| === EvilResistance is now known as Resistance | ||
| gusnan | I am maintaining a package i Debian that has migrated from unstable to testing - what is required for it to come to precise? Am I wrong in thinking it should be imported automatically? | 07:50 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | gusnan: if there's no Ubuntu diff, it'll come automatically | 07:52 |
| micahg | gusnan: at least until Debian Import Freeze which is Jan 9 | 07:52 |
| gusnan | micahg, thanks - then I'll try to be a bit more patient :) | 07:53 |
| dholbach | good morning | 08:10 |
| geser | gusnan: "automatic" means an archive admin has to start a script doing the importing (which is usually done as part of his daily duty) | 08:21 |
| micahg | well, it's probably done a few times a week, and not daily | 08:22 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| micahg | udienz: are you aware we're still syncing regularly from Debian testing? | 09:52 |
| udienz | micahg, but proftpd has been rebuild in precise | 09:54 |
| micahg | udienz: rebuilds shouldn't matter for auto-sync, only ubuntu revisions | 09:54 |
| micahg | or fakesyncs | 09:54 |
| udienz | ah.. ok i see. so my bug sync can mark as invalid now? | 09:55 |
| micahg | udienz: yeah, it just migrated yesterday, so it'll come in with the next autosync | 09:55 |
| micahg | unless there's a pressing need for it (FTBFS, breakage in precise) | 09:56 |
| * udienz set to invalid and unsuscrine ubuntu-sponsors | 09:57 | |
| micahg | udienz: thanks :) | 09:59 |
| DreadKnight | could anyone update tiled package? https://github.com/bjorn/tiled/issues/125 | 10:08 |
| DreadKnight | http://www.mapeditor.org/ | 10:08 |
| DreadKnight | the version from softwre center is really old | 10:09 |
| pmjdebruijn | http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=tiled&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all | 10:11 |
| pmjdebruijn | oneiric already has a new version | 10:11 |
| micahg | DreadKnight: precise has 0.7.1 | 10:11 |
| DreadKnight | micahg, I see; better but latest one is 0.8.0 : | 10:11 |
| pmjdebruijn | sorry | 10:11 |
| pmjdebruijn | I meant precise | 10:11 |
| DreadKnight | yeah | 10:11 |
| pmjdebruijn | best way to have debian get a new version, since ubuntu imports from debian | 10:12 |
| DreadKnight | or to have this in the official tiled PPA | 10:12 |
| DreadKnight | I'm looking into how to build binaries from source using launchpad | 10:12 |
| micahg | DreadKnight: you can file a bug and tag it upgrade-software-version, it would probably be better if Debian updated first since we have no diff at present, since it was just released this week, you might want to give the Debian maintainer a chance to update | 10:13 |
| DreadKnight | micahg, ok, will try that too, need to figure out who updated it last time | 10:13 |
| micahg | DreadKnight: only one uploader in Debian: http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tiled-qt.html | 10:14 |
| micahg | DreadKnight: if it's in Debian testing before Jan 9, precise will get it automatically, until Feb 16, you can request a sync from testing to precise | 10:15 |
| DreadKnight | hmm "maint:Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" | 10:16 |
| DreadKnight | seems the guy is on IRC | 10:16 |
| DreadKnight | micahg, sounds good | 10:18 |
| micahg | DreadKnight: also, tiled-qt seems like something that should qualify for backports as long as we can get someone to test it | 10:20 |
| DreadKnight | micahg, I can test it | 10:20 |
| micahg | DreadKnight: ok, so, starting in precise, there's a requestbackport script in ubuntu-dev-tools that can help you file backport requests | 10:23 |
| DreadKnight | micahg, installing; also poked paulliu... | 10:25 |
| micahg | DreadKnight: so, you might want to wait until 0.8.0 is in unless you want to test multiple times (which is fine as well) | 10:25 |
| DreadKnight | already testing 0.7.1 atm | 10:26 |
| micahg | ok, you'll need to test that the binaries that we prepare install and run in the target release | 10:26 |
| micahg | you could prepare a backport to test as well in your own PPA with backportpackage if you like, just include a link to the build when you file the request | 10:28 |
| DreadKnight | micahg, alright; installed ubuntu-dev-tools btw | 10:28 |
| * micahg is heading to sleep, but others might be able to help (or I can respond to pings in the morning) | 10:28 | |
| DreadKnight | micahg, well, if I was comfortable with making binaries in PPA's I wouldn't be here | 10:29 |
| DreadKnight | micahg, thanks for the help, good night | 10:29 |
| micahg | DreadKnight: well, going through the distro others can benefit from your work as well :) | 10:29 |
| DreadKnight | ofc | 10:29 |
| dholbach | l3on, I had another malformed patch - maybe you could use bzr merge proposals? :) | 10:46 |
| Laney | morning | 10:49 |
| Laney | dholbach: how do you feel about merging your developer stuff into the wiki now? | 10:49 |
| Laney | i tinkered around the edges again the other day | 10:49 |
| dholbach | Laney, by developer stuff you mean https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers? | 10:51 |
| ajmitch | that reminds me, I was looking at the ContributeToUbuntu page on the wiki & it's still suggesting to go through the motu mentoring program | 10:51 |
| Laney | that's the page you rewrote? | 10:51 |
| dholbach | or the suggested update for it? | 10:51 |
| Laney | yeah, it is - that | 10:51 |
| dholbach | ajmitch, huats and I have an action item to remove all traces of the motu mentoring programme | 10:52 |
| dholbach | Laney, it's a shame nobody merged it in back then | 10:52 |
| Laney | hmm? | 10:52 |
| dholbach | now it'll be a bit more complicated with changes that happened in the meantime, no? | 10:52 |
| Laney | I don't think there have been any | 10:52 |
| dholbach | oh | 10:52 |
| Laney | well, the edit that I did the other day | 10:52 |
| Laney | but I put that into TeamDelegation too so you can just ignroe that | 10:53 |
| dholbach | I thought you just said you made a few changes? was that to the draft? | 10:53 |
| dholbach | aha | 10:53 |
| Laney | yeah on the pad | 10:53 |
| dholbach | ok | 10:53 |
| dholbach | at least in the next 3-4 days I won't have the time to do it | 10:53 |
| ajmitch | dholbach: is that cleanup part of the developer advisory team stuff? | 10:56 |
| dholbach | ajmitch, yes :) | 10:56 |
| Laney | righto | 10:57 |
| * ajmitch saw that you were going to interview inactive contributors :) | 10:57 | |
| Laney | run & hide? | 11:01 |
| ajmitch | sounds like a plan | 11:02 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| l3on | dholbach, damn :/ There's a bug in LP which removes newlines from the end of attachments submitted by email... anyway, I'm going to use merge proposal for future works ... thanks for review dholbach :). | 11:14 |
| dholbach | l3on, anytime :) | 11:15 |
| l3on | I'm going to mark bug 822289 as invalid, someone could confirm :) ? | 11:34 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 822289 in python-apptools (Ubuntu) "oneiric packaging problem python-apptools due to unmet dependencies" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/822289 | 11:34 |
| l3on | hey guys.. is it possible solve bug 843734 ? I built ruby-sinatra in oneiric, it works fine... | 12:01 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 843734 in ruby-sinatra (Ubuntu) "dependency problem, does not install" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/843734 | 12:01 |
| tumbleweed | l3on: file a backport request? | 12:02 |
| l3on | mmm how? :) | 12:02 |
| tumbleweed | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports | 12:03 |
| l3on | tumbleweed, thanks... but requestbackport does not exist :) | 12:05 |
| tumbleweed | l3on: it's in precise | 12:05 |
| l3on | ahh ok :) | 12:05 |
| tumbleweed | (or grab ubuntu-dev-tools from the daily build PPA) | 12:05 |
| tumbleweed | we were going to backport that, I never got around to it :P | 12:05 |
| * tumbleweed kicks it off | 12:08 | |
| l3on | lol | 12:08 |
| tumbleweed | no, can't be done until bug 888665 is fixed | 12:11 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 888665 in Launchpad itself "Backports can't build-depend on other backports" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/888665 | 12:11 |
| tumbleweed | broder: ^ | 12:13 |
| broder | :-/ | 12:13 |
| ajmitch | oh right, that bug's still there. frustrating | 12:13 |
| broder | i wonder if we're at the point that i should start asking for a non-virtualized ppa to stage backports in | 12:13 |
| tumbleweed | broder: is that related? | 12:13 |
| broder | we could use it to stage u-d-t at the same time as distro-info in the ppa, then copy them both at the same time into the archive | 12:14 |
| tumbleweed | right | 12:15 |
| broder | it would be a bad stopgap solution but would let us handle some backports | 12:15 |
| tumbleweed | I don't see why backports PPA *needs* to be virtualized | 12:16 |
| tumbleweed | I also don't know how hard it is to get a non-virtualized ppa | 12:16 |
| broder | unfortunately i think you have to be employed by canonical | 12:16 |
| broder | or possibly at least informed by someone with a Serious Business Relationship with canonical | 12:17 |
| broder | s/informed/employed/ | 12:17 |
| ajmitch | or you may just need to talk nicely to the right people | 12:17 |
| broder | hmm...i guess it could work if you copied everything currently in the -backports pocket into your ppa and then never removed anything from the ppa | 12:19 |
| tumbleweed | why would that be necessary? | 12:20 |
| broder | because the ppa builder won't pull in build-deps from the real backports pocket either | 12:20 |
| tumbleweed | oh, duh, my mental model of thus assumes LP isn't buggy :P | 12:21 |
| tumbleweed | practically, one can just do that when necessary | 12:21 |
| broder | sure, that would work too | 12:21 |
| ajmitch | working off the assumption that launchpad isn't using outdated & buggy code is doomed to failure :P | 12:22 |
| broder | anyway, /me puts the laptop away and goes back to sleep for a few more hours | 12:25 |
| l3on | ok, bug 905304 reported | 12:26 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 905304 in Oneiric Backports "Please backport ruby-rack 1.3.1-1 (universe) from precise" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/905304 | 12:26 |
| broder | tumbleweed: hmm...you know what would be kind of awesome? if requestbackport ran a regexp over the request for bug references and spat out a "backports aren't for fixing bugs are you sure" prompt at you | 12:29 |
| * broder actually goes back to sleep now | 12:29 | |
| tumbleweed | heh | 12:29 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| l3on | dholbach, hey.. what do you think about this → http://paste.ubuntu.com/772162/ | 13:02 |
| l3on | it's the same problem of bug 849174 | 13:03 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 849174 in bibus (Ubuntu Oneiric) "Bibus is not installable in Oneiric (depends on python<2.7)" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/849174 | 13:03 |
| dholbach | l3on, I'm just about to head out for lunch - submit it for review and I'll have a look later on | 13:03 |
| l3on | oki :) | 13:03 |
| geser | l3on: one small note: also mention OCaml (and not just the version) in the changelog. Only from the maintainer change in your debdiff, I realized that 3.12.0 was the OCaml version | 13:38 |
| l3on | geser, yep yep.. It should be fixed in the last comment... | 13:39 |
| l3on | :) | 13:39 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| Ampelbein | l3on: Hey, about bug 905015 - I added a link to upstream's svn with a working patch, which got reverted by accident. | 14:13 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 905015 in rosegarden (Ubuntu) "Please merge rosegarden 11.11.11-1 (universe) from Debian testing " [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/905015 | 14:13 |
| l3on | Ampelbein, thanks... I got it and rebuild ... see new bug comments :) | 15:13 |
| l3on | jamespage, ping it's about bug 888937. Problem is that changing java we need upgrade md5sum ... | 15:22 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 888937 in fex (Ubuntu) "fex version 20110622-1ubuntu1 failed to build with openjdk-7" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/888937 | 15:22 |
| l3on | To fix problem I can set jdk7 as build-dep an update md5sum... let me know. | 15:23 |
| Laney | dholbach: your patch pilot mail reminds me to remind you that syncpackage now lets you sponsor syncs (in precise or the ubuntu-dev-tools daily) | 15:27 |
| Laney | :-) | 15:27 |
| jamespage | l3on, ack; I did look at the package but could not understand why the checksums where being validated during the build process? | 15:27 |
| dholbach | Laney, does the script already do everything correctly? I thought there was still something wrong with attribution? | 15:27 |
| Laney | that is the missing piece that got landed | 15:28 |
| dholbach | nice | 15:28 |
| dholbach | if it works as expected, it should be on ubuntu-devel-announce@ or some such :) | 15:28 |
| Laney | we should publicise that | 15:28 |
| jincreator | Hi, everyone. Is it possible to sync package which version is lower than in Ubuntu? | 15:28 |
| dholbach | jincreator, no | 15:28 |
| dholbach | whatever gets passed on to the build machines has to have a higher version than what's currently available | 15:29 |
| * dholbach goes back to writing the dev update | 15:29 | |
| l3on | jamespage, I don't know... :/ | 15:30 |
| jincreator | dholbach: Thanks. | 15:30 |
| dholbach | anytime | 15:33 |
| jamespage | l3on: it may be possible to make the checksums match; if we target the javac command at the right java release using -target 1.5/1.6 then it might match | 15:34 |
| jamespage | I'll give it a try | 15:34 |
| l3on | Ampelbein, FTBFS rosegarden in i386 mmm... | 15:50 |
| Ampelbein | l3on: Yeah, seen that. The reason: ac_cv_env_build_alias_value=i686-linux-gnu, which isn't the multiarch triplet. | 15:50 |
| l3on | maybe an `IF arch is "i686-linux-gnu" ; then do nothing ; fi ` should fix problem ? | 15:52 |
| Ampelbein | l3on: No, I think your previous patch (with dpkg-architecture -q.... in acinclude.m4) is a good workaround until upstream agrees on a better solution. | 15:54 |
| l3on | what's next step ? | 15:55 |
| Ampelbein | l3on: Reopen 905015 and update https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rosegarden/+bug/905015/+attachment/2635296/+files/debdiff_11.11.11-1_11.11.11-1ubuntu1.patch to the new version. | 15:56 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 905015 in rosegarden (Ubuntu) "Please merge rosegarden 11.11.11-1 (universe) from Debian testing " [Wishlist,Fix released] | 15:56 |
| l3on | Ampelbein, yesterday I tried this: https://launchpad.net/~l3on/+archive/ppa/+packages | 15:57 |
| l3on | It changes debian/rules in adding: | 15:57 |
| l3on | dh_auto_configure -- --enable-debug --with-qtlibdir=/usr/lib/$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) | 15:58 |
| l3on | But, I'm not sure it will build on armel | 15:58 |
| Ampelbein | l3on: It should. | 15:59 |
| l3on | what do you think... is it better ? | 15:59 |
| l3on | I mean, better than patch acinclude.m4 | 16:00 |
| Ampelbein | Yes, it's cleaner in my opinion. | 16:01 |
| l3on | ok, I'll do that change | 16:01 |
| bdrung | Laney, dholbach: and sponsor-patch supports the new sponsoring method of syncpackage | 16:07 |
| dholbach | nice | 16:08 |
| dholbach | that should probably be mentioned too | 16:08 |
| l3on | Ampelbein, done. Thanks again.. :) | 16:08 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| Ampelbein | l3on: Since we have -1ubuntu1 of rosegarden already in the archive, the new upload should be versioned -1ubuntu2. I changed that manually now and uploaded | 17:35 |
| udienz | Hi there, i just want to confirm that in bug 905252 i still in progress in maverick/lucid/oneiric and not ready for upload | 18:17 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 905252 in proftpd-dfsg (Ubuntu) "CVE-2011-4130" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/905252 | 18:17 |
| micahg | udienz: you want ubuntu-security-sponsors, not ubuntu-sponsors | 18:19 |
| udienz | micahg, yes i understood about it but crichton subscribed ubuntu-sponsors too | 18:19 |
| * udienz can't unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors | 18:20 | |
| micahg | udienz: uh, that's a bug I guess, I unsubscribed it | 18:20 |
| micahg | bdmurray ^^ | 18:20 |
| achiang | hello, i've just gotten a package accepted into debian. if i want it in precise, i need to file a sync request, right? | 18:24 |
| broder | ScottK: bug #892355 should have a lucid-backports task, right? | 18:27 |
| micahg | achiang: yep, we're still syncing from testing though, so should get it in around 10-15 days if it migrates | 18:27 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 892355 in maverick-backports "Please backport clamav 0.97.3+dfsg-1ubuntu0.11.04.1 from natty-updates to lucid/maverick" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/892355 | 18:27 |
| udienz | achiang, right. if i'm not wrong, since precise is LTS you must wait your package entering debian testing | 18:27 |
| micahg | udienz: new packages can be synced from unstable, but we're still far enough out that it's not necessary (getting close though) | 18:28 |
| achiang | micahg: ah, so if i just wait then ubuntu automatically gets it once it lands in testing? | 18:31 |
| udienz | micahg, hm.. thanks for this info. for this case, i think we can wait for new package entering debian testing because we still away from precise release. right? | 18:31 |
| micahg | achiang: yep, as long as it migrates before Jan 9 | 18:31 |
| micahg | udienz: yes, see above ^^ | 18:32 |
| achiang | micahg: ok, the date that scares me is the DIF. i really want this package in precise... | 18:32 |
| udienz | got it, thanks | 18:32 |
| achiang | micahg: so if the answer is to just wait, and then it auto-syncs, that's fine | 18:32 |
| achiang | micahg: but what happens if it doesn't migrate before Jan 9? Because Jan 12 is DIF | 18:33 |
| micahg | achiang: DIF shouldn't scare you then, you have 5 weeks afterwards to request the sync :) | 18:34 |
| achiang | micahg: oh! i thought DIF meant no more syncs from debian? | 18:34 |
| micahg | achiang: no more automated syncs :) | 18:34 |
| achiang | got it, i didn't realize "freeze" meant "automated syncs" | 18:35 |
| achiang | i thought it was "no more syncs, period" | 18:35 |
| micahg | achiang: we'll still be syncing up to release for various things for various unseeded packages as usual | 18:35 |
| achiang | ack | 18:35 |
| achiang | thanks micahg | 18:35 |
| micahg | well, 1.5-5 days before :) | 18:35 |
| broder | tumbleweed: do you think we can get something similar to http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/rdepends/ for debian? | 20:20 |
| micahg | gah, ruby sources are a horrible mess... | 20:30 |
| tumbleweed | broder: I asked if anyone was interested, and got no response | 20:41 |
| broder | in running it or using it? | 20:41 |
| tumbleweed | broder: there is, of course, less need for it, because Debian has less distributions in flight | 20:41 |
| tumbleweed | if anyone wanted it | 20:41 |
| broder | fewer distributions in flight, but more ports | 20:41 |
| tumbleweed | that's true | 20:41 |
| tumbleweed | if we do it, we should do it on Debian DDE. I can chat to enrico | 20:42 |
| broder | i have no idea how i would currently go about looking for, say, r-deps of a mips package | 20:42 |
| tumbleweed | youd download the Packages file and run grep-dctrl across it | 20:42 |
| broder | eww | 20:42 |
| broder | :) | 20:42 |
| tumbleweed | most people have that scripted, right | 20:43 |
| tumbleweed | or even easier: ssh into the dak mirror and do a dak rm, see what it complains about | 20:43 |
| broder | easier for you maybe | 20:44 |
| ajmitch | tumbleweed: I'm updating udd now, when's the best time to run the cron job for you? | 20:44 |
| tumbleweed | ajmitch: doesn't matter for me. I don't have anything that's cronned, using it, yet | 20:45 |
| ajmitch | ok | 20:45 |
| ajmitch | sunday morning it is then | 20:45 |
| micahg | tumbleweed: is your upload activity page supposed to be updated on a regular basis or was it a one time export? | 20:46 |
| ajmitch | it should only take a few minutes to do, anyway | 20:46 |
| ajmitch | micahg: it probably depends on the data I'm updating now :) | 20:47 |
| tumbleweed | micahg: once we have UDD on the ubuntuwire machine I can cron it | 20:47 |
| micahg | ooh cool | 20:47 |
| tumbleweed | although, I probably won't regenarte the affiliations very often, that takes hours | 20:47 |
| ajmitch | tumbleweed: you should be able to do that now then | 20:47 |
| tumbleweed | ajmitch: right, but I've run it after the last import (unless you just did one :P ) | 20:48 |
| ajmitch | tumbleweed: still downloading the data, I mean that you can set up the cron job now :) | 20:48 |
| * tumbleweed does that | 20:49 | |
| * ajmitch should try & get on that uploaders list | 20:50 | |
| tumbleweed | ajmitch: can haz python-psycopg2 ? | 20:51 |
| ajmitch | was sure I'd installed that one | 20:52 |
| * micahg was shocked to find out he was on it for lucid | 20:52 | |
| ajmitch | never mind, I've installed it now | 20:52 |
| ajmitch | micahg: yeah I sort of disappeared from the graphs | 20:52 |
| * tumbleweed wasn't but I've been on every one since :/ | 20:52 | |
| micahg | ajmitch: yeah, your last appearance on it was for feisty | 20:52 |
| broder | which list? | 20:53 |
| micahg | broder: http://people.ubuntu.com/~stefanor/upload_activity/ | 20:53 |
| ajmitch | micahg: that's pretty sad :) | 20:53 |
| broder | ah yeah, i've definitely never made that | 20:53 |
| micahg | broder: you're on your way for precise ;) | 20:54 |
| ajmitch | what's the number I need to hit for precise to get back on the list? :) | 20:54 |
| micahg | currently, I think it's between 10 and 15 | 20:55 |
| broder | oh really? sweet - i can totally make that :) | 20:55 |
| * ajmitch can do that... | 20:55 | |
| ajmitch | if I can find something I can fix :) | 20:55 |
| micahg | broder: you're already at 13 | 20:55 |
| micahg | ajmitch: lots of armhf FTBFS which are general | 20:56 |
| broder | micahg: i count 7 uploads to precise on https://launchpad.net/~broder/+uploaded-packages - does the graph count things i sponsor? | 20:56 |
| broder | oh, i guess syncs too | 20:56 |
| micahg | broder: I think syncs count, but cannot be sure | 20:56 |
| ajmitch | micahg: where are you seeing 13? | 20:57 |
| broder | ajmitch: count the number of times "precise" shows up on https://launchpad.net/~broder/+uploaded-packages and https://launchpad.net/~broder/+synchronised-packages | 20:57 |
| micahg | ajmitch: search for him in my precise-changes folder | 20:57 |
| broder | or that :) | 20:57 |
| ajmitch | ah right :) | 20:57 |
| broder | do i get credit for srus? that would totally push me over :) | 20:58 |
| micahg | I'm missing the first 2 days I think, but that's mostly the top uploaders anyways | 20:58 |
| ajmitch | micahg: there are only a few hundred FTBFS, that's not so bad :) | 20:58 |
| micahg | our newest MOTU was on the list for oneiric :) | 21:00 |
| broder | yeah, but they're the ones you have to worry about! they actually *do* things | 21:00 |
| * ajmitch was young once :) | 21:01 | |
| micahg | broder: not like we have a shortage of things to do | 21:01 |
| ajmitch | micahg: it's always a matter of finding where to start | 21:01 |
| broder | micahg: it looks like jtaylor had about 60 uploads during the cycle, though | 21:01 |
| broder | i'm not sure i can keep up with that | 21:02 |
| micahg | ajmitch: anywhere your heart desires :) | 21:02 |
| jtaylor | neither can I :/ | 21:02 |
| broder | haha | 21:02 |
| ajmitch | micahg: too many choices to make! | 21:02 |
| * ajmitch should check on the state of mono-debugger | 21:03 | |
| tumbleweed | broder: yes. And backports now | 21:04 |
| broder | psh. *that* just seems unfair...but i'll take it | 21:04 |
| ajmitch | is there a good way to do armhf test builds? | 21:04 |
| tumbleweed | broder: well, you would, if we attributed them | 21:05 |
| tumbleweed | but you could get the backports team in :P | 21:05 |
| broder | tumbleweed: huh? i'm pretty sure i get the changed-by on any backport i approved | 21:05 |
| tumbleweed | or is that archive@ubuntu | 21:05 |
| tumbleweed | broder: it doesn't make it into the LP SPPH, that I can see | 21:06 |
| micahg | hmm...backports don't seem to hit -changes | 21:06 |
| ajmitch | no, and for good reason | 21:06 |
| tumbleweed | it was specifically disabled | 21:06 |
| * tumbleweed digs out the bug | 21:07 | |
| broder | i see entries in ubuntu_upload_history for backports that have me as changed-by and signed-by | 21:07 |
| ajmitch | do all security uploads make it to -changes these days? | 21:07 |
| tumbleweed | broder: oh, cool | 21:07 |
| tumbleweed | ajmitch: yes | 21:07 |
| tumbleweed | backports were excluded because people were confusing them with -security | 21:07 |
| tumbleweed | (actually I assume "all" not sure about that) | 21:07 |
| micahg | ajmitch: nope, mine don't | 21:08 |
| ajmitch | right, I didn't think they did | 21:08 |
| micahg | ajmitch: all the ones from the P3A do | 21:08 |
| tumbleweed | ajmitch: bug 59443 | 21:08 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 59443 in Launchpad itself "Soyuz should send announce messages for backports to different list" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/59443 | 21:08 |
| ajmitch | micahg: you have a separate special place? | 21:08 |
| micahg | ajmitch: I use the public PPAs since I don't work on embargoed stuff | 21:09 |
| ajmitch | right | 21:09 |
| tumbleweed | cronned: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~stefanor/ubuntu-activity/ | 21:10 |
| tumbleweed | (daily) | 21:10 |
| ajmitch | great | 21:11 |
| ajmitch | so it'll update in ~5 hours or so | 21:12 |
| tumbleweed | yup | 21:12 |
| ajmitch | this download of the udd data will be done by then, I hope :) | 21:13 |
| ScottK | broder: Yes. Fixed. Thanks. | 21:26 |
| Ampelbein | hmm, build-rdeps can't search for universe build rdepends? | 21:56 |
| micahg | Ampelbein: try reverse-depends from ubuntu-dev-tools | 21:57 |
| Ampelbein | Oh, I see, thanks micahg. | 21:58 |
| jtaylor | no-change rebuild changelogs (buildX) are kept or does one drop them on ubuntuX updates? | 22:19 |
| Ampelbein | I'd drop them, they contain no useful information IMHO. | 22:20 |
| jtaylor | I choose something nice and simple for my first upload: bug 902494, due to the simplicity of the fix a SRU candidate so I don't want to wait to long for debian | 22:34 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 902494 in silly (Ubuntu) "symbol lookup error: undefined symbol: png_create_read_struct" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/902494 | 22:34 |
| jtaylor | so how does this now work? I only ever dput'ed to ppas and mentors :/ | 22:34 |
| broder | jtaylor: step 1: target the bug correctly | 22:36 |
| broder | (click "nominate for series" and check oneiric, or whatever) | 22:36 |
| jtaylor | you mean nominate for oneiric? | 22:36 |
| broder | right | 22:36 |
| broder | step 2: make sure the bug is fixed in precise or going to be fixed soon | 22:37 |
| jtaylor | yes I prepared a precise upload | 22:37 |
| broder | ok. then "dput precise my_build.changes" | 22:37 |
| broder | err...wait | 22:37 |
| broder | no | 22:37 |
| broder | dput ubuntu :) | 22:37 |
| broder | lp dispatches the upload based on the Distribution line in the .changes file | 22:38 |
| broder | so make sure that says precise/oneiric-proposed/whatever | 22:38 |
| broder | it should also have a Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed header, which is what triggers the janitor to close the bug | 22:39 |
| broder | jtaylor: is that the information you were looking for? | 22:41 |
| jtaylor | yes thanks | 22:41 |
| jtaylor | for the -propsed upload the same upload procedure + update bug description + subscripte sru team? | 22:42 |
| broder | yep | 22:42 |
| broder | oh sweet - i finally caught an upload that's affected by my pkgbinarymangler change. we are, in fact, no longer generating symlink-should-be-relative tags for langpack symlinks: http://lintian.ubuntuwire.org/full/ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com.html#brasero | 22:46 |
| broder | (the package-contains-broken-symlink tags will go away next time i update lintian) | 22:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!