ^^
[17:27] <ScottK> micahg: ^^^ ?
[17:44] <Riddell> does kdesudo 3.4.2.4-1ubuntu1 still work, first merge after my accident and I want to make sure I do it right :)
[17:45] <BarkingFish> your...accident??? Physical accident, or online "uhoh i borked something" type of accident? :(
[17:47] <ScottK> BarkingFish: Read kubuntu-devel
[17:48] <BarkingFish> ScottK: is there an online archive? I've not been getting my ML messages from it
[17:48] <ScottK> Yes.  See lists.ubuntu.com
[17:50] <BarkingFish> thanks
[17:54] <BarkingFish> holy cow...
[17:54] <ScottK> You're welcome.
[17:55] <BarkingFish> Thank you ScottK 
[17:55] <BarkingFish> and I hope you're getting back to your regular self, Riddell - damn.
[17:56] <BarkingFish> I still have to find out why I'm not getting messages from the ML. Is there a human administrator who runs the mailman?
[18:05] <ScottK> I'd try to subscribe again.
[18:27] <micahg> debfx: will talk to chrisccoulson about it, I know we dropped the patches on trunk
[18:31] <debfx> micahg: I can understand that supporting the patches in daily builds is not manageable but I hope that doesn't affect releases
[18:32] <micahg> debfx: well, if the integration patch gets no test coverage, it's problematic
[18:34] <debfx> micahg: there are still beta releases
[18:35] <micahg> right, let's see if he's willing to rebase for those
[18:40] <debfx> micahg: it is enabled in the beta (9.0~b4 / precise). anyway the bug is also about a regression in existing releases (the current firefox versions in natty and oneiric)
[18:41] <micahg> debfx: if it's enabled in the beta, we should be able to get it for the next release in 2 weeks
[18:45] <micahg> debfx: is that patch you attached in the bug just a refreshed version of what's in the beta or a new patch?
[18:48] <debfx> micahg: it's a patch of the patch
[18:48] <debfx> the same as https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-4.0.head/revision/838
[18:49] <micahg> debfx: so, is this piece missing currently or in 9.0 beta 4?
[18:51] <debfx> micahg: it's missing in the firefox releases that are currently in natty, oneiric and precise
[18:52] <debfx> micahg: if you'll push firefox 9 to all of those fixing it there is enough
[18:52] <micahg> yeah, Firefox 9 will go to natty/oneiric on Dec 20 barring testing issues, there will be a new beta for precise later this week
[18:53] <debfx> but please make sure that it's also fixed in the branches for future firefox version (e.g. trunk even if it's disabled there)
[18:53] <debfx> so the regression won't be introduced again later
[22:14] <apachelogger_> skaet: sorry that I could not help with release stuff, I was not around last week
[22:17] <apachelogger_> debfx: uhhh, firefox :S
[22:18] <apachelogger_> maco: "UDS seems to be just about all the meeting that needs to be done to make Kubuntu happen. Efficiency!" I wonder if that is really a good thing
[22:19] <apachelogger_> :O
[22:19] <apachelogger_> Riddell: how are you?
[22:24] <Riddell> apachelogger_: bit zonked.  I should do a dist upgrade tomorrow and see what useful things I can do
[22:28] <apachelogger_> Riddell: are you back in scotland?
[22:59] <valorie> yay, I see Riddell, apachelogger_ and ScottK activity in channel!
[22:59] <valorie> \o/
[23:01]  * apachelogger_ hugs valorie
[23:02]  * valorie {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{hugs}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} back
[23:03] <valorie> I'm not the only one whose been missing you
[23:03] <valorie> glad to see you back
[23:03] <valorie> :-)
[23:05] <apachelogger_> valorie: back might be an overstatement
[23:05]  * apachelogger_ is figuring out things
[23:07] <valorie> ok, actual words in IRC, then
[23:13] <apachelogger_> :)