=== doko__ is now known as doko | ||
=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
=== cnd is now known as cndougla | ||
=== cndougla is now known as cnd | ||
=== Guest46496 is now known as jrgiffor1 | ||
mitchell` | aloha. | 08:26 |
---|---|---|
mitchell` | When filing a bug report on Launchpad, are there any markdown-style formatting options? | 08:26 |
mitchell` | For example if I want to mark something as a code block? | 08:26 |
mitchell` | The help system and links on the page reveal nothing, but I thought I'd ask. | 08:26 |
lifeless | not yet, poolie has a branch in progress that will add this | 08:27 |
mitchell` | cool | 08:29 |
mitchell` | thanks :) | 08:29 |
=== zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
=== keffie_jayx is now known as effie_jayx | ||
effie_jayx | dobey: I mean to merge the debian directory from one branch with the source from upstream to build the package | 10:40 |
effie_jayx | but what happens to debian/changelog, does it stay untouched? | 10:40 |
Laney | bigjools: we just tried a sponsored sync & it seems to have worked well, thanks! the only thing we've noticed besides UI is that the sponsoree doesn't get email | 11:10 |
Laney | want a bug for that? | 11:10 |
bigjools | Laney: have they ever got email? | 11:11 |
bigjools | I mean, yes, please file a bug if you want something but I need to know if it's something that is missing from the old syncs | 11:12 |
bigjools | compared to old syncs I mean | 11:12 |
Laney | checking | 11:15 |
geser | IIRC I got accepted mails from sponsored syncs (when they got processed by an AA) | 11:15 |
bigjools | ok thanks | 11:15 |
Laney | you always got mail by virtue of the workflow being bug-based | 11:16 |
Laney | I don't remember if /soyuz/ sent you one | 11:16 |
geser | bigjools: will check my mail archive when I'm home to be sure | 11:17 |
bigjools | ok , cheers | 11:17 |
=== allenap changed the topic of #launchpad to: Build delays due to earlier hardware failure | https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: allenap | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
Laney | bigjools: yeah, confirmed that you do | 11:20 |
Laney | bug #902114 | 11:24 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 902114 in Launchpad itself "When sponsoring using copyPackage, the sponsored person is not sent email from Soyuz" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/902114 | 11:24 |
bigjools | thanks | 11:24 |
Laney | yw | 11:27 |
Forage | Are the builds still catching up after the failure? Or is there a different reason why my uploads have been waiting 15 hours so far? | 12:42 |
bigjools | we are missing some builders, they'll be back this weekend | 12:43 |
Forage | ah | 12:43 |
Forage | I assumed everything was back to normal again, or at least did not expect such a big delay | 12:45 |
Forage | by the way, if I look on the build status page, I get to see "Pending (2505)" as a status for each package. What does the 2505 mean? Is it a status code or e.g. position in a queue? | 12:47 |
bigjools | it's the score | 12:58 |
bigjools | the queue is not revealed anywhere, but it's based on the score and the order of entry | 12:58 |
dobey | effie_jayx: in recipe builds? no, it is updated with an automated entry at time of build, but the bzr repository itself is not modified | 13:07 |
=== zyga-afk is now known as zyga | ||
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps | ||
glen | hi, can i somehow add links to mailing lists of teams to project page? | 13:48 |
glen | i.e i'd like to have on project page: https://launchpad.net/eventum two lists | 13:48 |
glen | https://launchpad.net/~eventum-developers and https://launchpad.net/~eventum-users | 13:48 |
glen | is it possible? | 13:49 |
glen | currently i added as text to project description | 13:50 |
=== epsy is now known as \u03b5 | ||
=== zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== zyga-afk is now known as zygaq | ||
=== zygaq is now known as zyga | ||
SpamapS | is there a bug in bug search right now? | 17:46 |
SpamapS | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.importance%3Alist=UNDECIDED&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_supervisor=ubuntu-server&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.component-empty-marker=1&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_cve.used=&field.affects_me.used=&field.tag=-notserv&field.tags_c | 17:46 |
SpamapS | That should only show bugs with ubuntu-server as the bug supervisor | 17:46 |
SpamapS | but its showing *all* bugs in Ubuntu that are New/Undecided | 17:46 |
=== bigjools changed the topic of #launchpad to: Build delays due to earlier hardware failure | https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
SpamapS | Hm if I manually rebuild the search it works right.. | 17:49 |
SpamapS | but the only difference seems to be adding &orderby=-importance | 17:49 |
lifeless | well, the search you want is timing out | 17:51 |
SpamapS | It has worked a few times for me | 17:51 |
SpamapS | and timed out a couple as well ;) | 17:52 |
SpamapS | without a bug importance, it times out a lot more | 17:52 |
SpamapS | like, always | 17:52 |
SpamapS | :-/ | 17:52 |
SpamapS | OOPS-e8a2841c618a6644cb0281502950af4a | 17:53 |
ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=e8a2841c618a6644cb0281502950af4a | 17:53 |
lifeless | SpamapS: you can look at the oops yourself :) | 17:54 |
SpamapS | lifeless: that is *seriously* nice | 17:54 |
SpamapS | wow | 17:54 |
* SpamapS is distracted by the wonder of closed loop error inspection | 17:54 | |
lifeless | duh :P why do you think I spent such time on this :) | 17:54 |
SpamapS | figured you were bored ;) | 17:55 |
SpamapS | So, is it the addition of the order by that is causing this problem? The server team has been using this particular search for at least 20 months.. | 17:56 |
christoph_debian | hi! is there somewhere a confortable way to say "this package in sid/preceise builds fine in $someolder-ubuntu please build it in my ppa" without creating a handfull of different version/distribution uploads? | 17:57 |
SpamapS | ORDER BY BugTask.datecreated LIMIT 76 OFFSET 0' | 17:57 |
SpamapS | wouldn't bug ID be more efficient? :-P | 17:58 |
lifeless | SpamapS: there is a bug for tjis | 17:58 |
SpamapS | christoph_debian: you may be interested in the 'backportpackage' script which will take any .dsc and spray it out to as many releases as you want, automatically uploading to PPA :) | 17:59 |
lifeless | SpamapS: short story, something went over a threshold and the planner went nuts | 17:59 |
SpamapS | lifeless: that is a pretty gnarly SQL statement.. ;) | 17:59 |
SpamapS | WHERE BugTask.assignee IN (SELECT team FROM teams) | 18:00 |
SpamapS | that in particular seems like it might cause fits | 18:00 |
SpamapS | Oh wait thats a subselect | 18:00 |
SpamapS | oi | 18:01 |
lifeless | welcome to the mire that is LP bug search | 18:01 |
lifeless | SpamapS: teams is a CTE | 18:01 |
lifeless | SpamapS: not a subselect | 18:02 |
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chr1sccoulson | ||
SpamapS | I don't speak deep SQL-eze | 18:03 |
lifeless | common table expression | 18:03 |
SpamapS | "one of those things that you can shoot yourself in the foot with" | 18:03 |
lifeless | think 'inlinable function' | 18:04 |
SpamapS | So, when are we moving to Solandra ? ;-) | 18:04 |
SpamapS | lifeless: seriously, SQL's ad-hoc capability is a blessing and a curse.. is there any plan to go to a more scalable search method? SOLR would eat this for breakfast. | 18:06 |
lifeless | I know | 18:07 |
lifeless | yes there are, but no staff time to do it | 18:07 |
=== cnd is now known as cndougla | ||
christoph_debian | SpamapS: indeed that works | 18:09 |
lifeless | SpamapS: notice at the bottom - we get tracebacks for each action | 18:11 |
lifeless | SpamapS: so we can tell what triggered it | 18:11 |
lifeless | :) | 18:11 |
* lifeless smugs | 18:11 | |
christoph_debian | hm no not that way "PPA uploads must be for the RELEASE pocket." | 18:11 |
lifeless | SpamapS: so what is this a search of (in english) | 18:12 |
lifeless | Limit (cost=6159595.53..6159595.72 rows=76 width=925) (actual time=27815.295..27815.320 rows=76 loops=1) | 18:13 |
SpamapS | lifeless: all bugs marked new on packages that have ubuntu-server as bug supervisor | 18:13 |
lifeless | righto, this is the one daviey had blow up last week | 18:13 |
christoph_debian | this backportpackage doesn't accept a pocket name if one doesn't directly upload it seems | 18:14 |
SpamapS | 27815, is that seconds? so .. only 7 hours | 18:14 |
lifeless | SpamapS: http://explain.depesz.com/s/CQn | 18:14 |
=== cndougla is now known as cnd | ||
lifeless | SpamapS: bug 892820 | 18:16 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 892820 in Launchpad itself "Timeout on Distribution:+bugs searching by bug supervisor" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/892820 | 18:16 |
SpamapS | lifeless: so there is evil in ordering.. wouldn't ordering by whatever the clustered key of the table is be the most efficient method? | 18:18 |
lifeless | SpamapS: pg doesn't cluster | 18:18 |
christoph_debian | d backportpackage also doesn't support supplying a different gpg key | 18:20 |
SpamapS | lifeless: at all? sad. | 18:21 |
lifeless | SpamapS: you can, manually, but it ages right away | 18:21 |
SpamapS | lifeless: thats one of the best tricks in InnoDB.. put the important stuff early in the PK and you can order by it.. lightning fast order by. | 18:22 |
lifeless | SpamapS: bug heat, for instance, causes a rewrite of every bug tuple every few days | 18:22 |
lifeless | SpamapS: we can do lightning fast order by - we can - the problem here isn't order by being costly | 18:22 |
SpamapS | sort + nested loop then? | 18:23 |
lifeless | SpamapS: look at the plan | 18:23 |
SpamapS | lifeless: I have zero knowledge of tuning pg queries | 18:24 |
lifeless | note the seq scan on bug task *inside* an inner loop | 18:24 |
SpamapS | its like op ork gleep .. | 18:24 |
SpamapS | OOH | 18:24 |
lifeless | now | 18:24 |
lifeless | its throwing that into a hash | 18:24 |
SpamapS | That I grok. Yes, scans are bad, mmkay | 18:24 |
lifeless | the table scan is crazy | 18:26 |
lifeless | there are 194 bugs matching your criteria | 18:26 |
SpamapS | Yeah | 18:27 |
SpamapS | part of the reason we may not have seen this before is we usually kept that number < 30 | 18:27 |
lifeless | no, its because its making bad predictions | 18:28 |
SpamapS | well I was thinking maybe the prediction was different w/ 30 | 18:28 |
lifeless | hmm | 18:28 |
lifeless | your url is different somehow | 18:28 |
lifeless | the ss CTE is gone | 18:28 |
lifeless | the url in https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/892820 may work if you leave the bug listing beta | 18:29 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 892820 in Launchpad itself "Timeout on Distribution:+bugs searching by bug supervisor" [Critical,In progress] | 18:29 |
lifeless | SpamapS: that search, can I get a screenshot of you setting it up on the advanced search page or something ? | 19:02 |
SpamapS | lifeless: is it enough to say that the only changes to the default are to make sure only status 'New' is checked, and type in 'ubuntu-server' as the bug supervisor? | 19:06 |
SpamapS | lifeless: thats exactly what I've just done to reproduce it. | 19:06 |
lifeless | SpamapS: let me see | 19:13 |
lifeless | SpamapS: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu timed out. Not a win. | 19:15 |
SpamapS | lifeless: seems that even getting more specific.. only bugs with NEW and UNDECIDED ... times out. :( | 19:35 |
SpamapS | OOPS-090c23f65f06474b1dab9c4b998ff34f | 19:35 |
ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=090c23f65f06474b1dab9c4b998ff34f | 19:35 |
SpamapS | wait that one isn't fair. ;) | 19:36 |
SpamapS | OOPS-5e15e62026c1471f9750455874cb0482 | 19:36 |
ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=5e15e62026c1471f9750455874cb0482 | 19:36 |
Forage | I got my first build on launchpad and it failed to compile. According to the received e-mail I was free to "contact a member of the Launchpad Buildd Administrators team" for help. Does this channel count? :-D | 19:56 |
Forage | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/87089367/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.empathy_3.2.2-0ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 19:56 |
Forage | As far as I can tell it failed at "FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]" | 19:56 |
Forage | The question is why | 19:57 |
Forage | Is it the two "undefined reference to" messages before or is "dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2" a separate error? | 19:58 |
Forage | the two "undefined reference to" don't look like real errors | 19:58 |
Duditz | hi all! please, after I do launchpad actions, when my karma is updated? | 19:59 |
Duditz | . | 20:11 |
dobey | Forage: the undefined reference errors are the problem | 20:15 |
Forage | hmm, not good then | 20:16 |
Forage | that would mean the source contains bugs, doesn't it? | 20:16 |
Forage | I can't imagine it's a dependency or build issue | 20:17 |
dobey | maybe | 20:17 |
Forage | or maybe outdated patches | 20:18 |
dobey | it's not linking to an X lib | 20:18 |
Forage | hmm, no additional patches touching that file | 20:22 |
Forage | bleh, can't find it | 20:59 |
Forage | why is it that whenever I "just" want to give something a try, stuff is going wrong in a weird way? | 21:01 |
Forage | x11 is linked as far as I can tell, and no changes where made in that area to make it break | 21:02 |
micahg | Forage: #ubuntu-packaging would probably be more appropriate since it's an issue with the packaging and not the PPA itself | 21:39 |
Forage | micahg: thanks for the hint, I'll give it a try | 22:07 |
Forage | I tried xclaesse as well, since he did some empathy packaging for the telepathy ppa already, but he's afk | 22:09 |
=== nyuszika7h is now known as nyan-cat | ||
=== nyan-cat is now known as nyuszika7h |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!