[01:56] ScottL: re updating seeds> I'd suggest updating as you go so the changes get coverage in the daily images, you can then poke for a meta upload at your leisure [01:58] ScottL: also, not being an "Xfce Ubuntu" per se, Ubuntu Studio has more flexibility WRT default apps, you should be able to use most GTK based apps w/out issue in Xfce, the only issue might be a GTK3 theme, but you'll inherit one from Xubuntu in any case [01:59] * micahg should probably just reply to the ML in context [02:02] micahg, what will (or should) happen with the setting packages that will be OEL'd [02:03] xubuntu includes much more setting in a single package (i.e. -default-settings) than ubuntu studio [02:08] OEL'd? [02:08] ScottL: you can inherit or make your own [02:28] micahg, what i mean is that some of the existing ubuntu studio packages will not be necessary [02:28] should have said "existing ubuntu studio setting packages" [02:28] for example, ubuntustudio-icon-theme should no longer be necessary [02:29] ScottL: that's fine, you can seed/unseed whatever you wish, if you need something removed from the archive, let me know [02:30] micahg, okay it's the 'removing from the archive' that i will need to seek...but later, let's get things built and released and see about doing the actual 'removing' next cycle [02:30] just being prudent [02:30] archive removals just need sponsorship in terms of acknowledgment that it's the proper course of action, so you just file a bug with the reasoning and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors [02:32] that's fine too, just letting you know you have some freedom here [02:32] you are not bound by what xubuntu does (except WRT the xfce component versions :)) [03:05] ack'd [03:06] so you are suggesting that i might parse out what is in the xubuntu-default-settings package into the respective ubuntustudio-* package? [03:06] i hadn't considered this [03:07] i understand what you mean now about making changes and seeing results without changing seeds