[08:47] <ikonia> hi TACPILOT
[08:48] <TACPILOT> hello
[08:49] <TACPILOT> i get it ... absolutelyl no humor allowed
[08:49] <ikonia> TACPILOT: I'm sorry I had to remove you from #ubuntu and forward you to this channel.
[08:49] <ikonia> TACPILOT: however I felt it was the best course of action as you must have had 10 - 15 warnings over the past few days about your comments in #ubuntu
[08:49] <ikonia> various jokes, /me commands, running commentory of what you're doing.
[08:49] <TACPILOT> actually I think u have me confused with another
[08:49] <ikonia> TACPILOT: I don't
[08:49] <TACPILOT> but I will take the hint
[08:50] <ikonia> I know I've spoken to you about this a few times
[08:50] <ikonia> is there a reason you keep ignoring this ?
[08:50] <TACPILOT> then u definitely have me confused with another
[08:50] <ikonia> I %100 don't
[08:51] <TACPILOT> what ever .. this is the first time we have talked together so I dont know who u think I am
[08:51] <TACPILOT> but I will heed the warning regardless
[08:52] <TACPILOT> you are more than welcome to put the logs in my face if u think I need refreshing
[08:52] <ikonia> I don't need to pull logs, I'm not trying to prove you wrong, I'm just curious as to why you ignore the requests to stop these things in #ubuntu
[08:52] <ikonia> is there something that's not clear ? or do you not understand the topic of the channel ?
[08:53] <TACPILOT> I am a light hearted guy with keyboard scars on my forehead .. helping others doesnt have to be stiff
[08:53] <TACPILOT> but if thats the rules so be it
[08:54] <ikonia> it's not a matter of being "stiff", it's the whole offtopic and running commentory thing too
[08:54] <ikonia> there are 1400 people in the channel
[08:54] <ikonia> you constantly doing
[08:54]  * ikonia installs an application
[08:54]  * ikonia configures an application
[08:54]  * ikonia smashes head that it doesn't work
[08:54] <TACPILOT> admittedly today indeed
[08:54] <Myrtti> the channel has way too much traffic to allow for anything else than support issues - we try to help many people who have no previous experience in IRC and need help with their problems
[08:54]  * ikonia asks for more help
[08:54] <ikonia> TACPILOT: it's not just today, as I've said I've spoke to you about this before
[08:55] <TACPILOT> then u need to pull the logs cause that aint me !
[08:55] <ikonia> TACPILOT: thats the reason I forwarded you to the channel as it wasn't just a 1 request thing
[08:56] <TACPILOT> look yes today i was trying to make light but I we never had this conversation before
[08:57] <ikonia> TACPILOT: do you not remember the discussion after busy box and the 3.0 kernel
[08:57] <TACPILOT> now like I said .. if the rules are that stiff I will abide ..
[08:57] <ikonia> it's not "stiff"
[08:57] <ikonia> it's just allowing others to get help cleanly and clearly
[08:58] <TACPILOT> absolutely but I was damn serious and there was no humor involved I was asking for help .. how can u confuse the 2 ?
[08:58] <ikonia> as I've said its not the just the jokes, it's the overall attitude/approach for help
[08:59] <ikonia> if you're comfortable you understand to just keep the help clean and clear, I'm happy to let you back into the channel
[08:59] <TACPILOT> attitude != horseplay
[08:59] <ikonia> I know it doesn't
[08:59] <TACPILOT> I can understand no horseplay
[09:00] <ikonia> ok, I'll remove the forward for you, one moment
[09:00] <TACPILOT> untill some one warned me that idividule was a troll I was legitimatley trying to help some one
[09:01] <TACPILOT> TY .. I can assure no more horseplay ..
[09:01] <ikonia> the ban forward has been removed, you're welcome to leave this channel and re-join #ubuntu
[09:01] <TACPILOT> tnx
[09:02] <TACPILOT> no luck ?
[09:03] <TACPILOT> the ban still apears to be in effect
[09:04] <ikonia> ooh, really ?
[09:04] <TACPILOT> i try again
[09:04] <TACPILOT> still no luck
[09:04] <ikonia> one moment
[09:05] <ikonia> there we go
[09:05] <ikonia> sorry about that, my fault
[09:05] <TACPILOT> that did it TY
[20:03]  * Pici hands out aspirin to everyone
[20:03] <ikonia> are you ok ?
[20:03] <Pici> I'm fine, just sharing the joy.
[20:04] <ikonia> ha ha
[20:54] <ikonia> hello SuBmUnDo
[20:54] <SuBmUnDo> hello :)
[20:55] <ikonia> SuBmUnDo: are you going to stay in the channel long enough to discuss the reason you where removed from #ubuntu this time or are you going to part straight away saying "bye" again
[20:56] <ikonia> SuBmUnDo: are you sticking around to discuss and hopefully resolve it ?
[20:59] <SuBmUnDo> i'm was testing a away script for xchat
[20:59] <SuBmUnDo> sorry
[20:59] <ikonia> yes, but you continued to do so after being asked 4 times to stop
[21:00] <ikonia> is there a reason you ignored the requests to stop and just carried on
[21:00] <ikonia> you ended up getting removed from #ubuntu and muted in ##linux
[21:02]  * mneptok taps his watch
[21:05] <SuBmUnDo> ikonia, I will not do it again
[21:05] <ikonia> thats not what I asked
[21:05] <ikonia> I shouldn't have to ban you to get you to listen to multiple requests to stop doing something
[21:11] <SuBmUnDo> sorry again
[21:11] <ikonia> is there a reason you ignored the requests though
[21:11] <ikonia> the same way you are ignoring the question I'm asking ?
[21:20] <SuBmUnDo> I was and still am busy so did not see .. but the moment I had not seen
[21:26] <ikonia> SuBmUnDo: so, if I remove the ban forward and allow you to return to ubuntu, which I'd like to do, how can I be sure or have confidence that you'll see and follow instructions in future
[21:27] <ikonia> SuBmUnDo: I'd be a bit more relaxed about it if it was one or two requestes, but you where asked many times and in multiple channels (although other channels are not an issue we are responsible for)
[21:32] <mneptok> SuBmUnDo: this channel has a no-idle policy. you will be removed from here, and eventually banned if you cannot respond in a timely manner.
[21:34] <mneptok> SuBmUnDo: i asked you to stop the /away messages. you say you did not see that request because you were "busy."
[21:35] <mneptok> 11:03 < mneptok> !away | SuBmUnDo`away
[21:35] <mneptok> 11:03 < ubottu> SuBmUnDo`away: Please do not use noisy away messages and nicks in Ubuntu channels. It is annoying and unnecessary. Use the command "/away <reason>" to set your client away silently. See also «/msg ubottu Guidelines»
[21:35] <mneptok> 11:04 < SuBmUnDo`away> sorry
[21:35] <mneptok> (MST/US Dec12)
[21:35] <mneptok> SuBmUnDo: my logs say that you saw the request, and continued to mess with /away messages
[21:35] <mneptok> why?
[21:36]  * mneptok taps his watch again
[21:37] <SuBmUnDo> i'm was testing a away script for xchat
[21:38] <mneptok> and you continued testing it after being asked to stop, and apologizing
[21:38] <mneptok> why?
[21:41] <SuBmUnDo> ok, I will not be back to the channel #ubuntu and ##linux and bye bye
[21:41] <mneptok> you sure about that decision?
[21:42] <mneptok> all Ubuntu core channels have the same policy.
[21:42] <SuBmUnDo> yes I'm sure, has said he did not see the requests
[21:42] <SuBmUnDo> ok
[21:43] <mneptok> then it is settled. please /part this channel.
[21:44] <mneptok> @mark #ubuntu-ops SuBmUnDo will not follow core channel guidelines. remove on sight.
[21:45] <pangolin> awesome catalysing and making sure the user understood why he was even in here.
[21:45] <pangolin> not noticing there was a clear language barrier was also good.
[21:46] <mneptok> the lag in replies started to feel deliberate.
[21:47] <pangolin> maybe google translate wasn't working so great
[21:47] <mneptok> i try not to let my latent Jesus complex spill into IRC ;)
[21:47] <pangolin> maybe repeatedly asking why they broke a rule is really not important
[21:48] <pangolin> we are here to guide not to judge.
[21:49] <mneptok> i'm here for the cookies and blackjack
[21:49] <pangolin> I failed at it also btw. I should have stepped in.