[07:24] <alourie> good morning
[10:22] <mvo> jibel: hi, sorry for nagging, but do you think you would have time for the SRU verification for software-center for the popup window improvements? its needed for the ISD people (paypal)
[10:24] <jibel> mvo, what is the bug number ?
[10:25] <mvo> jibel: btw, I'm happy to help with the main-all-amd64 thing, I just need to login to that machine again
[10:29] <mvo> jibel: bug #893988
[10:29] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 893988 in software-center (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 3 other projects) "paypal purchase view needs support to create new windows (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/893988
[10:36] <jibel> mvo, ok, I can verify the SRU this afternoon.
[10:43] <mvo> awsome, thanks jibel!
[11:07] <mvo> jibel: I try to create the amd64 main all image now
[11:11] <jibel> mvo, precise-proposed is enabled after upgrade from lucid. it shouldn't be isn't it ?
[11:20] <mvo> no, it shouldn't be
[11:20] <mvo> that is odd
[12:50] <mvo> jibel: fwiw, the test-all-amd64 stuff is churning along nicely, I really hope this will give us a sensible base-image
[13:35] <jibel> mvo, is oneiric affected by bug 893988 ? There is an SRU but I can't reproduce it. The popup opens fine.
[13:35] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 893988 in software-center (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 3 other projects) "paypal purchase view needs support to create new windows (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/893988
[13:35] <mvo> jibel: is the window transient for the parent (i.e. on top of the parent)? iirc that is something I fixed in this sru
[13:35]  * mvo double checks
[13:36] <jibel> mvo, it was on top of the parent, yes.
[13:36]  * jibel tries again
[13:36] <mvo> jibel: and keeps being on top too?
[13:36] <jibel> mvo, that's what I'm checking
[13:38] <mvo> sorry, I think that was the fix and I should have put it into the instructions
[13:38] <jibel> mvo, no problem.
[13:38] <jibel> mvo, on maverick is there any special source to enable commercial software ? When I select 'for purchase' the list is empty
[13:40] <jibel> there's a bug with LP login page BTW, sometimes I'm redirected to 'My account' page
[13:41] <mvo> jibel: mav> oh, hm, there should be software there
[13:41]  * mvo scratches head
[13:42] <jibel> verified on natty
[13:43] <jibel> there are warning message on the console about unsecure javascript but that's all
[13:44] <davmor2> jibel: do you by any chance click on the payment button twice?
[13:45] <patdk-wk> hmm, topic is so outdated
[13:46] <jibel> patdk-wk, and I lost my op privileges again :(
[13:46] <patdk-wk> my /mop command isn't working :)
[13:47] <jibel> mvo, there's definitely something wrong with lp redirection
[13:48] <jibel> verified on oneiric
[13:48] <mvo> jibel: thanks, I will pass this on
[13:49] <jibel> davmor2, nope. I don't think so. trying again
[13:50] <davmor2> jibel: that's when I find I get it when it looks like there is nothing happening so I click on the pay button again
[13:53] <jibel> davmor2, it looks like you're right. If I quickly click twice on buy, then proceed with authentication, I'm redirected to 'My account' instead of the payment page.
[13:53] <jibel> mvo, ^
[13:54] <jibel> davmor2, do you know if there's a bug already filed ?
[13:54] <davmor2> jibel: yeap iirc I put in a bug to disable the button once it is depressed I'll chase it up though
[13:54] <jibel> davmor2, thanks
[13:55] <jibel> I can't test on Precise, there's nothing to purchase
[13:56] <jibel> and s-c crashed :/
[13:56] <jibel> mvo, for 1 SRU verified you get 2 more bugs. Are you satisfied ? ;-)
[13:57] <davmor2> jibel: it's better odds than me testing ;)
[13:58] <mvo> jibel: *meeeh*
[13:59] <mvo> jibel: actually I think thats a bug for the pay.canonical.com people, but indeed, pretty impressive test result :)
[14:21] <mvo> jibel: I hope I got a main-all-amd64 now, fingers crossed, test is running
[14:21] <mvo> jibel: the lts-main images are also missing, right?
[14:21] <jibel> mvo, right. I haven't try to produce them yet.
[14:22] <jibel> mvo, we can recreate main-all-amd64 automatically or it needs some magic incantations ?
[14:23] <mvo> jibel: I think it will be able to be auto-generated, I did nothing special except for ensuring that the latest install_all.py with the multiarch exclusion is used
[14:24] <jibel> mvo, I'll deploy it on the other server and let you know if something goes wrong.
[14:24] <mvo> jibel: thanks!
[17:05] <alourie> damn
[17:05] <alourie> I thought the meeting is today
[17:50] <brendand> mvo - thx for the merge again
[17:50] <brendand> mvo - any changes required?
[17:52] <salem_> roadmr, ping
[17:53] <roadmr> salem_: hey! what's up?
[17:55] <salem_> roadmr, hello.. just have some questions regarding the checkbox roadmap. do you have some minutes to talk about it?
[17:56] <roadmr> salem_: sure, here or shall we talk-talk?
[17:56] <salem_> roadmr, we can talk here, np
[17:58] <roadmr> salem_: ok! so what's on your mind?
[18:02] <salem_> roadmr, so, as we discussed before, there are some plans to redesign the ui, but that would require some work on the backend and so on. Now, just for me to understand, what is the checkbox roadmap? is this new UI supposed to be ready for then next stable ubuntu version? Or the plans are to ship this qt interface that is similar to the current gtk frontend? And then later redesign with the modified backend?
[18:02] <roadmr> salem_: we want to ship the new UI with 12.04
[18:03] <roadmr> salem_: we still need to discuss the backend changes needed in more detail
[18:03] <salem_> roadmr, ah ok, so in other works we need to get this new ui done until  April 2012
[18:04] <roadmr> salem_: we also need to come up with the actual user stories for what we want the new UI to do, ara and I are working on that
[18:04] <roadmr> salem_: yep, actually, by mid-february, that's when feature freeze hits
[18:04] <roadmr> salem_: Ideally we should have the stories this week
[18:04] <salem_> roadmr, yes, indeed. we can set a meeting anytime you want to discuss the changes regarding the backend
[18:06] <roadmr> salem_: yep, let me see how progress with the user stories goes, we could talk either this week or the next
[18:06] <salem_> roadmr, ok, thank you.
[18:07] <roadmr> salem_: I think we will have a clearer idea if we come up with the stories and some (probably awful) storyboards
[18:09] <roadmr> salem_: Would you agree to take the current Qt implementation as far as getting the test selection (tree) working, and then we can begin focusing on the new version?
[18:11] <roadmr> salem_: I'm going for lunch, back in a bit :)
[18:11] <salem_> roadmr, yes, I completely agree. I think we should start as soon as possible the new UI, as it would require a lot of work :)
[18:13] <salem_> roadmr, Bon appetit!
[20:49] <alourie> hm
[20:49] <alourie> weird, I'm not on Launchpad -qa team
[20:49] <alourie> what would be the difference between -qa and -testing Launchpad teams?
[20:49] <alourie> -testing is a subset of -qa ?
[21:00] <alourie> jibel:  thanks :-)