[16:27] <bdmurray> jsalisbury: are you very familiar with ata error messages from the kernel?
[16:27] <bdmurray> jsalisbury: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/86483004/UbiquitySyslog.txt
[16:28] <bdmurray> in that file there are some errors regarding ata4, frozen and timeout messages
[16:29] <jsalisbury> bdmurray, looking
[16:30] <jsalisbury> bdmurray, hmm, I'm not familiar with those specific messages.
[16:30] <jsalisbury> bdmurray, almost looks like some type of I/O issue
[16:31] <bdmurray> I thought I recall at one point in timeout errors being driver issues but I can't be certain.
[16:47] <bdmurray> jsalisbury: thinks seems helpful https://ata.wiki.kernel.org/articles/l/i/b/Libata_error_messages.html
[16:57] <jsalisbury> bdmurray, thanks for the link.  I'll take a closer look at it.
[17:40] <bil21al> bdmurray: on which day we have a metting?
[17:41] <bdmurray> bil21al: Wednesday the 21st
[17:41] <bil21al> ok
[19:26] <alex_mayorga> Hello! Can someone help me de-duplicate https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/906471
[19:26] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 906471 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_display_get_event() (dup-of: 814473)" [Undecided,New]
[19:26] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 814473 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_display_get_event() (affects: 37) (dups: 10) (heat: 190)" [Medium,Triaged]
[19:26] <alex_mayorga> I contend it is a duplicate
[19:27] <micahg> alex_mayorga: it's already a duplicate
[19:28] <alex_mayorga> micahg: I see that, but I don't think it should be, is an entirely different version of the package and of Ubuntu
[19:28] <micahg> alex_mayorga: doesn't matter if the crash is the same
[19:30] <alex_mayorga> micahg: I see, would poke the bug upstream then I guess
[21:52] <bdmurray> micahg: did you say something about patch subscriptions for security bugs?
[21:52] <micahg> bdmurray: yeah, crichton subscribes ubuntu-sponsors when ubuntu-security-sponsors is necessary
[21:53] <bdmurray> micahg: and if bug.security would be sufficient?
[21:53] <micahg> let me check, mdeslaur ^^^
[21:55] <mdeslaur> bdmurray, micahg: hrm, yeah, that makes sense, we can always send them back to ubuntu-sponsors if they don't turn out to actually be security relevant