| === allison_ is now known as wendar | ||
| === JackyAlcine is now known as VirgilHawkins | ||
| === VirgilHawkins is now known as JackyAlcine | ||
| === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
| === jibel_ is now known as jibel | ||
| === akher0n is now known as akheron | ||
| onkarshinde | Is it possible to remove certain binary from archive? | 13:30 |
|---|---|---|
| tumbleweed | can we remove the sources that build it too? | 13:30 |
| onkarshinde | My query is in regard to bug #903382 It will be reat if someone with more knowledge about archive look at it and let me know which is feasible approach. | 13:33 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 903382 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "[powerpc] Unsatisfiable dependency in oneiric" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/903382 | 13:34 |
| ampelbein_ | onkarshinde: micah's suggestion looks sensible, did you try it? | 13:37 |
| geser | onkarshinde: 1) isn't possible (archive constraint that published packages mustn't change) | 13:38 |
| Laney | yes, just rebuild it | 13:38 |
| geser | so your only option is to do a new SRU | 13:38 |
| onkarshinde | Bumping the version means that I will have to work on SRU. Also the 'no change rebuild' SRUs are supposed to be clubbed with other SRUs. So I just wanted to check if '1' was possible. And 'geser' just said no. :-) | 13:38 |
| onkarshinde | By the way, isn't this a bug if 'precise' binary got copied to 'oneiric-proposed' in case of FTBFS. | 13:39 |
| geser | yes, checking if LP shows what happened | 13:40 |
| tumbleweed | removing it would mean replacing the binary currently published in precise, where it *is* installable | 13:41 |
| tumbleweed | so yes, rebuild | 13:42 |
| geser | wouldn't precise need an upload too? to guarantee that (version in oneiric(-updates) <= version in precise)? | 13:43 |
| tumbleweed | yes | 13:44 |
| Laney | woe is buildd backlog | 14:16 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| studentz | New in MOTU & running Oneric. My q? Which dist should replace <release> (Oneric or Precise) in this command pbuilder-dist <release> create. Thanks for your patient. | 15:49 |
| psusi | whichever one you want | 15:50 |
| studentz | psusi Thanks. | 15:51 |
| psusi | presumably you want oneiric if you are planning on backporting, precise otherwise | 15:51 |
| psusi | or if you are just building to install yourself on oneiric | 15:51 |
| studentz | Hi there: I got an error with pbuilder http://paste.ubuntu.com/769099/ Sorry bother you. What I'm doing wrong? | 16:17 |
| psusi | are you running ubuntu or setting up an ubuntu pbuilder on debian? | 16:40 |
| psusi | it looks like you're missing the ubuntu archive keys... install ubuntu-keyring | 16:41 |
| studentz | psusi running Ubuntu Oneiric . | 16:41 |
| studentz | psusi ubuntu-keyring already installed. Also I have a gpg exported and ssh key. | 16:45 |
| psusi | I usually just use pbuilder, not pbuilder-dist | 16:47 |
| studentz | psusi something like pbuilder create or pbuilder oneiric create ? | 16:51 |
| === ampelbein_ is now known as Ampelbein | ||
| psusi | studentz: you have to set up a .pbuilderrc and configure it for what release and so on... I didn't know about pbuilder-dist, which looks like it handles most of that for you automatically which seems nice... | 16:56 |
| hyperair | jtaylor: ping | 18:07 |
| jtaylor | hyperair: pong | 18:07 |
| hyperair | jtaylor: regarding the gtk+ backport, do you know which bugs are fixed by 2.24.7? | 18:07 |
| jtaylor | one in easymp3gain and one in geany | 18:08 |
| jtaylor | one moment | 18:08 |
| jtaylor | Bug 875878 and Bug 851383 | 18:09 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 875878 in easymp3gain (Ubuntu) "Easymp3gain Hangs when clicking Add File or Add Folder" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/875878 | 18:09 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 878933 in gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric) "duplicate for #851383 Crash when attempting to open a second file from the recent file list" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/878933 | 18:09 |
| jtaylor | its possible there there are more in other gtk2 packages | 18:10 |
| jtaylor | its time for my first motu action :) | 18:16 |
| jtaylor | is this correct: syncpackage -d unstable pyzmq | 18:16 |
| jtaylor | (from unstable as precise already has zmq 2.10 so we need to upgrade, its not in testing due to a failure on arm) | 18:17 |
| jtaylor | and I'm curious if it builds on armhf | 18:17 |
| === nxvl_ is now known as nxvl | ||
| micahg | jtaylor: click ports on the PTS page | 18:23 |
| jtaylor | ah it built there | 18:23 |
| jtaylor | weird | 18:23 |
| jtaylor | I'd still like to sync it, as right now ir ftbs on all arches in precise due to b-d zeromq < 2.10 | 18:26 |
| jtaylor | it works fine on i386 + amd64 and I plan to investigate the arm issue when I find the time | 18:26 |
| micahg | jtaylor: sounds good | 18:30 |
| hyperair | jtaylor: both bugs look like they come from gtkfilechooser being broken. | 18:33 |
| jtaylor | yes that is the source of the bugs | 18:34 |
| hyperair | jtaylor: the diff between 2.46.6 and 2.46.7 is pretty damn big. is it really not feasible to backport patches? | 18:34 |
| jtaylor | both fixed in .7 | 18:34 |
| jtaylor | not really | 18:34 |
| jtaylor | the patch is not small and something of the 1000 line diff can easily be forgotten | 18:35 |
| jtaylor | pretty much the complete source file was refactored between .5 and .6 leading to the breakage | 18:35 |
| hyperair | urgh | 18:35 |
| jtaylor | + another huge diff to fix that again | 18:35 |
| hyperair | i see. | 18:35 |
| jtaylor | I'm running on .8 from precise currently | 18:36 |
| hyperair | hm | 18:36 |
| jtaylor | in one of the bugs is a backport attempt for the geany issue, but it does not fix the mp3gain issue | 18:37 |
| jtaylor | fixing that will probably pull the rest of the .7 changes | 18:37 |
| hyperair | i see. | 18:37 |
| hyperair | with geany, there's actually a workaround upstream that fixes the issue, but the diff for that is nontrivial and involves some refactoring again. | 18:38 |
| hyperair | jtaylor: huh, i see a patch in gtk+ that already fixes the filechooser issue with geany, and i can't seem to reproduce it here. | 19:22 |
| hyperair | werid. | 19:22 |
| jtaylor | yes its incomplete | 19:22 |
| jtaylor | I could still reproduce it with the patch | 19:22 |
| jtaylor | as a few others but not all | 19:22 |
| hyperair | i see. | 19:23 |
| jtaylor | great pyzmq fails on the archive builders but works fine in my chroot ... | 19:26 |
| ScottK | jtaylor: build log? | 19:27 |
| broder | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/87386428/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.pyzmq_2.1.10-2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 19:27 |
| broder | there are...a lot of test failures there | 19:27 |
| broder | unfortunately the output from the test suite isn't very useful | 19:29 |
| * Zhenech_ smells some network-needing tests and your buildd-chroots forbidding it and then disappears | 19:29 | |
| jtaylor | it should not need network | 19:29 |
| jtaylor | its the same testsuite as all versions before which worked fine on the builders | 19:29 |
| broder | it is using network - at least one of the failures is from binding to 127.0.0.1 | 19:30 |
| broder | but that should work | 19:30 |
| broder | i wonder if the buildd's network access is firewalled off in some dumb way that causes problems | 19:31 |
| tumbleweed | I've never seen binding to 127.0.0.1 be a problem before | 19:32 |
| tumbleweed | hrm, SpamapS is talking about similar problems in #ubuntu-devel | 19:38 |
| ajmitch | I've seen binding to localhost fail, and binding to 127.0.0.1 succeed | 19:38 |
| ajmitch | iirc that was because of buggy ipv6 code | 19:38 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!