=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== fader_ is now known as fader
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== brendand_ is now known as brendand
[15:13] <roadmr> salem_: morning! had a good weekend?
[15:41] <salem_> roadmr, hello, sorry.. I was out for lunch.
[15:41] <salem_> roadmr, yes, it was fine, and yours?
[15:41] <salem_> roadmr, did you have time to check my qt branch of checkbox?
[15:41] <roadmr> salem_: hey! yes, it was alright (the weekend)
[15:42] <roadmr> salem_: about the code, yep, I had a look, I created a minimal whitelist to test with and it looks OK
[15:42] <roadmr> salem_: I still need to read through it carefully to see how you work your magic :)
[15:43] <salem_> roadmr, haha, so far no magic, I am just reproducing the gtk frontend behavior. :)
[15:44] <roadmr> salem_: great! about the tree selection thingy...
[15:44] <roadmr> salem_: the GTK code contains a lot of quirks and special handling cases, I was thinking we could maybe skip some of those to simplify things
[15:45] <roadmr> salem_: for instance there's code to deselect an ancestor if all its children are deselected
[15:45] <roadmr> salem_: I think we can safely ignore that, remember we should treat this just as an exercise for you to get to know checkbox
[15:45] <salem_> roadmr, yes, I was hoping the qt widget would have something to automatically handle this, but did not have time to check
[15:46] <roadmr> salem_: and for us to get to know Qt ( I'm failing there, haven't really read through the code )
[15:46] <roadmr> salem_: but we shouldn't spend much more time on this, because we then need to go into creating the new UI and we don't have too much time for that
[15:47] <salem_> roadmr, yes.. so far I am considering this qt ui a good exercise to understand the checkbox code and to understand what could be done with the current code layout
[15:49] <roadmr> salem_: exactly! well I still think that most of what we want to do can be handled if we give the UI a way to set checkbox configuration variables
[15:49] <roadmr> salem_: but I guess we'll know once we dive into actually doing it
[15:52] <salem_> roadmr, yes, true. I will keep working on it and as soon as I have something new to my branch I will let you know.
[15:52] <roadmr> salem_: great, thanks!
[16:55] <brendand> mvo - coverage on debfileapplication is up to 64% now
[16:55] <mvo> !!!
[16:55]  * mvo hugs brendand
[16:55] <brendand> mvo - i've done pretty much all the easy bits
[16:56] <brendand> mvo - i need a convenient way to fake a deb file as being installed
[16:56] <brendand> well, ideally it won't be fake, it actually will be installed
[17:01] <brendand> mvo - who to send reviews to for software-center. you, or is there a team?
[17:05] <mvo> the tema
[17:05] <mvo> the ~software-center-developers team
[17:05] <brendand> mvo - yeah, found it. thx
=== salem_ is now known as _salem