[16:01] <hallyn> \o
[16:01] <smoser> #startmeeting Ubuntu Server Team Meeting
[16:01] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Dec  6 16:01:07 2011 UTC.  The chair is smoser. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot.
[16:01] <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
[16:01] <RoAkSoAx> o/
[16:01] <lynxman> o/
[16:01] <smoser> there we go
[16:01] <RoAkSoAx> lol
[16:01] <smoser> Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:01] <smoser> TOPIC: Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:01] <smoser> #TOPIC Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:01] <smoser> agenda shows none
[16:01] <smoser> do we have any?
[16:01] <Ursinha> no
[16:02] <zul> hilo
[16:02] <Daviey> lets go.
[16:02] <smoser> #topic Precise Development
[16:02] <Daviey> bug 883988: zul ?
[16:02] <Daviey> I believe that was confirmed to still be an issue?
[16:03] <zul> Daviey: yeah ill have a look
[16:03] <Daviey> zul: rocking, you'll be able to update in next weeks meeting?
[16:03] <zul> da
[16:03] <Daviey> bug 893926: No hurry, up for grabs.
[16:03] <Daviey> bug 855030
[16:03] <SpamapS> just a general call out, please test MySQL 5.5 as its build is quite different and we've already missed a few subtle things.
[16:04] <SpamapS> like.. the fact that the client programs are statically linked to libmysqlclient. :-P
[16:04] <Daviey> SpamapS: great.. lets go through the bugs first?
[16:04] <Daviey> zul: ^^ Have you heard anything
[16:04] <Daviey> ?
[16:04] <zul> Daviey: no
[16:04] <Daviey> k
[16:05] <Daviey> bug 881903: hallyn, blocked on a new upstream version... you were investigating iirc?
[16:05] <hallyn> it's near top of my list to do
[16:05] <hallyn> but not at the top
[16:05] <Daviey> cool
[16:05] <hallyn> Daviey: that really is low prio...
[16:05] <Daviey> hallyn: Yeah, it's really a marker for a "New upstream version" i think.
[16:06] <hallyn> fair
[16:06] <Daviey> bug 888124: jamespage ?
[16:06] <hallyn> good news though, lxc reboot patchset is making progress
[16:06] <SpamapS> Daviey: lag fail. ;)
[16:06] <smoser> hallyn, woot!
[16:06] <Daviey> hallyn: woot
[16:06] <lag> SpamapS: Why do I always get the blame?
[16:06] <Daviey> bug 607039: Up for grabs, experience of NFS probably required.
[16:07] <Daviey> lag: because you are a plum.
[16:07] <lag> Daviey: :)
[16:07] <Daviey> bug 894713: defer to kernel section.
[16:07] <smb> Daviey, Just found the bug again today
[16:07] <smb> Am on it
[16:07] <Daviey> smb: Rocking!
[16:07] <Daviey> bug 833499: zul ?
[16:09] <zul> ill take it as well
[16:09] <smb> Daviey, and bug 607039 is still nearly solved. I think I asked something last and did not notice an update. But lately I seem to have problems with my filtering and lp mail
[16:09] <hallyn> eh?  didn't smb have an update on that?
[16:09] <Daviey> bug 889644: Being worked on in Debian, volunteer to investigate / ping?
[16:09] <smoser> for those following along at home, Daviey is walking down the list at http://status.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/release-bugs.html
[16:09] <Daviey> smb: Oh, didn't know you were kicking NFS.. great
[16:09] <Daviey> hallyn: were you also?
[16:10] <smoser> #link http://status.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/release-bugs.html
[16:10] <hallyn> not since smb looked at it
[16:10] <rbasak> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openmpi/+bug/889644/comments/2 says it's in progress on Debian
[16:10] <Daviey> super
[16:10] <rbasak> No idea about status though
[16:10] <Daviey> rbasak: Fancy investigating?
[16:10] <rbasak> OK, I'll ping the maintainer again
[16:10] <Daviey> great.
[16:10] <Daviey> bug 887186: RoAkSoAx ?
[16:11] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: i haven't look at it yet. this week though
[16:11] <Daviey> bug 893134: zul
[16:11] <Daviey> RoAkSoAx: cool
[16:11] <zul> done
[16:11] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: but given the change between squid and squid3 I don't think that bug will apply again
[16:11] <Daviey> RoAkSoAx: sounds good
[16:11] <Daviey> rbasak: bug 858878 ?
[16:12] <Daviey> isn't that fixed?
[16:12] <zul> yes
[16:12] <rbasak> I'm a bit confused about the status of this now
[16:12] <rbasak> It needs an SRU too, doesn't it?
[16:12] <zul> yes
[16:12] <rbasak> But it contains many other fixes, which are we backporting?
[16:12] <Daviey> rbasak: can you update the precise task?
[16:13] <Daviey> rbasak: Are they they all sec' fixes?
[16:13] <rbasak> what do you mean by update the precise task?
[16:13] <Daviey> bug 862558: adam_g - deprecated bug for precise?
[16:14] <Daviey> rbasak: Looks like the bug task is still open for precise?
[16:14] <adam_g> Daviey: yeah
[16:14] <Daviey> rbasak: as in, not fixed
[16:14] <rbasak> ah
[16:14] <Daviey> adam_g: bug 868488 , looking good in precise development?
[16:15] <adam_g> Daviey: yup, as soon as the new rewrite lands that'll be fixed
[16:15] <Daviey> adam_g: Might be a good idea to mark those Invalid if irrelvant.
[16:15] <adam_g> ill do that
[16:15] <Daviey> bug 871278, zul ?
[16:15] <rbasak> something might have got lost in the branch merge, I'll track it down
[16:15] <zul> this week
[16:15] <Daviey> rbasak: rocking
[16:15] <Daviey> zul: have i heard that before? :)
[16:16] <rbasak> will it be sufficient to SRU the patch for the CSRF fix only?
[16:16] <zul> Daviey: not this week :)
[16:16] <Daviey> bug 875262: I think koolhead really needs some help with this, anyone jumping in?
[16:16] <Daviey> rbasak: we'll talk about it after the meeting, slightly different process for sec' fixes.
[16:16] <rbasak> ok
[16:16] <zul> Daviey: if i can trade the tgt one with someone else then maybe ;)
[16:17] <SpamapS> I can take a look at the php bug w/ koolhead
[16:17] <Daviey> SpamapS: rock star!
[16:17] <Daviey> SpamapS: talking of which, how is bug 887410? :)
[16:17] <koolhead11> SpamapS: am absolute n00b i would admit
[16:17] <SpamapS> I think its a simple fix, will update it to Triaged
[16:17] <Daviey> super
[16:17] <Daviey> bug 890362, zul ?
[16:18] <zul> today
[16:18] <Daviey> bug 891433, utlemming ?
[16:18]  * SpamapS will be unavailable for the next few minutes
[16:18] <Daviey> SpamapS: cool
[16:18] <utlemming> its done
[16:19] <Daviey> bug 876768, hallyn - i sync'd but didn't close the bug.. everything looking good?
[16:19] <utlemming> The merge request will go through once my build is done
[16:19] <Daviey> utlemming: can you update the bug task please?
[16:19] <Daviey> ah, cool.
[16:19] <hallyn> Daviey: oh, i suppose so - haen't tried it since then
[16:19] <Daviey> bug 891977: untouched since last week, i have a PPA package which fixes - but not yet merged.
[16:19] <hallyn> Daviey: there were a few bug requests from deiban already :)
[16:20] <Daviey> hallyn: eek!
[16:20] <hallyn> s'ok, i think they're hooking it into libvirt
[16:20] <hallyn> win
[16:20] <Daviey> RoAkSoAx: bug 898838 ?
[16:20] <Daviey> and RoAkSoAx: bug 898840
[16:21] <Daviey> Whilst RoAkSoAx is typing, any other bugs we should be working on?
[16:21] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: taking care of this week
[16:21] <RoAkSoAx> taking care of them this week
[16:21] <Daviey> < SpamapS> just a general call out, please test MySQL 5.5 as its build is quite different and we've already missed a few subtle things.
[16:21] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: bug #900349
[16:21] <adam_g> Daviey: i think we might want to track bug #900553 tho i think it might be resolved with the pending merge
[16:21] <Daviey> < SpamapS> like.. the fact that the client programs are statically linked to libmysqlclient. :-P
[16:21] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: sitting in the new queue, then I'll request MIR for it
[16:22] <Daviey> awesome!
[16:22] <Daviey> Nobody working on anything not listed?
[16:23] <hallyn> working on SRUs today...
[16:23] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: on powernap today
[16:23] <Daviey> \o/
[16:23] <hallyn> sorry SpamapS
[16:23] <koolhead11> testing keystone from zul PPA
[16:23] <Daviey> (BTW, if anyone else wants to drive the development roundtable - please offer yourself. :)
[16:23] <Daviey> smoser: move on?
[16:23] <smoser> #topic Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:24] <smoser> anyone?
[16:24] <smoser> i dont hae anything.
[16:24] <smoser> so ...
[16:24] <smoser> 5
[16:24] <smoser> 4
[16:24] <smoser> 3
[16:24] <smoser> 2
[16:24] <smoser> 1
[16:24] <koolhead11> i might
[16:25] <koolhead11> go to a college tech week this month
[16:25] <Daviey> robbiew will be in Boston shortly for, erm
[16:25] <robbiew> LISA
[16:25] <hallyn> oh, fun
[16:25] <Daviey> thassim
[16:25] <hallyn> one of my favs
[16:25] <SpamapS> sorry I'm back
[16:25] <SpamapS> SCALE!
[16:25] <Daviey> So be there if you are groovy.
[16:26] <SpamapS> Feb 20, Los Angeles
[16:26] <Daviey> SpamapS: never, ever, be sorry for being back :)
[16:26] <SpamapS> err
[16:26] <SpamapS> Jan 20
[16:26] <SpamapS> haha
[16:26] <SpamapS> http://www.socallinuxexpo.org
[16:26] <Daviey> rocking
[16:26] <SpamapS> There will be a Juju charm school on Friday, and Jorge and I are presenting.
[16:26] <zul> budapest next month
[16:27] <SpamapS> zul: thats not open to the public though
[16:27] <zul> SpamapS: it could be :)
[16:27] <SpamapS> BUT, if you are going to be in Budapest, we'll certainly come have a beer with you!
[16:27] <smoser> ok
[16:27] <smoser> enough batter
[16:27] <smoser> moving on
[16:27] <smoser> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[16:27]  * SpamapS feels the coffee kicking in
[16:27] <smoser> hggdh, ?
[16:28] <smoser> anyone have anything for the man the myth the legend ?
[16:28] <hallyn> yes
[16:28] <hallyn> hggdh: did you ever fix your problem yesterday with kvm?
[16:29] <hallyn> if not, can you open a bug?
[16:29] <hallyn> it sounded scary...
[16:29] <hggdh> here
[16:30] <hggdh> no news from QA
[16:30] <hggdh> hallyn: no, I did not. It flatly refuses to work, and no logs are generated
[16:30] <hggdh> I will open a bug on it
[16:30] <hggdh> ..
[16:30] <hallyn> thx
[16:30] <smoser> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[16:30] <smoser> wooh
[16:30] <smb> Nothing in particular. Some info in bug 607039 may be interesting in general. At least I did find out new things. :)
[16:31] <smb> bah
[16:31] <smb> wrong one...
[16:31] <smb> bug 886521
[16:31] <smb> yes that was the one
[16:31] <smoser> alexbligh has some more fun bugs for you to read, bug 900799
[16:31] <smb> otherwise smoser, what do you have for me today :)
[16:32] <smoser> he likes to do silly things, like attach the same disk to 2 different buses.
[16:32] <smoser> so, smb please take a read at that.
[16:32] <smb> Which is the thing xen does sort of
[16:32] <smoser> sort of... although he points out that it might be more difficult.
[16:33] <smoser> as in xen, you can compleletely ignore the emulated if you have the xen_pv
[16:33] <smb> yeah, agreed
[16:33] <smoser> but in kvm, you can't copletely ignore the scsi bus if you have virtio devices.
[16:33] <smoser> so, its fun.
[16:33] <smb> I guess he wants to do something like that under kvm
[16:33] <smoser> right.
[16:33] <smb> Not that I think it is supported
[16:33] <smoser> s/wants to/does do/
[16:33] <smoser> and wants you to support it
[16:33] <smoser> :)
[16:33] <smoser> anyway.
[16:34] <smoser> thats all i've got
[16:34] <smoser> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (NCommander)
[16:34]  * smb is so ... whatever
[16:35] <Daviey> heh
[16:36] <smoser> NCommander, ?
[16:37] <smoser> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[16:38] <smoser> anyone have anything here ?
[16:38] <lynxman> nothing on my side o/
[16:38] <smoser> ok. i fyou happen to have something, you can fit it into open discussion
[16:38] <smoser> #topic Open Discussion
[16:39] <smoser> anyone have anythign for open discussion ?
[16:39] <Daviey> Not here... :)
[16:39] <smoser> if not, then we're dangerously close to finishing
[16:40] <SpamapS> just a general call out, please test MySQL 5.5 as its build is quite different and we've already missed a few subtle things.
[16:40] <zul> wait....wait....i got nothing
[16:40]  * SpamapS repeats
[16:40] <zul> SpamapS:  like what?
[16:40] <lynxman> a pony would be nice
[16:40] <smoser> anyone got any recent zul sitings ?
[16:40] <smoser> ok.
[16:40] <smoser> then here we go
[16:40] <SpamapS> smoser: he's hibernating
[16:40] <smoser> mdeslaur had my favorites.
[16:41] <smoser> #Announce next meeting date and time
[16:41] <smoser> Tuesday 2011-12-13 at 1600 UTC - #ubuntu-meeting
[16:41] <smoser> #endmeeting
[16:41] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Dec  6 16:41:34 2011 UTC.
[16:41] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2011/ubuntu-meeting.2011-12-06-16.01.moin.txt
[16:41] <Daviey> \o/ thanks smoser
[16:41] <smoser> smoser out
[16:41] <SpamapS> smoser: ty
[16:59] <ppisati> o/
[16:59] <jsalisbury>  Roll Call for Ubuntu Kernel Weekly Status Meeting
[16:59] <cking> o/
[17:00] <apw> o/
[17:00] <ogasawara> o/
[17:00] <jsalisbury> #startmeeting
[17:00] <jsalisbury> ##
[17:00] <jsalisbury> ## This is the Ubuntu Kernel Team weekly status meeting.
[17:00] <jsalisbury> ##
[17:00] <jsalisbury> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[17:00] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Dec  6 17:00:59 2011 UTC.  The chair is jsalisbury. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot.
[17:00] <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
[17:01] <jsalisbury> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Precise
[17:01] <bjf> /closeo/
[17:01] <jsalisbury> # Meeting Etiquette
[17:01] <jsalisbury> #
[17:01] <jsalisbury> # NOTE: '..' indicates that you are finished with your input.
[17:01] <jsalisbury> #       'o/' indicates you have something to add (please wait until you are recognized)
[17:01] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] ARM Status (ppisati)
[17:01] <ppisati> P/omap4: a new kernel (1402.3) based off O/omap4@1206.13 has been uploaded and
[17:01] <ppisati> it contains the large mmap() fix, armhf architecture support and some more
[17:01] <ppisati> config syncs against master. Work on a 3.2 kernel has started.
[17:01] <ppisati> lp#861296 ("mmap fails to allocate 2030Mb heap on ARM"): the fix has been
[17:01] <ppisati> committed for [MNOP]/omap4 and L/imx51.
[17:01] <ppisati> ..
[17:02] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs (jsalisbury)
[17:02] <jsalisbury> Last Updated: 2011-12-06 09:17:13.422472
[17:02] <jsalisbury> [17:02] <jsalisbury> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kt-meeting.txt
[17:02] <jsalisbury> [17:02] <jsalisbury>  * 35 linux kernel bugs (up 15)
[17:02] <jsalisbury> [17:02] <jsalisbury>  * 4 linux kernel bugs (up 4)
[17:02] <jsalisbury> [17:02] <jsalisbury>  * 0 precise linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[17:02] <jsalisbury>  * 7 oneiric linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[17:02] <jsalisbury>  * 9 natty linux kernel bugs (down 1)
[17:02] <jsalisbury>  * 3 maverick linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[17:02] <jsalisbury>  * 7 lucid linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[17:02] <jsalisbury>  * 0 hardy linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[17:02] <jsalisbury> [17:02] <jsalisbury>  * 31 precise bugs (up 10)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 671 oneiric bugs (up 20)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 1632 natty bugs (down 5)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 1049 maverick bugs (down 1)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 951 lucid bugs (up 4)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 32 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury> [17:03] <jsalisbury> [17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 1 precise bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 8 oneiric bugs (down 1)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 20 natty bugs (up 1)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 38 maverick bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 74 lucid bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 0 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury> [17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 4 precise bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 70 oneiric bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 435 natty bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 236 maverick bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 207 lucid bugs (down 1)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 2 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury> [17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 0 precise bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 1 oneiric bugs (no change 0)
[17:03] <jsalisbury>  * 4 natty bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <jsalisbury>  * 0 maverick bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <jsalisbury>  * 2 lucid bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <jsalisbury>  * 0 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <jsalisbury> ..
[17:04] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Milestone Targeted Work Items (ogasawara)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [LINK] http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/canonical-kernel-team-precise-alpha-2.html
[17:04] <ogasawara> || apw        || hardware-p-kernel-boot                || 1 work item  ||
[17:04] <ogasawara> ||            || hardware-p-kernel-config-review       || 2 work items ||
[17:04] <ogasawara> ||            || hardware-p-kernel-delta-review        || 4 work items ||
[17:04] <ogasawara> ||            || foundations-p-ipv6                    || 1 work item  ||
[17:04] <ogasawara> || cking      || hardware-p-kernel-delta-review        || 1 work item  ||
[17:04] <ogasawara> || jsalisbury || other-p-bug-workflows                 || 1 work item  ||
[17:04] <ogasawara> || ogasawara  || hardware-p-kernel-version-and-flavors || 1 work item  ||
[17:04] <ogasawara> ||            || hardware-p-kernel-config-review       || 34 work items||
[17:04] <ogasawara> || tgardner   || hardware-p-kernel-version-and-flavors || 1 work item  ||
[17:04] <ogasawara> ||            || hardware-p-kernel-delta-review        || 1 work item  ||
[17:04] <ogasawara> If your name is in the above table, please review your Alpha-2 work items.  Note that Alpha-2 is Thurs Feb 2.
[17:04] <ogasawara> ..
[17:05] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Blueprint: hardware-p-kernel-power-management (cking)
[17:05] <cking> Power Management:
[17:05] <cking>  * Crowd-sourcing ALPM testing Wiki:
[17:05] <cking>       https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/PowerManagementALPM
[17:05] <cking>    Please follow instructions and test. Note, you may be risking your
[17:05] <cking>    data with these tests!
[17:05] <cking>  * Exhaustive testing of pm-utils power.d scripts across various machines,
[17:05] <cking>    write up and recommendations presented here:
[17:05] <cking>       http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/power-benchmarking/pm-utils-results
[17:05] <cking>       Recommend removing journal-commit + readahead power.d scripts
[17:05] <cking>  * Complete PCIe ASPM crowd-sourcing, patch deployed in Precise-next
[17:05] <cking>  * Investigating reducing psmouse interrupts
[17:05] <cking> ..
[17:05] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: Precise Development Kernel (ogasawara)
[17:05] <ogasawara> We have uploaded the 3.2.0-3.8 Ubuntu kernel which is based on latest upstream v3.2-rc4 kernel.  The 3.2.0-3.8 upload also resolved the remaining armhf build issues.  We are still witholding the patches to drop the i386 non-pae flavor until after the Tech Board discussion regarding the issue on Mon Dec 12.
[17:06] <ogasawara> Important Upcoming Dates:
[17:06] <ogasawara>  * Thurs Feb 2 - Alpha 2 (~8 weeks)
[17:06] <ogasawara> ..
[17:06] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: CVE's (apw)
[17:06] <apw> [17:06] <apw>  
[17:06] <apw> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/CVE-linux.txt
[17:06] <apw>  
[17:06] <apw> Currently open CVEs for each supported branch:
[17:06] <apw>  
[17:06] <apw> || Package                                  || Open      ||
[17:06] <apw> ||                                          ||           ||
[17:06] <apw> || linux Hardy                              ||   11 (--) ||
[17:06] <apw> || linux Lucid                              ||    8 (--) ||
[17:06] <apw> || linux Maverick                           ||    8 (--) ||
[17:06] <apw> || linux Natty                              ||    8 (--) ||
[17:06] <apw> || linux Oneiric                            ||    5 (--) ||
[17:06] <apw> || linux Precise                            ||    5 (--) ||
[17:06] <apw> || linux-ec2 Lucid                          ||    8 (--) ||
[17:06] <apw> || linux-fsl-imx51 Lucid                    ||    8 (--) ||
[17:06] <apw> || linux-mvl-dove Lucid                     ||    8 (--) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux-mvl-dove Maverick                  ||    8 (--) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux-ti-omap4 Maverick                  ||    8 (--) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux-ti-omap4 Natty                     ||    8 (--) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux-ti-omap4 Oneiric                   ||    5 (--) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux-ti-omap4 Precise                   ||    5 (--) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux-lts-backport-maverick Lucid        ||    8 (--) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux-lts-backport-natty Lucid           ||    8 (--) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux-lts-backport-oneiric Lucid         ||    5 (--) ||
[17:07] <apw>  
[17:07] <apw> We gained a couple of new CVEs this week and closed out the same number
[17:07] <apw> so the overall stats remain static.  We only have fixes for two of the
[17:07] <apw> remaining CVEs.
[17:07] <apw>  
[17:07] <apw>  
[17:07] <apw> == 2011-11-29 (weekly) ==
[17:07] <apw>  
[17:07] <apw> [17:07] <apw>  
[17:07] <apw> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/CVE-linux.txt
[17:07] <apw>  
[17:07] <apw> Currently open CVEs for each supported branch:
[17:07] <apw>  
[17:07] <apw> || Package                                  || Open      ||
[17:07] <apw> ||                                          ||           ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux Hardy                              ||   11 (+3) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux Lucid                              ||    8 (+3) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux Maverick                           ||    8 (+3) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux Natty                              ||    8 (+3) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux Oneiric                            ||    5 (+1) ||
[17:07] <apw> || linux Precise                            ||    5 (+1) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-ec2 Lucid                          ||    8 (+3) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-fsl-imx51 Lucid                    ||    8 (+3) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-mvl-dove Lucid                     ||    8 (+3) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-mvl-dove Maverick                  ||    8 (+3) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-ti-omap4 Maverick                  ||    8 (+3) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-ti-omap4 Natty                     ||    8 (+2) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-ti-omap4 Oneiric                   ||    5 (+1) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-ti-omap4 Precise                   ||    5 (+1) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-lts-backport-maverick Lucid        ||    8 (+3) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-lts-backport-natty Lucid           ||    8 (+3) ||
[17:08] <apw> || linux-lts-backport-oneiric Lucid         ||    5 (+1) ||
[17:08] <apw>  
[17:08] <apw> We gained yet another 5 CVEs this week.  We closed out a couple.  Two of
[17:08] <apw> the new CVEs await upstream fixes.
[17:08] <apw>  
[17:08] <apw> ..
[17:08] <apw> (oops)
[17:09] <jsalisbury> apw, anything else to add, after the (oops)?
[17:09] <apw> ..
[17:09] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: Stable, Security, and Bugfix Kernel Updates - Oneiric/Natty/Maverick/Lucid/Hardy (bjf/herton)
[17:09] <bjf> Last week saw the verification and testing of the current -proposed
[17:09] <bjf> updates. Here is the status for the main kernels, until yesterday (28/11):
[17:09] <bjf>  
[17:09] <bjf>  * Hardy - 2.6.24-30.97
[17:09] <bjf>   * Regression testing in progress.
[17:09] <bjf>  
[17:10] <bjf>  * Lucid - 2.6.32-36.79
[17:10] <bjf>   * 3 of 3 bugs verified
[17:10] <bjf>  
[17:10] <bjf>  * Maverick - 2.6.35-31.63
[17:10] <bjf>   * Regression testing in progress.
[17:10] <bjf>  
[17:10] <bjf>  * Natty - 2.6.38-13.53
[17:10] <bjf>   * 3 of 5 bugs verified
[17:10] <bjf>  
[17:10] <bjf>  * Oneiric - 3.0.0-14.23
[17:10] <bjf>   * Regression testing in progress.
[17:10] <bjf>  
[17:10] <bjf> Current opened tracking bugs details:
[17:10] <bjf>  * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kernel-sru-workflow.html
[17:10] <bjf>  
[17:10] <bjf> For SRUs, SRU report is a good source of information:
[17:10] <bjf>  * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/sru-report.html
[17:10] <bjf>  
[17:10] <bjf> Future stable cadence cycles:
[17:10] <bjf>  * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseInterlock
[17:10] <bjf> ..
[17:11] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Open Discussion or Questions? Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[17:11] <jsalisbury> If nothing else to add then
[17:12] <jsalisbury> #endmeeting
[17:12] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Dec  6 17:12:02 2011 UTC.
[17:12] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2011/ubuntu-meeting.2011-12-06-17.00.moin.txt
[17:12] <jsalisbury> Thanks everyone
[17:12] <cking> thanks jsalisbury
[17:12] <sconklin> thanks jsalisbury
[17:12] <apw> thanks
[17:12] <smb> ta
[17:39] <jsalisbury> ls
[19:59] <highvoltage> Good evening
[19:59] <ViaNocturna> Evening
[19:59] <Andy80> good evening
[19:59] <highvoltage> do we have quorum?
[19:59]  * drubin is here
[20:00] <brendand> hi
[20:00] <highvoltage> we need two more board members for quorum
[20:01] <drubin> I don't know if we are going to make it tonight
[20:01] <Andy80> let's wait some minutes :)
[20:01] <drubin> just saw the email from czajkowski saying she can't make it
[20:02] <drubin> highvoltage: I am happy to wait, I should be around for a while
[20:02] <roadmr> nooo :(
[20:02] <Andy80> it would be sad for me :\ I've canceled an appointment to be here :(
[20:03] <highvoltage> since there are few members on the list, we might schedule another meeting if this doesn't work out. it's probably not fair making eveyrone wait a whole month, especially considering that the next one would be smack bang in the middle of holiday time
[20:03] <ViaNocturna> :-(
[20:03] <drubin> highvoltage: I agree
[20:03] <highvoltage> (I guess we should postpone that one by a week too, make it 10 January instead of 3 January)
[20:04] <drubin> makes sense
[20:04] <highvoltage> I'll take that to the list
[20:04] <drubin> highvoltage: it is only 5mins, maybe lets give it another 5 mins at least before we cancel this one.
[20:04] <cr3> highvoltage: maybe a good way to get those who really want to become members, make it january 1st! :)
[20:05] <drubin> cr3: at 8am
[20:05] <highvoltage> crehehe
[20:05] <drubin> ;)
[20:05] <ViaNocturna> cr3, in which case ill be there
[20:05] <cr3> there's a reason why I'm not on the board or any board for that matter :)
[20:05] <brendand> cr3 - not even the parole board?
[20:05] <cr3> ViaNocturna: I'm just a pom pom girl for brendand today but I'd also be there just for him!
[20:06] <roadmr> the water board even
[20:06] <cr3> brendand: ... and perhaps on a water board
[20:06] <highvoltage> I wonder what happened to iulian, he was speaking about the meeting just minutes ago in another channel
[20:07] <ViaNocturna> how many members need to be present?
[20:07] <Andy80> maybe someone is still having dinner, don't know....
[20:07] <highvoltage> 4
[20:07] <highvoltage> we currently have 2
[20:07] <Andy80> it's almost dinner time here in europe
[20:07] <Andy80> here he is :)
[20:07] <highvoltage> you eat late!
[20:07] <ViaNocturna> i know...its like 9pm here
[20:08] <iulian> highvoltage: Having dinner as well.
[20:08] <iulian> :)
[20:08] <Andy80> highvoltage: I finished 20 minutes ago ;) it's 21:08 here :)
[20:08] <highvoltage> let me see if I can get stgraber...
[20:10] <stgraber> hey
[20:10] <ViaNocturna> hey
[20:10] <cr3> stgraber: woohoo, thanks for joining!
[20:10] <micahg> highvoltage: FYI, if this is EMEA  it seems the fridge entry is out of date (seems to say 21:00)
[20:10] <highvoltage> stgraber: do you know how to drive the new bot?
[20:10] <highvoltage> micahg: yeah, the fridge gets confused every time there's timezone changes
[20:11] <stgraber> highvoltage: yeah, but I'm debugging some API breakage in the new tracker, so I can give you a 30s intro but not chair :)
[20:11] <highvoltage> is ianfarell here?
[20:11] <highvoltage> ok, I'll chair
[20:11] <highvoltage> Welcome to this month's EMEA Regional Board Meeting.
[20:11] <highvoltage> Candidates will be able to present themselves one by one in order of the agenda on the wiki page.
[20:11] <highvoltage> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership/RegionalBoards/EMEA
[20:11] <highvoltage> Only board members can vote.
[20:11] <highvoltage> If you'd like to show your support for an applicant, please wait until it is their turn.
[20:11] <stgraber> highvoltage: thanks
[20:11] <highvoltage> Candidates should prepare an introduction of 1-5 sentences and also have a prepared wiki page for their application.
[20:11] <highvoltage> is egyparadox here?
[20:12] <highvoltage> Andy80: well, I guess it's your turn then. could you please introduce yourself and tell us why you want to be an ubuntu member?
[20:12] <Andy80> yes
[20:12] <Andy80> My name is Andrea Grandi, I'm an italian student and software developer. I use Ubuntu since its first version and in general I'm a Linux user since 1996.
[20:12] <iulian> Isn't Iain first, highvoltage?
[20:13] <Andy80> I've started contributing to Ubuntu since the first version, at the beginning only spreading its use and reporting some bugs. During last years I've also been involved in organizing events related to Ubuntu, I've contributed with some patches to Unity-2D and attended two UDS and leading a session during the last one in Orlando.
[20:13] <Andy80> (I've prepared this before, to save time.... feel free to ask me any question)
[20:13] <highvoltage> iulian: indeed, but I called him out earlier and he doesn't appear to be present
[20:14] <Andy80> You can find my wiki page with the complete list of my contributions and testimonials here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AndreaGrandi
[20:14] <iulian> highvoltage: OK.
[20:14] <highvoltage> any questions for Andy80?
[20:14] <iulian> No questions from me.
[20:15] <drubin> none for me
[20:15] <highvoltage> I guess we're ready to go then
[20:15] <highvoltage> Vote: Andy80 for Ubuntu membership: +1 / +0 / -1 (only board members can vote):
[20:15] <iulian> +1
[20:15] <drubin> +1 [long standing commitment, and good contributions ]
[20:15] <highvoltage> +1 [ Ubuntu big fixes, great advocacy effort in italy ]
[20:16] <stgraber> +1
[20:16] <highvoltage> Result: +4
[20:16] <highvoltage> Andy80: congratulations and welcome :)
[20:16] <Andy80> wooooooow :)
[20:16] <Andy80> finally ^_^
[20:16] <highvoltage> brendand: are you present?
[20:16] <Andy80> yeeeeah :D
[20:16] <iulian> Andy80: Keep up the good work!
[20:17] <Andy80> iulian: you can bet on it! :)
[20:17] <brendand> hi
[20:18] <highvoltage> hi brendand, please introduce yourself
[20:18] <brendand> My name is Brendan Donegan and I've been an Ubuntu user since Feisty and started contributing in a big way just over a year ago. I'm mostly involved in QA activities (Bug Squad, ISO testing) but also contribute code to the Checkbox test tool and sometimes to Ubuntu packages like Update Manager
[20:19] <brendand> my wiki page is : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BrendanDonegan
[20:19] <brendand> It has all the details and some testimonials
[20:20]  * cr3 testimonialed for brendand, if there's any doubt... his name is really Brendan :)
[20:20] <highvoltage> any questions or cheerleading for brendand?
[20:20] <brendand> Any questions?
[20:20]  * iulian doesn't have any questions for brendand and is ready to vote.
[20:20]  * cr3 cheerleads a "B" for "Brendan"
[20:21]  * drubin is ready
[20:21]  * bladernr_ cheerleads a "D" for ... D
[20:21]  * stgraber is ready too
[20:21]  * roadmr has an "R"
[20:21] <highvoltage> Vote: brendand for Ubuntu membership: +1 / +0 / -1 (only board members can vote):
[20:21] <drubin> +1
[20:21] <highvoltage> +1 [ Great QA effort, hardware certificatoin, SRU hardware testing, Ubuntu Friendly, Bug squad ]
[20:22] <iulian> +1
[20:22] <cr3> stgraber: nudge :)
[20:23] <stgraber> +1
[20:23] <highvoltage> Result: +4
[20:24] <iulian> brendand: Well done.
[20:24] <highvoltage> brendand: Congratulations and welcome!
[20:24] <cr3> brendand: congratulations, you can now try to pickup girls in the pub by saying you're an ubuntu member!
[20:24] <roadmr> congrats!
[20:24] <ViaNocturna> congrats
[20:24] <brendand> my wife will no doubt be indifferent
[20:24] <highvoltage> ViaNocturna: your turn :)
[20:25] <iulian> Heh. :)
[20:25] <ViaNocturna> hey there, my name is Arthur Moore, I am a 25 year old from Holland, I have been with Ubuntu since 6.06 and have helped in the forums IRC and writing applications for new users
[20:25] <ViaNocturna> I have also tested beta versions for the last 2 releases and advocated Ubuntu to whomever would listen
[20:25] <ViaNocturna> my wiki is: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/arthurmoore
[20:26] <highvoltage> ViaNocturna: did you submit your test results to the QA ISO tracker?
[20:26] <ViaNocturna> yes i did
[20:27] <iulian> ViaNocturna: What kind of scripts have you written so far? Are they published somewhere?
[20:27] <highvoltage> ViaNocturna: I notice that you filed few bugs in Launchpad, what do you usually do when you encounter a bug in Ubuntu?
[20:27] <highvoltage> (when testing the pre-releases)
[20:27] <ViaNocturna> Yes I have written scripts to get Paltalk running on Linux, and also a program that will backup applications, all are on my website ubuntuarmy.wordpress.com
[20:27] <ViaNocturna> Report it back the moment I encounter them
[20:28] <highvoltage> ViaNocturna: any other activities you'd like to share?
[20:29] <highvoltage> any other questions of feedback for ViaNocturna?
[20:29] <ViaNocturna> yes, I also started university and was the only ubuntu user, i converted half my class and also wrote instructions to connect to the network and handed that to the IT department
[20:29] <highvoltage> ah, I saw that on your wiki page
[20:30] <iulian> ViaNocturna: Are you involved with the LoCo team?
[20:30] <ViaNocturna> iulian, unfortunately i dont drive and there isnt a loco team in my area
[20:30] <highvoltage> Vote: ViaNocturna for Ubuntu membership: +1 / +0 / -1 (only board members can vote):
[20:31] <drubin> +0 [ I think on the right track but very hard to see visible contributions ]
[20:31] <highvoltage> +0 [ ViaNocturna is on the right path, signed the code of conduct and is actively envolved, but needs more involvement and feedback from people he has worked with on wiki page ]
[20:31] <ViaNocturna> thanks for your feedback
[20:32] <drubin> ViaNocturna: keep going! re apply in a few months
[20:32] <ViaNocturna> i will, thank you so much
[20:33] <iulian> +0 from me at the moment. I would like to see more work done in the areas that you want to help out. It is also good to get some testimonials from existing Ubuntu members.
[20:33] <stgraber> -1 [ No testimonials, not much documented contributions, same goes for LP profile. Probably on the right path, would love to see you apply again a bit later. ]
[20:33] <ViaNocturna> iulian, i understand...thank you anyway
[20:33] <highvoltage> ViaNocturna: yeah, you're definitely ubuntu member material, I think if you get more involved with the Dutch loco (there is one) and get some more information on your wiki as you work along you'll be able to do a bit better next time
[20:33] <highvoltage> Result: -1
[20:33]  * iulian nods.
[20:33] <highvoltage> and that wraps it up for tonight, thanks for attending everyone!
[20:33] <ViaNocturna> highvoltage, sorry i thought you meant local group
[20:33] <drubin> highvoltage: Thanks for chairing
[20:33] <highvoltage> ViaNocturna: yep, your country is local enough for us :)
[20:34] <ViaNocturna> thank you
[20:34] <ViaNocturna> highvoltage, lol thats true
[20:34] <iulian> highvoltage: Thanks.
[20:34] <cr3> stgraber: thanks man for taking a moment away from fixing your iso tracker api!
[20:34] <highvoltage> next meeting is tentatively set for 10 January, we'll set it on the wiki page once confirmed
[20:34] <highvoltage> meeting adjourned!
[20:35] <Andy80> iulian, highvoltage, drubin what happens now? I mean... is there anything particular we have to do?
[20:35] <ViaNocturna> take care all, and congrats to the new members
[20:35] <roadmr> whee
[20:35] <iulian> Andy80: What do you mean?
[20:35] <Andy80> I don't know.... for the @ubuntu alias, for the cloak, for the blog feed ecc...
[20:35] <Andy80> do we have to do something, contact anyone ecc..?
[20:36] <iulian> I'm sure there's a wiki page explaining that, Andy80.
[20:36] <drubin> Andy80: read the wiki it is all listed there :)
[20:36] <Andy80> ok, fine ^_^
[20:36] <Andy80> thank you all again and have a nice day :)
[20:36] <stgraber> highvoltage: thanks for chairing twice in a row (at least)!
[20:37] <brendand> thanks everyone
[20:37] <pangolin> !membership
[20:37] <pangolin> should have info ^
[20:37] <Andy80> yep, thank you ^_^
[20:38] <iulian> Andy80: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership and click on the links under the "Benefits of Membership" section.
[20:38] <iulian> Oh, I'm slow nowadays apprently.
[20:38]  * iulian is getting old.
[20:38] <iulian> s/apprently/apparently/
[21:45] <MrChrisDruif> EMEA Membership meeting is over?
[21:46] <alourie> MrChrisDruif: yes
[21:47] <MrChrisDruif> Rats, log is on wiki.ubuntu.com/EMEA?