[00:01] <FernandoMiguel> humm haven't file one for gconf
[00:01] <FernandoMiguel> want me to add it there?
[00:01] <FernandoMiguel> oh wait... I did
[00:01] <FernandoMiguel> nvm me.........
[00:12] <FernandoMiguel> nite
[02:58] <micahg> welcome bjsnider
[10:00] <gnomefreak> it seems firefox/firefox-trunk are the same versions as in t-bird as well :)
[10:00] <gnomefreak> now i have to figure out how to combine t-bird+lightning
[10:11]  * gnomefreak hates removing packages 
[10:11]  * gnomefreak smoke i hope
[16:13] <chrisccoulson> bhearsum, is libgnomeui installed on your linux builders?
[16:13] <chrisccoulson> (not sure how easy that is to find out)
[16:14] <bhearsum> i can check
[16:14] <bhearsum> our builders are CentOS 5.0 though, ftr
[16:15] <bhearsum> libgnomeui-2.16.0-5.el5
[16:15] <bhearsum> libgnomeui-devel-2.16.0-5.el5
[16:16] <chrisccoulson> bhearsum, ok, thanks
[16:16] <bhearsum> np
[17:21] <micahg> bjsnider: chromium daily failed again, wanna take a look?
[17:35] <bjsnider> micahg, i misinterpreted something in the previous build failure. '-' means '+'
[17:35] <micahg> bjsnider: yeah , I think so
[17:36] <micahg> it's saying that those are built but not installed
[17:36] <bjsnider> right
[17:36] <micahg> I believe
[17:36] <bjsnider> i'm chatting with fta about it right now
[17:36] <bjsnider> that's what he says
[17:40] <bjsnider> i'll have to do a pbuilder build here to make sure the damn thing succeeds
[17:42] <micahg> bjsnider: that would be great, thanks
[18:14] <micahg> bjsnider: chrisccoulson made the change already for the .pak files
[18:19] <bjsnider> ok
[18:20] <bjsnider> it still might fail though, even though it's at the end of the run
[18:20] <bjsnider> i have to go look at the other ppas
[18:27] <micahg> chrisccoulson: didn't we back out the single glib include change in precise, or is that just temporary?
[18:28] <chrisccoulson> micahg, i've no idea, how come?
[18:28] <micahg> chrisccoulson: it was breaking everything :)
[18:28] <chrisccoulson> chromium is broken because some functions moved between header files
[18:28] <chrisccoulson> which is why glib now inforces the single include
[18:28] <micahg> ah, ok
[18:29] <micahg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.31.2-0ubuntu2
[18:29] <bjsnider> a couple of small changes to the bot confs have to be made to add precise
[18:32] <chrisccoulson> micahg, thanks
[19:20] <bjsnider> alright daily built successfully, so that's fixed, now i will go after -dev and -beta
[19:41] <chrisccoulson> i started using tmux today, and i'm liking it a lot :)
[19:43] <micahg> hmm, maybe I should try something like that
[19:43] <chrisccoulson> i used screen before, but tmux is better
[19:44] <chrisccoulson> this is all i need. screw unity, i'll just take tmux thank you :)
[20:09] <chrisccoulson> w00t, test hang \o/
[20:11] <chrisccoulson> bhearsum, if i wanted to find a build log of an official build of firefox, is it possible to do that?
[20:15] <bhearsum> absolutely!
[20:15] <bhearsum> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/8.0.1-candidates/build2/logs/ for 8.0.1, for example
[20:15] <bhearsum> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/8.0.1-candidates/build2/logs/release-mozilla-release-linux64_build-build10.txt.gz is the build log for 64-bit linux
[20:16] <chrisccoulson> bhearsum, excellent, thanks. that would have saved me asking my earlier question :)
[20:16] <bhearsum> ah
[20:16] <bhearsum> hehe
[20:16] <bhearsum> let me know if i can speed anything else up by answering a question
[21:10] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I just wanted to verify what we'll be using branches for in the lucid/maverick rapid release migration, for the Firefox side, is it just firefox?